CdnFox

But I thought it wasn't, I thought you weren't demanding proof! Anyway I cite this thread. Yes yes, you're very pretty, give me the picture you made and i'll put it on the fridge.

It's crappy watching another floor crossing, especially when it's quite obvious that this one is not based on ethics or morals the way that some in history have been. Obviously she's been bought out. But the fact is it is legal and while the liberals are slime balls they're playing the game and they're winning. We just have to remember that when we get back into power Yes. I've got pamphlets that are a longer read and harder As usual you can't actually argue against what she says, all you can do is whine Pot, meat cattle. Kettle this is pot If you have an idea of what's going on in the committee meetings then say so. It's not complicated

Well sooner or later we will get back in. The liberals can tilt the scales in their favor but they can't actually end elections The trick is we have to be very ready when we get back into cheat even harder than them and always remember that they will never do the right thing so why should we? It's unfortunate that liberal supporters have chosen to turn this into a race to the bottom when it comes to morals and ethics but it is what it is and we just simply have to rise to the challenge and meet the moment when our time comes

I appreciate your surrender Looks like I'm educating all the lefties on what is and isn't a war today. It doesn't need to be a declared war to be a war. But dropping one bomb on somebody is not a war. Seriously how are you guys having this much trouble with this simple concept?

Absolutely, especially in British Columbia where tree planting in the summer was a routine and highly prized employment gig for many university students. Just not 100% sure it's a military skills set

A two-way conflict is a war arguably but what you're talking about isn't a war. You drop one bomb on somebody it's not a war. You going and arrest a guy it's not a war. I think we can both agree it would be childish to pursue that sort of semantics. The current Iran conflict is a war that you would be absolutely 100% correct to say that he started that war. But the rest of it really isn't a war and vast majority of people understand that. And no, a threat is not a war nor is an embargo. Both could lead to war but they are not war. You were going to argue that you would say he started world war 3 because of the tariffs. You're engaging in pure hyperbole at this point. You might be able to convince yourself but you're not going to convince any other rational person is certainly not his supporters that embargoing Cuba is a war. I ran as a legitimate war and if you want to criticize him for starting wars you can talk about that and whether or not that should have happened or there are other ways to handle it but that's pretty much the only war you've got right now

oh you mean you want a cite. Yawn. People can read the thread on their own. I get that you're embarrassed that you said something which has now been shown to be stupid. You are there for trying to deny that's what you said. Just like you denied ever suggesting that there has to be proof and then immediately went on into say no what's your demanding is that there's proof You have a good day at school kiddo, take your teacher an apple and behave during nap time

This is what kills me. Multiple times we see people on the left here screaming about the science of climate change and how it clearly supports what they're saying. But the moment that we ask for the actual science so we can look at it every single one of them every single time is unable to produce even one single scientific document that shows that climate change is a crisis or that there's anything we can reasonably do about it that would have a meaningful impact And we're not talking about once or twice, at least four or five posters here have asked for that kind of science dozens and dozens of times from many different left wing climate hoaxers here It is quite obvious the science doesn't exist or if it does their opinion is not based on it

We both know I'm not sadly. But I'll answer it for you regardless. You're wrong. That grade three level response trying to deflect from your own stupidity and failings is your idea of a witty retort? Kid, once again you said something stupid. Instead of being an adult's about it when it was pointed out you tripled down on the stupid. And same as always you now want the stupid to be someone else's fault other than your own Kid. You are responsible for your own stupid.

LOL oh look guys.... a leftie is losing an argument and having strange homosexual fantasies Once again the left claims to be Pro gay rights and the tolerant people and so on but the moment they get angry they start treating homosexuality like it's the worst insult possible I'm sorry homosexuality distresses you that much. Clearly you think suggesting someone is homosexual is one of the worst insults you can think of. Gay people are just people dude, and it's not okay to attack gay people and use them as some sort of insult. Well at least you didn't call me a nigger so I guess that's something Nobody is more racist or homophobic or intolerant than the left. Here's the latest example we never go a week without seeing it. Shameful

But he hasn't actually spent the money. These are all things he says he's going to do and said he would do before the end of the year but hasn't done He promised that he would hit our 2% by the end of the year in real military spending instead he hasn't done that and he's trying to include planting trees as part of military expenditures

We were pretty effed When the military was in charge of Canada's defense. I don't see how were any worse off now

Sorry I think you got confused halfway through that, are you supposed to be the gold medal m0ron in that analogy? You're really not very good at this are you

