gatomontes99

Yes it does. I didn't say I don't understand. I can condemn something I understand.

Do you have any funny memes? Or just angry memes?

You are getting trolled. He's not staying. He likes pushing your buttons to watch you melt down. And frankly, I like it when he does it. It's hilarious.

Your dumb asś speculation is nothing more than your dumb aśs speculation. Oh, I forgot. Hitler wasn't like Hilter and Trump wasn't like Hilter so Hitler and Trump are the same! What a joke. I have some young hoochies to dance with her at Coachella so whatever.

That's a distinction without a difference. Justification synonyms Even you used support in place of justification. And you did so trying to excuse the support/justification for assasination. I want you to understand that your argument boils down to, "it isn't happening but it's great that it is." You can't have it both was. It is either happening, as I have proven, or it is ok as you just suggested. Trump is literally leaving the office in under 4 years. To suggest that he can't be voted out of office is ludicrous. To suggest that is justification for assasination (aka support) is just disgusting.

A prime example of "tell me you support assasination without saying you support assasination." Your entire argument is that DJT deserves it because he's a dictator. Exactly how does that make the survey invalid?

Rule #2 From the article written by the people that analyzed the data: These effects were largely driven by respondents that self-identified as left of center,3 with 48% and 55% at least somewhat justifying murder for Elon Musk and President Trump, respectively, indicating significantly higher justification for violence against these figures. https://networkcontagion.us/wp-content/uploads/NCRI-Assassination-Culture-Brief.pdf Your pathetic attempt to seem strong is clearly over compensation. Just like the other thread, where you know you are wrong, you are taking an indefensible position and trying to support it with false bravado. You are neither strong or convincing.

Nothing. Clearly "ludicrous" is an adjective for "case" and the case was "against Trump". I've never seen an adjective wedged between two nouns and described both nouns. You are taking an indefensible and wrong position and won't admit you f'd up because your TDS won't allow you.

No it doesn't.

Actually, that quote calls the case against Trump ludicrous. So, just bundle it up with some other things and call it Rico laws or something. That's what we do now, right?

At least she didn't think Guam was going to capsize. Just sayin'.

This is the essence of small government. This is the heart of local politics. When I voted for Trump i was 1 of 152 million. When I voted for Abbott I was 1 of 8 million. When I voted for my Texas rep, I was one of 50,000. When I voted for myor of my town, I was 1 of 609. You have the most freedom and the biggest say in the smallest elections. I can go talk to my mayor and he will listen. That's how I got our little league baseball field fixed. Smaller is better for you. You have a bigger voice. With no department of education, you can go to the school board and tell them you want better online learning tools or better lunches or higher paid teachers and they can do something about it. As it stands right now, there are so many strings attached that these school boards can't change where the money goes. Our school had $1.35 million from the state and federal government for grass. They don't even have enough grass to justify a riding lawn mower. But the school board can't divert the money because that would violate federal mandates and they'd lose the rest of the money. So they spend $1.35 on a small patch of grass. It looks great BTW.

Inspection schedules come from the FAA and the Manufacturer. The operator doesn't schedule the inspections, they comply with them. Then the FAA and the manufacturer screwed up. The operator doesn't invent inspections. Good gawd, that's a stùpid argument. The bird comment was meant to symbolize random events that are plausible but unpredictable. I wasn't literally saying that birds took down the airplane.

Let the investigation come to the final conclusion before we start handing out punishments. Also, damage could have happened after the inspection. Just because the inspection was relatively recent, doesn't mean it is the perfect solution. There is a reason aircraft have a maintenance log for inoperative equipment between inspections. A mechanic could look at an airplane right now and certify that everything is working perfectly. Then, on the next departure, a hydraulic line breaks or an engine fails. It happens. Inspection can't catch everything and I have no idea what phase of inspection was done on the helicopter. Some phases check a list of items. Some phases check many items. And some phases check all items. Some items have time limits because of known engineering or materials problems. Some parts require deep inspections on cycles, some on hours. Just saying there was an inspection is absolutely meaningless. Thats like saying there was air and gas. So what? Was that part inspected? Was it a visual inspection or did they test for microcracks? Was there a manufacturing defect that was undetected? There are ways to many questions that can't be answered right now. Schumer is just an asṣ looking for a spotlight to save his rep.

This helicopter crash could have been a defective part, some kind of weird bird strike, or any number of things. But this ìdiot Schumer is in hot water with his base so he's trying to appear tough. All he's doing is calling on operators to be punished for generalizations that may or may not apply to them. Let the examination of the event find something first.

Yeah and whoever fire bombed Shapiro's home needs to be held accountable. What if someone had died?

https://networkcontagion.us/wp-content/uploads/NCRI-Assassination-Culture-Brief.pdf This comes from a poll produced by NCRI and Rutgers. A whopping 55% of left leaning nut jobs think its ok to KILL the current sitting President. Only 48% think it's ok to KILL Musk.

How do you screw up posting a YouTube video that is automatically integrated into the post when you claim to be so good with computers that you told the fbi how stupid they are? Any how...these things aren't the same. Three people led the country with no accountability or recognition. They were a shadow government. Laura getting in Trump's ear and him listening is not the same. Not even close. Presidents have always had advisors. What Biden had was a shadow government.

This video is an interview of a staffer from the "Biden" White House. She reveals that the three people in charge were called the Council of Presidents and that they ran the country for the majority (if not the entirety) of the Biden administration. They are: Mike Donilon Steve Ricchetti Anita Dunn She also confirmed that Hunter made a lot of the calls when Joe was sick with Covid and that he sat in on classified meetings.

The link is from well before the tariffs went in place and detailed how the tariffs were a negotiating tool. No one was negotiating before they had tariffs levied against and now they all are. You assertion that it wasn't a negotiating tactic or that they all wanted to negotiate before hand is just oddly void of reality.

And I think we've seen several threads about how the left is just fine with violence. This outright endorsement is just proof positive that they are.

https://www.thenegotiationclubs.com/blog/the-negotiation-behind-trump-tariffs

Except Canada did nothing until the first tariffs. Then, all of a sudden, they were willing to work with us on the border. You are full of it.

You can't prove a single one was willing to negotiate. They had multiple opportunities under Trump and Biden. They gave a little under Trp's first term, but they tried to get it back under Biden. They didn't want to deal. They wanted to steal. You can't show me any where we're they said they wanted a new trade deal before Trump said he would impose tariffs. Because they didn't want to. They are the only ones to make that proclamation: https://www.ctvnews.ca/world/trumps-tariffs/article/france-and-its-partners-will-not-yield-to-us-threats-says-french-trade-minister/ But the proof in all of these is in reality. None of them negotiated new trade deals. Canada/Trudeau kept saying they were team Canada, Mexico refused to deal with cartels and no one really truly negotiated until tariffs became reality.

It's a real debate.