-
Posts
11,717 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
9
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Everything posted by blackbird
-
This is just another example in an endless list of cases of a failed justice system in Canada under liberal laws. The system is so lenient it is shocking. It also gives far softer sentences if the suspect is an aboriginal person. In this case, teen killer got two years in custody and one year under supervised release after killing four people. Apparently the maximum sentence that can be given under liberal laws is three years. Teen gets 3-year sentence for quadruple homicide on Carry the Kettle Nakoda Nation | Watch
-
There are major differences between police investigations and public enquiries as this article shows. quote Public inquiries can uncover information that police investigations cannot access due to legal exemptions and protections. Here are some key points: Legal Exemptions: Institutions may withhold certain information during lawful investigations to protect the integrity of the process and prevent self-incrimination. Public Inquiries: These inquiries are commissioned by government ministers to address public concerns and can reveal details that police may not disclose, such as the circumstances surrounding serious incidents or misconduct. Confidentiality: Information obtained during police investigations may be kept confidential to ensure effective law enforcement and protect sources of information. Public Interest: The purpose of public inquiries is to establish facts and prevent future occurrences, often leading to recommendations that may influence further legal actions. Access to Information Act: This act allows institutions to protect information that could hinder lawful investigations, ensuring that sensitive details remain confidential. These factors illustrate how public inquiries can provide insights that police investigations may not be able to access, emphasizing the importance of public inquiry processes in safeguarding sensitive information. 6 Sources
-
According to this report the great majority of Canadians have rejected the basic morals of the Bible, such as "thou shalt not kill". This does not bode well for Canada. When some places in the Bible became very evil and decadent, such as Sodom and Gomorrah, God judged them and destroyed them. There are many people in Canada who are mentally-challenged in various ways. We see it all the time in the news and on the streets. Now offering these people MAID and thinking that is a rational thing to do is a recipe for self-destruction of large numbers of people. Offering death to people with mental problems is not compassion. It is the worst kind of evil imaginable. Removing Bible readings from public schools decades ago has obviously contributed to this problem and well as the rejection of Canada's Judeo-Christian heritage in favour of multi-culturalism, which has no moral compass. Majority of Canadians support MAID for mental illness patients, research says | Watch " What is the Bible's stance on euthanasia? Definition and Context of Euthanasia Euthanasia is commonly defined as the act of intentionally ending a life to relieve pain or suffering, sometimes referred to as “mercy killing.” In contemporary discussions, this topic intersects with medical ethics, quality of life, and personal autonomy. However, the biblical framework, shaped by themes of human dignity, divine sovereignty, and the sacredness of life, provides comprehensive principles that address this issue. Though the Scriptures do not mention the specific term “euthanasia,” biblical teachings on the value and sanctity of human life, God’s dominion over life and death, and human responsibility toward one another inform an overarching stance. The Value of Human Life in Scripture From the earliest chapters of Genesis, humanity is distinguished as made in the image of God (see Genesis 1:27). This foundational truth imbues each person with inherent worth, transcending health status or length of life. The psalmist reflects on divine involvement in human life, proclaiming: “For You formed my inmost being” (Psalm 139:13). This passage underscores the belief that each individual is personally and intentionally known by the Creator. When evaluating any practice that ends human life prematurely, these foundational texts remind readers that life itself bears a unique value. It is not merely a biological or utilitarian phenomenon; it is a sacred trust given by God. Key Biblical Principles Regarding Life and Death 1. God’s Sovereignty Over Life: Scripture consistently affirms that ultimate authority over life and death rests with God (see 1 Samuel 2:6), indicating that human interventions should not presumptuously usurp this divine prerogative. 