-
Posts
41,525 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
351
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Everything posted by CdnFox
-
Nazi Democrat Party Member Wants to Criminalize the Truth
CdnFox replied to WestCanMan's topic in Federal Politics in Canada
No massive cultural genocide was inflicted on anybody, and there is no such thing as cultural genocide. That's why genocide comes from the word genos. The only reason people try and shoehorn genocide into the discussion is because it's an emotionally charged word that they feel sounds really bad so if they can somehow include it they think it makes their case stronger. It doesn't And if it's not about us then stop asking us to pay for it, stop taking our money, stop demanding that the government solve all your problems. But most of all quit trying to pass laws that take away our rights while using the false claim that somebody took your rights away as an excuse. It's not only not true, it's stupid to say that if it was true -
Slavery- a new old economic model?
CdnFox replied to paxamericana's topic in Federal Politics in the United States
Sure. It has often been said that language is a stupid way to communicate just because of things like that "drive thru window". Turns out they don't mean that. Sounds more like indentured servitude to me, but I suppose it doesn't advance the discussion to nitpick the semantics -
Occasionally you run into people that have such poor self-esteem that there's personal sense of worth and value becomes transferred to another entity. They emotionally invest in their sports team of choice, or in a video game character that they play, or their political team, etc etc. And they associate theirsential own value with that other entities value. Essentially @ExFlyer thinks of himself as a good person only as long as the liberal party is doing well. If the liberal party fails he thinks he's failed. He also obviously believes other people are the same. If the Carney messes up it's exflyer's mess up too. This isn't entirely uncommon in adolescent kids. it's a difficult time of emotional instability for them and they may not have that sense of self worth most of us do. So they latch on to something like this.
-
It's already been pointed out to you that this was a lie. So I guess the question is if you have to lie and pretend that carney is doing better than he is, what does that say about you? And what does it say about carney Canadians don't want an election right now. It's only been 7 months. So they're a bad gov't, but they'll get a chance to fix that between now and the spring. I suspect at that point once we're close to a year they won't get such a break.
-
New Submarines: Carney vs Poilievre
CdnFox replied to August1991's topic in Federal Politics in Canada
Kid literally everybody here is pointing out what kind of person you are and it's not good. And he accepts your admission that you lost -
Your post was nothing but rampant hyperbole And emotionally charged language "everything Trump says is a lie. Literally everything." That is Factually incorrect/ That was how you started. You didn't get a single sentence in before making untrue statements Trump lies a lot. but many of the things he says ARE true as well. The rest is nonsense and hate filled opinion.. Trump has never accused hillary clinton of child trafficking as another example. Yet you claim he did so for years. Your post was nothing but vitriol over the top emotionalism basically saying how much you hate trump. The few tiny grains of truth that might have been located in there are Swept Away by the absolute river of sewage.
-
USAID dismantling kills hundreds of thousands
CdnFox replied to Radiorum's topic in Federal Politics in the United States
That's what i was thinking/ He went to costco last week and slaughtered a whole tribe -
So you CAN'T disagree with any of the points, so you resort to childish insults that wouldn't impress anyone past the grade 5 level Very convincing. you're clearly the adult in the room LOL
-
USAID dismantling kills hundreds of thousands
CdnFox replied to Radiorum's topic in Federal Politics in the United States
Yawn. Not giving someone something for free that they didn't earn isn't killing them. And just out of curiosity, what's the dollar figure you'd feel is fair to "kill" all these people for? 24 isn't enough, is it ok to 'kill' them for 50? 100? you must have a figure in mind, how much would it take of your personal money to be worth "killing" them over? -
Slavery- a new old economic model?
