Jump to content

CdnFox

Senior Member
  • Posts

    41,407
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    351

Everything posted by CdnFox

  1. Then why doesn't that say what he did with it? You say they know - but they don't seem to So they don't know. So - no proof of collusion. Everyone lies to the committee. All that suggests is he doesn't want to talk to the committee. Hell - HILLARY lied to the senate committees she was in front of too. But it doesn't even come close to suggesting collusion, Do you see ANYTHING there that says trump asked them to? Or aided them in that attempt? Nope. Nothing. No collusion. I'm sure russia wanted to hurt clinton, i'm sure Trump wasn't upset to hear that, but that is NOT collusion You can lie all you like - but the committee doesn't say it's collusion, mueller doesn't say it's collusion, none of the evidence presented shows collusion, THERE IS NO COLLUSION. And lying about it won't change that.
  2. It's not collusion. Sorry. So what's really happening here is if ANYBODY who even knows trump speaks to a russian about anything - it's collusion as far as you're concerned. Which is a lie. In every way. NONE of that is collusion. At all. Which is why they don't use the word 'collusion'. How is it collusion? What 'collusion' is going on? There's none. He talked to him about their game plan. Well that's nice - but that's not collusion at all. In what way did that affect the outcome of the election? Sharing YOUR strategy to win with someone else is not collusion, it's not a crime, it's not anything like that. The most LIKELY reason to do it is to convince those guys that you're going to win and they'd better be ready to do deals and work with you and not help the other guy. Remember - russians had already supplied the fake steele dossier info. So it's pretty likely trump was giving them a heads up that he was goingto be president so maybe don't do that But the report very conspicuously does NOT say 'collusion' - does it. No collusion kiddo.
  3. LOL - so now you're having english issues? That's not what a 'strawman' is Typical lib - use your 'fallacy of the day' calendar and accuse the person of whatever today's is. FFS, learn what words mean before you use them. The chart shows that the relevant age range has NO difference AT ALL. You obviously missed that when you went looking for that graph to prove a point you'd already decided before looking at the evidence You screwed up. Now you're trying to recon it to make it look like you just had a really bad point instead of a complete eff up. There's no difference. Sorry. It proves i was absolutely correct for her age range. Which is what we're talking about. Nice try tho It is THE ONLY THING relevant to the above point, You TOTALLY screwed up and now you're desperately trying to defend the indefensible. You are quickly progressing from 'i made a mistake' to "i'm an unmitigated retard who's such a desperate loser i can't even admit i made a mistake in an online discussion". Pathetic. Say it slowly with me .... The.. Chart... Shows... There's.... No... Risk... At.... Her.... Age. There's no medical reason to refuse her. You just hate people who didn't want to get vaxxed.
  4. As you have lied several times. No collusion kiddo. As EVERYONE has pointed out to you. And this is after YEARS of investigation with SEVERAL DOZEN experts who are bias against trump and desperately wanted to bust him putting in a massive effort to find SOMETHING. And nothing. No Collusion. Of course the dems still try to deny - how else can they justify the millions and millions wasted on this. But - facts are facts.
  5. Funny enough the gays and lesbians tend to hate the trans historically. I was friends with a few trans and a fair number of gays and the trans always said the gays and les treated them worse than the straights did and the gays always expressed a great distain for the trans. And both suggested this is pretty normal and acknowledged in their communities. It kind of surprised me because in my mind they're sort of in the same boat, both face judgement for their sexuality and gender issues and both have been persecuted in the past so you'd think they'd sort of be natural allies, but they definitely DO NOT see it that way.
  6. Dogs and cats sleeping together .. Mass Hysteria!!!
  7. naw - just the two of you. You remind me of pee wee herman Except, y'know, less manly.
  8. LOL! well i have to admit you know, every time i see a particularly shapely cephalothorax.... aarrroooooo baby!!!!
  9. Hypocrisy, the cornerstone of all leftist rhetoric.
  10. You missed one point and its key to this - "if you're not willing to hear about the trans agenda 24/7 then you're a hater and a nazi". People are SICK of it. They're sick of having to sit through 24 hours of trans talk all the time, and sick of having to nod and agree constantly or be labelled a nazi. People who once liked trans people are going to come to hate them, just out of frustration with the left shoving it down their throat constantly and calling everyone who doesn't immediately agree with every part of their agenda racist and a nazi.
