H10

It was obvious all of the cops were so scared of yatim, even after the 9 shots and before the tazer discharge, notice how they all ran backwards from yatim. I am not saying it was even a reasonable fear. Why did Yatim have his penis showing on the bus to the passengers?

Both of them were about equally big. People like you shouldn't become cops, they have a deep unfounded paranoia. If you are a cop, you will likely get punched or kicked, and you can't shoot people for doing that. There are some scenarios like when the tazer fails and the guy is coming on top of you where you might have to shoot him, but its a last resort not a first. Wilson didn't even attempt to use the tazer, he had one, it was obvious he was planning on killing, frankly, white cops shouldn't be allowed into african american neighbourhoods.

Lol, who send all those soldiers to back up the vietcongs?

I agree with your general claim, we should report bad lawyers to the police. However, why would it surprise you that the law society would protect lawyers? It is after all a LAW society for LAWYERS, the LAWYERS PAY THE FEES. Why would they care about you? And since when do professional organizations go after their own kind. This is how Canadian society is and has always been. Police protect police, journalist protect journalist, lying bryan willians and fared zakaria and pierce morgan commit huge sins and still get to be on tv, teachers protect teachers, nurse and doctor protect their own kind. Everyone looks out for their own kind and profession. I agree it SHOULDN'T be like that, but you seem to think it ISN'T. If a doctor makes a medical mistake that kills your sick mother, the nurses and other doctors will cover up not help.

Only far left liberals take evolution as a given or think it is "fact" when it is at best a theory far from ever being proven. Evolution in its broader form is incompatible not only with morality but with science. It claims matter literally appeared out of nothing. A blatant lie.

I was not surprised at all, China is a country built on human rights abuse, and is about the worse human rights abuser in the world. Do not forget their number one ally is North Korea and the communist in Vietnam. It is how their culture is and how these people are. This is a country with forced abortions and mobile execution vans, where people fall through elevators and life is cheap. Why would they behave civilized?

Its not America's gun culture that is the problem, it is America's violence culture that is the problem. A country founded on violence, where the government regulated violence and endorsed people to engage in behaving outside the law for hundreds of years using armed terrorist bands, has created a culture of violence plain and simple. From the Wild Wild West to the Ku Klux Klan to the confederates and stealing indian land and african people and so on. America has an addiction to violence and war and crime and it is all state sanctioned. When you give an 18 year old guns unlimited send them over to Iraq and say have fun, then expect literally hundreds of thousands of these young men to return home in America and adjust normally, its insane! America's violence culture is the real problem, but that tears at the heart of the fabric of who they are. So instead everything else will get blamed, jews, guns, money, poverty, blah blah blah

At this point I'd be surprised if Hilary one, firstly, she seems to have done something grossly illegal with the whole computer scandal, and she will be lucky if she doesn't get arrested in my opinion. Secondly, Sanders is closing in on her, he has the largest rallies save for Donald Trump of any candidate and he is really really popular and well liked. Where Clinton has the right rhetoric, Sanders connects to young people because he has the right actions. And Sanders is either tied or passing or within 10 points of clinton in most the major battle grounds and there hasn't even been a single debate yet. To put this in context, Obama was not even polling this time in 2007, they hadn't even debated. Clinton is going to lose badly.

