CdnFox

Sorry, hamas and the religious fanatics are definitely left-wing. And so are there supporters, only has to glance at America and Canada to see that. It sure as hell ain't the proud boys out there supporting Hamas But as usual you have to lie to try and make your point. Which means you don't have a very good point

Don't know this guy from a hole in the wall. Sorry not a credible source and he's not citing anything i can look up. Bottom line is we gave away gear we needed and we havent' replaced it yet. That i CAN verify. Not like us, we were far worse and we're the ones the us cares about. Announcing is not buying. What do we actually have. Nothing? But haven't bought anything, That was over a year ago and we still don't have any. They are now requiring soldiers who aren't currently deployed to return their gear because there's a shortage. So maybe we didn't actually wind up buying it in the end? We sure don't have them now even though it was supposedly a year ago No it isn't and you've already seen that you're political knowledge is far below average. The bridge is absolutely an issue with a competing bridge in the area having paid trump tons of money to sour the deal for example and that's been widely reported. You simply don't know what you're talking about You mean they'll say they'll take our money if we offer it. That's nice but we haven't actually paid anybody anything or signed any deals of any substance. Or have we ordered submarines and aircraft that I don't know about? I understand just fine. And I understand carney hired a whole bunch of people to make sure it happened faster than ever in our history and yet it isn't. And the Americans aren't stupid and they look at the situation and they realize carney is playing games. We're not actually spending any more than we usually do on military stuff we're just adding a bunch of stuff that you didn't used to be military into the equation and pretending that our spending went up It's all fake dude. It's like when they gave a raise to the military and then cut back on the deployment benefits so that it wasn't really much of a raise at all and for many actually a pay cut Ourselves with announcements we'd be the toughest country in the world right now but as it is we haven't actually improved our military preparedness at all

Isn't that what the referendum is? An effort to GTFO of your country? i feel like you're sending mixed messages

That doesn't mean that they or the us forgives canada for being so far behind all these years and doesn't expect them to spend money FIRST on military improvements. Sorry to burst your bubble. Like i said it's been a year and what have we actually bought? Our guys hare having to turn in their backpacks because there's not enough to go around. Do we really need to spend 5 years buying backpacks? We can't do that faster? Carney hired his banker buddies at a million a year plus benefits just to make sure procurement was faster than ever before. They are delaying the Gordie Howe Bridge because a competing bridge paid trump a lot of money. Fentanyl and calling our PM governor is about trade deals. But this does appear to be about military spending. They're pushing Carney to make decisions about fighter planes and actually buy submarines and other equipment so the candidates preparedness is actually a real thing. Of course they'd like a significant amount of that gear to beat American, that goes without saying, but this isn't just pressuring people for the fun of it. Americans and the world are looking at Carney's so-called military spending and coming to the conclusion that it's not very military. Our military is not actually substantially better off to Dave than it was a year ago after he got elected. Despite him swearing that procurement would happen faster than any time in Canadian history That's just the way it is. Say what you like but we really can't defend our position very well at the moment.

no, PP wasn't buddy buddy with castro But even if he was at least castro wasn't trying to directly interfere with or coopt our democracy or sign secret deals with his version of the gestapo. There's always been trade and interaction with china. Harper was a little more harsh with them, when they stepped out of line he invited the Dalai lama to visit and basically told them it gets worse from here if you continue. But since Justin we've been more and more and more pushed into the corner and forced to do whatever they want and now we're signing secret deals with their secret police? what the hell! Well they have to be concerned about it. There's absolutely no reason to believe that every single secret candidate knows isn't being funneled to the Chinese at this point. And it becomes a trade irritant as well. But what really pisses me off is we signed to deal over this but we didn't even get anything in writing about not having those terrorists put back that they took off temporarily. So we didn't even get it written deal on tariffs but the RCMP has been forced to sign a deal to give them Intel and cooperation

RCMP won’t release China policing pact despite Conservative, NDP pressure - National | Globalnews.ca The RCMP says it won’t release the full agreement it signed with China’s Ministry of Public Security without Beijing agreeing to do so, despite demands from the federal Conservatives and NDP for answers on what it contains. Robin Percival said the memorandum of understanding signed in January “outlines specific forms of mutual collaboration” on policing, the exchange of information and investigative assistance, but did not give further details. “The RCMP will not unilaterally make public or share the contents of an MOU with a third party without the concurrence of the other party,” Percival said. “As such, the RCMP is not releasing the contents of the MOU at this time.” So the RCMP signed a deal to cooperate with china's secret Police Service who we know has been interfering in Canada and we're not allowed to know the details. Carney is selling us out. This country is in serious trouble

