-
Posts
8,818 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
24
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Everything posted by User
-
We are so far gone removed from every time you have used that term now and all the different contexts and this answer doesn't say anything either. So, you go dig up the last comment you made where you used oppression and you think I was confused, then you explain exactly what it is Einstein said that applies and why.
-
If you are trying to protect and save your family, you present yourself at the border and affirmatively claim asylum. That is not what the vast majority of illegal immigrants do. The vast majority of illegal immigrants are evading authorities. The majority of asylum claims are a defenseive one, where people only claim it AFTER being caught and facing deportation. Of all asylum claims, on the best year, 50% are approved, usually more than that are rejected. You are a liar. You will do or say anything here to support this lawlessness.
-
Fascist? ROFL, it is simply a statement of fact. You can't handle facts very well, because you are a liar. Just like you blatantly lied to me the other day and then ran away when called out for it. This is a dumb argument. Basic human common sense knows and understands it is wrong to cross another nations borders, especially when they are clearly marked, patrolled, and enforced. Also, a large chunk of people evaded border patrol and were smuggled in or snuck in absolutely knowing they are wrong and once you are here, it is literally in the news every other day. These things are not a secret. This is not some obscure law that says you can't catch a Rainbow Trout out of the Snake River on every other Thursday and never on Sunday's and definately only a fish between 8 and 10 inches on every odd day of the month and never on Easter. Get real. None of this changes the fact that they are in fact here illegally and people who are here illegally get deported.
-
People here ILLEGALLY are criminals. It is a violation of Federal law. The term "alien" has a legal meaning in US Code, it does not mean they are from mars. Well, no, there is a pretty good count of those who should not have been, if you reject the invoking of the Alien Enemies Act. So, less than 300 or so.
-
LOL, no, the ruling is not sound. It basically boils down to this activist Judge taking words from the law, making up his own interpretations as to their meaning, making up his own interpretations as to what bar has to be met for them to be used, and then determining that the Trump administration didn't meet any of that. It is absolutely activist BS for a district Judge to think they can tell the President while in command of Troops, that he must relinquish that command based on this specious reasoning. Nevermind the stupidity of saying Trump had to go through the Governor to mobilize the Guard. If that were the case, then Eisenhower would never have been able to use the Guard to protect Black kids going to school because the Governor could have said no.
-
There is nothing arbitrary about it. Biden administration, supported by other Democrats with Sanctuary city policies, have allowed and encouraged massive invasion by illegal immigrants including known violent gangs. It is not "arbitrary" to identify known and suspected gang members from Venezuela and expel them. Folks like you support this madness, you want this madness, you don't want to deport any illegal immigrants and support policies that protect criminals being released from jail just to go out and harm Americans again rather than work with ICE to deport them. So you make this due process argument dishonestly.
-
Yes... but to what extent of pain is China willing to endure? If they launch a surprise attack against Taiwan, which they are poised to do, and prepared to respond to a conventional warfare response from America by releasing a surprise drone attack throughout the states... that IS a concern. China has been running their air force and navy constantly by Taiwan, they have been building up Amphibious forces and training constantly. These are all tactics and part of a strategy that would prevent advanced warning or early warning postures to be ready to fight against their invasion. When they are ALWAYS conducting military operations that look like a pretext to war against Taiwan, when they actually do it, that will be harder to detect. So, if America then responds with conventional forces, which China has also been preparing for asymetrical warfare against... it won't take much for them to hinder conventional Navy response with overwhelming missiles and if needed to start taking out our bases with a conventional response. All they have to do is make it painful quickly, take Taiwan, and then what... we are going to committ to full scale war to take it back? Likely not. Just saying, it is not as cut and dry as it seems to just ignore the realm of possibility here for a state actor like China to deploy something similar. It is exactly why Hegest / Trump administration was right to be concerned about China buying up all the land around the Panama Canal.
-
No, that is not what the law says at all. If someone jumps the border fence in front of a Border Patrol agent and then screams asylum, there are asylum officers who will quickly screen them to determine if their request has any merit or not, and if not, quickly send them on their way back to deportation. There are also rules around the timing and location as well as interpretations on what Aslyum means. Once again, the folks being arrested at their court check ins, were not there with valid asylum claims to have their asylum hearings... these were known illegal immigrants Biden was ignoring and letting check in.
-
No, I am saying your criticism is two-faced. You say you support them defending themselves, but then criticize them for doing so. Israel is not just far more ethical than Hamas, what they are doing is more than anyone would ever do in a similar circumstance. Well, maybe France would have just outright surrendered to Hamas. Even now, you say you support them eliminating Hamas... well, eliminating an enemy that uses their own people as human shields to hide behind is not easily done without some collateral damage. They are and should be under no obligations to continue to let Hamas control that food aid for their own purposes to continue to wage war, to continue to control the people of Gaza.
-
Well, they hold West Bank Settlements as security buffer zones.At the end of the day "Internation Law" is being violated a dozen different ways in how Israel controls these areas, it is not just if they somehow gave 100% of it back, but then too, any actions they are taking to continue a blockade to inspect for arms... You see, every layer you peel back is another "International Law" they are violating to the point they would be beyond vulnerable to enemies controlling Gaza that have stated their mission is to destroy them. So... you demand Israel follow "International Law" just to let Hamas import every weapon system they desire to fulfill their mission to destroy Israel? It is not as easy as just saying give back the West Bank. Israel is doing more than any other nation on Earth would ever do in thier position to limit the impact of war on civilians. This notion that they are committing war crimes is BS.
-
National Guard and Marines about to be deployed to LA!
User replied to User's topic in Federal Politics in the United States
You just go from one bullshit claim to the next. What are these previous attempts to use Marines for riot control/protecting government buildings like this? Marines are trained on deadly force escalation and rules of engagement; none of that changes here. Marines are not trained just to kill first, as if anything else must now be a new skill. Marines stand various guard posts throughout their duty all over and all over base in positions that do not mandate deadly force as the first resort. You are beyond ignorant on this stuff and instead of just admitting you are wrong, you just spew more BS. -
Unfortunately, I don't think they will do that... at least not as their primary goal. Now, if that is a happy coincidence, sure. Maybe if it looks like there could be regime change with a little extra push, they might do that.
-
What does this even mean? This is such absurd nonsense. The US has already long been able to use expedited removals without having to go before a judge. If the border patrol watches someone jump the fence at the border, they deport the person right back. They don't get an immigration hearing. Trump doesn't have to try to bypass the immigration courts. This mechanism already exists.
-
Here we go... your usual dishonesty. The issue is ILLEGAL immigration.
-
National Guard and Marines about to be deployed to LA!
User replied to User's topic in Federal Politics in the United States
You do not need "Years" of training in riot control tactics and basic property protection. Not even police get this, they go to academies for maybe a few months where they spend a day or two on any given subject, tactic, or technique. The fact that the Marines have spent even a few days training for just this purpose gives them more training than the average police offiver has. Once again, you have no damn clue what you are talking about. Marines in the infantry do little more than train on tactics for defending positions as well as how to engage in hand to hand combat techniques. The average Marine still gets some training in all of those things regularly each year. They also do extensive training for urban environments, especially since 9/11, as the war on terror has dictated operating in them. Once again, you have no damn clue what you are talking about. He doesn't give a shit, he just says crap to say it, regardless of knowing if it is true or not. Just pure ignorance.