CdnFox

In other words you really would rather see Canada burn down. Well at least you're upfront about it You are a total liar You never voted for share and you've never voted conservative

Actually it could be argued that this is one of the worst. The others you mentioned weren't great of course but most were short, and the impact was relatively temporary. But this is a lot more permanent and i don't think you understand how bad it is. Already we're seeing a fair number of people die due to a lack of medical capacity that just wasn't a problem in 2000 or even 2015. People's buying power and quality of life has already taken a drastic hit and something like 25 percent of canadians used a food bank last year. That's pretty bad. The youngest generation feels more hopeless than ever before. Usually the young people are the most hopeful generation, for the first time they're the least hopeful youngest generation canada feels more hopeless - Google Search People are living in fear of what comes next, our economy is bleeding investment and bleeding good jobs, crime is high to the point where people are generally fearful for their safety, and on TOP of it all more and more people especially the young are feeling disenfranchised and without a voice, and they watch politicians play games to steal power. And there is NO hope of this recovering in less than a decade, and frankly every day that becomes less likely as carney fails to address any of the issues. These are right up there with all the other things you mentioned and threaten to be much worse with the pain spread over generations, not just a half decade or so 6 months before an election, rather than 6 months after. She had to immediately run and face her constituents. Little bit different

Same thing in BC. Back in the 90s it was proposed that in order to collect welfare etc you should have to be working as a crop picker or the like, or other simple but hard to fill jobs, then you'd get pay and welfare. The human rights folks had a melt down.

Google says you're a lying sack of shit, you lying sack of shit In fact going back to the 90's we find papers and documents refuting the idea that 'climate change is a crisis" Many climate change scientists do not agree that global warming is happening - PMC So. what you're saying is YOU"VE never googled it and you're entire position is based on non scientific sources. Whether most scientists outside climatology believe that global warming is happening is less relevant than whether the climatologists do. A letter signed by over 50 leading members of the American Meteorological Society warned about the policies promoted by environmental pressure groups. “The policy initiatives derive from highly uncertain scientific theories. They are based on the unsupported assumption that catastrophic global warming follows from the burning of fossil fuel and requires immediate action. This trend continued with many scientists publishing data and peer reviewed papers questioning if it's a crisis (PDF) ‘Global warming is not a crisis!’: Studying climate change skepticism on the Web Seeing as you like non scientific links i''ll give you one, but even this one links to actual research Evidence does not support ‘climate crisis’ claims | Fraser Institute "other research suggests what most people intuitively know---because Canada's climate is colder, global warming could produce higher benefits and lower costs for Canada than the U.S. For example, Canada's agriculture and tourism industries would likely benefit from warmer temperatures." The link to that study is in the article There are dozens more. BUt i've given examples spanning almost 3 decades. So I've got no problem finding tons of stuff that says climate change isn't actually a crisis Isn't it interesting that you can't find a single bit of science that says it IS a crisis Well if you want to stay on topic why not actually post some scientific studies instead of admitting you don't have any

This is their little game. If anyone challenges the idea that climate change is a crisis or questions what percent of it is man-made or not or whether we can do anything to actually change climate change they come back with this idea that we're denying the climate ever changes This is a logical fallacy known as reducio ad absurdum where they take a reasonable position proposed and reduce it to a ridiculous level to try to argue against it. It would be great if we could just have honest discussions about this stuff but.... here we are

OH you mean this one? https://science.nasa.gov/climate-change/evidence/ There is NO ORIGINAL SCIENCE ON THAT PAGE AT ALL. None. That is not a peer reviewed study, there's no science work, even the conclusions are not backed up or based in actual Research. That is a nasa propaganda page with zero scientific value. So no you didn't. You're a complete liar. And NO link has ever been posted here to any such work that i've ever seen and i've been looking and asking constantly. So not only do you have ZERO scientific research to back up your claims, you're prepared to lie about it. So why would ANYONE believe you or the other climate cultists about the subject?

You know, when @Goddess argues things she tends to provide proof. When she says the covid vaccines had higher risks than originally thought she posts actual peer reviewed research documents that arrive at that precise conclusion, and more than one. LIkewise i usually provide actual research to back up my science related claims, actual accounting research and gov't statistics for my economic claims, etc. Yet for some reason YOU can't come up with single actual original research document to support your claim. Why not?

Then... Why are you and everyone else being asked having such a difficult time producing any original science work? Seriously, every single person who's brought up climate change has been asked to provide an actual scientific study or the like indicating that climate change is a crisis right now and or showing that anything we've proposed to address it (like carbon taxes) will have a significant and measurable result. So far no one has, they just say the same thing as you. "The evidence is out there! Trust us! WHooo BOY there's a lot! Can't show you any tho..."

What kind wouldn't? Many scientific peer reviewed studies reports and articles use that term. There's even a peer reviewed study and a few peer reviewed papers on the crisis in peer review Most works define how they're using the word if it isn't obvious. So if THAT was your argument, complete and utter swing and a miss on your part. But heck at this point i'd take a scientific research paper that used similar words even if it wasn't specifically 'crisis' Unless it's not really a crisis. Certainly people TALKING ABOUT the research use that term constantly, and have completely dire predictions which they also can't back up as it turns out with hard science. IS that a fact. How on earth do you expect us tp take you remotely seriously then? It sounds like what you're saying is that no scientist thinks it's a crisis or is even sure that mankind's behavior is the primary culprit. IF that's the case then why are you trying to suggest people who doubt it are 'retarded' and such? You get how this makes you look right?

