blackbird

Parliament could impose the Notwithstanding Clause on these Supreme Court rulings and overturn the SCC ruling. Pierre Poilivre could also, promise to impose the Notwithstanding Clause when he is elected and make it retroactive. GOLDSTEIN: Use notwithstanding clause to overturn Supreme Court decision reducing sentences for multiple murderers (msn.com)

Another news report on the topic. LILLEY: Odd donations to Trudeau's riding association raise questions (msn.com)

If you want some details about how the election interference works, go to this website which tells quite a bit. The mainstream media has not reported the details which are on this website as far as I can tell. (CBC, CTV) Vancouver’s Beijing allies align with Trudeau’s Liberals - Asia Pacific | Business in Vancouver (biv.com)

Well, the news just reported General Fortin is suing the Federal government and Trudeau for six million dollars. He was fired from his job as the person in charge of the government's actions against the Pandemic. He was fired because of some sexual allegations or charges against him. He was later acquitted. Trans Mountain pipeline is now going to cost taxpayers at least 30 billion dollars, up from seven billion. Election interference fiasco will cost millions of dollars. The government apparently knew about the interference years ago and it looks like they did nothing. The continual flow of illegal migrants across the Roxham Road crossing is costing millions of dollars to put them up in hotels and provide other services. Some hotels were being booked for the purpose but were apparently not filled while taxpayers are still required to pay for renting the whole hotel as a block of rooms.

The Supreme Court ruled last year that the law passed by the Harper government in 2011 giving consecutive sentences for mass murderers was unconstitutional and since then killers who were given longer sentences have had their sentences reduced to a maximum of 25 years at which time some may be eligible for parole. This means the families must go through the hellish parole hearings which causes great ongoing distress in their lives because they don't know if these killers will be released on parole. This is not justice. This is cruelty imposed on the innocent families by the Supreme Court. EDITORIAL: Supreme Court imposed cruelty on families (msn.com) How is it a small group of unelected judges can make such a ruling overturning our elected parliament's decisions on such crucial matters. There is something seriously wrong with this system. It needs to be radically changed.

Canada has been sucking up to Beijing for 50 years and China is Canada's second largest trading partner. Many politicians in Canada may be heavily influenced by China. It took years for Canada to make a decision about Huawei telecommunications company while the Five Eyes decided to ban them years before. What would one expect with a wishy-washy government in Canada?

Influence from China has been growing for decades. We also know that if anybody complained about Chinese Communist influence or interference in our country they would have been dismissed as a wacko or a racist. Yet birth tourism for one thing is a common thing. Women from China and elsewhere fly in to have their babies born in B.C. so they will have Canadian citizenship. Then leave after the baby is born and gets its citizenship. Citizenship is handed out like McDonalds toys for kids. It is a useful tool for the future. Foreign money has purchased billions of dollars worth of real estate in Canada and nothing was ever done about it. Organizations were established in Canada as friendship organizations and nothing was every said to oppose that. Then you had the twinning of towns or cities, another ridiculous scheme. Tens of thousands of students are brought in from China to study in our universities. Lots of money was donated to the Trudeau Foundation from people with ties to foreign governments. What exactly was that money used for? Now we have a situation where Australia, the UK, and the US have formed a military alliance to protect their interests (AUKUS) and Canada is not part of it. I wonder why. Is it because they don't trust Canada or is it because Canada is heavily influenced by China, or is it because Canada doesn't want to join and prefers to be all things to all countries (a globalist of some kind) and a pacifist nation? Perhaps a combination of these reasons.

These are apostate or false churches that don't believe or follow the Bible in many areas. They are social gospel churches and believe in liberalism or progressivism, things the opposite of what the Bible teaches.

Many Canadian politicians and governments at all levels have turned a blind eye to Chinese interference for decades. Tasha Kheiriddin: Jagmeet Singh must pull support for Justin Trudeau's Liberals (msn.com)

There is only one truth and that is what God has given mankind, in English, the King James Bible. Other languages have God's truth in their languages. The Scriptures are the final infallible authority on all Biblical and moral matters. Sola Scriptura, the Scriptures alone.

