-
Posts
7,730 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
61
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Everything posted by gatomontes99
-
House Ethics Report on Matt Gaetz
gatomontes99 replied to NAME REMOVED's topic in Federal Politics in the United States
Okay. Let's say you arrest a celebrity that talked about that time they were high at a party on a talk show. How do you prove it? The celebrity can say theynwere performing a bit. Then what do you have? A statement on a staged TV show and no hard evidence. No, they arent arresting anyone for that. Now, take that same celebrity that killed someone in a DUI accident and they say, under oath or while being interrogated, they had done drug xyz right before the accident. Yes, they can be arrested for the drug use and any charges from the accident. If Gaetz was using illicit drugs while committing statutory rape, ues he would have been arrested. -
House Ethics Report on Matt Gaetz
gatomontes99 replied to NAME REMOVED's topic in Federal Politics in the United States
Bullshit. I posted the law right there. There might be areas that don't prosecute the crime of consuming illicit drugs, but it is a crime. That is called prosecutorial discretion. Saying we choose not to enforce the law is not the same as making it legal. -
House Ethics Report on Matt Gaetz
gatomontes99 replied to NAME REMOVED's topic in Federal Politics in the United States
How do you consume the drugs without possessing them? And yes, it is illegal to consume them. (d) “Illegal use of drugs” defined (1) In general The term “illegal use of drugs” means the use of drugs, the possession or distribution of which is unlawful under the Controlled Substances Act [21 U.S.C. 801 et seq.]. Such term does not include the use of a drug taken under supervision by a licensed health care professional, or other uses authorized by the Controlled Substances Act or other provisions of Federal law. I didn't misrepresent anything and your evidence is all rumor and speculation. My evidence is hard evidence. -
This is from Chris Cillizza, a former CNN analyst. Do you get what he's saying here? He's saying he intentionally ignored the story because the WH told him to. He's making the excuse that he didn't want to be thought of as being insensitive. But he's telling you that he heard the WH message and that message was, don't look into it, so he didn't.
-
NYC Subway safer than ever
gatomontes99 replied to User's topic in Federal Politics in the United States
I've said it before, and I'll say it again. We have enough aśsholes here. We don't need to import more. -
House Ethics Report on Matt Gaetz
gatomontes99 replied to NAME REMOVED's topic in Federal Politics in the United States
You can't prosecute someone for crimes that are in the past? So, what, you prosecute them for future crimes? Lmao...right. So canceled checks, sworn testimony, Joe Biden bragging about it, burner phones that bypassed the WH call center, fake loans, wire transfers, bank SARs and Hunter's laptop are all just circumstantial. But the dossier....oh the dossier and the rumors and the media reporting with anonymous sources and leaked allegations that all just sound so so juicy are real man!! They are all real!!!! Just as sure as there are Grey's from planet XQN1A visiting families in Phoenix, Trump is working with Putin!!!!!! Do you hear yourself yet? See @Deluge?! Do you see it now man!!! I don't need question marks, that's a statement!!!!!! Matt Gaetz is a bad man because Orange man bad and stuff!!!!! You idịot!!! -
House Ethics Report on Matt Gaetz
gatomontes99 replied to NAME REMOVED's topic in Federal Politics in the United States
Nobody gets 100% of their nominees and Gaetz was lacking in tactics. Maybe Trump did it to dump Gaetz. Maybe not. Either way, the house won't have the same problems they had under Joe. Matt was a net negative during that time. Maybe McCarthy wasn't the right speaker, but what Matt did harmed our cause. -
House Ethics Report on Matt Gaetz
gatomontes99 replied to NAME REMOVED's topic in Federal Politics in the United States
So the same people that cried "there is no proof" of Joe Biden fleecing our enemies for cash while there were bank transfers, text chains, emails, videos, business partner testimony and so much more are now crying guilty when the DOJ investigated and declined to prosecute Matt Gaetz. But, the house ethics committee started a report under Pelosi and then McCarthy wouldn't stop it because Gaetz didn't vote for him, so that is gospel, true, undeniably Trump's fault. -
Donnie vows to end woke, calls it Bullshit
gatomontes99 replied to West's topic in Federal Politics in the United States
Ok. Whatever you say skippy. -
House Ethics Report on Matt Gaetz
gatomontes99 replied to NAME REMOVED's topic in Federal Politics in the United States
NDN. -
The Pr1ck Is At It Again
gatomontes99 replied to herbie's topic in Federal Politics in the United States
Dont be a prịck, let the prịck be a prịck. It's how they identify. He's probably a female prịck. -
Should the FAA Follow Canada's example?
gatomontes99 replied to gatomontes99's topic in Federal Politics in the United States
If you'll remember, it was Biden that chose not to celebrate the 50th anniversary of the interstate system. I assume it's because Dwight D Eisenhower was the POTUS that brought that about. -
NYC Subway safer than ever
gatomontes99 replied to User's topic in Federal Politics in the United States
But but...GUNS ARE BAD AND MIGRANTS ARE JUST LOOKONG FOR A BETTER LIFE! /LWNJ response -
The Pr1ck Is At It Again
gatomontes99 replied to herbie's topic in Federal Politics in the United States
Lmao....he breaks you guys so quickly and easily. It's quite amusing really. So he gets us better shipping fees and that upsets you. Why? -
Far Right Watch in America
gatomontes99 replied to NAME REMOVED's topic in Federal Politics in the United States
Isnt this his journal? I wonder if the FBI has stopped by yet.
