Goddess

Ivermectin Docks to the SARS-CoV-2 Spike Receptor-binding Domain Attached to ACE2 - PubMed (nih.gov) Ivermectin binds to the spike protein, potentially rendering it ineffective in binding to the cell membrane.

Long COVID after breakthrough SARS-CoV-2 infection | Nature Medicine NOTE: BTI = breakthrough infection More bad news, doubles, triples and quads - when they get it, there is a consistently HIGHER risk of long-hauler syndrome, as compared to pure un-injected. Accumulation of spike protein (which your body does not stop producing, post-vax, as there is no mechanism in the jabs to stop it) probably accounts for these findings.

https://expose-news.com/2022/07/11/boris-distraction-uk-gov-revealed-triple-vaccinated-94percent-covid-deaths/?fbclid=IwAR0BjreZ2tlcrTrB8nMf-RRjMJdZU1kW9JNGcY8iyDku0U6fgYbfqDxhd_E

In case you're wondering what the "N" antibodies are that they are testing for levels in the UK data, (I was wondering, too ?) N stands for nucleocapsid. This is a structural protein that forms complexes with the RNA of viruses like covid. The reason to track it is: if you get vaccinated with any of the currently existing covid-19 vaccines, they teach you to respond to and attack S-1 proteins - the infamous spike. This is what you learn, express, and carry antibodies for. So, if you test a vaccinated person for S antibodies, you’ll find them. But you will NOT find antibodies to N proteins. Those will ONLY be found in those who got covid, recovered, and acquired resistance.

**sigh** I have an idea - Since "monkeypox" isn't keeping people in line, rushing for boosters, let's keep the fear porn going: OOOooooooo.... scary "Ninja". I guess the letters and numbers bA-5 whatever aren't scary enough. This New ‘Ninja’ COVID Variant Is the Most Dangerous One Yet (yahoo.com) Let's look at are some of the claims being made here. Because they are disastrously wrong. (Please keep in mind everything I've posted in this thread already. It is established science, established virology.) No one is seeing evidence that this is terribly true - outside of the vaccinated. It’s not at all clear that BA.5 is inherently more contagious, more “ninja". It’s just increasingly vaccine advantaged because we antigenically fixated the herd with a leaky vaccine that trained intensely for narrow, non-sterilizing immunity. Of course the virus did this. It’s the evolutionary gradient such a vaccine creates. No other outcome was possible or plausible. So yes, of course people are getting infected again and again. That’s what antigenic fixation does. It turns your immune system into a one trick pony unable to adapt to changing pathogens. Our own Sock Boy PM is evidence of this. Once you are fixated, new adaptive responses are not learned. That means that this is 100% wrong: We already know it doesn’t work. If live virus cannot overcome the antigenic fixation, neither can a vaccine, especially as it’s going to be based on variant strains that are well out of date by the time it’s released and just fixate patients further. We already know that variant specific boosters don’t work. They tried them. It did not elicit novel response. mRNA vaccines inhibit learning to produce antibodies - there is no sterilizing immunity being achieved by them. See UK data and attached screenshot with pertinent part: Weekly Flu and COVID-19 Report_w42 (publishing.service.gov.uk) These new “variant boosters” are just marketing hype. They’re going to be approved without clinical trials based on being “known to be safe” and “eliciting biomarker response.” They’re just going to see if the boosters generate **some** predetermined antibody response. Of course they will. But what we do not know is: do those antibodies have any effect on current covid strains? do they provide any sort of sterilizing immunity? (Doubtful, as the others have not) and if not, are they just going to drive more and deeper OAS/ADE? (likely because that’s what leaky vaccines do) Adding to this mess is the issue that boosters seem to be eliciting greater adverse event response than the original 2 dose course. (IMPORTANT: this is not going to be assessed before these are approved. It’s been removed from the trial protocols.) This is indeed precisely the case, but it’s vaccines and boosters causing it. It is becoming incredibly obvious in the UK data - and Canadian data - that the boosted are getting covid at multiple times the rate of the unvaxxed. And the extent of that greater susceptibility was accelerating when they stopped publishing this data. (See UK data screenshot.) Vaccines, at least at one point, provided some reduction in death risk perhaps on the order of 50% (at least before counting side effects, but NOTE: that this has never, ever, ever been a sufficient amount of efficacy for ANY vaccine, until now.) But if you quadruple cases, that’s still twice the deaths overall. ^^^ Stunningly stupid ^^^ This variant was selected for and preys upon the vaxxed and boosted. They are the ones getting it, spreading it, and suffering from it. It has become highly clear in nearly every sound data series. US over 70’s are near 100% vaxxed and highly boosted. Yet their hospital rate is more than double (+130%) year on year despite an objectively milder variant. We’re already approaching the summer highs from last year despite being 6-7 weeks away from a likely peak. So, sorry, but it’s not the “unvaxxed” doing this. This is the predictable and inevitable outcome of generating herd level antigenic fixation with narrow, leaky vaccines. This is WHY we do not use them.

