User

I have. Now what?

Hamas. Runs. Gaza. How do you give anything to anyone without taking Hamas out first?

Which time? You have been wrong over and over and over again for years now.

It is. We have been stopping Iranian bound shipping. I suppose you want Iran to keep the Straight closed and/or impose extortions on ships having to pay to get through?

Not interested in your link spamming to others equally stupid assertions. You said Israel has a vote in America, they do not. You claim to be a Nationalist not wanting to be involved in world affairs and arguing the same for America and then speak out of both sides of your mouth when convenient wanting to be involved in world affairs. Go worry about Canada. The US will deal with Iran and their threat to the world and our strategic interests in the region.

Yes… back to the point, your arguments here are YEARS old and have been wrong. Continue to be wrong, have been proven wrong, and you grasp at straws like a drowning person trying to spam outdated links to outdated opinions.

ROFL, Canada has far fewer people….

What does that have to do with Hamas then or how you think they will be brought to justice? Hamas controls Gaza.

Can you ever stay on topic and directly respond? The issue was your claim about dead people’s motives. Rittenhouse motives were self defense, not that he was trying to stop an active shooter.

Ah yes… once again, an outdated article already half way to being proven wrong. ROFL

By two dead people?

We were talking about Hamas and your empty words saying they should be brought to justice. I ask how, you say give them a state. Now you say give the Palestinians one… how does that bring Hamas to Justice? When Hamas is running Gaza… how does you give the Palestinians there a state? As usual, you are a clown.

You are presuming motives of dead people that make no sense based on the facts.

Empty words like always. You have offered nothing that shows how you bring Hamas to Justice, instead you want to give them a state.

Once again, as I said, you offer nothing but empty words and instead want to reward the terrorists.

Palestine statehood? The issue was, you support no means to bring anyone in Hamas to Justice. It’s empty words. Now you instead want to give them a state.

Yes. You say this, but it is empty words as you support no means to bring anyone to justice.

Do you really not grasp what a hasty generalization is? What were the absurd dichotomy of choices and why are they absurd? This is the dumb game you and others on here play. You say you don’t support Hamas… but at the end of the day almost all of your criticism is against Israel fighting a war to stop them and like you are doing now, you refuse to clarify and be explicit on how Israel is supposed to fight this war. The outcome is that you effectively want Israel to do little to nothing other than live with the constant daily terrorism that killed their people. Again, for the millionth time, explain to us how exactly you approve of Israel fighting this war to stop Hamas. It’s an analogy. The point was to highlight the motives behind your criticism and desired outcome, which you ignored. You don’t have to think fighting fires is the same thing. The point was, sure, you can criticize Israel making mistakes, maybe some of their choices, but at the end of the day, if you fundamentally oppose what they are doing, the motivations of that is no longer just mere healthy criticism, it’s you opposing them and… defacto supporting Hamas. So, AGAIN, do you support Israel fighting a war against Hamas? Like the firefighters… even though they may not deploy the hose lines the best way, maybe they were too aggressive in smashing the windows out on your car parked in front of of the fire hydrant, and they could have been more careful carrying your family out to safety… BUT did you still support them putting the fire out at all? Trying to save your family at all? You see, the point is you can criticize them, but if your criticism is ultimately that no, you think they shouldn’t have been there to put that fire out at all… Did you forget this part or are you running like the coward you are again?

The issue was not gerrymandering, but HOW it was done… Do try to keep up.

No, you responded to the back half of the question - the easy and conditional corollary - ignoring the whole point of the question. You squealed and complained and went pages refusing to answer a simple yes or no question. Again: Your own logical argument was based on the explicit answer I did give to the question. Proving this was nothing more than a stupid dishonest game you played after lying and being a coward running away initially. Doing it to you isn’t proof of my always doing it to everyone… Furthermore, when it proves accurate… Except once again, you refuse to actually respond to the point, you just ignore it. If you don’t support Hamas, then how exactly is Israel supposed to respond to what they did on October 7th? What makes it retarded? Let’s see your response.

Hell, the problem isn’t if he does or not, it’s that even if he does, his position comes down to Israel has to live with it and the daily terror attacks and constant looming threat, because they can’t respond perfectly enough.

Nope. You are the baby killer. How many did you kill today? Amazing how you never cared one bit when Biden was President.

You evaded the whole point of the question. I was asking if reasonable limits could be applied to Israel's response. It was a really simple question, and it only required a yes or no answer, but you squealed and raged against it for days instead of answering and allowing us to move on. 🤣 Evaded?! No, I responded to it, just not HOW you wanted, and speaking of evade, you just ignored the meat of my response where I pointed out that I did respond to the entire point you were trying to make anyhow! And you sit here lying again, that it was you who ran like the coward you are, never explaining you didn’t like the HOW just saying I didn’t answer when I did. Your entire point came down to the part of the question I didn’t answer explicitly, regarding if you can criticize Israel! So I did answer the point of your question the whole time. You chose to play this dumb dishonest game instead, just as you continue now. I don’t reframe any criticism that way. You are making a hasty generalization. You continue to dodge this for yourself as well. I have given you the chance, asked you, to explain your criticism and you keep avoiding that like the coward you are. Gee, I wonder why. Which is why you keep hiding from my questions?

The party of real science: Men can be women! That dude (sorry women) destroying women’s records in sports is totally fair as they are the exact same! Unborn children are just a clump of cells but the unborn Sea Turtle is endangered and must be protected!

This is a real post on X. Kyle Rittenhouse - “opening fire” Civil rights - “rally” Holy crap, this is NBC News. This isn’t just a mere skewing, it is outright false. Kyle Rittenhouse didn’t just open fire, he was being chased down and attacked at a riot where people were burning buildings down. He fired only after being jumped having someone swing a skateboard at his head and another person coming at him with a gun drawn. The way NBC frames this was as if he just opened up shooting at people at some peaceful civil rights rally.