  11. Hey bozo - i'm not - and i see your comprehension and reading skills are as poor as always But lying is your stock and trade so....
  12. Of course he is. This kind of pathetic clinging to a lie which was obviously a lie from the get go is why the dems are unfit to lead their country. As biden is proving daily. But you have to admit, The "that's not a committee report that's just the commitee reporting" angle was pretty amusing
  13. Oh look - admits she was wrong but YOU are the bad person for MAKING her wrong LOL! Remember crackho - children LIKE nudity and kink!! That's what the planners of these events say. So we all know it's more than just Aguilera. Don't we. If you have to lie to make your point, you probaby dont' have a very good point
  14. My place must be standing on your back while you lay prostrate on the ground then HOws my boot taste? No, sorry but no married couples or single couples "manage this trick". That's stupid. And i said it can easily take 4 weeks (sometimes a little more) to get an accurate reading, AND - sometimes you get a false one. So it does not leave a lot of time to realize you're pregnant and make arrangements to deal with it. And then there's cases where girls are on the pill or using another kind of protection and for whatever reason it fails. That happens. So they aren't THINKING to look. And suddenly they realize htey should have had their period a week ago and they get suspicious and maybe then they check but now you're pretty much at 6 weeks. it's not a lot of time. Sorry. And the fact you'd feel the need to lie about it shows you know that's the case. That is the opposite of what you said. I was the one who said it was based on the constitution and whether or not abortion was covered by it I've read the case several times over the years, discussed it with a number of people who are into american law You've been exposed as a liar and dishonest person kid. You were ENTIRELY wrong with what you said previously about roe vs wade, you are ENTIRELY wrong about women being able to know the moment they're pregnant and you STILL Haven't made any case that the fetus is a human so you have no reason to claim it's murder. And you keep begging like a little biatch for me to let you 'win' and crawl away because you know you've got nothing. You're pathetic. Back under your rock troll.
  15. Not really. He was arrogant and felt that the liberals coudn't be defeated (which was true for most of his time in office for sure). Arrogance can sometimes look like 'balls of steel' but it isn't. There's little doubt he was tough but his real issue is that he thought whatever he did he was untouchable. As we would see elsewhere. Awww muffin. Frankly when does it ever come up in public? And to be entirely honest if they HAD gone it would not have been seen as a bad thing. History wouldn't be recording it as some disaster. Hussein WAS defeated and he WAS a problem - the us didn't lie about THAT. So its not like it's a case of 'thank god we avoided disaster" its more like 'Well, its probably best we didn't go. This is the guy who screamed at every camera he found that the GST was evil and was gone the day he got in office. Yet it wiped out our deficit and he kept it. Any appologies there? The left out and out LIES about many of the great decisions harper made, while quietly doing them in the background. Remember how we were 'muzzling scientists'? Those same laws are still in place but now it's fine because it's trudeau. Remember when they bought mortgages from the banks using the CMHC and the libs said it was so terrible? Saved hte country and guess who did it himself when covid hit. On and on it goes. Frankly like i said, it's probably the best decision but NOT BY MUCH. Going would not have been a bad decision either. I think this was the best but there you go. They weren't quite obviously fake. They were actually relatively plausible. It's easy to say that after the fact but there was a fair bit of evidence presented. The left operates on morals? Chretien was the same guy who presided over the whole sponsorship mess, gave his friends illegal gov't loans, strangled a protester and raided the ei fund for 70 billion dollars and pretended it was 'surpluses'. He HAD no morals. He was a scumbag who was SO arrogant that HIS OWN PEOPLE REVOLTED AND THREW HIM OUT. And the same liberal party that now has been in front of the ethics commissioner and found guilty of major breeches (criminal ones at that) numerous times, tried to interfere with the justice system, funnels cash to their friends through single sourced contracts, and who's leader groped a woman and blew it off as 'sometimes women experience things differently'. Yeah - i'll take 'stick by your allies' over THAT kind of "Morality'.
