CdnFox

Oh i forgot what level of intellect you're at. Here let me reply in a way you'll understand.... I'm rubber and you're glue, whatever you say bounces off of me and sticks to you! I'm sorry i can't do it in crayon, you'll just have to stretch your mental abilities LOL well that's some serious short term memory problems you have! Is it the drugs would you say? It' all right there Awww ,muffin. It's hard to be you As even you admitted they're over. we may develop a new relationship but the one we had is over. Carney said it. Trump said it. She said it You said it. End of story. Sorry for the anguish being wrong obviously causes you

But you've just admitted she was right. He did say our relationship is over. You're suggesting that a new relationship of some sort may very well form and that may be true but that's not conflict with what was said. You realized you were wrong and you're trying to weasel your way out of it

I meant Trudeau but you admitted voting for him too. And when carney faceplants and fails and is thrown out youl'l insist that whomever is his replacement is WAY better than that loser As you are doing now. You don't care who's the best. You care about your tribe, and make decisions in a cult like fashion instead of doing what's right for your country and you've done so for well over a decade.

No the facts in reality say what I say they say. Again That was only a week or two ago and he went on at length about itr and everyone saw it. But you do the same thing where you make statements and then try and walk them back later or pretend you didn't make them. So you want what he says to be true because it would justify some of your own bad behavior He insults everyone including other people's parents, other people's families, other people in general and he makes accusations that are outrageous and inappropriate. And you don't complain about any of that. Interesting. This goes for you as much as it goes for him but if you act like a shit stain there are no position to tell other people how they smell. Sorry kid

Yeah you admitted you voted for him. And I would point out the Carney is doing exactly the same things that Trudeau did. So there you go

Good thing I never suggested that. Actually the way I describe things is how the human brain works most of the time. I realize you wouldn't have known that personally or anything You've met robosmith i see But no, that's not what i proposed at all and no that would not be an effective strategy. The problem with the current strategy and we see this from you all the time as well as many other people here is that if you insist that someone must definitively prove something before they are allowed to use it in an argument then people tend to keep demanding more and more proof and then just dismiss the proof as it comes in for one reason or another and say it's not sufficiently proof worthy and when arguments that way. And that's not okay. So generally the way it works is that if somebody makes a claim that you're going to refute it then the burden is on you to make a case as to why it's not true using at least as high or higher evidence as was provided which might take the form of logic or reason. For example if you were to claim that the sun rose in the west this morning I might refute it with the logical argument of the sun rises in the east, it always rises in the east, there's no reason to believe it's different today and that would be a reasonable argument Now the ball would be back in your court to explain why something exceptional happened or provide evidence or the like etc. Trying to win an argument by demanding cites or Focusing on minutiae there's more childish than it is practical. If you genuinely think somebody is wrong about something dig up the evidence to make that case one way or another and present it

LOL says the guy who supported trudeau, who lost so bad he had to run from his own party members Conservatives won for about 10 years the libs have for about 11 years who can say who'll win next year But the difference is that i'm not so cultish as to mistake the fortunes of the party that i support as being the same as whoI am as a person. For me it's like rooting for a local sport's team, you hope they win and sometimes you win and if not oh well there's always next time For you it's baked into who you are as a person, which is why you can't admit to any of the mistakes carney makes. Those are YOUR mistakes too in your mind which is pretty weird.

I proved it then. Now you want me to prove it again. Then you'll want me to prove it again next week Everyone knows it's true kiddo. It's just the kind of person you are Trump said it when he claimed that we were ripping them off and things had to change. Carney said it when he talked to the rupture to the current system and how our relationship with the united states as it has been is over. It doesn't mean we won't have some new relationship but it very clearly says we won't be continuing our current trade and security relationship with them Sorry you weren't paying attention

LOL well i don't think we realized that I think you're having weird daydreams about me or my life Which is flattering and concerning at the same time At any rate, looks like you couldn't address the point Well there you go.

