User

This is a baseless assertion. You presume racism because of disparity. You have yet to actually prove racism exists. If we follow your absurd logic, the NBA and NFL are racist, because they have disparity towards more black people... Disparity in outcomes != Racism

Oh gee, lets see... I point out that cops were abusing David when he didn't deserve it, your response is that they deserve each other. If the cops are abusing him... you are saying he deserves it as they deserve each other. But hey, why don't you just use clear language to condemn the cops in this circumstance instead? Clear this all up.

Oh wait... no, breaking news, Iran has just released MechaGodzilla! Thousands more Israelis are dying now!!!!!!!

Here is my take... If the police are going to allow lawlessness in the streets, then there is going to be lawlessness in the streets or people forced to take matters into their own hands. I don't condone disproportionate uses of force, what I mean, is that if folks are going to stand in your way, you have no obligation to assume their intentions are good and should try to drive around or through them at slow speeds not intended to run them over or if safe, get out and move them out of the way. If they escalate and start becoming violent, then you presume they mean you harm and you accelorate to get clear of the area. If they are too stupid to move, that is on them. If they escalate more, then engage in whatever force is needed to defend yourself.

Right... right... just like there has never been a true capitalist country either... Also, I called it. @BeaverFever is going to run away from the stupid claims about right wing violence vs left wing violence...

An excellent point. Up until about 5 years ago in all of human history before, those thousands of years, there was no such thing as so-called "gender affirming care" the trans madness folks were pushing on kids. Do you think anyone anywhere would have tolerated a parent having their childs breasts cut off when they were 15 just so they could look more like a boy? Of course not. @Michael Hardner is complaining about something being a "right" that was only just invented yesterday.

You are the one advocating for the lawlessness of illegal immigration here...

Sorry, but no. You are trying to make an absolute argument that is absurd on its face. Do parents have the right to starve their kids? To rape them? To chop their legs off because they think they should be in a wheelchair? No. No. No. No. There is no you either support parents rights 100% or you don't position here.

Oh come on, I already had a thread created!

Yes... what does "started" mean again? If it is an inescapable doom loop, we have already begun.

Well, as usual, you jump into a discussion on page 20 and think you know what is going on... Flyer was not only acting like this to that "spazzy little cretin" as he was doing this same dumb routine with me. I get why you might be defending him, because after you try and fail to make arguments and push whatever leftist talking points you are parroting, this is the same kind of behavior you resort to.

Starts? What is this thread about... it has already started! We are DOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOMED!

Really big tarps! That will do the trick.

This is a good ruling. States should be able to pass laws to protect their children from being butchered by those pushing this trans madness onto children. Of course the media will frame it up to be a "setback for transgender rights" As if there is some "right" to chop a little girls breasts off or a little boys penis off. Supreme Court OKs Tennessee ban on gender-affirming care for kids, a setback for transgender rights https://apnews.com/article/supreme-court-transgender-health-care-trump-79fc6f3bbdab2e92d6f0184201a468a9?taid=6852cb000fbaa400015b806e&utm_campaign=TrueAnthem&utm_medium=AP&utm_source=Twitter “This case carries with it the weight of fierce scientific and policy debates about the safety, efficacy, and propriety of medical treatments in an evolving field. The voices in these debates raise sincere concerns; the implications for all are profound,” Roberts wrote. “The Equal Protection Clause does not resolve these disagreements. Nor does it afford us license to decide them as we see best.”

Your posting here is what I would expect from some poorly coded shit talking bot a 15 year old created in his basement.

It is already oppression. "Planned" is doing a A LOT of heavy lifting there. "Planned" = You are told the plan and you are forced to execute that plan.

Not scared.

"dangerous" is controlled by numerous laws and protections in the workplace preventing putting people into knowingly unsafe working conditions without protections and mitigations. Also, almost all the so called "ag-gag" legislation has been found unconstitutional and mainly centered around animal rights groups tresspassing to take videos of the slaughter to show it as inhumane because they don't believe there is any humane way to kill animals for food.

So... why did he only last 3 days if he is so hard working?

4 years. Trump's term is up, and we have an election. Amazing how that works.

So, nothing would be the answer. You asked what this person thought about have to pay more... when there is nothing that says he is having to do that.

I didn't see that mentioned in the article. What are you basing this on?

That is not saying much, figuring your position was not a very serious one and doesn't impact you... It is not hard to follow someone off a cliff, but I choose not to.

You did more than lie. You have spent the last week doing even worse in your dishonest behavior in refusing to admit it and playing dumb or outright ignoring it when called out. YOU made it an issue, YOU continued to make it an issue every time YOU continued to lie and play these dishonest games. Even now, you still won't admit what you have done, that you were wrong, or apologize or own up to anything. So, you run away like a coward now.