Jump to content

CdnFox

Senior Member
  • Posts

    41,292
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    351

Everything posted by CdnFox

  1. to a degree I think it's even simpler than that. I think they caved in that site and said we have successfully stopped them from being able to build bombs essentially. And then they said to them if you start to dig this out or try and repair the facility there's going to be a problem. If you leave it as it is that's fine we're satisfied And they started to try and dig it out and get back to refining material nor the warning. I mean no matter what the US bombed or how successful it was I ran can rebuild what was blown up. They were told not to and according to reports they were going ahead anyway and rather then enter into yet another round of negotiations or attempts to dissuade them the us and israel agreed they'd had enough. The initial strike could have been very successful and iran could still be looking at rebuilding. The two are not mutually exclusive.
  2. LOL i guess that's your way of admitting you're a hate filled irrational bigoted violent nutbar We kind of knew that but thanks for taking the time to confirm
  3. How's that working out for the Americans right now that there's a pendulum swing? How do you think it'll work out in Canada when the inevitable time comes here?
  4. Cuz if you can't why are we even talking about this?
  5. They promised everybody that it would be 2 percent of gdp in 2025. Did that happen or not? Budget officer, the guy who works with the numbers, says no. Have you noticed how much time you liberals have to spend explaining why it's completely justified and should have been expected that carney has broken yet another promise?
  6. That you're a terrible person? Sure. That there may be a substantial portion of the left that is of similar quality as you? Sure And as far as I can tell everybody is kind of pointing at you and laughing or shaking their head. Wheee i guess? Nothing you can say ever has or ever will. You are literally the definition of inconsequential. Most of the time you just make me laugh. But there are times when you do make me a little sad, knowing that there are people like you out there in Canada who just don't care about human life and are so blinded by their ideology that they will actually hate other groups of people they've never met based solely on the fact that they believe differently will always make me a little sad. Sometimes I look at people like you and think "Is that really the best we could do with 4 billion years of evolution?" But, it is what it is Most of the time you make me laugh
  7. First off I noticed you couldn't answer my first question, so I take it you've actually admitted that there really was no other choice other than going to war. Well there you go As to this question they had believed that that was the case. But reports have come in that while the facilities were damaged I ran would be able to replicate or get things back in operation relatively soon. And then they would be moving forward to complete a device. He was telling the truth insofar as they hit it and did a lot of damage but the amount of damage they did may not have been as much as they wanted. There's only so much you can tell from space pictures Was that your last shot? Did you have anything else or are you done looking kind of silly?
  8. Who claimed it did? Oh, were you just trying to distract from the fact you were wrong again? Silly boy No, it's how the human mind works actually and it's entirely practical. If you believed NOTHING unless PROVEN (hi robo!) you couldn't get through your day. You can't think like that and actually function. Its similar to legal evidence. Only certain specific crimes require 'proof beyond a reasonable doubt'. The legal system could not function that way. So for other circumstances we have different levels such as "clear and convincing", which means the evidence is pretty strong (but could be wrong), and "proponderance of the evidence", or "balance of probability" in Canada, which is "more likely one way than the other". So you're entirely wrong. Having a strict and universally applied metric for evidence for something like a debate club as value because somebody is trying to win or lose in a debate club and you need to have rules the same as you do with any other sport. But the purpose of those debate clubs is generally not to actually discuss and flush out ideas, it's to win the debate I realize that for you your goal is to try and use some sort of technical method to win where you can't with logic of reason. That's why this whole concept upsets you But the entire world functions the way that I said it does and while that may be inconvenient for you you're just going to have to learn how to make logical arguments again. Sorry for the inconvenience
  9. Actually not nonsense, that was reported. And iran had always claimed the damage was less than the US wanted it to be. You'll have to do better than "nonsense" if you're going to make a case that it's not true or is false reporting or the like. It certainly has the ring of truth to it.
  10. So he's clearly an !diot. Even after he did think about what to say he couldn't think of what to say
  11. Why was it not necessary? What other options have not been tried that we might have tried that would succeed? It seriously sounds like you're basing your opinion on nothing more than your bias. And the world can't afford to run on "Muh Feels". We've already got enough problems as a result of that kind of thinking. There could be no doubt that the Iranians are moving towards having nuclear weapons. That has been well established by numerous presidencies. There can be no doubt that the Americans have spent years negotiating trying to resolve this issue. And there can be no doubt that the iranians are funding terrorist groups on top of this which is already led to the Hamas israel war, the shutting down of the straight thanks to the houthis, and of course Hezbollah frequently causes problems. So what was your other solution that would have made this war unnecessary?
  12. Not the poles that you showed. Good lord you didn't even really understand what you were looking at did you?
  13. Well that certainly worked for Justin Trudeau supporters didn't it Somewhat of a side note, have you actually ever met a flat earther? I mean I hear they exist, and every once in awhile you'll see somebody on the internet making claims or doing a stupid video but I have to wonder if they're not just doing that for the LOLs. I feel like we're constantly talking about this group of people but I'm not sure there are more than maybe like seven people who have mental health issues who actually believe this and the rest of it is this weird meme that has taken on a life of its own
  14. It's absolutely racist and sexist to suggest women and minorities are too stupid to get this kind of id but white males got it figured out no problem πŸ™„πŸ™„πŸ™„πŸ™„ You guys are literally claiming that black people and women are too dumb to be able to cope with this and therefore won't be able to vote despite having 3 years to work it out.
