Five of swords

The history of it had a deep impact on all of us and our psyche and genetic archetypes. That was just one thing. There are dozens. The scientific revolution. The industrial revolution. The shadow of the roman empire. Conversion to Christianity. Colonialism. The Treaty of Westphalia. Etc etc. All these events had profound impact on who we are now and left genetic imprints on us

Totally false. I even mentioned one example already...history of manorialism

Sorry but no. There are significant things the various euopean ethnicities do share in common...far more than needed to make them a meaningful category. Even if it was only that they share a history of euopean manorialism that would be enough...but it is so much more

I'm pretty sure I could deconstruct the black race far more easily than you could deconstruct the white race. Thr fact is that Europeans are all very closely related...Europe being a rather small continent. Europeans also all share very important and defining moments in history...the various technological and cultural revolutions happened across the continent.

Then I guess you can stop complaining about black people being enslaved. No such thing. Right?

Huh? Hitler literally sided with Ethiopia against Italy. He only tried to resist the allied invasion...because he was at war...

Google ai is wrong and deliberately programmed to be wrong. Every country Hitler invaded he was forced to. There was simply no option. He had to invade poland because of danzig and the fact he was a genuine German nationalist. Then France and the uk declared war so he was forced to invade countries thanks to that. He was forced to invade the ussr because it was simply obvious that Stalin would attack him at some point (Stalin was happy to wait while Germany and the uk bled eachother...he ultimately planned to conquer both of those countries)...and Germany needed oil from Ukraine. His hand was absolutely forced. And it wasn't because the uk or France or the usa citizens had any reason to fight him for their own interests...it is because jews had bought the politicians in those countries.

He never set out to conquer the world. The third Reich was not the holy Roman empire lol...weird attempt at a bad semantic argument...and not even the hre intended world domination anyway. You are just very poorly educated.

It might seem like a contradiction but I am a national socialist and I picked anti patriot. But then again, I am from the usa. So it makes sense. I am loyal to my nation...but my nation is my race. The usa is anti national

Huh? You mean to pretend he chose to make war with them?

The population getting more old will not be 1/100th of the problem associated with the population getting more brown.

Uh...Hitler lost because he was fighting the 3 biggest empires in the world. One being the biggest empire in human history. It was still close, though.

Well the headline...which is all I bothered to read...clearly suggests that Africans starve when the usa doesn't give them free stuff. So...this is the only possible interpretation...they can't take care of themselves. Right?

I'm literally a national socialist and I am one because I believe it is the most truthful ideology. Truth absolutrly does exist...and national socialists viewed relativists as their enemy. As usual you are saying the opposite of the truth.

So you are admitting that Africans lack the ability to take care of themselves.

We are all impressed by your mindreading skills

Somewhat interesting for you to admit that 'human rights' is just about US global domination.

This is because the usa got what it wanted. Assad out of power. Ukraine is too far away from Israel for the usa to care about for its own sake.

And yet like I said taxes had nothing to do with why Caesar was killed. He was killed by the senate because he was taking power from the senate

Lol Caesar was not killed over taxes...and he was a populist leader. It was the elite who hated him...the opposite of what you were pretending

Lol I am one person. There is no such thing as a politics of one person...you seem totally naive about what politics is.

Dude...the people loved ceaser. He was killed by the senate. Learn some history

Can you explain where prince john came from in your brain? Was there some Robin hood reboot where the villain was prince john? In the real story it was implied that the royalty sided with Robin and the sheriff was a rogue agent. Indeed he was just keeping stuff for himself as you suggest conservatives do Only non political people care about left vs right. Those are constructs of media consumption. They have nothing to do with actual politics.

No...a conservative would keep it all for himself

Robin redistributed the wealth in a manner he felt was more fair rather than keeping it to himself. That is socialism. The sheriff of Nottingham (prince John? Wtf you don't even know the story?) Was just a capitalist who cared more about money than the health of society.