H10

Report finds many have encountered bias in schools, and half think it's hurt their chance of promotion. So, the same white secretaries, teachers and principals who are racist to non-white teachers are suppose to give non-white students a fair shake? The aboriginal-centric, chinese-centric, indo-centric and africentric schools are looking better by the day. Although I am interested to see how this turns out. We all know canadian corporate culture never allows you to blame anyone. So it will be interesting to see how this turns out.

It doesn't matter if whites commit disproportionate crime. That is not the central claim of my thread. 12 pages and constant derailing by trolls who want to discuss everything but the thread title problem. I think there have been only 2 poster who answered. Its not about you agreeing or accpeting my claim, there is already substantial data to support this, I'm not particularly concerned if you agree with the data or not. I am far more interested in learning why white people do these crimes in the first place. What are the cultural factors that lead to a some of the richest countries in the world like USA, UK, Australia and Canada, to having huge populations of whites being arrested and incarcerated in cultures that were largely constructed by whites. Whites make the rules of the game so to speak. You would not expect them to be the majority of jail, they make the rules, they are stopped by their own kind of police, tried by their own judges, and own juries and own white prosecutors. Strangely most people want to duck the explanation thank you.

Racism is a white problem. http://www.thestar.com/yourtoronto/education/2015/05/29/black-teachers-still-face-racism-on-the-job-in-ontario.html

That almost never happens. it happens but very rarely. much more often is guy is holding knife and cops shoots him, guy is walking toward cop, and cop shoots him, guy put his hand in his pocket to reach for his wallet and cop shoots him or cop just plain old shoots him in the back. There are only a small handful of cases where cops are really justified in killing and someone is actually trying to butcher them with a knife and they are almost always mentally ill people because any killer knows gun beats knife 99% of the time. You might get in one or two stabs but he'll get off 10 shots and you'll be dead.

^That is my point CTV is national, cp24 is local toronto media, hiding asian criminal identities.

" Across a wide range of jurisdictions the estimates are that mothers receive primary custody 68-88% of the time, fathers receive primary custody 8-14%, and equal residential custody is awarded in only 2-6% of the cases." http://www.huffingtonpost.com/robert-hughes/are-custody-decisions-bia_b_870709.html If men walk away they get thrown in jail for being a dead beat dad of a kid they didn't want. If men cannot afford their kid, they go to jail for being a deadbeat. If women cannot pay they get a cheque from the government and welfare to take care of the kid or child support. http://www.forbes.com/sites/jefflanders/2013/04/02/five-reasons-your-prenup-might-be-invalid/ And this is an understatement, people's prenups get thrown out all the time for the softest reasons. http://www.huffingtonpost.com/stann-givens/when-a-prenup-gets-thrown_b_5542093.html I am not talking a girl with a shirt on. I am talking how men are subjected to the whims of female fancy whether or not ann act is sexual assault. Women want a man who will be sexually aggressive towards them "if they desire him" yet it isn't clear to men when this is the case. it isn't the case of a man going overboard there is a limit. You can't choke a girl out or keep going when she clearly uninterested. When you go to Europe you see a difference. A man will walk up to a girl and start humping her, if she isn't interested she walks away or whatever. in Canada, she calls security and police and he goes to jail for misreading her signals. Big difference. Then they claim canadian men are boring, yet they are the ones who have killed the environment for fun. A woman's isn't obligated to have sex with a man. But it is unfair that there are such harsh and punishing laws against men who make honest mistake. A woman can show up to my house and dance around in her under wear jump on top of me and grab my crotch, but if I do the same to her, she can at any time claim sex assault and rape claiming she didn't want to be touched. Take the ivy leagueu girl with the mattress who claims rape, she claims she was raped because she agreed to vaginal sex, but then her partner stuck it in her rectum and it was rape because she never said ok to the rectum. Now it was probably just an honest misunderstanding, he probably thought it was what she wanted, he didn't go there to rape her. It'd be like claiming theft if you told the gardener to remove all your bushes and he removed a shrub because he got carried away and they look alike to him. Woman should be more clear in this field. If women truly want men who ask their permission before every act of intimacy, then they should stop wanting dominant and stop rewarding men who don't ask and stop reading 50 shades of grey.

It is indeed reasonable and possible.

Don't have to convince me, America is the number one exporter of crime. They have single handled raised the crime rate in all of the americas.

Cops have a high per capita murder rate. Not to mention all the other crimes they do. There are about 1 million cops in the usa. They murdered around 1200 people per year. If there were 300 million cops in the usa, you'd have a jaw dropping 120,000 murders per year. That type of murder rate would make colombia look like paradise and the wild west look tame.

