CdnFox

That is not what you said at all, and today IS after October 7th. You said that it was fine to wipe out hamas but that unless they destroyed the iranian regime it was just 'mowing the grass'. Remember? All those 'mowing the grass' references? You really were quite adamant about them wiping out the iranian regime. So, now they're doing it! Yay right?!?! Why would it be late now? Do you have some intel that says iran was going to stop funding these terror groups? Your whole point was that even if israel won and hamas was all but dead iran would fund them to rebuild. Well... now iran can't!! Yay right?!! And you're very happy bout it right? This is literally what you were demanding they do! Who knew trump would do exactly what you wanted him to do and take out the iranian regime. I'm sure you'll praise him for doing what you suggested right?

And once again you can't defend your position or make a rational argument so you simply switch to insults. Why don't you just answer his question?

Yes. Apperently you're not I'm going to say yes because he said in the video "there aer no pipelines to the east coast". Nice to see your attention span is as good as always So far the only one that's showing up that's stupid is you. He said the reason they're buying other people's natural gas and oil is because we don't have pipelines to the east coast. And he's right. You actually took the time to post proof that he is correct. Which makes you the special kind of stupid He's pointing out that as a country we need to get out of our own way. The liberals spent 10 years saying there was no business case for natural gas. Carney has deliberately left policy in place that prevents pipelines from being built. If we HAD built pipelines or if we were in the process of doing so now, WE could be the ones serving other countries energy needs. Which would be good That's not complex.

LOL yeah, just like i wasn't sure he wouldn't run again and wasn't sure he would lose if he did I'm funny that way Sure. I mean it takes a lot of effort, pulling your head out of the sand like that,,,,

This is absolutely true. Unlike wood and ducks which float in water. And you know what else floats in water? Mike! Therefore.... HE"S A WITCH!!! BURN HIM!!! BUUUUUURN THE WITCH!!!!!! Well he may not be a witch but he's being a twat. The information that our current immigration policies (and by current i mean since 2015) have been hurting us has been out there for some time. He's denying the undeniable just out of sheer spite.

Only if you're a citizen. So you DO NOT have the right to vote unless you can demonstrate you're a citizen. Pretty simple.

So what are the sources you're looking at suggesting? Trudeau certainly had promised to keep increasing the carbon tax by double and triple, Carney's saying he will be raising his, what are your numbers Oh dear, did i just magically go back on 'ignore' again once i asked you a difficult question? What surprise timing!

Problems with one lead to the other. Continually denying the obvious will only cause eventual blowback, which we're already seeing on the immigrant file

Based on the polling right now it looks like trump will survive the midterms. Soooo... not so sure about that. well you never were terribly observant were you

And yet often are. That's been a serious problem. This resolves that. You seem very upset by that concept.

Wow, you're really cementing that stereotype that left Wingers have more mental health problems aren't you ?

Peer review has been many times proven to be almost useless to be perfectly blunt. Three scientists prove this not that long ago when they published three papers that literally peer reviewed and published and were completely made up and were pretty obviously not legit with even a casual look, but the headlines were great. I can't remember all three right now but it was stuff like "study of dogs and dog park proves gender is non binary" or the like. They did it SPECIFICALLY to show that peer review has become useless as their papers should NEVER have passed peer reviews. But if they're politically correct sounding they can with no problem.

But projected. So you're wrong and you're mad at me for it. Gotcha. Yes. Zero I'm sorry basic facts and truth upsets you so much. But only a die hard liberal fanatic would claim facts and truth are "anti carney propaganda"

Sure you are. it isn't I thought you weren't looking for absolute proof of anything, can't disprove without proof. And i'm not actually disproving or proving anything, i explained how things work to you now and you're first reaction rather than intelligent discourse was.... Cite? LOLOL Thanks for proving my point. Sorry kid, the world doesn't work like that. You mean rational debate and intelligent discussion. Actually it is . Sorry to break it to you. You want to be able to get out of arguments you can't win simply b y yelling CITE! followed by INVALID SOURCE!! over and over again on repeat. Nope. And demanding that makes you look like an ignorant tard. If you think he's wrong, then make your case and provide your own evidence. like this: debate club rules not appropriate for online discussions - Google Search Traditional debate club rules, which are designed for structured, synchronous, and judged in-person events, are often inappropriate or impractical for online discussions, social media, and forums. Online environments are generally asynchronous, lack a neutral moderator, and are designed for rapid, informal engagement rather than formal argumentation. Requiring Immediate, In-Depth Citations Why it fails: While citing sources is important, demanding instant, formatted, high-quality, academic-level citations for every minor point discourages casual participation and slows down the conversational nature of social media. The Problem: It shifts the focus from the exchange of ideas to a "source battle," often ignoring that online, many opinions are personal, not academic. LOL either way you lose kiddo So ... time to learn to make an intelligent argument. I've rarely seen you do that but i'm sure if you try hard and maybe watch a youtube video or three or something you can make a reasonable stab at it.