2. Sixth Commandment: One succinct directive undergirds traditional Christian views on ending life: “You shall not murder” (Exodus 20:13). While euthanasia does not always carry the malice associated with murder, this command reveals how carefully Scripture safeguards human life. 3. Hope and Trust in God: In moments of extreme suffering, biblical examples highlight reliance on God’s sustaining presence (see Psalm 23:4). This perspective curtails the notion of taking one’s life or the life of another to halt suffering, focusing instead on the possibility of redemption within hardships. 4. Stewardship of Life: Believers are called stewards of what God has given, including their own bodies (see 1 Corinthians 6:19-20). As stewards, individuals acknowledge that they do not have absolute autonomy over their lives but remain accountable to the One who grants life. Biblical Examples of Suffering and Endurance Several examples illustrate how Scripture addresses suffering without sanctioning a premature end to life: • Job’s Trials: Facing profound physical and emotional affliction, Job never seeks an “early release.” Instead, he wrestles with God, his suffering, and his friends' counsel, ultimately recognizing his life remains in God’s hands (Job 2:9-10). • Jesus’ Example: In the agonies preceding His crucifixion, though He prays for relief, He surrenders to the Father’s will (see Luke 22:42). This example challenges the belief that immediate cessation of suffering is the ultimate aim. These narratives present hardship as a context for personal growth, divine intervention, and demonstrations of faith. Within this biblical worldview, life’s darkest seasons do not justify intentional termination. Moral and Ethical Concerns 1. Diminishing the Image of God: Euthanasia risks framing life’s worth solely through a lens of suffering versus comfort. Yet biblical teaching insists that the divine image persists in every circumstance. 2. Slippery Ethical Boundaries: Once the deliberate taking of life is permitted on the basis of compassion, broader questions arise about who decides when suffering justifies ending a life. Historically, such expansion of criteria (e.g., mental distress or infirmities) raises serious concerns about the potential devaluation of persons seen as “less fit.” 3. Legal and Cultural Implications: Societies have debated laws that permit forms of euthanasia. Yet Scripture’s caution against taking life invites scrutiny of any legal framework that places personal preference or expediency above the sanctity of life. Compassion, Care, and the Role of Hope Compassion remains a hallmark of the biblical perspective toward the suffering. While calls for euthanasia often stem from a desire to end pain, Scripture points to various alternatives: • Palliative Care and Support: Providing medical, emotional, and spiritual comfort honors both the dignity of the individual and God’s design for compassion. Throughout Scripture, believers are urged to “Bear one another’s burdens” (Galatians 6:2). • Prayer and Community Intervention: Biblical communities often rallied around the sick, seeking God’s intervention and offering practical support (Acts 9:36-41). This communal aspect reflects the responsibility to care for, rather than hasten the end of, those in distress. • Hope in Eternal Life: Beyond earthly affliction, Scripture holds out the promise of a renewed future free from suffering (see Revelation 21:4). While this does not diminish present pain, it shapes a perspective in which life remains a gift until God’s appointed time. Conclusion In surveys of biblical texts, the consistent theme is that life is sacred, divinely given, and under God’s sovereign care. Scripture affirms compassion for the suffering yet does not endorse terminating life as a solution. Instead, believers are called to uphold life by offering comfort, medical support, prayer, and the hope that arises from trust in God. Euthanasia, evaluated against these principles, stands outside the Bible’s moral framework. While Scripture recognizes the reality of pain and illness, it ultimately presents life-and its sanctity-as resting in the hands of its Creator. Adherents are thus encouraged to respond to suffering with patience, care, and trust in God’s redemptive work, affirming that every moment of life bears value and divine purpose. unquote What is the Bible's stance on euthanasia?
