Nefarious Banana

Not in my book. Trudeau . . . the steaming coil of Canada, and Singh a close second.

Would it be safe to say that Justin Trudeau is likely the most reviled person in Canada ?

A history lesson to be shared for educational purposes. Gun control advocates: What compromises and concessions are peaceful, responsible, and safety-conscious firearm owners willing to make with this latest legislation to keep Canadians safe from violent crime, especially involving firearms? Peaceful, responsible, and safety-conscious firearm owners: Let's put some context around our answers first . . . *In 1913, you required us to have a permit to carry a handgun. We complied. There was no discernable reduction in violent crime. *In 1920, you required us to have a permit to possess any firearm no matter where it was stored. We complied. There was no discernable reduction in violent crime. *In 1932, you required us to provide a reason (only two were permissible) for having a handgun. We complied. There was no discernable reduction in violent crime. *In 1934, you required us to locally register our handguns. We complied. There was no discernable reduction in violent crime. *In 1938, you required us to renew our registration every five years. We complied. There was no discernable reduction in violent crime *In 1951, you required us to centrally register our handguns. We complied. There was no discernable reduction in violent crime. *!n 1969, you designed the classification system so certain firearms could be prohibited on a whim. We complied. There was no discernable reduction in violent crime. *In 1977, you prohibited automatic firearms. We complied. there was no discernable reduction in violent crime. *In 1979, you introduced screening and safety courses. we complied. There was no discernable reduction in violent crime. *By 1994, you required a photo and two references to apply for a Firearms Acquisition Certificate, imposed a mandatory 28 day waiting period, made safety courses mandatory, expanded the background check and screening, reclassified certain firearms, introduced regulations for storage, transportation, and use, and prohibited standard capacity magazines. We complied. There was no discernable reduction in violent crime. *In 1995, you introduced licensing to have and buy firearms, and to buy ammunition. We complied. There was no discernable reduction in violent crime. *In 1996, you required us to get your Authorization to Transport certain firearms, and authorizations to carry certain firearms in very limited conditions. We complied. There was no discernable reduction in violent crime. *In 1997, you regulated shooting clubs, shooting ranges, and gun shows. We complied. There was no discernable reduction in violent crime. *In 2001, licensing became mandatory. We complied. There was no discernable reduction in violent crime. *In 2003, you required all firearms to be registered. We complied. There was no discernable reduction in violent crime. *In 2015, you introduced firearms prohibitions for those convicted of domestic violence. We complied. There was no discernable reduction in violent crime. *In 2019, you passed C-71, which would pave the way for circumventing parliament, and to ignore the experts' analyses (Law enforcement, firearms functional experts, community groups, etc.) which you claimed to base policies on, in any further restrictions. We complied. There was no discernable reduction in violent crime. *In 2020, you prohibited some 1500 models of firearms for absolutely no reason other than politically pandering and cowardice in addressing escalating violent crime. We complied. There was no discernable reduction in violent crime. *In 2021, you reduced judicial consequences for those illegally using their illegally acquired and already prohibited firearms. It didn't affect us, as it didn't apply to us, and violent crime rates continued to climb at an alarming rate. *In 2022, you banned the sale, purchase, and transfer of handguns. We complied. Violent crime rates continued to climb. *Also in 2022, you proposed this absolutely useless, enormously costly, and completely counter-productive measure of prohibiting even hunting rifles and shotguns even though the statistical significance of them or their owners being involved in a violent crime registered at the extreme right of the decimal point. And yet, violent crime continues to escalate. So, what compromises and concessions are we willing to make at this point in what has been over 100 years of faulty logic, deceptive public messaging, malicious and misdirected prosecution, and bad faith negotiations, while completely ignoring the contributing factors and root causes of those most at risk of violent behavioural trajectories AND increasing your leniency for those who actually commit horrifically violent crimes? Absolutely none. Copied from another website.

Grow a few vegetables, eat moose and elk.

How did you come to your conclusions regarding 'as yet un-tried' Pierre Poilievre? Some think you're the "mouthpiece and wind up toy."

Thinking you don't own a firearm.

Saskatchewan farm business owner talks about the federal governments fertilizer goals . . https://youtu.be/LMG4kuEN_kM

Disarmed and disillusioned . . . . yeah, we Canadians are a tough bunch. No one's going to push us around, except the armed criminals, and a narcissistic dolt and sidekick Jagmeet.

In conversations with friends, acquaintances, and others . . . . there is a palpable hatred toward the present Liberal government, and especially towards Justin Trudeau. Canada has devolved under his leadership. Disturbing times . . .

The investigation is over with the predictable results. Trudeau and his band of trolls now know that they're completely 'un-touchable' . . . . free rein granted, carry on with impunity. The precedent has been set for future Emergency Act 'emergencies' . . . . such as parking violations, littering, or even openly questioning this appalling federal government on their behavior and their propensity to deceive. Carry on Justin, make Hardner, ExFlyer, Queenie85, and their ilk happy . . . . . and remember Justin, Canada loves you.

Trudeau a psychopath? Mentally ill?

Colton Boushie, 22yr old Cree . . . . . shot and killed on August 9th, 2016.

You're using QueenBee's "yeah but, yeah but, yeah but Harper" . . . . line of ?thinking?

Gerald Michael Butts . . . . . puppetmaster supreme.

ExcessiveFlatulence . . . . always standing tall for Trudeau.

Hoping your constant negativity doesn't get the best of you.

Poor assertion. Hear both of them speak, listen to what they say, you and I don't need letters behind our names to discern which one has the smarts. You could have degrees and letters coming out your ying-yang and still have your shoes on the wrong feet.

You don't need the alphabet letters behind your name to have good sense, vision and intelligence.

Presuming you can read . . . . 'The Origin of the Deadliest Pandemic in 100 Years' by Elaine Dewar

You're a fool . . .

Suicide? Crime? punishable by death?

Trudeau apologist . . . . yeah but, yeah but, yeah but Harper.

Canada's embarrassment . . . . . Justin Trudeau.

What are you implying? The Final Solution is at the ballot box. Don't you be a coward and get out to vote when the election is called.

Guessing that there's more than a few Canadian citizens pondering a Final Solution for our appalling federal government . . . . . ??