Wow, I can always tell you're having a really bad day and are really emotionally hurt when you have to reply to me multiple times in a row and reuse the same memes So you admit that you said that this is what they should do, and that you continue to say that for a while, and now you're trying to say that somehow everything has changed. But you can't explain how everything has changed and everything's actually exactly the same. And it wasn't that long ago that you mentioned taking out Iran If you can't explain how things have changed and everything still the same then the only thing has changed is they actually did what you said they should and you're really angry because it's trump Which would make you a lying piece of shit hypocrite 🤣🤣🤣🤣 I just love rubbing your nose in the fact that that's who you are on a regular basis But i am , which is why you're story keeps changing. WHEEEE LOOK AT YOU GO!!!! What you're simply saying is nothing has changed and they're doing exactly what Next slower you said they should do but now it's trump doing it so you're angry You said if anyone is interested in peace in the middle east and a permanently and the conflict the way to do it would be to take out the Iranian regime. That's what trump is doing

When did I ever use the phrase "officially declared"? Do you need me to post some dictionary references so that you can understand that not all wars are declared wars? I realize you've got the english comprehension skills of a fifth grader but surely even you understand that you do not need to declare war for something to be a war No, sorry but it's a war. Every reasonable person refers to these large conflicts as a war. We had the Afghan Wars we have the Iraq War even the US government gave up trying to call Vietnam a police action and admitted it was a war I was afraid it would come to this. ONCE AGAIN i'm forced to teach you basic english skills No, a formal declaration of war is not required for a conflict to be considered a war under modern international law. Actual, armed hostilities (an "armed conflict") are sufficient to constitute a state of war, regardless of whether it is officially declared. Declarations have been obsolete since 1945. Do you have to declare war for a conflict to be considered a war? - Google Search "DERP!! WHAT WAR?!? ME NO SEE WAR!!!" Don't make me post the dog chasing its tail meme again

Nope, those were not the only dates you discussed it. And evne then that's not really what you said if you post your whole quotes. So trump is doing what you said should be done and you're,,,, unhappy? Were you lying? Or just hate trump so much you can't admit he's doing what you wanted him to? So you agree then that it's not actually a bit late. And you're feeling uncomforable about that. You absolutely just say it. And more than once. Which is why I'm bringing it up now. It's hilarious to watch you squirm when your own statements get thrown in your face later just because you didn't like who did it You're such a hypocrite

What happened to "I NEVER SAID ANYTHING ABOUT PROOOOOOOOFFF!!!! NO PROOF!! NEVER SAID THAT!!!! REEEEEEEEE LOL didn't take you long to make a mess of that did it. No it isn't, I just proved that, I posted an articles about it, that is stupid. It is appropriate for a debate club that you may have attended in grade school but it is not appropriate for non-line internet discussion, I posted part of the reasons why and explained it You are Beyond stupid. The circle back to your original position after kind of denying your original position is dumb This is why you lose almost every single argument you have on this forum. Get a clue

""unless we are extremely lucky, everybody will disappear in a cloud of blue steam in 20 years"." Kind of sounds like he's saying everybody's going to die to me

Sure, protests are exactly the same thing as voting. There you go everyone is franchised!

No, you demanded that the burden of evidence was on him alone to prove his point. If that's not what you're saying you're agreeing with me. In which case yes you're right. Everything I said was correct. Little weird for you to be admitting it at this stage of the game but yes absolutely The fact that you find a few sentences so hard to read and so draining emotionally and so upsetting does explain why you keep getting these things wrong. Maybe you should build up your tolerance for reading and learn a thing or two?

Absolutely!! DON'T VOTE AND PROVE YOUR POINT! Also, DON'T BREED! That's impotant too! "Take a stance! Keep your zucchini in your pants!" Also don't drive, it just encourages police to jump out in front of you and get hit which gives them an excuse to shoot! Actually if you could just stay in your basement and not bother anybody, that would be great You're totally winning big guy! WAY TO SHOW 'EM!!!!

You guys can't even quote one that says that this is an actual crisis. Dozens of people on this forum have asked dozens and dozens of times for actual hard science to show that this is a crisis or that actions that Canada could take right now with substantially alter that for example So I guess what we're really saying is this is the crisis

It's kind of what they do. Now some of the things, like rolling the coast guard into the military budget, I can kind of see that. I mean you could argue that it is a military style group and that its activities are similar enough that it belongs attached to the military But some of this stuff is outrageous.

And once again a lefty losing the argument immediately begins having weird homosexual fantasies. I will never understand this

Thanks! You're ugly and kind of goofy looking pretty much 24/7 But I love that this group that you had all these opinions about appears to be non-existent and you're only just realizing that half the stuff you believe is up there with Santa Claus I wouldn't call it cute but it is amusing