Five of swords

Maybe the reason you think you are so much more clever than I am is because you are severely retarded. Just a theory. If you are going to assert that the number 2 doesn't exist, then you cannot later say that 2+2=7. It is a contradiction. That is the analogous contradiction I was pointing out. But of course, such things go over your head. Ask a person of average iq to explain it to you. I cannot.

As usual, you probide your level of insight. Thank you so much for your contribution. Naturally, the very fact you understand what I mean when I say 'white' proves your narrative wrong, lol. In fact, it was a very significant legal reality in the history of the usa. Not 'English', but 'white'. If there was any truth behind your assertion, then there never would even exist a white racial category. But it does exist. So...try thinking more about stuff? (Try using someone else's brain for it)

We are living in a period of some sort of ideological crisis...where people are unsure what legitimizes the usa or what the usa really is or ought to be. In this environment, I see a huge number of 'very smart people' trying to tell the masses stories about what the usa is and where it came from. And generally, they are just wrong and seriously inadequate in my view. I just want to give my own impression of a general overview of what the usa is and how we got to where we are now. And I am just citing from memory of stuff I have read, but I am not going to bother dragging out exact citations...because it isn't really worth the energy...because I doubt that normies are even psychologically capable of considering that the entire mythology they have been told is simply not quite true. Firstly, as a very broad overview, I would say that the one thing all Americans had in common is that we are homeless. Anyone who wants to understand the usa ought to read 'look homeward, angel' by Thomas wolfe...who might be the greatest American author of all time, but is somehow obscure...and obscure for very good reason. First and foremost Americans are a homeless people.. but we are all homeless for different reasons...and those different reasons are often the source of conflict within the usa. The only thing that brings us together, however, is a common homelessness and a sort of longing for having some sort of homeland, or nostalgia or homesickness for a homeland long lost to us. The most cliche version of American homelessness, which is the version you will be exposed to the most if you read the most popular and well-known literature (tocqueville 'democracy in america', for example).. is the story of new England and the puritans. Massachusetts, primarily. The prevalence of that narrative is of course largely a consequence of the puritans building the ivy league schools. But objectively they themselves have only been a small part of America and in population they are not so significant. Those people were perhaps in their psyche just 'Anti homeland'. Their only homeland was in heaven, and they did not feel a longing to return to England, because such concerns are 'worldly' and the puritans believed in constructing an otherworldly utopia...'burn all your earthy possessions in flame'...including your homeland, and including all the witches. In stark contrast, you have the Virginia plantation owners. And they were homeless simply because they lost a war. Specifically, the English Civil War. Oliver Cromwell defeated the cavaliers who then fled to Virginia. In many ways the American Civil War was simply a repeat of the English Civil War, with the two sides literally being of the same genetic stock of their ancestors who fought the first English Civil war. Another element would be like the first settlers of georgia...whose purpose was to drive the Spanish out of north America and claim it for the British empire. Those colonies were also settled by people who had lost their homeland...but they were looking for a second chance for success after being humiliated and thrown in debtors prisons in England. Like the Virginia planters, they also had a longing for a homeland. And this could help explain why many of them feel a sense of comraderie and perhaps vicarious nationalism for jews and the Israel project. These people also have historically NOT had a 'pan European' loyalty...just as the kkk was as a rule not embracing all whites but was also anti catholic (like the spanish who oglethorp opposed, or the french who were chased out of louisiana and mississippi) (a notable exception being its second manifestation when it traveled north, and northern individuals like Lothrop Stoddard and Madison Grant did adopt a pan European identity) And of course many of the western states were settled by people willing to leave home seeking opportunity and wealth. The gold rush. These were people who cared more about finding gold and other opportunities than they cared about their home and growing roots. That is a powerful selection bias and can do much to explain why LA or Vegas has the character that it has today. Blacks and native Americans in North America also have their own struggles with a sense of homelessness...and that is for very obvious reasons that have been described to exhaustion in the main stream narratives. But it is interesting that this is am aspect of their experience that they can relate to with their 'oppressors'. I have seen some new 'edgy' historians make a big deal about how the usa was fundamentally 'inclusive'.. and the 'free white men of good character' in the 1789 naturalization act was in essence a highly inclusive act, considering how divided Europeans had been up to that point, and the naming of whites was not so much about white nationalism but more about depriving the southern slave owners from using their slaves for political power. There is truth behind that interpretation, but again it is still more complicated. Because there was a pan European aspect to the American project. Indeed, one of the beloved 'founding fathers' of the usa, Benjamin Franklin, stated quite explicitly in his writings (observations concerning the increase of mankind, etc) that the 'age of discovery' in European history left the Europeans horrified to learn that their continent is in fact quite small...and as soon as other people catch up to them in technology and 'enlightenment', they will easily surpass them in power and Europeans will be at their mercy, simply because Europe cannot support anything close to the population or resources that could exist in Africa or Asia. So yes, there was a significant motive for white expansion, while it was still possible, in the colonizing of North America, Australia, South Africa, etc. Sometimes Christianity was employed as a euphemism for this fundamentally racial project...and historically the genuine Christians were the primary enemies of that fundamental racial project (think John brown, for example). Anyway, that is all I can bother delving into right now. And it provides a lot of context underneath the Civil War and certainly world War 2...and world War 2 has replaced our older myths as the creation myth of this country. The normie American considers the primary goal of the usa to be the opposite of hitler...which to them means on the one hand not being authoritarian (about half the country considers that to be the primary sin of hitler)...and also loving the jews (about the other half the country considers racism to be the primary sin of hitler). Both sides are generally just confused by the nationalism of hitler.. that he loved germans and wanted to protect the German homeland...because we are uniquely incapable of even comprehending having a homeland, outside of living vicariously through the jews.

