Goddess

Let's start here: Do the covid jabs prevent transmission and infection? Do you still believe it benefits children and young adults to get covid-jabbed? There are hundreds of studies and datasets with the correct answers to those 2 questions. Do you still ignore the science and just go with what the MSM says?

Nothing to do with competency. They have the power to do it, dumbass.

So crazy the US Congress & Senate subcommittees are deep-diving investigations into that very possibility. You should really watch the committees. You wouldn't sound so stoopid then. Poor @eyeball you've been the last to catch onto everything and you're the last to catch onto this too. You really need to get your nose out of the MSM's arse. Isn't the 💩 smell starting to get to you???

Bwaahahhahahaaa! Seriously, dude. You've been wrong about everything and I've been right about everything. I'm not even debating this - it's a fact. There's literally hundreds of studies and datasets posted here that prove I've been right and you've been wrong. YOU still want children to die or experience life-altering health changes because you think it saves you!!! 🤣 Bwahahahaha! You're not just naive and scientifically illiterate - you're stoopid, too! 🤣

I believe he is scientifically illiterate. He doesn't understand it, so he relies on authorities to make his decisions. And he tells himself that gov'ts and authorities are always altruistic. It's the source of his gullibility.

It was incompetence. And desire for money, power and control. Some went along with it for money. Some for power. Some for control. Some for all three. Why is the idea of incompetent government, desire for money and power so foreign to you that you dismiss it out of hand? You really that naive?

Science thrives on open and honest debates. Power and control demands censorship. 👆👆 There's your motive. 👆👆

"Without it things would have been a lot worse". Hmmm. It looks to me that the gradient of the "COVID deaths" graph INCREASED after vaccines were introduced. This being the hallmark of no successful vaccine. Ever.

Maybe. But I've been right about everything and you've been wrong about everything.

In the covid era, public health and the media made it a virtue to create panic about being infected. This was gross malpractice on the part of the media and public health, distorting people's demand for lockdowns that harmed children, the poor, and the working class. In April 2020, a USC Understanding America Study found that respondents thought one in four people - 25% - who got covid would die from infection. These numbers were two orders of magnitude greater than the true infection fatality risk. No wonder people panicked. A 25% death rate is in the range of some Ebola outbreaks. The average American thought Covid was on the order of airborne Ebola! The spike in perception of risk happened immediately after lockdowns--which at least partly Michael Sanger's suggestion that lockdowns caused fear rather than resulted from it. But the 25% figure was a massive media and public health communications failure if the goal was to be truthful and keep the public informed. It was a catastrophic failure. Even by the end of June 2021, the perceived infection fatality risk had only dropped to one in eight, still orders of magnitude too high, and this is after most elderly Americans had been vaccinated and a large fraction of the country had immunity gained from covid recovery. Public health's primary job was to keep the public informed with accurate information during the covid era. In this, it failed. The panic ended up closing the minds of the public health establishment also, which caused them to push bad science and further panic as their non evidence based policies failed. @eyeball was one who openly mocked The Great Barrington Declaration, which has as its primary plank (one of two), the focused protection of vulnerable people. (The second plank was lifting lockdowns and opening schools, letting younger people live life as normally as possible). The document itself and accompanying material have a score of suggestions for specific policies to implement to do that. It called for local public health to be more creative in solutions to protect older people living in local communities in ways that protect their human rights. @eyeball rejected the scientific fact of herd immunity. The simple fact is that we did not then and do not now possess a technology to stop the virus from spreading. Interventions needed to be targeted and not cause more harm than good. And I highly suspect that these elevated estimates percolated up to the higher levels of policymaking too and affected the elite pandemic risk perception. This, in my opinion, is the main reason that paternalistic misinformation is the wrong approach for public health to take. It assumes that elites know better and are immune to the hysteria that they are generating. But soon enough one starts believing one's own lies. And during Covid, the establishment came to believe its own lies. This made it impossible for the establishment to engage in rational decisionmaking. What was originally instrumentalist misinformation spiraled out of control and became public policy. Authentic scientific controversy--without regard for the "consequences" of the truth--must take place out in the open and be encouraged and promoted; it must not be the private monopoly of elites. Society just won't function properly otherwise. @eyeball's chicken little panic is a good part of what caused Public Health to "do something". @eyeball did not care what the outcomes of just "doing something, anything, AAAAAGHHHH!!!!! Panic! Panic! Panic!" would be. He didn't care that children were at NO risk - he wanted them all jabbed multiple times with an experimental injection that was ALL risk and NO benefit to them, but it helped @eyeball with his "feels". @eyeball openly mocked the vaccine injured, called them all liars, insisted there were NO jab deaths or injuries, in spite of being shown the date over and over and over and over and over...... @eyeball rejected that myocarditis was a serious adverse event of the jabs he insisted children bear....for his own selfish self. What the public needed most was reassurance, plus directed care to vulnerable groups. What they actually got was something quite different. By accident or by design? By accident or by design? @eyeball says it was all accidental. But, @eyeball has been wrong. Repeatedly. On everything. He is a panicker - a frenzied panicker who demands others sacrifice themselves for his fake, based on lies panic. And he takes no responsibility for it because he was "just following orders." @eyeball is part of the problem. We need to stop listening to these FOOLS.