Some information on OAS - "original antigenic sin" - also known as antigenic fixation. Antigenic fixation is extremely well-studied and known, especially around influenza. The OAS moniker gives you an idea of how long this field of study has been going on. It basically works like this: Antigenic fixation/Hoskins effect/OAS is a simple evolutionary process driven by strong immune imprinting, such as that from narrow vector, leaky vaccines. You learn one response and use it preferentially in learning others. The covid vaccines have led to Omicron as being an OAS variant, creating an evolutionary gradient that selected for it. There are some reasons to be particularly worried about how this will affect the future at a societal/herd immunity level, because this antigenic fixation generated by the widespread application of a badly leaky or even infection amplifying vaccine is quite different that what occurs in nature. Instead of herd immunity, we now have herd immuno-fixation. In fact, herd immunity from covid in highly vaccinated countries, is likely impossible now. Most OAS is natural- just a property of human immune function in the face of pathogens that mutate a lot. We have seen this same thing with the flu. You build up a set of immune responses when you are young and fixate into them. As you get old and your generalized responses attenuate, you rely upon these learned responses more and more. Old age and experience substitutes for for youth and a potent army of generalized immune responders. This is expected and normal. But, a variant may come along that is similar enough to something you had in the past to trigger the old response, but different enough to render that response ineffective. And suddenly, the flu is very dangerous for you. You’re relying upon an ineffective antibody and cannot compensate with a generalized response. This is a big part of why flu gets so high risk for the elderly. It has limited overall social effects as the fixations of each person are widely varied and depend upon what pathogens they were exposed to in the past. It is this heterogeneity of herd immune characteristics that prevents strong selectors for far reaching OAS variants from emerging. This is a VERY important concept because the herd is diverse. Everyone gets some degree of OAS for influenza. But we get different OAS, because we had different exposures when we were young. Different flus, in different places and different times. This means that when some new viral mutation finds similarity with a certain kind of imprinted immunity and preys upon OAS, the effects are limited to small groups. This keeps large risks firewalled and prevents pandemics. But in a situation like covid where 70-90% of populations ALL got the same narrow inoculum exposure from a leaky (non-sterilizing) vaccine, that's NOT going to be the case. Fixation is homogenous. Everyone’s immune system pony has been taught the Same. One. Trick. This may have very serious implications. What it means if we have a large segment that are immuno-fixated in identical fashion with a non-sterilizing inoculum: It means that now if there is a mutation that finds a way to take advantage of this specific fixation, it has a HUGE cohort to infect. What might previously have been 2-5% of population at risk - is now 70-90%. And that changes everything. Now, one bad throw of the evolutionary dice and you have an instant pandemic where none was possible before. We all saw how quickly Omicron chased the vaccination campaigns. This was not a coincidence. It was driven BY the selective pressure of the vaccines that took what looks to be a throwback variant that did not evolve from delta, but rather diverged from it all the way back at the original pre-alpha ancestor and surged it to sudden global prominence. Omicron is so divergent from other SARS-COV2 variants that some are arguing it is an entirely different serotype. (READ here: Towards SARS-CoV-2 serotypes? | Nature Reviews Microbiology ). If you have a large pool of hosts that all have the same fixation, then you have a large number of individual labs in which to have such a mutation occur. The emergence of such variants is inherently a function of underlying mutation rate of the virus (which is high in covid strains) X the number of potential hosts and if the “win” state for virus is the same in all those hosts, then, in effect, all the labs are working on the same problem. You’ve effectively crowd sourced it to 70-90% of the population. Then some mutation chances on a high replication strategy and it goes like wildfire because so many are similarly susceptible. It's the “perfect storm.” You now have FAR more hosts in which to have random chances occur, all selecting for a mutation that attacks one specific weakness and that weakness is in most of the population, so once it’s out, there is no stopping it. And if this fixation prevents the hosts from developing strong new immunities based on these novel pathogens, this becomes.....OUCH. You get wave after wave of mutations until you wipe out the susceptible population. There is a lot here that we still do not know and this is not a proven hypothesis, but this does appear a serious potential issue. I'm not sure we’ve ever seen anything like it before in human evolutionary history.