You know, a funny analogy came to me when I was thinking about this particular malfunction you have with your thinking. It would be like if we were alive in 1700, and I was of the opinion that white people wanted to conquer all of North America. Which,in hindsight,we of course know that they did. And then you would protest that this could not possibly be true, because why would white people actually want to live around native Americans...who hate them and sometimes kill them and commit terrorist acts against them and their children. Well it just isn't as confusing as it should be. Sometimes people just have a will to power and are perfectly okay with taking land and power from other tribes, despite the fact it is mean and will cause resentment. The white man did not need to care that Indian raids would happen sometimes, because eventually thr whole continent would be in our control and the natives would be at our mercy...which in fact is how it played out. In exactly the samemanner...there may be jews who are inconvenient ienced by the arrival of Muslims who hate them in significant numbers. But jews have decided to make the middle east one of their homelands, just as white people made north America, and they are willing to deal with this conflict for the glory and the increase of their own people. Something white people used to understand, in fact...but now most white people struggle with even conceiving of such a normal and natural impulse. Furthermore, it is quite easy to find examples of jews who insist that all the formerly white countries mist become multiracial...Barbara learner specter being the cliche example...white it is vanishing rare to find any jew suggesting that historically white countries should remain white. You can find white 'gentiles' who feel that way, despite being hated for it, but you cannot find jews who feel that way. Why? Wouldn't it be better for jews, according to your theory? Why should it be so rare? That is in fact a very important question to ask and to find the answer to. That is a question Adolf Hitler certainly asked himself, and he had a perfectly rational answer. And it was why he was willing to risk world war 2, despite desperately preferring to avoid it.

That is exactly the sort of counterargument I expected you to make.

The murder rate in the usa is higher than Canada because there are more blacks and mestizos in the usa. Immigration will probably equalize that, however, and you can expect murder rates in canada to skyrocket. Dude, of course the death penalty is a deterrent. There are plenty of people I would kill if I was immortal or something. I would even take over countries. And institute a death penalty in them. Lol death is ultimately the ONLY deterrent. Because the only thing you can truly force another person to do is die. It is ultimately more important to solve the issue of crime than to comply with your arbitrary ethics around 'due process'. And in fact, a lot of your data around crime is just fake. Police chiefs have an incentive to just lie and pretend they are lowering crime when they are not...and they have no incentive to tell the truth. Even murders can just go unreported...especially in the most black parts of the city. Crime dropped in the 90s in the usa because literally about 1/4 of all black youth were kept in prison, lol. Today, black people are regularly released from prison even if hey murdered multiple people. So there is no way the crime rate is not insanely high...you just don't know about it.

You can go back a lot further than that, even. And even according to the Jewish texts. So they were kicked out of Egypt for being a subversive threat there...and the celebrate a genocide they committed against the Egyptians as revenge. Then they wandered the desert for a while and finally infiltrated and subverted the xanaanites...then later they subverted Persia in thr book of esther...I dunno I sense a pattern here

Medieval times? Like when the jews opened the gates of toledo for the berber invaders?

Regardless, you don't need to wonder why they are doing it. You can confirm that they are in fact doing it. Israelaid is an ngo that is largely responsible for the movement of arabs into europe

You are under the impression that public opinion matters. If that were true then integration never would have happened, for example. But some decades after integration, it was forbidden to question it. Culture follows law.

Israel owns the elite in the west, who don't care about public opinion Dude...the steam engine does not require nor necessitate population. The biggest factor in economics is technology. Always has been. Population is trivial in comparison.

The greatest economic growth in history was simply the result of the invention and development of the steam engine. It had nothing to do with population.

Sure, most people in Gaza want to stay. Israel is trying to give them no choice. But regardless all Arab countries are ultimately a threat to Israel, and they woukd rather 'confuse the nations' as senecherib did according to the talmud

I feel like you are asking these questions in a post that already answered them. Yes jews are different and no, Muslims in the west are less of a threat than Muslims in gaza

Jews don't have the same culture. For one thing, there is an obviously different historical legacy. Jews and white feel a different kind of connection to the 'holocaust', for example. Also, for centuries, jews had a very different way of life and survival strategy to white gentiles living in Europe. This had reproductive pressure on their population and made them into a fundamentally different people. Also, jews far prefer Muslims being in the west than next to israel...Muslims next to Israel are more dangerous. In the west Muslims become accustomed to decadence and product consumption and forget their blood and soil

Well people kinda did covid to themselves lol. Obviously it was fulfilling some deep fantasy/desire in many people...and they just acted out when they felt they had permission to. But the desire was always there, and I always saw it being there. What I am detecting is something different. Like people are surprised that they did not wind up winning the argument. And now they are just avoiding reality completely rather than face that fact.

Sorry but just wrong. There is a difference between a country and a nation.

With any political system, the sovereign decides the exceptions Who is us? Neither had any affect on me The only people who are elected are the public face of accountability, and they make no decisions on their own. It is like deciding the cast for the movie. Actors are not directors

Are you attempting to disagree with me? I didn't say that nobody put any thought into designing the system.

Hating poor people doesn't make you a patriot, lol

My side?

I don't think they hate the us

I don't think politics was ever any different, though. I guess all that has changed is that now citizens seem more aware that their opinions don't matter. It seemed like for a long time people were duped into believing that the elite gave a damn about public opinion.

Immigration is terrible for Canada which is exactly why it needs to increase dramatically.

You have this funny habit of expecting people to be logical with you after you demonstrate that you are incapable of logic