CdnFox replied to paxamericana's topic in Federal Politics in the United States
Fun fact side note, the:Ies that would eventually become Canada actually had a long like that back in the day. Slavery was technically legal, but only if the slave agreed to it. They had to have the right to leave at any time. Not "if they save up and buy their freedom' or the like, literally just "Yeah i'm outta here" "ok thanks for all the cotton" sort of thing. Slavery was shortly after that abolished and of course it was banned in all british colonies long before Canada was born but i always read about that and hear Indigo Montoya saying "Slavery. this word, i do not think it means what you think it does..." -
New Submarines: Carney vs Poilievre
CdnFox replied to August1991's topic in Federal Politics in Canada
This is precisely how it started. I replied to post from exflyer who claimed that science was in conflict with religion, i said no it wasn't and gave the example of the creation of the universe. THat's when you jumped in and started it all, and over nothing and you've spiraled out of control ever since. YOU were the one who said my agenda had been 'exposed' - conspiracy theory kiddo. There was no agenda - i corrected one twat's claim that science and religion are exclusive So the conspiracy theory term comes from YOUR POSTS. You accuse me have having some sort of ulterior motive and such. All a complete fabrication. None of my comments were wrong nor are they ignorant and are in fact quite mainstream beliefs. The bible cannot be taken verbatum word for word in it's entirety, Words have more than one meaning, context matters and there is use of metaphor and symbolism in the bible as well. Simple fact. well established and commonly believed. You freaked out over nothing and now you're big mad about that. -
New Submarines: Carney vs Poilievre
CdnFox replied to August1991's topic in Federal Politics in Canada
All the other comments have been the same. Like I said, you chose to read into it a whole bunch of stuff and you started a great big fight over nothing. That was my initial statement. The bible is not incompatible with science and Usually people who think it is are trying to take things too literally, and I offered the example of the world being created in six days where days as a word both in English and in Hebrew can easily refer to an age or time such as back in my day. This whole nonsense about there being some conspiracy or all of the other crap you came up with was in your head not in my words. All I ever claimed was that science and religion are not incompatible and that you can't take each individual word in the bible absolutely literally. All of which is true Now if you feel that science isn't compatible with religion that's it delete that you're allowed to hold, but that doesn't make me wrong. And if you believe that every word in the bible must be taken exactly as it's current dictionary definition means and that there is no context or use of metaphor in the bible at all and that's a position you can hold but that still doesn't make me wrong. Sorry kid, this was a complete brain fart on your part and nothing I've said is contentious or inaccurate. It's not a conspiracy, it's not projecting, it's not moving goal post, it's not any of the crap you seem to think it is. And for some strange reason as a christian you chose to attack the guy who said bible and science isn't incompatible instead of the guy who said that the bible isn't real and science proves it. You need to go sit and have a think about what you've done -
What are you talking about? Because it's socialist and there's no competition iCBC came up with a brilliant idea of not paying people when they're in an accident and our rates have gone down considerably since then. Turns out that when you are the state-run insurer all you need to do is get the state to change the laws and you never owe anybody any money : That's the great thing about socialism,the people have no choice BUT to agree with gov;t
-
WE sent weapons to the US?!?! They must have been so grateful, they would have been completely unarmed without our military industrial complex furnishing them with arms. You are a twat, but you're an amusing twat
-
Ummm. he did vote in person , it was added late along with one other person who had difficulties voting. "Conservative House Leader Andrew Scheer (Regina—Qu’Appelle, Sask.) and Conservative MP Scott Reid (Lanark—Frontenac, Ont.), chair of the national caucus, were initially absent from the House, but arrived late, saying they had technical difficulties with remote voting, and that they were voting “no.”" Liberals 'live another day' narrowly win budget vote, avoid election - The Hill Times Both their votes were recorded. as you can see from the vote totals LOLOL you got caught lying again little guy He's frightened because he's so tribal he doesn't care about anything but the liberals staying in power and he realizes he he has the ability to take that away
-
Nope. His promise: An end to interprovincial trade barriers. Achievement? Nothing. Trade barriers are worse than they've ever been His promise: The stimulate building new homes faster than ever in our history Achievement: 0. We're building homes that are rate lower than normal His promise: a deal with trump that Canada can live with Achievement: Less than zero. Not only do we not have a deal we have more tariffs than when he took office by far and our economy is suffering His promise: We would build at a lightning pace never seen for generations His achievement: Nada. There have been no new projects announced, and the only projects he's talked about is ones that were already progressing or had already started on their own. His promise: He would balance the operational budget within a few years Achievement: Big fat lie. The Parliamentary budget officer has proven that he cooked the books and will follow 100 billion dollars short of his goals and that he excluded things from the operational budget that every other country includes Carney has failed to cross the board. Since taking office he's achieved nothing. In fact he's made some things worse. Thank you for admitting you failed again. But honestly we already knew
-
I don't think the liberals wanted to go to the polls. I think they just knew that the other parties wouldn't yet. And they did back down on a couple of things and gave the NDP a couple of bones and gave Elizabeth me enough to get through the vote The bottom line is if an election is called the public will decide someone is at fault. It is not crystal clear who they would pick on although the liberals are definitely a possibility. Whoever gets blamed will likely suffer at the polls badly without knowing who that would be all the parties are somewhat nervous And for the NDP they still owe over 200 million from the last election, I don't think we can blame them considering they don't even have a leader And I think they all believe it sets the stage for the next confidence vote. In the spring they're supposed to either be a new budget or an economic update. I think it's a liberals are still disappointing all parties by that point and haven't had a deal the people can live with and the NDP has a new leader the liberals may find it a little harder. But the one thing that literally every single poster and pundit agreed on is that Canadians don't really want to go to the polls again right now so you can't really blame all of the parties for giving them r what they want
-
Toronto’s young, new male drivers could face $13,000 premiums | Toronto Sun Remember kids, sexism is wrong unless it's against males If anyone dares suggest that women should be paid last because they're more likely to go on mat leave or be less productive once a month the world would come to a screeching halt until that person was properly killed in a slow and painful process involving Puppy Chow and rabid poodles. But it's perfectly fine to say that we can categorize all MALES in a certain way. And while this may be a provincial story for now we're already seeing signs of this across Canada and even with the federal government. More and more it is becoming obvious that it is okay to be bigoted against one group but some other group is not and this growing sentiment is going to breed division and hatred the likes of which we have never seen. And in fact already is. We really have to start saying that this is either okay for everyone or not okay for anyone. Also what do you think the chances are of the average male sitting back and thinking "Well if I'm already paying extra for dangerous driving anyway....."
