CdnFox

Well as I said earlier this is a long way from being finished yet. And the theocrats you mentioned who have survived will inevitably immediately move to a point a new person and claim he's the legitimate leader and this is going to go on for a bit. Which is why regime change rarely works well unless it has a lot of support from the public. We'll see how it plays out. I'm fairly confident that the Americans and the Israelis would have been in negotiations with some group or another to take temporary control of the place away from the current regime and it's bureaucracy

That's nice. Now answer the question. But saudi arabia did not state sponsor Al Qaeda. Investigations found that neither the state nor its officials ever did anything to support them in any financial or other benefit fashion. Nor did they sponsor Iraq So it would appear to be that the answer to my question is none. Saudi Arabia doesn't support terrorist groups, you were being dishonest when you made that claim. Iran absolutely does and I can name them and can point to the violence in the last few years that this has caused. So instead of trying to play what aboutism on behalf of Iran can we agree that it's good that the state that sponsors these terrorists is currently being wiped out? Or is the left going back to being pro terrorist? I don't recall the president or Maga ever saying anything of the kind. This wouldn't be you making up fake things again to argue with because the real things you can't argue with? The republicans (there is no 'maga' that's just the term you use to dehumanize people) and their supporters under trump have said they want to have less wars and focus on america but that is not the same as suggesting they would never intervene outside the us borders And iran having nuclear weapons would be a direct threat to the us. So not really 'world policing', more like addressing a clear and present danger

Protests cost a fortune you twat, and they don't raise money Multiple organizations dig into dark money sources; who's funding Antifa? And they don't just cost money for the people backing the protest, it cost tens of millions of dollars to the taxpayer the form of police and other services necessary as a result.

I know you do buddy, that's why I pointed it out the first time Well I think you should but you do you Well that's the way the world works kiddo

Oh I love this part, this is the part where you pretend you never say anything and then demand that people go back and point out what you said and then you'll pretend 5 minutes later that you never said it again I totally understand your desires to pretend otherwise but you've been quite clear many many times. And you've been called out for it and not just by me. If a kid dies in a fashion that offends your political sensibilities such as Israeli chilrend being killed by Hamas Suddenly you're not terribly worried about it. The children are harmed by vaccines or drugs or killed by people with something other than a gun then oh well. But if somebody dies in a fashion that promotes your political agenda and oh my goodness, you're so upset and it's such a tragedy and how could we let this happen Case in point, the liberals are responsible for the current laws which allow child murders and rapists to go back out on the streets and do the same thing that afternoon that they're caught. This has been disgust and demonstrated ad nauseam. And your response is oh well. Can't be saying negative things about liberal policy

Bullshit. It's not even remotely comparable Hezbollah. Hamas. Houthies. They have funneled money in arms to all of these groups in large numbers not to mention a bunch of others. Name all of the groups that saudi Arabia funded that are causing similar levels of trouble. Also what the hell is it with all of these groups with their names beginning with h? But anyway you can't even begin to compare Saudi Arabia or the like with the destruction and damage we've seen from Iran's sponsorship of terrorist organizations

How much training do you need to understand "Don't swing shit at cops. Also don't bite them," And I'm sure he provided the police officers a detailed description and metallurgy study about what he had in his hand. He swings shit at cops and this is what happens. I know it, you know it, everybody knows it. Don't swing shit at cops And if you do and they arrest you do not bite them

Have you not heard about the RCMP reports about how their influencing our politics? Interference and threats towards our MPS? And perhaps you didn't notice but they have no problem using our trade as a political tool with them, slapping Tariffs on our canola and Seafood until they get what they want, and then only taking a portion of the tariffs off. We have to be very cautious with how we deal with them. It's not that we can't deal with them but they are far worse than the US when it comes to being unreliable trade partners and that has only grown stronger under the liberals. Harper used to keep them in hand but he's not around anymore and Justin simply couldn't. There's a reason they called him little potato. Carney has been in their pocket before he even was elected

Your statements and words. Coupled with your defense of the law which allows it and the party that keeps that law in place You don't give one flying crap. And that is consistent with how you view these things. Acknowledging that this is absolutely horrible and should be unacceptable to anyone would mean speaking against the liberal party that you defend constantly considering they are the reason that happens. And as always you would rather see people die than have that happen I mean even now you don't confend the law, you don't pretend the liberals for allowing the law and putting the law in place, it's all about you and defending the liberals