Absolutely lie. Other countries including the Americans will see if we are trying to skirt the rules and bend the terms in order to make it look like we're complying when we're not. And the Americans just fired a shot across our bow for that very reason and there's nothing we can say to argue. What matters is if our military preparedness is going up and were able to fulfill our roles in NATO. And right now it doesn't seem that anyone has faith that we will

Yeah I would try and rewrite what I said to if I were you. It was pretty stupid Nobody said it was. Once again you try and rewrite what was said to recover an argument that you've already lost. By we all I assume you mean the other voices in your head. You're already failing at critical thinking and nuance in this very thread. In fact you're failing with basic facts and simple logic. Wow, only took you three tries to get there. I know, math is hard. And the point is we don't have those 50 but we claim it as military spending for our military. It isn't, it's foreign aid. And it is these things and others like them that the Americans look at and shake their head and say we're not actually serious about military spending. It's not that complicated They've been going on about military spending since the first time trump was elected. You can't pretend that it's some fake thing he doesn't really care about. What he's saying loud and clear is that canada has always been seen as an ally and now they don't as much. They don't think we spend enough, they don't appreciate how canada says we should be forming a coalition to fight them which is essentially what he said in Davos and he's pissed off. But there's no doubt that they don't believe we've made any kind of serious commitment to military spending and preparedness and that has been an irritant for ages You can try and play it off but it's quite obvious but the Americans are recognizing what everyone should see is a simple fact. We are not spending money on actual military preparedness and Improvement. And just to hammer that home .... Canada military news: CAF members asked to return gear We don't have enough BASIC FRIKKIN GEAR to outfit our military. The people not actually deployed have to give theirs back so we can get by. Are you going to tell me that's another thing it takes 10 years to research and buy? Rucksacks and backpacks? Thank god we have a shortage of soldiers, we wouldn't be able to outfit them if we had a full team it would seem.

Doesn't make any sense. I've tried twice now to get you to articulate your position. A man who can't articulate what he means is a man too stupid to understand what he's saying . Are you such a man or can you actually state your meaning without sounding like a fortune cookie that got made on a Friday?

Of course I did and once again everyone saw me and now everyone thinks you're a liar again. Not that that represents much of a change Can you point to it on the map?

https://www.canada.ca/en/canadian-coast-guard/news/2026/05/minister-mcguinty-announces-816-million-investment-to-strengthen-canadas-maritime-security.html Yeah great, but that's not military spending. the coast guard is an important patrol/rescue force for sure but it's more about policing than fending off an invasion. And you're talking about an average of 116 million a year. I mean, great, the coast guard probably needed that. But it's a small amount and it's not military spending. It'll go under the defense budget but nobody would say that's going to keep canada safer from invasion than it was, that's just upgrading stuff it already uses.

Ok, so your position is that those countries who are primarily reliant on foreign trade moreso than or above their domestic consumption of domestically produced goods for their economy are the 'primary' people you are referring to when you reference "WEF Globalists". Or perhaps it would be more clear to say their gov'ts are who you mean. Is that accurate?

??? Literally every government in every country is export oriented. We all have to do business with each other. I think you would have to expand a little bit further than that

LOL what a lying sack of shit you are As i CORRECTLY pointed out at the time, battery storage is massively expensive and requires a huge land space for the same amount of power you can get from gasoline. Which is why i CORRECTLY pointed out that until it's as cheap and easy to store electricity from solar (or wind) as it is to store gasoline or oil then solar will never work as a primary power source And that's ABSOLUTELY true, and i gave you the links and the math. A "container" that stores 100 kw of electricity in the form of a battery would be ten times the cost and the size of a container with enough oil or gas (LNG whatever) to create the same amount of electricity. That's absolutely true. And you fought against that like a complete ****** before eventually breaking down into tears and running off. Statement was correct then, the statement is correct now. It is necessary as part of having enough electricity for our needs to be able to store the energy and use it as needed. Batteries are insanely expensive and hold a very small amount of energy for their size. Oil storage tanks are cheap and hold a tremendous amount of electrical potential energy for their size. And that is why solar and wind power cannot and will not be able to replace oil gas and nuclear as primary power sources And you look like a complete twat trying to argue against that before and I can't believe it would be stupid enough to bring it up again and relive looking like a twat the second time

