CdnFox

I doubt they'll go belly up but i'm not so sure about the rebound. Carlson was a HUGE slice of their success. Depending on what happens viewers may well land somewhere else. Remember, its not just about 'news', it's about the entertainment, and it's hard to find really good entertainers like that. Well -assuming you consider fox to be mainstream media... I think you might be surprised there.

In 300 some odd years all i can think of is nixon. Who else had charges brought against them? And that still doesn't hold the 'gov't' in check. At best that means that one guy who broke the law got caught but the gov't itself was largely unaffected. It's about the same. There have been investigations by the RCMP before during adscam and also an investigation of the finance minister and his staff for insider trading back in paul martin's day, so it has happened but it's really really rare and the police DO usually say 'meh, we can't do anything even if there is a crime here". Well check the settings you used for google translate, that should tell you

Of course it's correct. The selling of goods produces wealth. If that gets cut off then there is less wealth and less prosperity. Don't make me explain how capitalism works That might be true if you were a communist country satisfied with the bare minimum necessary to support life. But that's absolutely not the case think of it like this. A guy with the right hunk of land could absolutely be self sufficient and live off that land and never 'need' anyone else. But that guy is NOT browsing the internet, he's not wearing modern cloathes, he's not reading the latest books. He's living a minimal life. it's much the same when you scale it up. A minimalist country could SURVIVE provided it followed a communal market model with only a little capitalism perhaps but americans want far more than that. Not how it works No, canada would still have you beat by a landslide in that department. Our psychotically abundant hydro power takes care of a lot of our electricity needs and we sell tonnes to the states as it is. But - america could be self sufficient in the short term. But probably only in the short term. It wouldn't be very long till america's energy resourecs were starting to get tapped unless a new form of energy emerges. Manufacturing for whom? You just cut off trillions of dollars worth of customers. Sorry but the US is just as dependant now. If that trade stopped, the us would suffer horribly. Well the last time americans 'viewed' things that way we kicked their asses back across the border and burned down the white house . I see you've rebuilt it. It's very nice. But joking aside You're talking about economics rather than sovereignty. And the bigger your economic area of influence the more prosperous you're going to be. This is true going back 3000 years. That's why cultures and civilzations built roads, developed naval tech. Those who didn't tended not to advance. There's a reason all roads led to rome, or why china invested fortuntes of treasure into the silk road. Isolation is stagnation. America could survive - but it would be much reduced and over time would become less and less. Simple facts.

BWAAAAAHAHAAHAHAAHAHAAHAHAAH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Careful kiddos - he might declare the emergency act and sieze your unions bank accounts Sorry but this is funny They were all demanding firm action when it was the truckers, now that the police are taking firm action they're horrified at the injustice of it all

He didn't say you said they did. You called someone an !diot and then did exactly what you called him an !diot for doing So that'd make you an !diot squared i guess:)

Sure kid Why don't we have some fun. Explain what you felt was wrong or inaccurate about the dr who quote from the point of view of physics. Betcha can't Betcha didn't even really get it

Kid, we've been over this. Trump did nothing wrong or illegal and there was no collusion. Clinton did far worse and you claim her actions were angelic. For three years the dems claimed that trump illegally conspired with the russians and that turned out to be absolutely false. You might as well try to argue the earth is flat. You're going to have to find some other witch to burn i'm afraid.

and they've chosen to make this political instead of medical. Which is wrong. The premier absolutely can. If the premier says 'that requirement is gone", it's gone. So as soon as she said she'd look into it they made the demand. They don't. You screwed up and assumed she was older. The stats show there's no difference at her age AND WORSE for your case they show the chances of dying either way are almost zero. There's no debate here - that's what the charts say. So your charts proved that there is no medical basis for this. Next time do your homework before throwing up the first thing google gives you without thinking it through. Of course you do. If her age bracket is not at risk then it's not at risk. You effed up and now you're trying to spin it but we both know that's beyond stupid. Clearly there is NO risk of being unvaxxed based on the latest data you kindly provided. But instead you posted one showing 57 year olds aren't at risk. Thanks. That's all we needed to know. Anything else would be pure conjecture and smoke and mirrors on your part. People her age are safe. Holy crap guys - i think i broke him.