  16. The opposite is true. Most of us don't care about trump. But we don't like liars. And that'd be you. Trump did not collude with the russians to 'fix' the election. That's obvious to anyone with a brain. The problem is that you and your kind are so brainwashed and emotionally invested in the near-religion that he did that was spun over 3 years that you lose your minds and start seeing trump supporters with glowing red eyes every time someone speaks the truth to you. Seriously. You should think about that.
  17. Sure he did. He said specifically there was no evidence of him interfering with the election. Any collusion that resulted in an effect on the election would have been illegal. So - no collusion. At least you admit it now. Took you long enough
  18. Exactly - there's no evidence at all trup did anything wrong or that there was any collusion, None zero zip. All the reports agree, he committed no crime and did nothing wrong Sorry little guy, but we need some PROOF if you're going to make that claim
  19. Nope, went back and skimmed it when i realized i hadn't looked for the nazi thing (kinda rude seeing as i asked for it) and noticed the wiki link. Which mentioned an old german law about crossdressing. But you werent Where's that evidence? yeah - cool story. Now - where's that evidence you promised?
  20. Believe your ally? Makes more sense than believing your enemy
  21. Nahhh - didn't really read them I'm sure i'ts not news to you but nobody here takes you seriously, You're constantly wrong, you're a vicious anti-semite, you're kind of a scummy person. But - its entertaining to see you dance and jump and fling poo like a monkey so we entertain you But sometimes i just don't feel like wasting a lot of of time with your garbage and just read the first bit and just do a simple reply - you can usually tell because i only quote the first line or so. Sorry sweetie... you didn't think you were ACTUALLY relevant did you? Skimming it tho i didn't see any proof that the nazi's were against trans Did you dig that up or were you just lying about it? Oh - and transgender isn't crossdressing, and the law mentioned in wikipedia existed prior to the nazis. So - any actual nazi documents against it? No/?
  22. it took none of those things of course. But what's more interesting is that you've decided to take a topic that most people from across the political spectrum could probably come together and say 'arguably it was the right call' and have a discussion over and instead decided to turn it into a confrontation. THat's kind of pathetic. Harper was wrong, but for all the right reasons. He believed the us and if bush had turned out to be telling the truth we'd be singing a very different tune. He wanted to stand with our allies, which is actually a very correct thing to do in most cases. We lose prestige and a lot of power when we don't show up. And hussein was a bad guy for sure - and irag hasn't tried to bomb the us since. So. While harper probably made the wrong call it's not due to a lack of any moral character at all. It could have gone either way. And at least the right has the nuts to say he got something right when he did, your pathetic lot can never do the same when the situation is reversed.
  23. I literally counted it out for you. It's been 2008, 2012 2016 and 2020. This isn't hard. Well, not for most people. And considering you specifically referenced 2016 it's really two, but hey - don't let facts or logic hold you back. LOLOL - well i'm sure you try to convince yourself of that. It helps cover your own struggles with your emotions But first - i'm not an american. I don't really care either way and honestly - i think trump or biden, you're a little screwed either way So - no getting mad for me. Second, i was right, and this whole 'it's been so long' routine is absolutely hilarious I mean you've come up with some pretty dumb stuff before but this is impressive And third - all of your tells are starting to come out. Which tells us you're upset and angry, and i wasn't sure why but then it occurred to me.. you think trump could win the next one and it's frightening you. College or not if he wins the next one after all that's happened it proves America has rejected the left entirely. Well, you shouldn't let it bother you that much. You've got a year and a half to go, you'll take that already damaged brain of yours and shatter if if you spend all that time in fear,
  24. Where did the nazi's speak out against trans rights specifically? Could you show us that? Unless you're making it up of course
  25. Having emotional issues is positive? Well - i guess it probably helps keep the voices in your head from being able to all gang up on you, sooooo sure? LOL - you are so easy to damage You're just a fragile little flower at heart aren't you
×
×
  • Create New...