to a degree I think it's even simpler than that. I think they caved in that site and said we have successfully stopped them from being able to build bombs essentially. And then they said to them if you start to dig this out or try and repair the facility there's going to be a problem. If you leave it as it is that's fine we're satisfied And they started to try and dig it out and get back to refining material nor the warning. I mean no matter what the US bombed or how successful it was I ran can rebuild what was blown up. They were told not to and according to reports they were going ahead anyway and rather then enter into yet another round of negotiations or attempts to dissuade them the us and israel agreed they'd had enough. The initial strike could have been very successful and iran could still be looking at rebuilding. The two are not mutually exclusive.

LOL i guess that's your way of admitting you're a hate filled irrational bigoted violent nutbar We kind of knew that but thanks for taking the time to confirm

How's that working out for the Americans right now that there's a pendulum swing? How do you think it'll work out in Canada when the inevitable time comes here?

Cuz if you can't why are we even talking about this?

They promised everybody that it would be 2 percent of gdp in 2025. Did that happen or not? Budget officer, the guy who works with the numbers, says no. Have you noticed how much time you liberals have to spend explaining why it's completely justified and should have been expected that carney has broken yet another promise?

That you're a terrible person? Sure. That there may be a substantial portion of the left that is of similar quality as you? Sure And as far as I can tell everybody is kind of pointing at you and laughing or shaking their head. Wheee i guess? Nothing you can say ever has or ever will. You are literally the definition of inconsequential. Most of the time you just make me laugh. But there are times when you do make me a little sad, knowing that there are people like you out there in Canada who just don't care about human life and are so blinded by their ideology that they will actually hate other groups of people they've never met based solely on the fact that they believe differently will always make me a little sad. Sometimes I look at people like you and think "Is that really the best we could do with 4 billion years of evolution?" But, it is what it is Most of the time you make me laugh

First off I noticed you couldn't answer my first question, so I take it you've actually admitted that there really was no other choice other than going to war. Well there you go As to this question they had believed that that was the case. But reports have come in that while the facilities were damaged I ran would be able to replicate or get things back in operation relatively soon. And then they would be moving forward to complete a device. He was telling the truth insofar as they hit it and did a lot of damage but the amount of damage they did may not have been as much as they wanted. There's only so much you can tell from space pictures Was that your last shot? Did you have anything else or are you done looking kind of silly?

Who claimed it did? Oh, were you just trying to distract from the fact you were wrong again? Silly boy No, it's how the human mind works actually and it's entirely practical. If you believed NOTHING unless PROVEN (hi robo!) you couldn't get through your day. You can't think like that and actually function. Its similar to legal evidence. Only certain specific crimes require 'proof beyond a reasonable doubt'. The legal system could not function that way. So for other circumstances we have different levels such as "clear and convincing", which means the evidence is pretty strong (but could be wrong), and "proponderance of the evidence", or "balance of probability" in Canada, which is "more likely one way than the other". So you're entirely wrong. Having a strict and universally applied metric for evidence for something like a debate club as value because somebody is trying to win or lose in a debate club and you need to have rules the same as you do with any other sport. But the purpose of those debate clubs is generally not to actually discuss and flush out ideas, it's to win the debate I realize that for you your goal is to try and use some sort of technical method to win where you can't with logic of reason. That's why this whole concept upsets you But the entire world functions the way that I said it does and while that may be inconvenient for you you're just going to have to learn how to make logical arguments again. Sorry for the inconvenience

Actually not nonsense, that was reported. And iran had always claimed the damage was less than the US wanted it to be. You'll have to do better than "nonsense" if you're going to make a case that it's not true or is false reporting or the like. It certainly has the ring of truth to it.

So he's clearly an !diot. Even after he did think about what to say he couldn't think of what to say

Why was it not necessary? What other options have not been tried that we might have tried that would succeed? It seriously sounds like you're basing your opinion on nothing more than your bias. And the world can't afford to run on "Muh Feels". We've already got enough problems as a result of that kind of thinking. There could be no doubt that the Iranians are moving towards having nuclear weapons. That has been well established by numerous presidencies. There can be no doubt that the Americans have spent years negotiating trying to resolve this issue. And there can be no doubt that the iranians are funding terrorist groups on top of this which is already led to the Hamas israel war, the shutting down of the straight thanks to the houthis, and of course Hezbollah frequently causes problems. So what was your other solution that would have made this war unnecessary?