-
It actually started with the first coming of Christ, but the signs of the end times are intensified in past century. quote Spiritual Deception and False Teachers Perhaps the most dangerous sign of the last days is the proliferation of spiritual deception. Jesus warned, "For false christs and false prophets will arise and perform great signs and wonders, so as to lead astray, if possible, even the elect" (Matthew 24:24). The deception won't be crude or obvious—it will be sophisticated, compelling, and wrapped in religious language. Paul warned that "in later times some will depart from the faith by devoting themselves to deceitful spirits and teachings of demons" (1 Timothy 4:1). False teachers don't typically announce themselves as enemies of truth. They speak what people want to hear, tickle their ears with comfortable lies, and present themselves as angels of light (2 Corinthians 11:14). They'll promise health, wealth, and happiness while avoiding the difficult truths about sin, repentance, and the cost of discipleship. The Gospel Reaches Every Nation Amid all the darkness, God's redemptive plan continues to unfold. Jesus declared, "And this gospel of the kingdom will be proclaimed throughout the whole world as a testimony to all nations, and then the end will come" (Matthew 24:14). This isn't merely about having Christian missionaries in every country—it's about every people group, every tribe, every tongue hearing the good news of salvation through Christ. The technology of our age has made global communication possible in ways previous generations could never imagine. The gospel is advancing even in the darkest corners of the earth. Believers are risking their lives to carry the message of hope to unreached peoples. This isn't happening despite the difficulties of the last days—it's happening because God's purpose cannot be thwarted. Israel: God's Prophetic Timepiece The restoration of Israel as a nation in 1948 represents one of the most significant prophetic fulfillments in modern history. For nearly 2,000 years, the Jewish people were scattered among the nations, exactly as Scripture predicted. Yet God promised through Ezekiel that He would regather them: "I will take you from the nations and gather you from all the countries and bring you into your own land" (Ezekiel 36:24). Israel's return isn't merely a political development—it's a divine appointment. Jesus spoke of Jerusalem being "trampled underfoot by the Gentiles, until the times of the Gentiles are fulfilled" (Luke 21:24). The restoration of Jewish sovereignty over Jerusalem in 1967 marked another prophetic milestone. unquote Are We Living in the Last Days? What the Bible Really Says
-
"She told The Canadian Press ahead of her trip that she stands in "absolute solidarity" with First Nations as they oppose moves by the provincial government in British Columbia to weaken its version of the declaration." I thought Governor Generals were supposed to be representing all Canadians, but she doesn't appear to care about the rights of private property owners in B.C. This is terrible and doesn't bode well for the rest of Canadians who are 95% of the population. Gov. Gen. Mary Simon at United Nations to talk about Indigenous rights Also, what is she doing, supposedly at the U.N. as a representative of Canada, when she was not elected? Canada is supposed to be a democracy. She should not be there speaking on behalf of Canada or anyone else. That is not the Governor General's role.
-
Number #1 is hopeless because natives demand to own everything and demand endless billions in compensation. How do you negotiate with a mindset like that? The BC NDP is the worst government BC has ever had. They are completely in the native's pocket even though the natives are only 5% of the population. Eby acts like the rest of us, 95% of population don't exist. The BC government allows FNs dancers in costumes come right into the BC legislature to perform their dances. This is a ridiculous give away of our system. How can they allow this. 5% of the population gets all the attention and almost seems to control the government. The rest of us are in deep trouble. Now Eby just cancelled the plan to amend DRIPA. This is a major disaster for the people of BC who own land that is under threat from land claims. It is a threat to the resource industries who must bow and scrape to FN bands and get their permission to do anything. Eby says he won't change anything until December. Nothing will be changed this legislative session. Wow! Where's the urgency to protect the people of Richmond whose land is under threat? And everyone else and all the court cases going on? Who is protecting the people of B.C.? NOT THE NDP.
-
" Had Israel not attacked Iran in February 2025 and in June, the Islamic regime would now have an atomic bomb to use against Israel, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu told Independence Day torchlighters on Thursday. This would have been "the beginning of the end for the Jewish people," according to the prime minister. "This year, we faced a massive test. A little over a year ago, it became clear to us that Iran was preparing atomic bombs to destroy us. This is not an empty statement; it is not a 'spin.' If we had not acted with the spirit of 'a nation rising like a lioness and roaring like a lion, they would have atomic bombs, which would be the beginning of the end for the Jewish people. We were compelled to act," he said. "It is different because it comes after a year in which we challenged history. The establishment of the State did not stop attacks on the Jewish people. These attacks have continued. What changed is our ability to repel them. And if we thought that after the Holocaust, antisemitism would disappear from the world, it has not. It hasn't disappeared for generations, and it is not expected to," he added. He also added that Israel "not only changed the Middle East but also changed itself, because we are doing things no country ever dreamed of doing." unquote Netanyahu: Iran would have achieved nuclear bomb if Israel had not attacked over past 15 months
-