"Any unbiased document scholar will agree that the Bible has been remarkably well-preserved over the centuries. Copies of the Bible dating to the 14th century AD are nearly identical in content to copies from the 3rd century AD. When the Dead Sea Scrolls were discovered, scholars were shocked to see how similar they were to other ancient copies of the Old Testament, even though the Dead Sea Scrolls were hundreds of years older than anything previously discovered. Even many hardened skeptics and critics of the Bible admit that the Bible has been transmitted over the centuries far more accurately than any other ancient document. There is absolutely no evidence that the Bible has been revised, edited, or tampered with in any systematic manner. The sheer volume of biblical manuscripts makes it simple to recognize any attempt to distort God’s Word. There is no major doctrine of the Bible that is put in doubt as a result of the inconsequential differences among the manuscripts. Again, the question, can we trust the Bible? Absolutely! God has preserved His Word despite the unintentional failings and intentional attacks of human beings. We can have utmost confidence that the Bible we have today is the same Bible that was originally written. The Bible is God’s Word, and we can trust it (2 Timothy 3:16; Matthew 5:18)." Has the Bible been corrupted, altered, edited, revised, or tampered with? | GotQuestions.org The differences between the four gospels are not contradictions. Each wrote from his own perspective and to a certain audience. They are not contradicting each other. It just depends how you understand what they wrote. "We have four gospels because during the early church period, four people found it necessary to tell the story of Jesus from four different perspectives. Each gospel was written for a different (original) group of people, by a different author, who was trying to accomplish a different purpose." Guide to the Four Gospels - OverviewBible The King James Bible (1611) is an absolutely accurate and trustworthy Bible. Modern versions are corrupted in many ways and one should avoid those. For countless articles on the King James Bible go to: The King James Bible Defended! (jesus-is-savior.com)

My hope is this student take this to court and see if his rights to basic freedoms will be upheld. I think if a go-fund me was started for his legal fees, he would receive massive support.

I am not sure what kind of Bible translation you are reading. But I don't agree. You sound confused. Don't know what I can say about that. Will have to leave that for now. You will have to do some investigation, but sounds totally wrong. I can't do the research on that.

Terrific. Good. Just one last question if you will permit me. You believe in Sola Scriptura which means Scripture is your only rule of faith and practice. Do you believe that? Thank you.

Good. So you believe in Jesus as your personal Lord and Savior then?

Do you believe that Jesus died for your sins personally and was raised from the dead?

That is true. Anything else you can add?

What do you believe about Jesus Christ? That is the bottom line. You haven't said yet today.

What do you believe about Jesus Christ?

I stated what I believe. You claim to be a Protestant. So tell us in your own words and stop hiding behind the Five Solas.

Nonsense! I already explained it all. Nobody is required to recite the Solas. I agree with them and stated the same kind of thing in my own words. Now tell us what you believe IN YOUR OWN WORDS.

Come on Dougie93, you're not making sense here.

Latin has nothing to do with Protestant beliefs or Christianity. Your claim is absurd. Latin was used by the Catholic church and in the Latin vulgate that only priests who were trained in Latin could understand. Protestants never used Latin. Where did you get that idea? My interpretations can be verified in any Protestant church confessions as being absolutely true. You are not making sense here. Check and Protestants statements of faith, Baptist, Reformed Presbyterian, etc.

I was stating the basic Christian beliefs. It is not a requirement to have the Five Solas at the top of one's mind. They are a good summary, but I stated the basic beliefs as well. Latin has nothing to do with it. Latin was used by the false Romanism church. Original Scriptures were not written in Latin. Only in the false church was Latin the language priests used and most people could not understand in the last thousand years.

Of course what I said is covered in the Five solas. I did not say the fifth one because I was not reciting the five solas to begin with. I told you I was simply stating the principles of the Reformation and stated I may have left something out. Now you can state what you believe.