We haven't had a pole yet since he did that. We will watch what happens. That kind of thing tends to stick in Canadians memory even with the media trying it's damnedest to claim otherwise And none of the creditable holsters have him anywhere near those figures so again we'll see what the aggregate is after a few weeks

Both I and he berated you for it not more than a couple of weeks ago. And this is very you. You always do the things you accuse others of doing and then pretend that you don't. That's the kind of scumbag you are. You even went on about it trying to pretend you didn't for multiple posts. Everyone saw it. You're bullshit protest now impress no one Your tiny little piece of shit that lies about his entire life because he can't cope with it and thinks he can judge others for doing what he himself has done multiple times. If it weren't for the fact that you're usually pretty amusing to watch nobody would pee on you if you were on fire. nobody respects you, everyone thinks you're contemptable. Now go back to dancing for my amusement

He almost never mentions Trudeau. That's the voices in your head talking again. He does mention the financial disasters that Trudeau left behind but they're still here even though trudeau is gone So we kind of have to deal with that

which you have done. You've also called other people's mothers hookers. You've called every single person here every name in the book. You have absolutely no moral standing kiddo. You are far lower than a slug. You don't have a single scrap of decency to you and therefore you have no right whatsoever to comment on anyone else. You are a lowly little 15 year old piece of shit who's the kind of low life who would pretend his mother is dead to win sympathy on the internet. Nobody is buying your fake outrage for more than a millisecond. You're an ignorant piece of crap and everyone knows it and you would and have done far worse without the slightest hesitation

Yeah, that's good for them. Us buying their goods benefits them. In exchange they tariffed our stuff so we couldn't sell them as much as we did in the past. That kind of proves @Army Guy's point, we benefit them and they stab us in the back and this is FAR from the first time. THey are unstable and unreliable and if we let them have power over us they will use it to force both trade AND policy decisions on us.

Siome of them, sure. Not so much since trump took over but still Sorry there's not nearly enough scumbags in canada to think that the us would be a step up at this point Give carney a few years and we'll see where we're at.

Says the guy who randomly calls people pedophiles. Sorry kid but you've set the bar so low you don't get to complain However that's not really an 'insult'. There is a REASON first ladies make a point of looking very well polished, just as there's a reason why carney wears a suit and not jeans and a tee. And she's appearing in public there as the first lady representing canada, that's not just her going shopping or the like. So why does she look like that? it's not like they don't have the money

One thing Canadians don't like he's a serious flip flopper. This is not a good look for him at a time when he was really hoping his trade mission would wow the hearts and minds of Canada

In other words you knew you were lying and you expect somebody to call you on it. Fair enough

And rightly so. There have been many articles with regards to this, productive High Talent High skilled people leaving the country and those remaining behind are simply not the same quality. It's an issue

First ladies are always supposed to look dignified and regal, why the hell does she always look like he brought along his cleaning lady?

No, the problem is that he's still a better choice than the democrats

This is (shockingly) true. And every time it comes up, and it has come up CONSTANTLY, the public says 'just do it! Do it now! Noooooowwwww" But for whatever reason they sluff it off. I personally hope that David Eby trips on a rusty nail, gets hit by a dirty truck catches aids and dies in the emergency room waiting for care. he's the worst premier ever times cancer. BUt this was the right call and credit where credit is due

Yep. we both reailze at this point you failed economics 🤣🤣🤣🤣😂😂😂

Do you? Well I suppose that's what we should expect from you considering you're our resident Twit LOL you're projecting there kid Tell us the story of how you tripled your house value with your credit card again

They came into being in order to form a framework. Think back to the constitution of America for example. This is the founding document and explains why they came together, look at the preamble We the people, in order to form a more perfect Union, establish justice and promote domestic tranquility, provide for the common defense, propose the general welfare and secure the blessings of liberty That's why they did it. They created a nation and founded a constitution to create a framework for law order and for the provision to protect these things from others who would try to take them away But without that framework there is no basis for any law. If two guys are just living in the woods they can make agreements as to what they're going to do or not do but there cannot be a law. By what power would the law exist? If one were going to sue the other for breech of 'law', to what authority would he appeal? And what legislative framework would he say that law exists under? There's none. No. Always between recognized and about nations. Somebody stood forward and said I represent these people. But your sidestepping the point, the issue is the creation of law Conquest brings someone else under your law by force, but you still have a nation that is a framework for those laws. You can't have law without a national framework whether it's on the scale of a city or a continent. Otherwise there is no framework for the law. It has never happened in history, it can't happen. Before there can be law, there MUST be the formation of a nation that will provide the framework for those laws, it's enforcement and usually it's defense. otherwise, there's no law, there's just strong personal opinions on stuff.