Did Mike Pence get hanged? The conservatives want make Pence dead he would be dead. He won't come say things in a moment of anger but the reality is like Pence was never even attacked. However this is the third attempt on trump's life in a year and there has been a crap ton of other left-wing violence Also the events you're talking about happened almost half a decade ago. This has been thoroughly discredited. The problem is the left defines right-wing violence and left-wing violence very differently. If somebody who is a trump supporter commits violence then it is considered right wing violence even if there's no evidence that their political belief was a factor in the violence. And, a person is 'considered' right wing or a trump supporter if they EVER voted republican But if a Bernie Sanders supporter who kills is not considered 'left wing violence' unless there is a clear political motive, and i mean CLEAR. So all you have to do to make the numbers look like that is redefine things so that left-wing violence isn't violence and right-wing violence is I mean consider this: "From 2022 through 2024, all 61 political killings were committed by right-wing extremists" what about Luigi Mangione (2024): Charged with the high-profile targeted assassination of UnitedHealthcare CEO Brian Thompson in New York City. Entirely motivated by left wing politics, shot a man in broad daylight in the name of social justice. It doesn't get any more left wing, But "Shockingly" your stats don't count him, an avowed left winger who killed someone for political reasons to make a political point. All you've got is lies buddy.

I don't even recall seeing it before now and i very clearly said it's not ok with me. Once again you have to lie to make your point. read the thread. It's what you've been doing all along. In fact despite your claim above where you say I didn't condemn something, it is YOU who have not only failed to condemn this but defended it vigorously The left is all about hatred and violence and bigotry and you're living proof

I did right in front of you. I brought up all of Einstein's letters and went through them with you. He didn't say what you say he said, unless you take one letter out of context. He thought Israel was great and was going to be fine and was happy that jews had a Homeland The only reason you bring him up is because you realize everyone thinks you're stupid and you're hoping that your argument will have more credibility if you try and claim somebody smart agreed with you. Sadly that just makes you look more stupid

Were you reading your own words there? You sure are mad when i repeat what you say back at you Sooo.... what i said then. We gave away about a third and our guys still don't have even half of what they were supposed to. In other words i was right. Well... thanks i guess? Requests are nice but they're not apcs. And they can be canceled. Right now we do not have enough apcs to fill our needs and the Americans are looking at this and they're saying we're not taking this seriously. And they're right. You can whine and cry and dance and come up with bullshit and complain about what you yourself said as much as you like but it doesn't change that We rode off things like trees and a coast guard and military gear that we gave to someone else that does us no good as spending on our own military preparedness and the Americans obviously don't buy that anymore than any other same person would But I could see why you want to try and change the discussion considering you know I'm right and you would look like a twat trying to argue with. So you try and come up with something fake that nobody mentioned to argue about. The liberals have a very long history of canceling military procurement contracts. What matters is what we have in hand and the answer to that is far less than we should and obviously in the Americans don't think that's changing fast enough

Make believe seems to be where you prefer to live now

Oh so you're saying we make shit and our lavs are bad? or are you just trying to dodge the conversaion? We sent 50, not a few. And we still haven't come anywhere close to meeting our needs, not even half. And god knows if we wind up giving those away too when we get them. But my point stands. We gave away about a third of all of the ones that produced to Ukraine and chalk that up to our military spending. But in reality those 50 units did nothing to increase our preparedness. We don't have them. Good thing they're crap I guess, so we don't miss them

In other words you can't. Largely because they are actually factual. First you claim I never gave you a link, then you admit that I gave you links. Then you insist that something isn't factual just because I say so and when I question that you claim you were right because you say so I swear to god it's like you're trying to embarrass yourself. You have some serious mental health issues. You don't come here to contribute you come here to try and make yourself feel more important and deal with your self-esteem issues by attacking people and then when you get slaughtered in return you get buthurt and have little hissy fits That's not normal kid Oh sorry, was that too many words for you? I know you can only Mumble to yourself so fast

In your case because one of them gave birth to you and lets you live in her basement

Awww muffin Truth hurts does it? I notice you still couldn't actually refute any of it Facts are facts and if YOU can't demonstrate otherwise then you can't really argue it can you LOLOL are you actually replying and quoting YOURSELF?!?! And you think I'M the cheap entertainment? LOLOL kid, you're so messed up you're making HIM look almost sane

You're talking in your sleep again

For sure. And what he is noticed is that people do not buy his narrative I can see through his cheesy attempts to defend the indefensible, so what he's trying to do is substitute a credible person other than himself because he thinks people will have a harder time arguing with that more credible person So because we all point and laugh at him he tries the argument "Look! This really smart man is well respected agrees with me honest!" He feels that it will shield him from people pointing out that he's stupid because it's harder to argue that Einstein was stupid. But Einstein didn't say what he's claiming. He's taking one of Einstein's many letters and twisting it slightly out of context to try to make a point. I've posted ALL the einstein letters and gone through them with him on this forum and His interpretations are not terribly honest or terribly accurate. I'm sure you're shocked