Goddess

Ya, I know. You reject peer-reviewed scientific studies from top medical journals around the world. But you support scientists who tell you there's no such thing as natural immunity and believe that ivermectin is "horsepaste" because CBC told you so. You're anti-science.

Uh-huh. Not sure I believe you when you've consistently rejected science in favor of CBC headlines and keep repeating anti-science lies.

Ya, I know you laugh at studies and datasets. Not sure why you're proud of being anti-science....but you do you.

Wrong. The same photo mashups you've seen of the Con bot farms have been circulating on X for months but with Lib bot farm posts. But there was silence from the media, silence from Singh, silence from the Libs. It's to distract Lib supporters. You should be watching the committee meetings. Liberal party has been robbing Canada blind since they got into power.

People have been pointing out the Liberal bot farms on X for many months now, but it's been ignored. For how far ahead the Cons are in the polls, why would they need to use bot farms?

Yup. You bought into the fear-mongering hook, line and sinker and then denigrated anyone who pointed out the facts. Such a good little government drone, you are.

It's not my fault you believed the lies. LOL Riiiiiight. You've been the very picture of level-headedness through this all. 🤣

Nice try at re-writing history, m0r0n, but here's how it really went down: "Experts": You won't get covid if you get this shot. You: But we're still getting covid. "Experts": OK, you need 2 shots. You: But we're still getting covid. "Experts": 2 shots will keep you from getting hospitalized and dying. You: But we're still getting hospitalized and dying. "Experts": OK, OK. You need to get jabbed every 3-4 months for the rest of your life. You: Damned anti-vaxxers! They are the reason the shots aren't working! "Experts": Huh? Oh sorry, didn't hear you, counting our money.

Oh, we were told right from the start that we'd all need to get jabbed several times a year for the rest of our lives, were we? You seem remember things differently than I do. You know who warned you that the jabs wouldn't stop infection? Me.

Any time you'd like to, you're free to read all 80+ studies showing otherwise and show me where they are wrong. Uh-huh. Jabs are working great, I see. Really keeping those covid numbers down. Just like we were promised.

Further to the above, Pfizer for sure knew about the transcription issue. They knew transfection could be "transient or stable". This is from the patent:

A study by Aldén and colleagues showed something alarming. (I've covered the reverse transcription issue in this thread previously. You can search those posts if you need a refresher on what it is.) Intracellular Reverse Transcription of Pfizer BioNTech COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine BNT162b2 In Vitro in Human Liver Cell Line - PubMed (nih.gov) Preclinical studies of COVID-19 mRNA vaccine BNT162b2, developed by Pfizer and BioNTech, showed reversible hepatic effects in animals that received the BNT162b2 injection. Furthermore, a recent study showed that SARS-CoV-2 RNA can be reverse-transcribed and integrated into the genome of human cells. Our results indicate a fast up-take of BNT162b2 into human liver cell line Huh7, leading to changes in LINE-1 expression and distribution. We also show that BNT162b2 mRNA is reverse transcribed intracellularly into DNA in as fast as 6 h upon BNT162b2 exposure. What this means: That 👆 center 444 base pair amplicon 👆 is taken up into the human genome very quickly after injecting. Experts say if the middle part is taken up, almost certainly the entire thing is. This means it's VERY possible that the injection's (both Pfizer & Moderna) genetic code is permanently installed into the human genome. Studies are on-going - so there are no other studies that confirm or reject this scientific hypothesis. We are still in "It's an experiment" territory here. Further studies are looking at whether the genetic code is taken up by gametocytes (eggs & sperm), which means it would also be passed onto any offspring. The hope is that the body can edit it out. My feeling is that likely this is linked genetically only until the time the genetics are regenerated, which would vary from person to person for a variety of reasons - including diet, overall immune health, how many times they were exposed to the injections, and genetics. And probably other things people much smarter than me will think of for future studies. 🤣 This has been an INCREDIBLY RECKLESS experiment. Or intentional, since the jabs don't seem to do much of anything else. There is one jab-injured patient who offered herself for study in the US where DNA integration has been identified, but I'm waiting for the paper to come out first on that one.