It is the potential existence of a human. A fertilized egg is not a person. It only has the potential to be a person.

Does everyone still think going completely digital is the best idea ever?

I didn't know this about Canada until I met and became good friends with a single mom whose hubby buggered off to Quebec to avoid child support payments because Quebec doesn't enforce them for the rest of Canada. I learned it's actually a big problem - men buggering off to Quebec to abandon their kids and responsibilities.

It's pretty hard when the majority of the population is snoring and completely obedient to absolutely anything the government tells them to do, without any critical thinking or investigation. Enjoy your cricket paste. I don't think it's a coincidence that a new cricket factory for human consumption was just opened in Ontario and I don't believe you will have a choice about consuming cricket paste. The food shortages that require you to eat cricket paste are manufactured, the same as gas price increases, airport/passport chaos and the so-called pandemic were all manufactured. We're being led to the slaughterhouse and too many people think they're going to a day spa because the government tells them so. LILLEY: Dutch farmer protest sparked by policy Trudeau wants for Canada (msn.com) Ooops, sorry to wake you up.

Trudeau must be just seething. ? First she gets the George Jonas Freedom Award, so he throws her in jail on a BS bail violation and then she gets nominated for a Nobel. ?

Tamara Lich, currently sitting in a Canadian prison, has been nominated for a Nobel Peace Prize.

Lots of stuff happening at the legal level, as well. Doctors are starting to step up and demand answers and science from Public Health Officers all over the world. I suspect it's because they are now seeing the results (adverse events/uptick in all-cause mortality/explosion of cancers, unexplained deaths/neurological disorders) of this disastrous mass forced vaccination that threw all known science right out the window.

Good article that explains why mass vaccinating with a leaky vaccine during a pandemic, drives variants and infections. The article is from 2015 - a great of example of "science we tossed out the window during covid". Imperfect Vaccination Can Enhance the Transmission of Highly Virulent Pathogens | PLOS Biology Basically, the substandard, poor quality jabs turned the vaccinated into plague rats that drove the virus to mutate much faster than what would be normal and made them into a dangerous vector for transmission which amplified spread and risk. Now, the plague rats outnumber the villagers. It’s not the virus having an effect on vaccine function, it’s the leaky vaccine function having an effect on viral evolution and it’s not clear we’ve really even seen all the damage yet. Leaky vaccines make disease hotter and more deadly because now, vaccines become a weapon for the virus, not a defense for the society. If this is what's happening (and it appears more and more so to be the case), we need to know because it would have profound policy implications. It means vaccines should be banned, not mandated. It means boosters are a societal risk accelerator, not an attenuator. It means that adults do not need to be shielded from school kids, it means that school kids need to be protected from vaccinated adults, including their teachers. It's a scary inversion of general disease pathways that has been created here. Simplest way to test whether this well-known epidemiological hazard is happening, is to look at high vaccination areas and see how this is protecting them. If this is really a sterilizing vaccine, cases should drop year on year, once we adjust for testing levels and seasonal signal. In fact, we’d expect cases to drop even in the absence of a sterilizing vaccine because of the recovered cohort with acquired immunity. Thus, if such adjusted cases were to rise instead, this would be a fairly strong signal. If they were to do so out of season, it might be stronger still. Unfortunately, this is JUST what we are seeing. Cases in highly vaxxed UK and Israel are exploding. Some of this is testing, but using % positive as a rough proxy for test adjusted can help us here. Testing in both places is up about 2X on a per capita basis. but Israeli cases are 648/mm vs 161 same time last year. UK are 420 vs 16 and are now spiking well out of season. This is the result you’d predict from leaky vaccine spread. The FDA and NIH need to stop playing vaccine salesman and do their actual jobs. They never looked at safety and they never looked at long term sterilizing immunity. If they pushed a seriously leaky vaccine into hundreds of millions, blame for this lies 100% at their feet. The idea that boosters are a path out of this and can mitigate new variants needs to be instantly abandoned. If this is correct, they will only make it worse. You cannot live getting a booster every 4 months to re-activate your immune system. It will grind you to dust and bury you under adverse events. If the vaccinated are super spreaders and viral enhancers, the next booster should be actual covid. It’s the only way to protect the rest of us - from them. It would be a rich irony to see all those who have hectored and vilified the unvaxxed suddenly refuse to take the risk that would protect society, if it is revealed that they constitute the real threat. Further reading: This chicken vaccine makes its virus more dangerous | PBS NewsHour