Don't the white republicans blame the deficit on non-whites? The only reason why minorities ask the majority white culture to fix their problem is because of the nature of the system. Think about it rationally. if you are 10% of the population who has little control over government, and the government is the other 80% of the population...with 90% of government control over laws etc. it becomes difficult to fix problems that do not require the majority input but may need government force behind it. Income differentials is a problem. However, a poor white man is nothing like a poor original man. A poor white man can become a rich white man with a lottery ticket or be like Donald Trump or Ted Turner and get rich go bankrupt and get rich a bunch more times again. I don't know if you noticed this, but a poor white man can get rich a bunch of times. If a original man gets rich and goes poor he is not going to get rich again. And that is because the countries like USA where built for white people. The stick about religious pilgrims coming is a lie. There was a bunch of places in Europe they could have gone for religious freedom, and they were all christians anyhow. Europeans came to Canada and America because europeans were running out of farming land. America was considered the best country because the government would give you free land, and free labour through indian land stolen and african slave labor, so the view was well if you cannot succeed in an agricutlural based society with free land, free labour then you cannot suceed anywhere. If a poor white man becomes a rich white man no one is going to call him a chink, no cop is going to pull him over and card him for being white, he isn't going to have to face the discrimination that a rich original man would face. So I think there is nothing in common. Addressing poorness issues won't help because the problem isn't just poorness. It is a part, but you cannot address a sexism problem by saying well women make less money and are more likely to be poor so lets help the poor. No, you have to address a sexism problem through fixing sexism. You have to fix a racism problem through fixing racism. You see deny that SOME of these are race problems mean they continue. So if you say ok police cannot card poor people. Ok, well know they just card any original guy in a nice car. Not everything is a race issue. And bear in mind there are racial legacy issues from colonialism, slavery, apartheid etc that people who are non-white are still grappling with today. There is no real room for white people in these conversations, they are issues that those people need to resolve amongst themselves. There is no affirmative action or education equity for african or carribean canadians in Canada. Only for aboriginals. I am not that old, but I recall applying for university, they only asked if I was aboriginal. Not my race/culture. The very presence of a white person can have a negative impact on these groups.

Most non-white people learn quiet quickly that when white people are around it is just best to not talk about the issue of race or racism. This is because the white people accuse you of being the bad guy for calling someone elses' racist behaviour out. Even if you aren't calling them a racist. Do non-white ever tell whites to solve their own problems. Did Obama lecture whites in New york City and vegas about having to take personal responsibility for the financial crisis they created? I certainly never heard him say you white people created this crisis fix it on your own. Only whites tell non-whites that. As far as I know Canadian universities do not ask your race, so I am not sure how they are discriminating, except maybe aboriginals who I think get affirmative action in Canadian admissions. First you tell me people who share skin color have nothing in common then you tell me brown skinned asians have something in common... discrimiantion in the application process. If you are going to lie at least keep the lies straight. I don't care about people of color, that is just a pc line made up by racist people. All people have color, even white people have pink skin. And who died and made you the people of color king? Thus it is good to keep out the whites, because a normal white person wouldn't show up to an event like that, its not normal.