You just called it "veterinary treatments for parasites". 👆 You joined in the "horsepaste' lies. You repeated them ad nauseum every time I tried to point out Ivermectin's use in humans, including in the post you just made. Nice try. Liar.

Meanwhile, in England:

I'm really starting to think it's too many id!ot voters in Canada. "I demand to hear something that makes NO sense, to put my mind at ease!!"

Oh, are you saying you SUPPORTED the use of ivermectin during the covid years and the frontline docs who were using it? News to me. I remember you quoting the "horsepaste" lies. On the "good news" front: Who's the fringe minority now? YOU.

The most popular repurposed anti-parasitics are: Ivermectin, Fenbendazole and Mebendazole. Repurposed anti-parasitics are now being used successfully to treat Stage 4 Cancers and Turbo Cancers. For Pancreatic Cancer, the winner is Fenbendazole. Please dont' believe the people here, like robo and eyeball that say anti-parasitics are only for parasites and are just for animals. They don't know what they're talking about because they only listen to CBC headlines and the FDA, who lied about Ivermectin during the covid years. Dr. William Makis has a cancer clinic in Edmonton that is using Fenbendazole and Ivermectin with great success. Johns Hopkins Study: Anti-Parasitic Drug Slows Pancreatic Cancer in Mice | Johns Hopkins Medicine Mebendazole Impedes the Proliferation and Migration of Pancreatic Cancer Cells through SK1 Inhibition Dependent Pathway - PMC (nih.gov) Emerging Perspectives on the Antiparasitic Mebendazole as a Repurposed Drug for the Treatment of Brain Cancers - PMC (nih.gov) Repurposing Drugs in Oncology (ReDO)—mebendazole as an anti-cancer agent - PMC (nih.gov) (PDF) The Benzimidazole-Based Anthelmintic Parbendazole: A Repurposed Drug Candidate That Synergizes with Gemcitabine in Pancreatic Cancer (researchgate.net)

👆 Oh look, here's one of those human rocks now, trying to cause another avalanche of hysteria. 👆

Thank you, that was my point - we're going down the same road to avalanche, as we just did. It seems (judging by the people on this forum) - it's the same people, too.

Seriously, though.... A “people” version of an avalanche we call a “mass movement,” “mass hysteria,” “groupthink,” “riot,” “moral panic,” “stampede,” etc. Although there are crucial similarities between an avalanche of rocks and a mass hysteria (or one of these other variants) of people, one key difference is that people, but not rocks, have free will, and can choose not to be part of it. By refraining to “slide” despite being pressed to do so, a person not only doesn’t end up part of the mass hysteria, but also doesn’t further its spread. A small number of folks in March of 2020 were such “steady rocks.” They never got swept up into calling for lockdowns. Not for a minute, and not for two weeks. But most slid, at least for a while. Some slid for only a short stint and “woke up.” Others slid for many months before digging their heels in. And others are still sliding to this day, pressuring their neighbors on the mountainside (the social network) to continue sliding. Some will never join "Team Reality". Unlike rocks, these human sliders bear responsibility for the mass hysteria. And the “larger” the social forces the person could impart (the bigger the “boulder”), the more responsibility he or she bears. Their largest blind spot is themselves: they are among those culpable. They contributed to the very mass hysteria that bred entirely ill narratives and civil-liberties-violating interventions that it will take a generation to recover from. They are the boulders at the bottom of the mountain side who started near the top, helped ensure that the avalanche was as large as it was by their early pronouncements of fear and demands for interventions. The huge numbers of small pebbles were a bigger problem than the visible boulders here and there. I know many people who NOW say they only supported the first 2 weeks. They still don’t get it - all was lost there and then. It was a pandemic of cowardliness.

Excuse me, Sir, but you are not allowed to ask those questions. Nor are you an "expert", so you should be ignoring any datasets. Just trust your government. Trust "The Science."

It's been said that we should just change the name of Canada to "New India" and be done with it.

No, they would be a dead scientist.