Well, not 'intercontinental' in the sense of reaching the US, no. Europe for sure but that's kind of sort of in the same ball park so maybe technially 'intercontinental' but not really the way we normally mean it. However their missile tech is pretty advanced. They've always claimed they "deliberately" limit their current missile's range and that's probably true. It would take time for an icbm to be up and running but no where in europe would be safe for long and that's pretty bad. There are many reasons. And again its impossible to anticipate 'crazy', if nothing else. A religious zeolot gets control and decides to send everyone to hell because of some perceived slight from europe, what's to stop him? I mean russia has nukes pointed at europe, why would THEY shoot them? Yet is universally accepted they would if they felt sufficiently threatened. If they would never use them, why have them? They would instantly be a threat whether you see it or not. Currently they could not be that kind of threat. If they had nukes they could absolutely be that kind of threat. There is absolutely no way to guess what kind of issues might happen down the road so you wouldn't know until it was too late. Like I said, if a guy is pointing a gun at your head he's a threat regardless of whether or not you think he's going to pull the trigger

Really. define woman

I think he had some hard decisions there and I think the us would have been very angry at him if he didn't. So he was kind of backed into a corner. But he's definitely going to get some pushback and this is what people will be talking about instead of his india trip. I'm already seeing posts from the left who point out Sweden and France and a bunch of other European countries i've come out against the action, and they all comment on how this is supposed to be the coalition that carney claims to be leading yet they could do the right thing and he couldn't. He's already catching some flock for his trip to India because a senior unnamed official had said that India was no longer conducting any Trans country terrorism more activism, and many still believe that they are. Carney has not been willing to say one way or another which just makes him look sus. So even if a trade deal comes out of this I don't think anyone's going to notice.

No, back to pointing out you're wrong, uneducated and childish. YOU'RE the one with the pedophile fixation Is this because your mom is always trying to get you to 'hang out' with men for money? (maybe you should be ex-fancy?)

Yeah that's about what i thought.

We did. ANd we said things like this and the policy of releasing multiple time violent and sex offenders on bail automatically would lead to more rapes, more deaths, more abuse of children. And we were right The question at this point is why didn't YOU guys care about any of that

Maybe he shouldn't have crossed the border unlawfully

I'm hearing this from some iranian friends as well.

I just realized that carney is out in India right now trying desperately to get some deals and grab media attention to keep himself propped up in the polls . But right now every scrap of media is going to be about Iran. Anything he does will get minimal reporting time no matter what unless he winds up attacking them militarily. All that work and effort just completely went into the crapper. On top of it all half the country is going to be criticizing him for not condemning Israel's attack as they will see it on the other half will be criticizing him for the fact that government just admitted it has nothing to send to help with this if it wanted to He must be so pissed right now

The wars pretty much irrelevant. It will be one in short order. It might be run by this afternoon. It's the peace that they're going to have a tough time winning. That's where regime change tends to get tricky even when it's back by local support. And you can bet it won't be trump working out that solution. Israel and experts in America will be trying to figure out how to do this without putting in somebody they don't like but also not putting in somebody the public will turn against.

That in and of itself will probably promote a lot of peace, a lot of the unrest has been funded by Iran. But I think even more so will be the fact that all of these groups have just learned that if you honk America off enough, they will jump in your shit. That's got to be on the back of their minds as they are looking for new funding and wondering what happens next. Also I wonder how much Intel on all of these groups America is going to wind up with having captured the Iranian government records

I'm sure he got permission from china first. They recognized the value of propaganda

Sorry but the liberals are loons and so are you. And they're absolutely is a law that specifically does that

You expected truth and honesty and facts that made you look stupid yet again, confirming that you're an underage and illiterate child with no actual world experience? Well frankly so did I so I can't blame you

Yeah, the world is a better place right now that's for sure. But this is just the start. This is usually where regime change goes wrong, it's easy to kill the guy in charge but what happens now will be critical. hopefully there's a solid plan to get rid of the rest of this guy's beurocracy and military adherents and we'll see some sort of organic and lasting peace and stability, with a new group organically taking over rather than being 'installed' and the public getting behind them It's not ove ryet, this is where it gets interesting.

Yes and if the us could go back in time and prevent any of them from having nuclear weapons you can bet they would. It's too late to change anything once they actually have them. For the very reason that they might very well use them to attack if you push too hard Even with Ukraine the US had to ask and get their permission to remove nuclear weapons. Neither rush at nor the US were prepared to risk a conflict to get those weapons. They haven't. That does not mean they won't. And that is the challenge. Here's some simple math. If they would never use them, why do they need them? Of course they will use them under the right circumstances. America never pushes any of those countries too far for that very reason. I ran is hoping that if they have nuclear weapons they can force America to do what they want as well for fear of nuclear exchange It doesn't matter whether you can see it happening or not. That's utterly irrelevant. If a man is pointing a gun at your head the debate about whether he'll pull the trigger or not isn't relevant, he's a threat. It's best if he doesn't get the gun in the first place Number 6 on the list of things I'd never thought I'd see, iranians waving israeli flags