gatomontes99

Hunter confirmed all of this at the hearings. Of course, he said that Joe and Li only shook hands in a rope line and it was all very innocent. But that's how the grift worked. The way Joe was separated, and was able to have plausible deniability, went like this: 1. Hunter finds a mark. Someone needing a favor from the US government. 2. Hunter introduces the mark to Joe (rope line handshake, phone call at dinner, actual dinner, etc) 3. The mark is convinced that Hunter can deliver. 4. Hunter negotiates a deal, funnels the money through dummy Corps, and pays the big guy. Maybe I can find the video later. But there was a video of Joe glad handing people at a fundraiser. Hunter can be seen lurking near by. When one guy mentions doing business with Joe, Hunter swoops in and takes the guy out of ear shot of the camera and can been seen having a discussion in the distance. Joe pretended to know nothing.

I literally posted the X posts where he says he didn't pay for sex.

Either way, it needs to happen. Their abuse of his power is monumental. You understand that this is about how Joe Biden lied, right?

It's hypocrisy, but that is the symptoms. The disease is that their policies aren't widely supported. So they use tactics, like name calling, to shame people into supporting their policies. Because they prop up anyone that supports them and destroy anyone that doesn't, they find themselves being hypocritical. The cure would be to intellectually support their policies. However, as I have said enough times before, they are purely emotional creatures. The name calling is all they have.

They act as though that is a badge of dishonor. But, what it really is is the blue collar voters realizing that lower taxes, more jobs and lower inflation is a Republican thing that helps them. https://www.pewresearch.org/politics/2024/04/09/partisanship-by-race-ethnicity-and-education/ It's amazing how the left loves the middle and lower class, until they don't vote for them. Then their vote means the guy they voted for is scum. Why weren't the democrats they voted for before, scum? They do that with everyone too. Blacks that voted for Trump are stupid/uncle Tom/racist. Hispanics that voted for Trump are stupid/racist. Women that voted for Trump are stupud/sexist/racists. They literally call people names and then expect those people to come back. The Republicans don't do that. They assume they aren't explaining their positions well or are being silenced by the left. It's funny how they never call their voters or the Democrat voters stupid. At worst, they call them low information. Which implies the Republicans aren't getting their message out.

If it is true that he promised to tell the Chinese if we invade, you have to assume he would have told them where. I can't picture a more treasonous act. He would literally be sending our troops into a trap. His actions would have potentially killed thousands. If it is true.

This is the forward from the book "The White Privilege Album". I think Vincent is correct. But I was listening to the Author (AJ Rice) describe the forward and he said he wanted Vincent (aka black superman) to write the forward because it would lend more credence to the book. And that is why I posted all of the above. Why do we need to have people of a certain skin color make statements for those statements to be considered? The answer is because the left believes the validity of opinions are based on the color of the skin of the author. We, as the right, need to stop feeding that troll. I would agree with what Vincent said regardless of his skin color. The left won't agree with what he said, but they will adjust their tactics. I can't control how racist the left is. But, I think I can convince those that are on my side of the political spectrum to not play the left's racist games. Don't put people on your forward because it deflects the left's tactics. Put people in your forward because they make good points.

If this proves true, this is a big fùcking deal. Don't forget, Miley is the one that refused to allow the DCNG help on J6. Remember, Milley delayed the J6 response to make Trump look bad. A Col on the NG wrote a scathing letter to the House regarding the delays that came directly from Milley. https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2024/11/bombshell-report-oversight-subcommittee-finds-pentagon-deliberately-delayed/

A few arguments from Matt Gaetz. FYI, I haven't checked any of these. Im just putting his side up: Those are some of his rebuttals on X. Not my words. I'm just posting them so everyone can have both sides.

This: Does not mean that: Maybe that is what you meant to say. But that isn't what you said.

You added the link after I replied. The time tags on the posts prove that. Now, you implied they inteferred in our election by assassinating someone. They didn't assassinate anyone and it had nothing to do with our election.

Oh this is glorious. Are you telling me that the Indian government assassinated someone on American soil? Really? Who was that and when?

Lmao...wikipedia? Really? The same Wikipedia that the Indian government said was too biased? Yeah. Try again. https://www.msn.com/en-in/news/India/wikipedia-put-on-notice-by-govt-over-bias-inaccuracies-here-s-what-we-know-so-far/ar-AA1tw9kY

The difference is the Flynns didn't hide what they do. The Biden's did and they had an office to use as leverage.

Acting as a foreign agent while working with his dad.

But the prosecutors forced Flynn to sign the paperwork by threatening to go after his son. What would you have done?

Flynn didn't lie to the FBI. The FBI threatened to jail his son. He then signed an affidavit that he lied. Even more to the point, the "lie" was considered a common error by the investigators. The investigators did not seek any charges. They even said so publicly.

You get what you give.

Witness tampering to alter opinions in an election isn't a crime. Ok. Sure.

No. The fairness doctrine only pertained to conservative voices. It was effectively a tool for silencing dissent of the left. They accomplished this by labeling conservative opinions as opinions but liberal opinions as facts. That allowed them to force conservatives to allow liberals time while at the same not forcing stations with liberal opinions to allow conservatives on.

Do you know why conservatives hated it?

Lmao...no just means raise the stakes.

She's a deep stater. Even with Kash and company, she will skate.