herbie

Oh FFS it's over. Give up with starting multiple threads of the same shit to vent your frustration.

Don't like May? Then state an actual reason. Your discrediting her as a tool of Hamas simply for not licking Nethanyahu's balls is as pale as a F*ck Trudeau is for an argument. If you don't like her, a damn good replacement is now available in Victoria. Better spoken, younger, more civil and photogenic too. I'll sign the nomination papers if you will.

The "Facts" are offensive as they are neither facts or truths, they are repeating old redneck myths and stereotypes. You should be ashamed to repeat that shit.

Your home is a principal residence, not subject to any capital gains tax. Should the start letting you deduct mortgage payments, it most likely will be. We (the estate) did get dinged selling the family cabin. You are correct though as when my Dad sold the family home someone said he should've waited a year and got way more. He answered that he made over $10,000 a year raising a family and using the house for 50 years. That's why you BUY a home, not rent. They're not disposable items like cars or appliances. They're expected to go up in value. You just made a good argument for a UBI. One program to manage, one Ministry to oversee.

Hey dummy the election's OVER. Maybe you should've ranted against the GREENs, looks like they'll be calling the shots.

Read a real newspaper for once. Or watch any station other than FOX. They're pushing the bullshit that Kamala's the one not talking about issues and plans. As if blabbing incoherently about the size of Arnold Palmer's dick is.

But let's continually ridicule any alternative that actually would benefit working people. Back in the days when progressive wasn't a dirt word, Mulroney was talking daycare problems and possible solutions. Here 40 years later, some total buttheads are dismissing solutions as if they were a waste. Hell we were shelling out $800 a month for daycare back in the mid 1980s and envying our DINK friends. Took both of us working union jobs back then to raise 2 kids, and all we got was a tax write off for daycare. How in hell would someone making $1000 a month then afford $400 for daycare and survive? Shit, I won a $50 scratch back then and it took two of us to the Keg for dinner & drinks. Here we got people who still think it's 1957 and Dagwood goes off to work while Blondie stays home and raises the kids.

That she DID work at McDonalds and Trump's a f*cking liar like always. Read a real newspaper for once.

It has if you'd like to look at the data. In spite of the fact you're unable to understand basic math let alone data sets. There aren't any deaths from safe supply or safe use sites. So therefore the deaths are from fentanyl, not safe supply. Should the deaths go up, it would mean more people are using street drugs, doesn't it. Which kind of makes ranting against safe consumption disingenuous. Your gripe is actually against druggies being in your face so you can't pretend that's not a serious problem you can avoid addressing. They've already been outlawed from using in public places, you'll just have to avoid the back alleys and corners they're pushed back into if you wish to continue not acknowledging there's a serious social problem. Going back to locking them into institutions sure didn't reduce the number of addicts in 100 years of trying, did it? So do you actually want to solve the problem or not? Sure doesn't sound like it. And pi$$ off with the radical socialist bullshit, it merely flouts your ignorance.

If you're going out of your way merely to be offensive then you're doing a good job. says the actual roadblock

McDonalds replacing Ronald with the bigger clown Donald.

You live in a culture where everything is about making money. It's the incentive to get things done. Don't tell me you forgot that too? Or are you one of those from the Can'tservative camp of Negative Nellies?

I saw your reason. It failed to include any way they could have done what you wished and retained anything of their own culture.

Don't you understand that Republicans are not bound by the law is part of their fundamental platform?

Well thank you for your down vote. I'm not here for a popularity contest, it's a discussion forum. So do tell us which or what your big objection is? Can't or won't say it out loud? Already know it's not valid? What is it?

Ah ha ha ha! The libbie leftists are crying just because they think we should be held accountable for criminal acts just like them! Ha ha ha smiley face laughing face LOL We're running an actual criminal fraud artist candidate and they can't stop us hah hah hah... Deplorable is about the politest word in the English language.to call these Trumpalos.

I know you are but what am I? right back

That's exactly what I said. That's hard enough to do anytime, plus tack on security reasons, you won't see evidence without clearance and it won't be tried in an open court. Way more than simply 'difficult'

Oh FFS show us how politically ignorant your really are. Parrot rightwing dog whistles and buzzwords in ad hominem attacks as you can't even defend your own position. WTF does reconciliation have to do with Marxism or even any political philosophy? What? What is it really? That you're a selfish jerk jealous of anything someone else gets that you don't? That you're an outright bigot that hates natives? OR a wishful dreamer like Flyer who thinks that if you have a group with nothing and give them nothing they'll miraculously 'pull themselves up by their bootstraps' and become middle class? As if they should've saved up off welfare cheques and invested in Tesla and BitCoin?

She lost because she didn't run in her own riding and bit off more than she could chew. She also came 2nd in a riding that's still NDP'. Firstenau also made the comment you're ridiculing because the 'atmospheric river' was happening again, not some random heavy rain and only those so thick in the head they'll deny their own eyeballs to repute climate change have congealed into the Brand Name of conservatives. As do the ones mentioned in the news clips that voted 'against Trudeau" and the lady who said she would vote for Kamala Harris. All the dimwits sheltering in the 'one big tent' of the BC Conservatives. Mike DeJong kept steering conversation to 'Free Enterprise coalition' to keep the spotlight off the fringe of weirdos. He is a NORMAL conservative.

Let's make it as simple as possible for everyone. Voting will be like driving a car. Pick D to go forward Pick R to go backward

As usual, entirely backwards. We did it to them.

So can he sue Trudeau and win? Can he find a lawyer who'll get a security clearance to go into a closed court alone, because Peterson probably can't get one, and win? And you'll still never know anything other than he lost or won? Is it even worth giving a shit about some loudmouth getting offended?

Oh FFS what a TLDR rant. ??? A simple analogy was just too damn complex for you to understand???? Like they say: try to make something foolproof and God will make better fools.