The public schools already do pick and choose certain cultures. Even when they think they are being neutral, what do you think the "neutral" culture being taught in Ukranian or Russian schools are? Now Canadian? = white. As it stands now anyone of any race can go to an Africentric school, but the fact that not a single white in a region of millions of whites has chosen to do so, tells you alot about what they truly think of diversity. Diversity is only for african carribean folk. They want to send them to everyone else's schools but the other groups don't want to go to theirs. Diversity is putting 1 african kid in a white school, but it is not putting 1 white kid in an african school school. The city of Toronto has over 100+ cultures, it is by no means realistic to teach them all, throw on all the faiths on top of that and you are looking at an impossible amount of learning. You are also missing the issue, this isn't just about cultural learning. Alot of this is about white and non-original racism aimed at african and carribean students. The politics of teachers unions makes it impossible to fire them except for near crimes, further even if you could it would be reactionary and often too late and it is in nature often difficult to prove to a standard sufficient for most whites to accept or do anything about. Rather than trying to convince white people of racism they believe doesn't exist is occurring in the classroom it seems far more logical to set up your own school with your own teachers and not have to worry about fixing white racism which is a world wide endemic problem. This is the hypocrisy, the french have their own province, their own schools, teach their culture in these schools and religion all on public dime when do the african carribeans get equality and get their own province, their own schools, teach their culture and religion on public dime. Oh, I see because the state has decided to give preferential treatment to white french people's ethnic group, every other ethnic group should sit down and shut up and eat three lumps of coal. I am glad you are showing your true colors. Is this your idea of equality? One group gets billions and has schools and special treatment and another group is denied it all and has to pay for the first groups welfare and handouts because they are the wrong ethnicity. Sounds a whole lot like the separate but equal arguments of the past. Before you claimed you thought that "My point is we all can after school, send our children to places where they can learn culture specific to their family origins but in a public school, it should not pick and choose only certain cultures." IE. cultural neutral. Now you show your true colors as "public school should reflect the values of Canada and that is; 1-aboriginal history and values; 2-British history and values; 3-French history and values;" In otherwords you have never been for culture neutral, you are for british, french etc culture, which was precisely my point which you were trying to deny. This is the precise hypocrisy your ilk engage in. Pretending to be for neutrality when youa re indeed for white cultural supremacy. I do not like the idea of seperate schools for brits, french and italian catholics but we have them. When you are saying you are that centric schools delay having to deal with discrimination issues what precisely are you trying to say? Are you saying you'd rather see minorities discriminated earlier in life when they are more vulnerable and morelikely to drop out? Or are you saying the whites won't learn how to not be racist if they don't get to beat down on minorites during middle school? For a carribean student to go through elementary and high school with only african teachers would be highly beneficial because then when he does encounter racism, he'll have had teachers who have taught him how to deal with those issues and he'll have already been on the road to success so white racism cannot stop him at that point typically speaking. There is no good that comes from african carribean students being around white teachers or white pupils who racially attack them. Your perspective is indeed eurocentric and white supremacist, you admited it earlier when you said you were for a white power education that focues only on teaching white culture. Your jewishness is not comparable to being original because jewish are not originals and they are not african/carribeans. There is no one else like african carribeans in Canada, they are an exceptional people, the jewish cannot be comparable it is an apples and oranges flaw. All minorities do not have similar experiences, the jewish aren't getting carded and pulled out of cars and beat up and being called kikes by the cops when they commit crimes. They aren't demolishing the jewish parts of town in nova scotia. Then your argument is wrong. Isolated from mainstream. mainstream =british/french white to you of course? Is American segregated from England, or did America separate from England? America separated from England. Is it a problem that canada detatched from England? Of course not, these are only problems when someone african/carribean wants to do it. When African nations wanted to separate from England they sent in armies to murder of people by the millions, when white Canadians did it at the same time it was widely welcomed. Any word or concept about commonality is just being used as a code word by you for white or british/french. This has already been established. So when you are talking about a white vision, african carribean original people do not fit in there, they are not white. Further they don't want to be part of your white token world. Canada is a cultural mosaic we are suppose to form our own islands and stick to our own kind. And yes so far your position has been a straw-man. You know I am not arguing for segregation but you pretend as if I am arguing for segregation. It would be like calling Quebec french separatist French segregationist. And then going on to talk about the bad of segregation. That is a straw-man to a T. Instead of arguing why separation might be good or bad, you instead choose to argue against segregation,an argument no french separatist is really for. I won't reargue the funding issue with you because you have been proven wrong, I provided reliable data showing private schools are really gettin public funds all across canada. You claim the government shouldn't discriminate yet you are fine with a british and french centric curriculum, isn't that discrimination? What about the afro-centric schools are exclusionary any more than the eurocentric schools like the french and english or italian ones? You had no issue with the public schools focusing in on british and french histories, why is the africentric schools focusing on histories relevent to those people any worse? You idea that white or british/french is neutral is just inaccurate and plain discriminatory. Further you fail to prove how it is bias to focus on afro-carribean original culturehistory when you simultaneously claim it is not bias to focus on british and french history. The problem is you don't take your own advice, you want african and carribean originals to pay for your british and french schools which is discriminatory. LOL, yeah Canadians will only fund white segregation I guess. As for incest, I'm not personally a fan of it, but genetically it does have both good and bad. The bad you mentioned, but the good is that it tends to produce people of extremely high intelligence. It was why it was so widely practiced throughout the ancient world from egypt to rome to the monarchy of england to this day. In fact there are some theories that the reason you have so many highly regarded euro jewish scientist is because of inbreeding. It stops where you cannot find enough kids to form a school. So if you only have 10 kids no school, but if you can find at least 20 in the same age range then sure knock yourself out. Its a racist stereotype, o really, how about we look at how these respective cultures think and treat of african and carribean people where they are from. What are those marches and beatings they do to africans in Israel about? African and carribean people are done with your ilk. They don't want to be around your kind anymore and argue about racism. They rather just seperate from you and build their own things and be happy away from you. Most originals cannot publicly speak their mind for fear of white retribution, but deep down they know it is true, there is no room for them in white spaces and they are unwelcomed. I don't think they do but if they did its nothing of the level at which the mutant races do it. Taxes come from public coffers, I already pointed out Alberta fully funds faith based schools with public money. You clearly just don't care for facts. I am using the standards and precedents arguement. If there are 80+ schools for every culture, you cannot whine about another one having it. They have been typically tricked by white folks with false advertising to go to Europe. The reality is how can a resource poor place like western europe actually even support more migrants. At least if the Africans were going to Russia to get some of the resources I'd get it. They are being tricked. the Europeans in the west know their land is worthless. It is why they always invaded everyone else. So they are trying to trick the africans to leave africa so they all go to europe and then steal african land where all the resources are. I say clap clap, very clever plan. When you look at the actual wealth, a country like Zimbabwe or Congo or Malawi has much more resource wealth than most comparable european western states. They want them to all go to europe so they can steal their land and leave the africans trapped in europe on worthless european land. I am not racist, although I sure wish I was. Yes and the pak mentality is so ingrained in human behaviour it is foolish to try to go against it. What white student on campus in Canada has been alienated, isolated, segregated on a black run university? """What is absurd is using your argument, for a black man to succeed in society he will need to remain only with blacks. Good luck. If you think your being black means all other blacks will make you successful and your skin colour will unite you and all will be well if you remain within the Jane Finch corridor and never leave, stay there. Ruckus C. Johnson, an economist at the University of California at Berkeley, published studies showing that black students who went to desegregated schools for at least five years had higher graduation rates, high entry rates to college, higher college graduation rates, higher lifetime income, and healthier lives.""" Show me an article saying original students do just as well surrounded by a bunch of whites. He is much better off around his own kind than around whites. For one he will be judged based on his merit and personality not his skin color and that alone is enough to justify separation. Educated originals in this country struggle because whites don't want to hire a bunch of original people, and I don't blame, they shouldn't socializing and trying to work with whites in the first place, that is an inappropriate behaviour because they best predictor of future behaviour is past behaviour and whites have a long history of past racist behaviour and thus will have a long future and racist behaviour. As such trying to "integrate" (which is a lie) with people who are likely to be racist to you is utter non-sense and foolishness. Whites aren't interested in "integration" white parents cry tears in the US when their white kids are bused to the african american area, they set up charter schools (state funded private schools) just to circumvent those bussing rules. Integration means weakness for originals, you are putting yourself in a losing situation where you will always lose and you are begging whites hat in hand for fairness. The whites will outnumber you, they will gang up on you and beat you up then beat you down. It is how their culture operates. No different than what the European states all did in WW2 to the jews. The jewish were in every army and the whites didn't care, they united in their whiteness whether they were from nations who had traditionally hated each other like hungarians and italians to kill and beat up on the the non-white jewish. And if whites are truly for integration then they can be permitted to work for the african and carribean run business and attend their schools where they are the minority. We all know it won't happen. Whites understand this. They know minority means loser, so not one white kid will go to the africentric school out of millions of whites nation wide because no one white wants to be a loser. If you are white and 5 blacks say you did X, well who do you think wins when the teacher and principal are all black? In any situation in Canada majority rules. when you integrate as a original african or carribean you are saying i am going to make myself a minority, I am planning to lose. That is why the time to separate from the white, the jewish, the asian is now and has never been stronger than ever. ps. your use of the study is wrong, he was pointing out that underfunded original school students performed worse for having no funding.