Cop violence is among the most serious problem of our time, government armed agents trained in deadly force who seldom follow the law and have the right to shoot and murder anyone who doesn't comply with their orders. Its a modern day police state, a state run and governed by and for the cops. No one else can be caught on film murdering someone and not even be indicted. I often wonder what are these juries smoking.

The answer is obvious, take away police guns, so they aren't so violent anymore and will be inclined to treat people like humans not problems they are looking for an excuse to shoot.

Its not about white skin causing crime, if I thought whites were an inherently criminal race, I wouldn't ask the question. It would answer the question of why they commit crime, they are inherently criminal. I don't think that, I believe there are some cultural or societal factors. But I am trying to determine what they are. Part of the reason why its confusing is because the violence is spread throughout the white world, from chile to argentina to russia france and sweden, all polar opposites in the white world, so I can't see what these nations/cultures have in common. My hope was someone white would explain what it was. But instead most of the poster just get offended or try to blame minorities or throw red herrings on minorities and crime. I don't care about minorities, that isn't the topic of the thread. Minorities have nothing to do with the 200 white bikers arrested last week in mass white violence. Unless you are trying to say minorities secretly drive whites to murder other whites. And if you are going to say hiv/aids is a weapon of war, you need to look at how white nations created hiv/aids as a bio weapon under the "opv vaccine program" against blacks, homosexuals and "other undesirables". This is precisely why the countries who invented vaccines in Africa refuse to take the bio weapon vaccines that the west is trying to dump on them. The africans say, send us the tools, we'll make our own polio vaccines, the whites say no, you have to take our vaccines or nothing at all. The irony is that white Americans are now rebelling against the same poisionus vaccines they use to dump in africa, after the top scientist in merck admitted to spiking over 100,000 vaccines in the 1980s with aids/hiv. Anyhow, this is so far off topic, answer the question of the origins of white violence or don't respond.

If there are multiple causes of white violence, then I'd like to know what they are. There could be confirmation bias, but if you see a pattern wouldn't that also confirm a bias/view? I went back 50+ years to show that there was a long lasting pattern its not a new development. I did supply 3 links from the CDC, showing that whites have on average higher crime rates than blacks in america (equal assault, higher drug use and dealing, higher alcohol abuse and sexually assault and higher rates of gun carriage) etc. I showed whites where 62% of the population but 70% of the arrest in USA. In canada its the same situation. Whites have higher dispropotionate rates of crime, because the stats show based on how often they are stopped by cops they have hgiher criminality. And its not like white countries on average have the biggest populations. Only really USA, Brazil and russia have over 100 million people. Whites have high crime per capita. As for point 2, this is true of white countries, countries like usa and russia let alot of white criminals off the hook for being white and rich and well connected and crony and neopotism. The white kid with affluenza was the perfect case. Killed about 7 people harmed another 3 badly, yet gets a slap on the wrist and won't even have a criminal record. Yet a black woman who hit a white man who was drunk in the street at night by accident but left the scene got 50 years (the white guy left the scene too!) And black kids are tried as adult all the time when whites are tried as children for murders. There is no better example of a corrupt legal system than usa and the western nations. Just look at the innocence project. 70% of exonerees are not white. Blacks are 38% of the prison population but 63% of all exoneerees. Whites are 40% of the prison population and 30% of exonerees. I feel I am way off my original point, it was never meant to be a comparison of whites and anyone, but simply why white crimes occur (we have other threads on black, hispanic, asian etc.), so I found it weird in a country where 67% of criminals are white we ignore the biggest group. And plenty of countries like australia and new zealand have high rate rapes with majority white. Julian assange is white. Not to mention most of the pedophiles and pedophile priest are white, aka stereotypical pedo in sea or brazil is a white man.

Because we are a Constitutional Monarchy, we don't believe in murdering people just because the majority want violence.

In the past people would laugh at you, but not anymore, I can't blame any man who has no desire to date, marry or have sex etc. It is just a huge risk not worth it. Its like putting your balls on an anvil, and then giving a girl a hammer and another man is offering hundreds of thousands of dollars to smash your balls with the hammer, and hoping to not get hurt. I only have sexual interactions with foreign women in foreign countries, so if any false sex assault claims are made it won't hurt my job prospects in Canada (no companies do an international criminal search). And yes I travel alot. I have zero desire for Canadian women. Even if you could find one who was interested, which I encounter many all the time, the odds are she'd screw me over the first chance she got. Its what feminism teaches them, in the universities they teach about how men oppressed women. My people never oppressed women, my ancestors come from a matriarchal society (society where women oppressed men), but do you think the feminist care? No, I have a penis so I am guilty by association,, because rich white western men "oppressed" rich white women they married by "banning" them from working in a dangerous era where people died all the time on the job, o poor victims.