You trade with almost everyone. You do about 4.7 trillion dollars in trade. That's out of a 21 trillion dollar gdp. You do a LOT of business with the world. And if you're going to include canada and mexico then that's still not the US - so the best you could say is that north america is fairly independent -but that would mean the US is dependant on canada and mexico. Especially canada. Yet your title is canada is screwed. But your whole independence concept requires canada. And as we can see here you actually do a lot outside of north america https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_the_largest_trading_partners_of_the_United_States Remember that bad recessions involve a drop in gdp of only a few points. So blowing that off as nothing is simply not reasonable. Further a lot of those goods are ones you can't really get without tradiing. Yup, it do. Sorry. About 5/6ths of that is incorrect. Mexico is not a viable replacement for china for about a dozen reasons. China actually produces a pretty high quality of product, that's why the us buys so much. And while i'm sure there's going to be more investmet closer to home att the end of the day companies aren't doing that. Minor investments only. China is still the main supplier of many critical components. The car industry shut down until china could start selling them chips again. Sorry - America is still very dependent on the rest of the world. And it always will be. You're about 600 years too late for an america that doesn't reuqire a bit of trade to get by

You guys went into a major tail spin the moment china couldn't supply computer chips. and you do an aweful lot of business with the rest of the world for someone who's "independent". Sorry the us is anything but these days. That was clear during covid. that's a discussion that really needs to be had. It's cheaper ot have a decentralized supply chain like we do, but a global hiccup can put the economy in a really bad place. For everyone.

The thing is we've had all that in canada for decades, yet routinely get better voter turn out that the states federally. The idea that this is suppression is just ridiculous.

Well no. All else being equal doctors should be the same - not infallable but of equal credibility. However - in this case one group of doctors is ignoring medical evidence and appears to be pursuing an agenda, to the point where when it looked like they might be overruled by other doctors they threatened the woman unless she immediately caved to their wishes. So I have reason to question the motives of one set. YOU on the other hand simply pick the ones you like because you think the woman deserves to be punished for her stupidity. Ahhhh so you ARE a medical doctor now. There is absolutely no reason to believe that is true in the slightest. Further - she's already had it 2 times with no serious effects. AND as a result, as the medical information shows she's as immune as she would be if vaxxed. No it doesn't. Not in that age bracket. That was a 100 percent swing and a miss on your part and i think we both know it. Ther's no salvaging that What? When was I in the military? I don't think i've ever suggested that? I do understand triage fine having done some time in a health care environment but again - there is NO MEDICAL BASIS FOR THIS DECISION. She's got immunity such as there is from this variant, she was already cleared, and they are playing games. This is punative. It's just that simple.

Some even less than others it would seem

Denial is the first sign you have a mental health issue. Mind you so is thinking you're a girl when you're a boy, but i digress..... IKIDDING! I kid! ) It's everywhere. Every day there's a story about trans people picking fights over something. Trans story time for toddlers, or trans demanding various washrooms be changed, or trans competing in sports for women, or trans teachers with massive fake breasts, or trans wanting to shower with members of the opposite sex, or trans laws and such being debated and passed in the house, and of course... trans beer drinking. Look at this board - there's not many days when there hasn't been a thread about trans people or issues on the go since i came here. No other topic has such constant coverage other than the war. And we've contained that to one thread. Lying to yourself wont change anything.

the doctors who did the analysis she provided do. Any other questions?

OF course i did. But i can understand english. So i probably understood it better than you. Also, you dumb. So there's that.