Carrying mostly peaceful explosive devices

We have better turnouts as a general rule than the united states does. All these claims were made as voter ID was brought in another countries and none of it has ever turned out to be true

The same way they claim that justin Trudeau is a great financial planner and that Carney is achieving all kinds of things. They detached their brains from reality and believe whatever their echo chamber tells them But I think it puts it to bed for the rest of us

None of that is scientific evidence. Show a peer-reviewed paper not a propaganda web page. Somewhere there must be a peer-reviewed paper that says climate change is a crisis and or one that explains Exactly how various proposed mitigation methods such as carbon tax specifically reduces that substantially Everyone knows the climate changes. Nobody disputes that. But it's getting to the point where it's frightening are you guys seem to believe this is a crisis But apparently haven't seen a single piece of actual scientific study the demonstrates it Still haven't provided a scientific peer-reviewed study that shows that it's a crisis or that anything we can do to mitigate it will be effective Because seeing as you can't actually produce that I feel like you're on the wrong side of the wall of retardation. You believe it's something without evidence

LOL ok that was funny, i'll admit it

Simple fact is they win whether Canada crashes or not. It doesn't crash they get to continue to milk it. If it does crash they swap in a new leader and claim only they can fix it and borrow enough money to keep milking it. If that doesn't work then they turn it over to the conservatives for 4 years and the conservatives start to fix things and then the liberals jump back in and say how cruel the conservatives are taking all these steps to fix things when they should be giving people free money And they control enough of the government that they know they'll get back in Did you see this today, the cbc literally banned their people from giving interviews to the CPC Finally, proof CBC is biased against conservatives | National Post

I never whined about it. Sounds like somebody's got a bit of a guilty conscience You think it's unethical so you want people to stop talking about it. I get that. It is kind of unethical even if it is legal You're not even making sense anymore. I say he's super easy to read and you say I need additional training to be able to read. Logic and reason reason really aren't your thing are they? 2 to 4 years.

But I thought it wasn't, I thought you weren't demanding proof! Anyway I cite this thread. Yes yes, you're very pretty, give me the picture you made and i'll put it on the fridge.

It's crappy watching another floor crossing, especially when it's quite obvious that this one is not based on ethics or morals the way that some in history have been. Obviously she's been bought out. But the fact is it is legal and while the liberals are slime balls they're playing the game and they're winning. We just have to remember that when we get back into power Yes. I've got pamphlets that are a longer read and harder As usual you can't actually argue against what she says, all you can do is whine Pot, meat cattle. Kettle this is pot If you have an idea of what's going on in the committee meetings then say so. It's not complicated

Well sooner or later we will get back in. The liberals can tilt the scales in their favor but they can't actually end elections The trick is we have to be very ready when we get back into cheat even harder than them and always remember that they will never do the right thing so why should we? It's unfortunate that liberal supporters have chosen to turn this into a race to the bottom when it comes to morals and ethics but it is what it is and we just simply have to rise to the challenge and meet the moment when our time comes

I appreciate your surrender Looks like I'm educating all the lefties on what is and isn't a war today. It doesn't need to be a declared war to be a war. But dropping one bomb on somebody is not a war. Seriously how are you guys having this much trouble with this simple concept?

Absolutely, especially in British Columbia where tree planting in the summer was a routine and highly prized employment gig for many university students. Just not 100% sure it's a military skills set

A two-way conflict is a war arguably but what you're talking about isn't a war. You drop one bomb on somebody it's not a war. You going and arrest a guy it's not a war. I think we can both agree it would be childish to pursue that sort of semantics. The current Iran conflict is a war that you would be absolutely 100% correct to say that he started that war. But the rest of it really isn't a war and vast majority of people understand that. And no, a threat is not a war nor is an embargo. Both could lead to war but they are not war. You were going to argue that you would say he started world war 3 because of the tariffs. You're engaging in pure hyperbole at this point. You might be able to convince yourself but you're not going to convince any other rational person is certainly not his supporters that embargoing Cuba is a war. I ran as a legitimate war and if you want to criticize him for starting wars you can talk about that and whether or not that should have happened or there are other ways to handle it but that's pretty much the only war you've got right now

oh you mean you want a cite. Yawn. People can read the thread on their own. I get that you're embarrassed that you said something which has now been shown to be stupid. You are there for trying to deny that's what you said. Just like you denied ever suggesting that there has to be proof and then immediately went on into say no what's your demanding is that there's proof You have a good day at school kiddo, take your teacher an apple and behave during nap time

This is what kills me. Multiple times we see people on the left here screaming about the science of climate change and how it clearly supports what they're saying. But the moment that we ask for the actual science so we can look at it every single one of them every single time is unable to produce even one single scientific document that shows that climate change is a crisis or that there's anything we can reasonably do about it that would have a meaningful impact And we're not talking about once or twice, at least four or five posters here have asked for that kind of science dozens and dozens of times from many different left wing climate hoaxers here It is quite obvious the science doesn't exist or if it does their opinion is not based on it

We both know I'm not sadly. But I'll answer it for you regardless. You're wrong. That grade three level response trying to deflect from your own stupidity and failings is your idea of a witty retort? Kid, once again you said something stupid. Instead of being an adult's about it when it was pointed out you tripled down on the stupid. And same as always you now want the stupid to be someone else's fault other than your own Kid. You are responsible for your own stupid.