" Had Israel not attacked Iran in February 2025 and in June, the Islamic regime would now have an atomic bomb to use against Israel, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu told Independence Day torchlighters on Thursday. This would have been "the beginning of the end for the Jewish people," according to the prime minister. "This year, we faced a massive test. A little over a year ago, it became clear to us that Iran was preparing atomic bombs to destroy us. This is not an empty statement; it is not a 'spin.' If we had not acted with the spirit of 'a nation rising like a lioness and roaring like a lion, they would have atomic bombs, which would be the beginning of the end for the Jewish people. We were compelled to act," he said. unquote Netanyahu: Iran would have achieved nuclear bomb if Israel had not attacked over past 15 months
-
quote What are the signs of the end times according to the Bible? The signs of the end times according to the Bible encompass several key indicators that reflect both spiritual and societal changes. These signs are primarily derived from prophetic texts, particularly in the books of Matthew, Revelation, and Daniel. Here are the main signs: Wars and Conflicts: The Bible, particularly in Matthew 24:6-7, predicts an increase in wars, conflicts, and rumors of wars among nations. This escalation of violence is seen as a precursor to the end times. Natural Disasters: Scripture mentions various natural calamities, including earthquakes, famines, and plagues, as signs of the end (Luke 21:11). Recent studies have shown a correlation between climate change and the frequency of such disasters, which some interpret as aligning with biblical prophecy. Social and Moral Decay: The Bible warns of a decline in moral values, as seen in 2 Timothy 3:1-5, where it describes people becoming lovers of themselves, greedy, and unholy. This moral degradation is often viewed as a sign of the approaching end. False Prophets and Messiahs: Matthew 24:24 cautions against false prophets and messiahs who will deceive many. The rise of individuals claiming divine authority for personal gain is a significant concern in contemporary religious discourse. The Preaching of the Gospel: According to Matthew 24:14, the gospel must be preached to all nations before the end comes. This global evangelistic effort is seen as a fulfillment of prophecy, with organizations like Global Ministries actively working to spread the message worldwide. False Sense of Security: The Bible warns of a deceptive sense of peace and safety (1 Thessalonians 5:3), where people believe all is well, just before sudden destruction occurs. This warning resonates in today’s context, where complacency can lead to spiritual and societal peril. Signs of the Last Days in the Bible KJV In addition to the aforementioned signs, the Bible provides specific verses that highlight the signs of the last days. These include: Increased Knowledge and Travel: Daniel 12:4 speaks of a time when knowledge will increase, and many will travel to and fro. This can be seen in our modern age of technology and global connectivity. Persecution of Believers: Matthew 24:9 warns that believers will face persecution and hatred for their faith. This reality is increasingly evident in various parts of the world today. Signs in the Heavens: Luke 21:25-26 describes signs in the sun, moon, and stars, indicating cosmic disturbances that will occur as the end approaches. These signs collectively illustrate a biblical framework for understanding the end times, urging believers to remain vigilant and prepared. For further reading on these interpretations, resources such as the Understanding Last Days Scriptures can provide deeper insights. unquote For more details on this go to: Signs of the End Times KJV: Understanding Biblical Prophecies from Matthew 24 and Revelation - Global Ministries Online The cancel culture is just another sign of the corruption of society. Then there is the liberal government policies sanctioning abortion, medical assistance in dying and growing authoritarianism or control of everyone's life. Crime out of control, school kids being taught sexual orientation and gender identity ideology. A general decline and corruption of society.
-
The CEO of Air Canada paid the penalty for his inability to speak French when he expressed condolences in English only for a tragedy that occurred. He was soundly condemned by all the Quebec MLA politicians as well as PM Carney. This is bizarre. It is a prime example of the cancel culture which is fast to condemn anyone. In this case, it was a prime opportunity to push the French language narrative even though every individual who heard the condolence understood what he was saying in English. "Air Canada CEO Michael Rousseau apologized for his inability to speak French in a condolence message following a fatal plane crash. Air Canada CEO Michael Rousseau issued an apology after facing criticism for delivering a four-minute video message of condolence in English only, following the deadly Air Canada Express crash at LaGuardia Airport that killed two pilots, including French-speaking Canadian Antoine Forest. In the video, Rousseau used only two French words, “bonjour” and “merci,” prompting backlash from Quebec politicians and Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney, who described the English-only message as showing a lack of judgment and compassion. Global News+3 Rousseau stated, “I am deeply saddened that my inability to speak French has diverted attention from the profound grief of the families and the great resilience of Air Canada’s employees. Despite many lessons over several years, unfortunately, I am still unable to express myself adequately in French. I sincerely apologize for this, but I am continuing my efforts to improve”. The apology comes amid calls for his resignation from Quebec Premier François Legault and other political figures, who argued that his failure to communicate in French showed disrespect to francophone employees and customers. Global News+4 unquote CEO of Air Canada apologizes - Search
-
The Vatican has been anti-Semitic for 1,500 years throughout Europe. They justified the persecution of Jews through history claiming the Jews crucified Christ. They forgot one thing. Christ was a Jew. Would Jesus approve of the persecution of the Jews. I strongly doubt it. The Pope during WW2 said little about the Holocaust perpetrated by the Nazis. The Vatican had a hard time recognizing Israel and still thinks Jerusalem should not solely belong to Israel. Nothing they say can be trusted.