Well, they sure fooled you 🤣

25-year-old man arrested following sexual assault | Royal Canadian Mounted Police (rcmp-grc.gc.ca) A 25-year-old man originally from India, but residing in Halifax, N.S., has been arrested following sexual assault incidents in Moncton. There were at least twelve victims, some of whom were under the age of 16. The perpetrator has already been released back into the public. Women don't matter.

I agree. That's why the Cochrane study with a cohort of 50,000 was so important.

That's what I don't understand, either - more hospitalizations, more deaths by substantial increases and....crickets. Crickets compared to the "5 alarm, hair on fire, shut down everything, fire people who don't inject, everybody panic!!" days. Bizarre.

One of the lies told knowingly about the jabs and covered up with censorship, was that these are not "vaccines". They are genetic therapies. As such, they should have been subject to very different regulations and trials. This means the US FDA should have scrutinized this platform in its gene therapy division. That’s an entirely different ballgame. This also points out the fact that, said plasmids, were intentional and the process was not as they represented. "Conspiracy theorists" have been trying to tell you this since before they rolled out. mrna-20200630 (sec.gov) 👇 The journey of a lifetime — development of Pfizer’s COVID-19 vaccine (nih.gov) 👇 Ask yourself - had you been told the truth - that these were not traditional vaccines but were in fact, largely untested genetic therapy - would you still have taken them? Would you have given them to your children? They knew you wouldn't, so they lied to you on purpose. See below:

Critical thinking is not for everyone. 1, It's very clear the alphabet entities lied to the public and tried to cover things up. 2. It was these alphabet entities that docs got their info from. (I don't view this as a valid excuse - docs could have easily looked into the trial data and kept up with the papers. Many did just that. When injecting humanity with an experimental medical product using not one, but TWO novel platforms, you'd think this would be a no-brainer for docs to want to know how the experiment is going.) 3. Docs were lied to just like the rest of us. The difference is - they have the education and responsibility to ensure they "do no harm." You'd think the Thalidomide, Vioxx, Tamiflu, Gardia, opiod debacles would have rang some alarm bells for docs but noooooooo....... 3 easy and logical thinking steps. It doesn't have to be some vast conspiracy. Just a few people at the top and a whole bunch of underlings who question nothing, especially when paid enough to look the other way. Then you silence, blacklist and fire anyone who questions and VOILA! The rest STFU.

Bingo.

If he can't even admit it doesn't stop anyone from getting or giving others covid.... 🤷‍♂️ At least he's stopped claiming it wasn't giving anyone myocarditis. And he's stopped claiming no one in Canada has been injured or died form them. Slow progress, I guess. Lie to me once, shame on you. Lie to me twice, shame on me. Lie to me 3,423 times, my name is eyeball.

Look, you were told the injection stayed in the arm, that it would prevent transmission, infection and hospitalization and death. You were told there were no other drugs that would save you - only the injection. You were told 100% safe and 95% effective. You were told if everyone got injected during the pandemic, it would end. You were told unvaxxed people were the ones driving variants, when science already knew it was you vaxxed people, injecting with a non-sterilizing vax. Remember what we've always known about antibiotics - finish the Rx or it doesn't cure the infection??? That was known science. You guys decided to throw that out the window too. The real science disagreed with all those things. It's all on record in the Trickle thread. Look, darling - I'm sorry you followed the conspiracy theorists and not the real science. Getting mad at me doesn't help. Just pay attention next time and don't think that just because CBC says something, it's the truth. Honestly, I don't know why you're clinging to the lies - most people recognize they were lied to about everything and the shots were basically useless.

No. Your side threw it all out the window and went with conspiracy theories instead. (See Venandi's post above.) You know you were lied to and duped. Sorry you're pissed about it. Maybe pay attention next time.

Home Page - The Hope Accord Please sign the Hope Accord.

We threw almost every bit of established virology, immunology, vaccinology.....right out the damn window. The sad part is - so much of this was easily Google-able. Like Ivermectin. I went with a friend to church yesterday (I know, I know 🤷‍♂️) and there was a call for prayer for one family - I'd say the parents are early-mid 30's with 3 little kids all under about 6-7 yrs old. The dad is going in for surgical ablation on his heart on Tues. His heart has been racing and causing havoc, the wife said for 2 years now. My heart sunk - Hmmmm, two years since he was likely forced to vax to keep his job. Too many people are not connecting the dots yet.

Maybe they were forced to, after a video of the beating surfaced?