Why do white people believe they have the right to be in every meeting in a group they aren't a part of? I sure find it to be strange. You don't see a bunch of straight people showing up at the gay meeting or a bunch of men showing up at women issues meeting trying to tell women all kinds of stuff. I have noticed whenever a white person is let into these types of events they typically derail the discussion and try to take it over. I also believe the legacy of white racism, white imperialism, white colonialism and white racial violence so on means that the mere presence of white people can in many students minds can cause them to behave differently and silence them. Most non-white people learn quiet quickly that when white people are around it is just best to not talk about the issue of race or racism. It is a good idea to bar whites because you have to understand the legacy of white racism will often negatively influence the student group just by white people being present. Also, these groups ought to have a right to meet amongst themselves to figure out how to solve their own issues. A common complaint of white people is non-whites not taking personal responsibility to fix their own issues and depending on whites to fix them. Maybe these folks have taken that advice and are going to fix their own problems without white people. In fact it is almost hypocritical how whites want them to fix their own problems but don't want them to have their own meetings or schools or anything for themselves. How are they suppose to fix their own problems if they cannot meet? Typically the white people coming to these events are coming to troll. But let us pretend that the white person had good intentions. The legacy of racism and colonialism is such that many of these people are going to look to the white person for solutions in the room and that the white person will typically end up assuming a position of leadership undermining the entire point of these group meetings. I know for instance that in mexico, the concept of the white jesus was bashed into people heads, then when you look on the televnovas it is all blonde hair blue eyed people whiter than American daytime tv shows, then when you look at the leadership it is all white people. This is the legacy of racism and colonialism where mexican people are taught to look to whites for leadership and solutions and it creates issues for the brown folk becoming dependent on whites to solve their problems instead of solving their own problems. These people have literally had it bashed into their head white better than brown. So the mere presence of white folk will undermine their abilitiy to solve their own problems because they have been trained to view whites as the ones who do that. So yes, whites should be excluded.