I use to be pro-capital punishment until I studied the concept deeper. The cops lie and plant evidence, the prosecutors lie and hide evidence that shows innocence, the doctors lie and pretend dna they never tested matches, bad defense lawyers screw peoples cases, prejudice juries are hand picked by the prosecutor to convict, if you look the wrong way you'll get convicted even in absence of evidence (minority, white guy with tattoos, beard, whatever, anyone who isn't a preppy looking figure is going to get locked up once charged unless they are a cop). Tough on crime doesn't work for America where something like 40% + of the population has been arrested, it doesn't stop or deter crime it just makes more people "Criminals" who aren't even violent. when you send people to prison, prison is basically a training ground for criminals, so tough on crime tends to just train more criminals than absolve them. We need to get softer on sentencing and look to reform bad behaviour and catch people who fall out the school system as teens. If you graduate high school, and get a decent job or career odds are you won't commit crime. If you drop out of high school at 15, odds are you will become a life long criminal. Lets stop people from joining the gangs and help kids BEFORE they go do crimes. Prison is expensive, keeping a kid in school is cheap. And how can anyone trust a government known for lying, stealing, cheating and robbing its citizens to fairly administer a death penalty when senators are raping and beating and stealing from the taxpayers?

No. That is why the government cutting off indians for being indians is wrong.

Its trolling when you don't answer the question and try to change the topic constantly.

Stop trying to dodge the original question, why are whites so violent

See stats a posted multiple times on the first page and on the page above your quotes. You didn't answer why whites are so violent and still haven't you just troll my thread trying to convince whites have lower crime rates. Even if it were true, you are still dodging the question why do they commit the crimes?

We are a nation of rule of law. Once the British claimed the continent as north America and the land as part of britain, they had to respect indian land rights. The government can no more steal indian land than it can steal white man land in montreal or your house or my house. They don't get to steal land because of different skin color. If you want to go back to barbarity and we can all murder each other off for land, we can, but I think thats not what most canadians want.

Untrue, you can simply say you can't find a qualified female applicant. Also if you don't hire a female, there is no one working there to sue you for gender discrimination. You can just say you hired the best applicant available or your friends. Cronyism isn't illegal. I don't think there are any gender quotas as of yet. Its true that discriminatory hiring doesn't end chance of sex assault claim just the workplace ones. I am not saying I advocate it, nor would I do it, I am simply saying there are plenty of people who ARE doing this. Hey you identified another way men are discriminated against. Men who run for office have their sexual histories brought up and dragged through the mud and its used as a weapon against them. But women who sleep around like belinda stronach don't

Yeah man up. and I forget sex harassment laws. Women who check out "hawt" guys aren't sexually assaulting him. Men who checkout hot girls= sex harassment. Men will just continue to leave the corporate world and stop marrying and opting out. They will start firms and not hire females to avoid sex assault claims altogether. Why marry and risk being screwed when you can marry a girl in Saudi Arabia who can't screw you due to saudi laws?