TX_1~ABS:AT/TX_2~ABS~AT (nih.gov)

Canadian Dr's blog: He breaks down the PHAC stats from April and May this year, quite well. Importance of Vit. D and how the vaccines deplete the body of it. He speculates that this is the reason why triple-vaxxed are dying in droves. Dr David Grimes: Covid-19 & Vitamin D : Lack of benefit of vaccines in Canada There appears to be mortality benefit from one or two vaccinations, but the benefit is lost in those with three vaccinations. Conclusions My understanding of this is that each vaccination creates an intense immune stimulation, its very purpose. However it is known that immune activation comsumes the essential Vitamin D, a molecule of which can be used only once and then it is irreversibly de-activated. It follows, but is as yet untested or unpublished, that successive vaccinations will consume Vitamin D and deficiency will result. Reduction of immunity will follow, including response to further vaccinations. Vaccinations require Vitamin D, and so perhaps all we need is correction of widespread VItamin D deficiency to optimise natural immunity. This would reverse the apparent ineffectiveness of triple vaccination. Vaccinations must be considered to be at least disappointing in their effectiveness. We have no controlled trials on which to judge effectiveness and safety, but observational data, such as from Canada, are disturbing. In many countries Covid-19 cases and deaths are higher at present than they were in 2021

More than 1,000 peer-reviewed papers on covid vaccine injuries compiled here: COMPILATION: PEER REVIEWED MEDICAL PAPERS OF COVID VACCINE INJURIES - COVIDVACCINEINJURIES.COM #139 - involves Ontario, Canada. Ontario is being watched closely, as 297 children in Toronto area alone now have myocarditis from the jabs.

UK doctors lay it all on the line to keep children out of harm's way. FDA meeting records show the WCH issued a global recall on the children's vaccines THE SAME MONTH the US approved the genetic products for 6 months-5 yrs of age. Letter to the UK Gov from 76 Doctors: Comprehensive Reasons Why the US FDA Decision Authorizing COVID Vaccinations in Infants and Young Children Must Not Happen in the UK - Global ResearchGlobal Research - Centre for Research on Globalization

Who would determine what is a significant amount of risk that women should take? And how much risk is acceptable? Is it a 50% chance of death? 75%? 100%? I think each woman and her doctor are in the best position to determine how much risk she is willing to take. A woman with 2 or 3 children already may not want to risk it at even 50%, leaving her children parentless and in foster care or motherless. Another woman may feel 50% is an okay risk. These decisions are best left to each woman to determine, based on her own circumstances in life.

And thank you for leading the charge against the hostile alien takeover.

Good article, but still a bit weasel-y. It's not really a "phenomenon". It's a well-known fact that this happens with repeated, unnecessary shots. Especially leaky ones, like the 'Vid vaxes are. The immune system starts to fail. And this is exactly what we're seeing, as reported in this article, as well - multiple vaxxed adults contracting and dying from covid more than unvaxxed adults. Which makes the whole "inject yourself with toxic spike every 9 months, or else" thing.....very suspicious.

I wonder what the science is behind the 9 month thing. Every study shows immunity wanes very quickly - within a few weeks to a few months after vaccination. Perhaps they know that shooting yourself up with toxic spike protein every 2-3 months would be disastrous.

Not really. They are continually held over our heads like the sword of damocles. Do you think the government is lying when they say they will require shots every 9 months and can change the definition of fully vaccinated whenever they want?

Erm, when they change the definition to however many jabs they want you to have, what exactly do you think is going to happen? I think it will be the same as last time - mandates, loss of freedoms for those not able or willing to get jab after jab after jab after jab. The reason I think this is because the article clearly states: I would suggest it's the government that is scare-mongering. The article is just reporting what they're planning on doing.

'TWO DOSES ARE NO LONGER ENOUGH': Canadians required to get COVID shot every nine months (msn.com) Looks like Canadians will be forced to take all 10 jabs Trudeau bought for each of you. He's going to protect you from covid, even if it kills you.