Five of swords

I don't understand why them being sexually abused is connected to them being natives. It is a well known cliche that kids in catholic schools are sexually abused. All kids. What does them being native have to do with anything? All kids in catholic school also had to suffer corporal punishment...etc. I don't see how those issues specifically relate to anything about them being native. The only thing that really is connected to them being native is that they were being trained to be in a European culture rather than a native culture, which is not in their dna. But for people to admit that this matters in any way they would first have to admit that dna matters...which of course means that Adolf Hitler did nothing wrong. So nobody is allowed to argue that.

The people who can save this civilization are exactly the people the civilization hates the most. It is doomed.

Just the destruction of the western world will be good enough. I think it is inevitable anyway.

What do you call it?

I'll enjoy doing that impaling

People can be conquered without fighting a war. They can even be conquered after winning a war.

It's basically just people complaining that they were conquered. My response is just no sh*t, it sucks to be conquered. That's why you should try to avoid being conquered. I certainly think my own people are currently conquered...and that is current day

So according to you, everyone in the western world does in fact have health care. Fyi, I dont.

I told you my position. It is very clear and simple. It is a fact...you can call it a tragic fact...that many people who get pregnant simply do not have the resources or the know how to provide for a child. In fact, from what I see, it seems most people are struggling to even take care of themselves.what do you expect those people to do? All you have to offer is 'well you cannot get an abortion because killing is wrong'. How useful is such an absolute? Would you also tell soldiers in the military that they cannot kill? You are simply putting people in an impossible situation. Maybe you could at least attempt to find a realistic solution. You could say...people with less than a million dollars can't have sex. Well okay...not many people will be having sex under the age of 60, and there won't be much of a birth rate. Can the species survive this way? Lol, I have no idea. But at least that would be you attempting to solve the problem. As it stands, you offer nothing. And all I am telling you is that this is not going to work. Because it won't. And I didn't construct this reality you live in so it isn't my fault and it isn't my 'depravity' that made the world such.

So now you seem to be moving goal posts. You seem to accept the idea that people may not have a choice, but you want to pretend that you confronted me with the question of how you determine when this is the case or not, which you never mentioned. You combined that fallacy with ad hominid. You aren't very good at this.

Perhaps it did answer the question. If people have no choice but to do horrible things, then you just have to accept it. But it does make sense to ask why people had no good option. Is it a failure of the state? For sure I have no doubt that people felt forced to kill their own children in the 'great leap forward' in mao's china...but you could certainly blame the state for that rather than those individuals...and you could then ask whether the juice was worth the squeeze.

This was my original position. People have killed children for those reasons. In the middle ages this sort of thing was well known. Especially a disabled child. Sometimes, families simply didn't have a choice. There were not enough resources for everyone and they would leave a child in the woods to die of exposure. Royalty would also allow children to die, especially if it was the result of an illicit affair. Basically in times of less prosperity, this sort of thing was also less illegal. Not because people were more evil but because they were more desperate. There simpy was not a good option available to them. Likewise, in the usa, abortion is more prevalent among desperately poor people. It is easy for upper middle class snobs to judge such a thing as evil, but they don't seem to comprehend the simple consequences of how being poor can complicate decisions. Perhaps they like to pretend nobody in their country is poor.

Based on that logic means based on logic, not on a claim of fact. It is different for you to suggest that I am wrong about my parents being intelligent than to suggest that my logic that traits are heritable means that I am a basset hound (which is, in fact, a contradiction). You are e not a good judge of who is slow witted because you are severely retarded...evidenced by this very conversation.

It doesn't matter what your opinion is. You quote tweeted me saying that I am intelligent because my parents were. And you said 'based on that logic' my parents were basset hounds. So.. it was exactly my logic that traits are heritablr that you think I am a basset hound. If you have any other opinions around the issue, it isn't relevant...because you explicitly said 'based on that logic'...and concluded something that assumes heritability. Amazing I have to spell that out to you.

Irony means that the truth is the opposite of what you would expect. For example, if you would suggest I am a fool and a basset hound because I suggested traits are heritable, then one would expect you would not base that reasoning on the assumption that traits are heritable. That would be ironic. And it isn't an admission that my parents are basset hounds to simply point out that irony. But this is all far to advanced for a severely retarded person to follow, so carry on.

The main reason anyone ever does anything remarkable is for the advancement of their people. Canada doesn't have a people.

If you are trying to imply that I am a basset hound, then there is a comedic irony here...because you would basically be admitting that I am correct about traits being heritable

Well my parents were intelligent so it makes sense that I would be also.

Is sonething wrong with the third world?

Doesn't that just make him an american?

Every state requires, for its own stability, that the vast majority of its subjects adopt a state ideology which reinforces the legitimacy of the state. That was true 600 years ago and it is true today.

They also call Hitler a communist. It's funny.

If I simply told you the average housing costs in canada, you could choose to interpret that as an incitement to riot.

If people think it is so terrible for natives to be sent to schools to deconstruct their own culture, then why is it okay for white kids to be sent to schools that deconstruct white culture?

Why are you calling the country Canada? If, as you want, all the important roles are filled by pajeets, then the country should be called india.