It's valuable when i repurpose it OF course you didn't get the refreence because you don't understand any of this. Next time i'll talk about something more your speed. LIke lego or something. LOL - it's a perfect representation and it's hilarious And the fact you would say that very clearly demonstrates you have zero understanding of it Which would be fair, most people don't. Physics isn't something that interests most people. Most people think schrodeinger was just some guy who hated cats. But - you felt STUPID not knowing it for whatever - and are desperately trying to google it to figure it out And now you're making statements that prove you didn't know anything but are the kind of person who'd try to fake it Kid - you's dumb. LOLOL - aww you poor little guy you TRIED to look smart and you blew it There's an old saying about it being better to keep your mouth shut and be thought a fool rather than open it and confirm it for everyone

Actually that was better than you have been

"think" might be a strong word for you to be throwing around

So has bud. Both have long histories of it. It's not the issue. As i've said it's foolish to think given the scope of the backlash that this is really about people disliking trans people. It just isn't for the most part. The majority of people just don't give a crap if some he/she drinks a beer. This is about wokeism and throwing this crap in people's face night and day. You can't go 5 mins without hearing about the poor trans people. For YEARS now. And now you can't even have a beer without it being political. That's the backlash. If you talked that much about kittens people would be fed up about kittens. The trans political movement has gone too far and now there's a backlash.

Awwww muffin - it's always adorable when children throw a tantrum when they don't get what they want Sorry little guy, maybe try facts or reason next time.

Sure, but it shoudln't be political. What makes it so is the facts. Denying it over and over again doesn't make it false. There is no medical basis for her exclusion. It proved her argument. So there is no medical reason why she should be denied. Based on her age - the chart you posted says there's no difference. Did you MEAN to prove me right? And if the doctors decide you don't deserve help because of your political views, you'll be fine with that right? Here's a little extra tidbit. They told her that if her name came up and she hadn't been vaccinated they wouldn't proceed. Danielle smith heard about the policy and said that she will seek a second medical opinion on whether or not this policy is necessary or useful. TEN DAYS after that announcement she gets a letter saying if she doesn't get the shot immediately she'll be dropped from the program, which means she dies. They did not want to give her time for Smith to look into this. Sorry - 100 percent political. And that's a bad reason to kill someone.

Yeah but we probably won't notice any immediate dif,345oq82349 0w9847 q308q0w98 qwy yqw[w [CENSORED]

At this point yes. And widening the gap https://338canada.com/alberta/ Campaigns matter and they haven't really started yet - but notley is REALLY underperforming in that regard right now. I'm honestly disappointed, i thought all things considered she'd be out of the gate like a bat out of hell building momentum. Instead she's almost invisible. Election day is may 29 - the official race has to start soon. Obviously Smith is going to go for a short election cycle as that favors her, so right now notley and her friends should be blowing out the doors with media and advertising while it's still off the official books - but they're not. I was kind of looking for an interesting fight and i'm not sure i'm going to get it. What i thought might be Van Dam vs Stallone is shaping up to be Chuck Norris vs Urkle.

LOL - awww you're so cute when you get all flustered like that "could" lead to pregnancy doesn't mean "did" . And they can't find out till at LEAST after their period is missed. Do some reading. HAAHHAAHAHA - Tell me you know i'm right without telling me Nobody said you claimed a human being is created at conception. I said "IF YOU ARE GOING TO...." . It's right there in your quote. If you don't feel like a complete retard right now, you should If you're NOT going to claim that then as i noted previously you've got no case. Life is meaningless. We kill life all the time. Cancer meets the definition of life. If the fetus is not a human being it has no human rights and it cannot be said to be murder. Ahem... from the first line in your own link: based on the right to privacy contained in the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. Exactly as i said. ANd if you read the case you'll see it even more. The question was whether or not abortion is constitutional. it was not commenting on abortion itself. You are totally begging me And you do this every time you realize you've blown it You become irrational and then beg and whine that i should admit you won Sorry kiddo. I think everyone can see who blew this one lol Apparently It's my place to be correct and yours to be the village !diot But i really didn't need you to put me there, i was there from the get go