The overpopulation claim makes no sense. People in the lesser populated developed countries use up all the resources and threaten the stability of the world. 20 million australians destroy and use up far more resources than 200 million + indonesians. If any population needs to go down its europe, america and canada. Because another 100 million people in australia and canada would use more resources than another billion people in asia and africa. Not to mention due to colonialism and slavery many countries in africa are grossly underpopulated. a country like Mali is very large but has so few people that it is easy for the rebels to hide because most of the country is not even inhabitated.

So much for freedom of speech. Its ironic, you can come from a law school like saudi arabia where they still hang people and still get recognized but if you come from one in BC that says gayness is immoral, which is factually true you are punished and banned from practice, canada is sick.

I'd consider it terrorism. He did it for a political reason to "Start a race war" no different than muslims who bomb and shoot to start a "Religious war on infidels". Just another example of a violent young problem population male white.

That would be like saying someone steals from you, you sue them in court and the court orders they give you money back and damages and that thief then says the way to stop stealing is to stop taking money from people. Pretty outrageous.

Your claim affirmative action breeds resentment is non-sense, doing nothing about racism breeds resentment, so either way someone will be resentful. The Italians, jews, germans, french and acadeans and cape brentoners and new foundlanders all have their own schools. Look at the thread topic, you want to discuss every possible example in one topic, and you know its disinengenious because its impossible. Go start threads on those if you are so concerned. How would you know what the black experience is, are you black? Jews were 75% of the slave traders, I doubt they went through the same thing as West Indian immigrants. Your experiences are not that of teacher's in schools who are black. This is what the jew culture claims, to be merit based but they hire only jews. Only a white skin jew could talk about color blindness, when wide spread hatred is aimed at someone due to their color, the colorblindness arguements go out the window.

What specifically is he accused of that would prove this. To me this is no more credible than those nuts saying harper is a closet jew and is working for jews and israel controls the world and jews start all the wars. Proof Please.

So laws to correct past racism are racist? That is like saying racism should never be finished.

She was in blackface, and alot of whites are in blackface without the paint. The vast majority of blacks are killed by whites. That is the epidemic. A white man just murdered another white man this week in toronto and another in london over a cell phone. The data says whites ar 70% of federal prison.

And it is being done by whites pouring the guns, drugs, alcohol and hiring the whites in black face to do it.

O well so sad too bad. 600 years of white terrorism and genocide against blacks and now blacks are fighting back and whites want to cry that blacks won't sit down and be quietly ethnically cleansed anymore by white people. Get over it.

You don't know who'll they'll kill. The KKK kills all kinds of people, they are terrorist. If we kept out ever guy screwing 9 yea rold no more immigrants from europe.

So it is your claim blacks were not discriminated against even when there were laws made specifically against them, that even the white president admitted was racist, along with the white congress? Where did I say all blacks perceive racism equally. Again you are trying to project your views onto me. It seems you are so blind to racism you cannot even admit that openly racist laws are indeed racist.