There is no affirmative action for blacks in Canada. In the USA affirmative action reasons for implementation have to do with Jim crow post civil war to 1980 laws and policies where the government underfunded black schools destroying the children's abilities to compete with white students who got full funding and were introduced to content at an early age like standardized testing and multiple subjects. Black schools often had no textbooks, were outdoors, had outhouses as opposed to running water etc. Jim Crow also robbed multiple generations of blacks of wealth. 80% of wealth in the USA is passed down generationally (parents to child). when your parents were victims of the tulsa genocide of wilmington genocide, or one of the over 10,000 ethnic cleansings Affirmative action isn't entirely about slavery. More so about Jim Crow(after slavery but before whites changed the laws to be "legally equal"), and pretty much every black American alive today has been impacted by Jim crow for the worse. "In the decade immediately preceding World War I, a pattern of racial violence began to emerge in which white mob assaults were directed against entire Black communities. These race riots were the product of white society�s desire to maintain its superiority over Blacks, vent its frustrations in times of distress, and attack those least able to defend themselves. In these race riots, white mobs invaded Black neighborhoods, beat and killed large numbers of Blacks and destroyed Black property. In most instances, Blacks fought back and there were many casualties on both sides, though most of the dead were Black. Gunnar Myrdal opposed the use of the term �riots� to describe these interracial conflicts. He preferred to call this phenomena �a terrorization or massacre, and (considered) it a magnified, or mass, lynching.�13 Race riots occurred in both the North and South, but were more characteristic of the North. They were primarily urban phenomena, while lynching was primarily a rural phenomenon. Although lynchings were decreasing slightly by the turn of the century, race riots were perceptibly on the increase. Large-scale interracial violence became almost epidemic, as increasing numbers of Blacks migrated to Northern cities. The greatest number of race riots occurred during and just after World War I. During this period the North was concerned with the tremendous migration of Blacks from the South, and the displacement of some whites by Blacks in jobs and residences, which escalated social tensions between the races. The South was concerned about the possible demands of returning Negro soldiers, who were unwilling to slip quietly back into second class citizenship. The summer of 1919, called �The Red Summer� by James Weldon Johnson, ushered in the greatest period of interracial violence the nation had ever witnessed. During that summer there were twenty-six race riots in such cities as Chicago, Illinois; Washington, D.C.; Elaine, Arkansas; Charleston, South Carolina; Knoxville and Nashville, Tennessee; Longview, Texas; and Omaha, Nebraska. More than one hundred Blacks were killed in these riots, and thousands were wounded and left homeless. The seven most serious race riots were those which occurred in Wilmington, N. C. (1898), Atlanta, Ga. (1906), Springfield, Ill. (1908), East St. Louis) Ill. (1917), Chicago, Ill. (1919), Tulsa, Okla. (1921) and Detroit, Mich. (1943). What follows is a brief summary of the facts concerning each riot. http://www.yale.edu/ynhti/curriculum/units/1979/2/79.02.04.x.html When your grandparents and parents were run off their land that was stolen by racist that affects your parents and you. They have to pay rent on land they use to own. That takes money away that could have sent the grandkids to private school, to get a tutor, prep schools etc.. It also affects the people's behaviour. They spend the money as soon as they get it, because you never know when a mob of whites are going to come take everything anyways. Note, none of these white criminals ever saw a handcuff, an indictment, an arrest. No black was ever compensated for their internments in tulsa. And often the threat of the white mafia burning down your neighbour was enough to run most people out of town from fear of being murdered. So even if just 8 people were killed. Those were marching orders to the thousands, get out or your next.

Men's right issues 1) Divorce. Women seem to always get the kids and men are expected to pay inflated childcare cost and alimony to women. 2) Abortion. Women can opt out of a pregnancy, men cannot. If want to say its my body and I can abort it without a man's permission. Fine, but men should have a walk away option too. Reproductive rights shouldn't be just for women. If we are to have a truly equal society we need to be given everyone fair options. 3) Prenuptials. Even when men have them, the courts seem to make a litany of exceptions and excuses that apply to no other countracts to ensure that men cannot protect their assets successfully 4) rape and sexual harassment laws. Women want aggressive men and men who will sexually ravage them and "take charge", see 50 shades of grey. Yet if you make an advance on a woman who isn't interested it can result in a sexual assault charge. The same thing goes on in the arena of rape. Women give all kinds of mixed signals, may show up to a man's house at night get naked and then give all kinds of mix signals. Some women don't understand that a large amount of women will not only never aggress and never say yes, they will purposely act disinterested in sex or like they don't want to have sex with you when they are really just testing the males interest and trying to not look like a "s---t". I haven't even touched on the whole, 1 man gets drunk 1 woman gets drunk and woman regrets or forgets the next day she can say rape and ruin the man. 5) Affirmative action, women get affirmative action programs to help them, how is that fair that a white woman who is part of the majority class who is more privileged than any other part of society (including white men) get a leg up over everyone else! White women claim they are a minority, but are the largest group by numbers, the most in middle management, the minority of the homeless, have better employment rates and university rates than most other groups. White women were also part of the privileged rich white oppressor class who oppressed the rest of the poor whites and colored folks in canada. 6)I can understand the move to hire the "best" applicant. Ok that is at least fair. But then women of white skin color go and pull this stunt http://metronews.ca/news/toronto/1356898/john-tory-asks-committee-to-re-consider-all-male-ttc-appointments/ Ok so now we have female quotas it isn't just the best applicant anymore? How is it more fair to have a gender quota than a racial quota or cultural quota? 7) Most the rape is violent prison rape against men. Most the murders are against men. Men die younger but get less funding for their diseases like prostate cancer but breast cancer is huge. More examples from rooshv 8) Men or more likely to die on a dangerous job, no one calls for affirmatie action for men in teaching who are underrepresented. No one says we need more male teachers and nurses.