-
You must be wacko. Israel is only defending itself against the surrounding Islamic regimes that want to destroy it. That has always been the case since the Roman Empire attacked Israel in the 1st century CE and killed many of the Jews and scattered many throughout the world. So for the past 2,000 they have struggled to survive and endless anti-Semitism in Europe and other places. The Muslims took over control of Israel soon after Islam was started in the 7th century and spread by the sword. It remained under the Ottoman Empire for centuries. After the endless persecution of the Jews in other countries, many of them became determined to re-establish their homeland Israel and miraculously were able to in 1948. The Muslims in surrounding countries and in the Palestine area never accepted that. They continue to try to destroy Israel. This is not a question of Israel wanting to be at war with their neighbours. They are simply trying to survive as a nation.
-
The fact Iran seeks to destroy Israel is a well established fact. It has nothing to do with Trump. quote Key Facts 1.Iran's calls for Israel's destruction are officially documented policy, not misinterpretation—Supreme Leaders have repeatedly used terms like "cancerous tumor" and called for elimination. 2.These threats constitute incitement to genocide under international law, violating fundamental principles of state conduct and human rights. 3.Iran funds and arms proxy groups like Hamas and Hezbollah specifically to carry out attacks against Israeli civilians, as documented by intelligence agencies. 4.Holocaust denial by Iranian leadership serves to delegitimize Israel's existence and normalize antisemitic conspiracy theories worldwide. 5.Iran's nuclear program is viewed by experts as potentially aimed at acquiring capabilities to threaten Israel's existence. 6.These policies destabilize the entire Middle East, threatening millions of civilians across the region regardless of nationality or religion. 7.Iran's rhetoric often conflates Judaism with Zionism, promoting antisemitic stereotypes that endanger Jewish communities globally. 8.Many Iranian dissidents oppose these policies, showing this extremism doesn't represent the Iranian people's will. unquote From Rhetoric to Action: Iran Calls for Israel's Destruction - Israel Fact Check It is also a fact that the U.N. is loaded with anti-Semitic countries. They are useless as far as conflicts concerning Israel and Iran. The U.N. has been passing anti-Israel motions ever since Israel became a state in 1948. They would be useless.
-
You are missing the most important point. How can you condemn America and Israel for defending themselves from a tyrannical regime like Iran? How does the Pope justify condemning all sides when one side is trying to get a nuclear weapon to destroy Israel? This is where the Pope has failed. The RC Church has a 1,500 year history of being anti-Semitic throughout Europe. We know that is a fact because it is well documented in history. So why would they care about defending Israel from the Islamic terrorists like Iran and others? The Pope is pontificating about an imaginary world. That is not the real world. What would he say about the Allies defending the west from Hitler and the Nazis in WW2?
-
How do you pay for health care?
blackbird replied to August1991's topic in Provincial Politics in Canada
If you're talking about long term care, the only alternative is government subsidized long term care. In B.C. they charge 80% of the person's income. I guess that is not so bad, but the problem is the long waiting list. It could take around a year to get into one. There is a shortage of care homes, another problem. -
How do you pay for health care?
blackbird replied to August1991's topic in Provincial Politics in Canada
All levels of government have wrecked the country with taxes and regulations. It is not possible to fix things so badly wrecked. It would take a miracle. Private long term care can cost $8,000 or even $10,000 per month. Government subsidized long term care has a long waiting list. It could take a year to get into a place.