  15. Yes. Negotiating. Not sending money into terrorist cells within the country blowing things up and launching attacks that killed thousands of civillians. See the difference? I would bet they know more about both than you do about them. Well you'd have to be a pretty weird kind of guy to think of war as 'clowning around'. I had previously assumed you were over the age of 12, i apologize if that was incorrect. Ending the threat of iran having nuclear weapons is a very real and serious business. That's just a simple fact. Efforts have been ongoing for decades now to come to a resolution on that which was peaceful. Further, they cannot be allowed to continue funding all the terrorist groups such as the huthi, hezbolla and hamas any further. This has lead to serious trade disruption, death of our allies and a host of other problems. So. Was this war the only way? Was there no other way? Some will argue one way or another. But obviously trump felt this was his only option and there's nothing "clowning' about it. And yes war is bad. It's going to screw the world economy which was already dealing with instability and it's especially going to hurt most of Canada (not alberta). But unfortunately sometimes that's necessary. I would have definitely preferred to see another option before war, but i'm not the one at the bargaining table and maybe that just wasn't possible.
  16. Absolutely, your comorehension issues are bubbling up for the rest of us again LOLOL Daylight savings time leave you confused little guy? You're getting slaughtered this morning
  17. So you admit you couldn't provide a link and the numbers are different but you're angry i noticed? Gotcha little guy LOLOL First thing in the morning and you already look like a tard. And i see Goddess is taking your lunch money as well. I bet you hate mondays We've all seen you say that in essence. You don't give a damn about policy or truth, you just live in fear of Poilievre and worship the liberals regardless of leader. There's no need to prove that which is common knowledge
  18. Uhhh... no.... LOL you didn't read it did you ROFLMAO!!!! I knew you weren't an adult yet but i thought you were old enough to be able to count! I don't know why you're so petrified of PP but clearly he's got you in a panic
  19. The last time we discussed evidence I asked you for any actual scientific documents or papers demonstrating that climate change was a crisis or that anything that we could do in Canada would make a substantial difference and what that difference would be Magically instantly all of a sudden had me on ignore again rather than answer the question πŸ˜πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚ Climate change happens every day, has since the beginning of the planet, but the idea that it's a crisis or there's anything that we can do in Canada to reduce it in a meaningful fashion is a complete hoax. Oh whats that? I'm on ignore again? Golly imagine that, shucks what timing LOLOL
  20. GASP!!!! You must be a terrible person then As to the right giving you the benefit of the doubt, you've been given so much benefit free of charge around here that you should really rename your nickname to welfare state. You are the one that blows your own credibility not prejudice And with that out of the way you'll notice that the left always has to create the fake image of a supervillain. You never come back with reasonable or logical arguments, you come back with a threat such as the opposition is all Nazis. Or they're all racists and the racists are going to get us. Well they're all capitalists and they're all going to sell us into slavery. Or they're all white nationalists. That's why "we need to censor people" or "we should cancel xxxx person" or "only the gov't should have control over guns/media/your money etc etc" You know, to stop the nazi racist capitalist misinformation spreaders. And the Russians. The left ideology can't survive without a fake boogie man to scare people with. The right may point out threats from time to time but generally speaking they put forward ideas and reasoned arguments, and don't generally need 'bogiemen' for their points to make sense. "people should be responsible for their own situaton and mistakes". "gov't shoudn't control peoples lives and should be minimalistic to preserve people's freedoms". No bad guys needed. See the difference?
  21. Literacy isn't, but the filtered lenses through which you read everything certainly are. Normal people who are not driven by bigotry and hatred can read the same thing and not arrive at the same conclusions
  22. The villians are the ones who blow people up without warning and are trying to develop nukes. The 'not quite as villainous as the villians' are the ones who attempt to negotiate and give warning.... and THEN blow people up, and who already have nukes Much like the iraq war the validity to a degree will hinge on how close they were to developing nuclear weapons. But there's no doubt they WERE sponsoring much of the terrorism in the area, and threatening the straight of hormuz with their support of the houthi. War is an extreme option but if a negotiated settlement wasn't possible and american interests were under threat and there was a credible threat of a nuclear weapon's program proceeding and producing results, then the us has reasonable justification.
  23. Well, at LEAST the occasional one anyway You think the world is better if democracy is repressed through violence do you. Well.... no shock. no need to pretend. I don't wish people i don't like dead just because i don't agree with them. Have you EVER heard me wish trudeau or carney dead? I think they're 1000 times worse than trump, yet i've never suggested anything close to that. I've never wished any of the leftist numbars dead either, and that includes biden when it was announced he had a fatal illness. Normal, decent people don't do that very often. But the left does. They want trump dead, they want kirk dead, they want executives in the medical insurance industry dead, they want the jews dead and hell you even want me dead. That's just the kind of people you and the left are these days. But that's you, don't project your own mental health issues on us. Not at all. The same could be said of the jews, the corporate execs, the christians and the right wing free speech advocates. If any of them died your kind would be out celebrating the violence and their death. I'm well aware of that. Like i said. It's the kind of monsters you are.
  24. You mean like, they're the kind of people who'd wish folks they don't like to die or not care if someone dies as long as it's politically expedient?? That sort of 'loathsome' person? Not all of them surely.
  25. Oh dear. Calm down now.... deep breaths .... Wow, the left really DOES have more mental health issues doesn't it!
×
×
  • Create New...