CdnFox

You still seem fake, and poorly coded. If you never been to school you realize that everything you just said is completely wrong. But I do have to admire your consistency

LOL i have been to both regularly all my life and the difference is immediate and obvious they are ALL different. My god man, have you never even been to a us city before? It wouldn't be that hard for someone to blend in, they're not THAT different, but they are VERY different to anyone who's lived in and visited both. And they always have been. they are not the same.

That's a lovely article explaining why he's down on his knees with his trousers down and his mouth open. Now is not the time to talk. He's been talking now for over half a year and got nowhere. Trump is still putting additional tariffs on our industries right now. Carney has failed us in every way possible.

Pot, meet kettle. Kettle this is pot. I'll leave you two alone now, you have so much in common to discuss

No, that's a lie and you're well aware of it. The polls were quite clear This is what I mean. You constantly spout obvious lies. And then you cry like a baby when nobody believes you.

Whereas you blame harper right? The fact that canada is weak is 100 percent the liberals fault. the fact that trump sees carney as a pushover who will give him whatever he wants is carney's fault. Other places have worked out deals they can live with, we're going into recession and business is fleeing. Carney was SPECIFICALLY ELECTED because he said he could deal with this. It's Carney's failure and the liberal gov't before him. Trump has always been trump.

No, property tax is... wait for it... a tax. It's not a 'fee'. All tax money goes to provide services one way or another. This is just a tax. You may pay fees ON TOP of the tax. But it's a tax. I thought you said you knew how this stuff works?

Dude you're a knowm liar, and it's painfully obvious that you're not attempting to mock anything. You can't get mad when people aren't believing you're telling the truth when you're operating with such an ,... er... honesty deficit to begin with You clearly support liberals. I"ve heard you speak out against china but you also think that the liberals benefitting from china is no big deal.

Dude the substance was dog poop IT would be the worst thing they can do. THe US is already a dumpster fire and it's best days are behind it. It's called independence. Don't make us burn down your white house again. In what way? Britain really hasn't had anything to do with canada or it's governance in about 100 years. America is already failing. You can see the signs the same way you can see the signs of the fall of the roman empire overtime. Every empire dies in the end and it's clear that the US has passed the halfway point We can. And we're fine with that

Why do you hate psychiatrists? They were probably having a great day but now....

LOL awww look at that Legato, you've hurt his feelings with facts and things he can't argue M0r0n a person having low intelligence or an intellectual disability. which is linksoul to a t

For me the distinction would be the intention to destroy the population. I differentiate this from simply attacking the population we're having the population die as an unfortunate side effect of other military actions. The allies bomb Dresden with the specific intent of killing civilians. Today that would be considered a war crime but I still don't think it would be considered a genocide. Their goal was still military it wasn't to kill all of the german people, it was to severely disrupt the germans ability to conduct war by creating a national catastrophe that they had to address and spend resources on and clogging the roads with civilians. With today's expanded definition there still appears to be some intent necessary to specifically target the ethnic group for non-military purposes. And I just don't see that happening a lot in this conflict. There may be individual cases, and there may be war crimes where populations were targeted when they shouldn't be, but I've never gotten the feeling that the end result or goal was to completely displaced the Palestinians.

Well hopefully it'll work out. It isn't Quebec's interest to secure this and not leave it up to chance for the future so I would still hold out hope that a deal is in the works

Sure, and as I recall harper lent a bunch of money to the Atlantic provinces to develop electricity infrastructure to the states. I agree that Quebec tricked newfoundland into an outrageously bad deal by exploiting issues that the current leader at the time had and that he acted in the worst interest for his province and not the best. But still it is a valid point that if you are going to use another Provinces land and access then they are due reasonable compensation

Don't be silly. You just set it to the temperature you want and hit "AUTO" and it handles the rest. What do you think this is, 1970!??!

Nobody should be expected to sacrifice on behalf of another province. Making accommodation is one thing but it's something else entirely to expect a province to bear risk and cost for no benefit while another province makes a fortune. Confederation is about cooperation not exploitation

I honestly think they thought the entire world would come to their aid, presumably after a week or so as the world has always done. We've seen many times Hamas attacks Israel, Israel retaliates and because Hamas hides behind its population there are civilian casualties and then the rest of the world screams about how unfair that is and give Hamas a bunch of goodies. But this time they went too far and the rest of the world didn't show up when it was supposed to. They sided with Israel instead and suddenly Hamas realized it had a tiger by the tail but there was nothing it could do. So here we are. They effed around and found out

Do you though? That is what i said. They don't care about the target as long as they're first. That is also pretty much what i said. They generally have a goal or a target and are focused on reaching that rather than just beating someone else. You suck at disagreeing. Carney is absolutely an opportunist. 100 percent. Trump not quite so much ( more of a narcissist) but he has that element too. an opportunist is neither negative nor positive. They don't care if they break your window or not, they just want the easy 20. If they can get it by opening the window they probably will. But the big difference is they didn't think about that 20 until they saw it in front of them. The Opportunist saw opportunity and took it. Whereas the othet two had something they were actively working towards. Carney wasn't thinking about being prime minister 10 years go, or even 5 years ago. He never ran for office, he never announced intent, Some liberals talked about recruiting him but it never went anywhere, and then he saw the perfect opportunity to try. So him and freeland set up a fake 'leadership race'. If that opportunity hadn't been there he never would have bothered. Trump had a goal. He was bound and determined to run again and win at any cost. Spent 4 years working towards that. not an opportunist.

Y can't be zero in Canada. There's no where in canada i'm aware of that doesn't charge property tax

Well you should be able to help us out with the mass thing, your brain seems pretty dense

Yeah, most of us call that 150 years of history, thanks for joining us

LOL nobody even mentioned PP, you're obsession is spiking again. And the truth comes out. Carney denied any of the pictures were real and said he never met either except maybe they were in the same room at some point because they both attended lots of functions. Now we know that's not likely true and his wife was her friend. In democrat land that would be good enough to convict her as a child molester.

Actually had to think about that for a second

sigh. You : But you don't pay tax unless it's a brand new home. Me: You pay property tax , there's definitely a tax you: DUH THAT"S WHAT I MEANT ALL ALONG WHEN I SAID YOU DON"T PAY A TAX!! Derp!!!! for god sakes man. The instructions for the bottle of Nyquil are not at the bottom