Five of swords

Lol.so help me understand. What is 'racist' about suggesting that Justin does not really rule Canada?

Lol...I don't even understand how what I said would be considered racist to a normie like you. I'm just telling you what attitude your owners have...I am not saying I agree with them. Africans are just easier to manage. They don't save as much money as Canadians do. They don't seem to organize much meaningful resistance, etc. You don't even have to speak about the difference being racial or genetic...it is just well known that the third world provides an excellent slave class while people from developed nations are more of a headache to manage. 'Legacy canadians' aren't particularly good slaves so they need to either be remodeled or replaced, from the perspective of the elite. Don't blame me for that...I didn't make it true.

The people who really rule Canada, who are not Justin, would be more than happy to just kill all Canadians and replace them with africans.

Your mistake is thinking this is a bug rather than a feature. And people being enraged won't change anything.

Oh. So you are currently agreeing with a Hitler supporter

Oh..I said that I think 1+1 =2, then I asked what you think. Instead of answering the question you started mumbling about 'leftists' and covid. Just noting you failed to answer.

So what? How are you planning on solving this problem?

You admit you dodged the question, then?

So who overthrows the Canadian government?

But ehat would be the point of an olive branch, then? Nothing can be done about immigration until the Canadian government is removed.

Fyi, I happen to believe that 1+1=2. How about you?

Clouds are left and so are forks. Meaningless drivel.

Just replacing one meaningless term with a meaningless phrase. In reality marx was extremely 'burdened' by what had been, and he wrote a lot about history and what he saw as the lessons of history. Is there any coherent thought hidden in here?

Non answer to what was essentially a non question. Clearly you woukd rather talk about Hitler and tattoos than ideas or making any real point. I can certainly understand why you are so intimidated.

Sounds like you are conflating 'conservative' with 'proletariat'. Anyway, I would imagine that if you are so busy producing stuff, then you ought not bother with political philosophy.

I don't even know what 'left' is supposed to mean here. But whatever it means, I would laugh at the idea that Kamala is radical in any way. She is the perfect milquetoast status quo candidate. She would do nothing but carry on the exact same direction and policies that the us has followed since Reagan.

'Patriotic choice' is a meaningless platitude. And in fact there is no way to define what exactly 'America' is.

Money has no intrinsic value. 'Paying' a citizen is meaningless. The state is what causes money to have value in the first place. Even if you back currency with gold, a starving man gains nothing if you just hand him a block of gold. Clearly you need to develop your thoughts some more.

I do not think people who get a swastika tattoo can be considered real national socialists. It is a philosophy, not a fashion. Did Hitler have such a tattoo?

Well that isn't marxism

Yeah, I have no doubt he would agree. What's your point?

Well the usa is not a legitimate state. There needs to be a total revolution and the institution currently called the united states must be dismantled.

That kinda reveals something absurd about our whole 'form of government'. The idea that people making some mark on a peice of paper every 4 years can make any difference to power. It can't. Destruction of the usa is for me a state of mind. It is a way of life. I work for it in everything I do. And I never vote.

Because I care about my people and their civilization, I think it is best if a full blown world war 3 occurs. And hopefully this time the usa loses and is totally destroyed. That is the only hope for civilization to continue existing in the world in any form.

Totally incoherent. If all humans have one god...then why shouldn't there be a one world government? I can see nothing about religion which supports national sovereignty. Quite the opposite, in fact. And people who support a one world government will offer their reasons. And none of those reasons are 'Satan told me so'. Even if you are going to argue that they are lying about their 'real' motivations, it still cannot be said that it is IMPOSSIBLE for the reasons they gave to be legitimate. Therefore, there is no necessary connection to religion. On the other hand, I do not know of ANY major religion that does not have global ambitions.