Goddess

I guess if I'm a "lunatic feminist" for being against men killing their pregnant/post partum partners because they never wanted to be a father, then I will wear that label proudly.

Do you know what IS an objective fact? https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-021-03392-8 Homicide is the #1 killer of pregnant and post-partum women. More men will kill their pregnant or post-partum partner because they don't want the baby. More women will die at the hands of men. What do you plan on doing about that? Let me guess, since this consideration hasn't even entered your mind - you will do nothing. As men have done for millenia. You won't be nearly as vocal about controlling men as you are about controlling women.

Fetus Is Not An Actual Person Philosophy Essay (ukessays.com) This sort of helps understand both sides of the debate. I think it's not about when "life" begins, but when "personhood" begins.

So when couples go for IVF treatments and multiple embryos are there, but only one is implanted and the rest are destroyed....who should go to jail for murder? Both parents? Just the mother? The doctor? All of them?

That is a religious belief, not a scientific one.

Miscarriages are medically termed "abortions." ‘Miscarriage or abortion?’ Understanding the medical language of pregnancy loss in Britain; a historical perspective - PMC (nih.gov) Nothing has changed, really. Abortion Vs. Miscarriage: Why Terminology Is Crucial Post-Roe (scarymommy.com)

And others. Every one of you want to comment on that one case, but not one of you will touch the Malta cases. ? I know why though. Because it proves that women are going to die needlessly, as they did before Roe.

But again, my point was that abortion numbers should not be used to show that women are deviants who need to be controlled by the government or state.

I linked to more than one state that is already prosecuting women for miscarriages. It happened in the past, and was part of why Roe was argued in the first place. Nothing has changed since abortion was illegal. Old white guys, who understand nothing about female biology still want the ability to decide for women. Even in this thread, a man stated that pregnancy by rape was so rare that it didn't matter. That was stated by US politicians who wanted women to carry their rapists babies. It is a false statement. And in states that will outlaw all abortion with no exceptions, the morning after pill, normally given to prevent a pregnancy after rape, will be illegal and women will be forced to carry rapist babies to term. Sorry, but I can't help thinking that if the situation was reversed and men could get pregnant and were getting raped by women millions of times a year, they would never stand for this. But they expect women to. And in some states, rapists who father children are given parental rights. It's obscene what men demand of women.

I think this is why Roe vs. Wade was originally enacted. So women could have the privacy to not have to provide their medical records to prove anything to you. It's none of your business.

The point is that it is medically termed an "abortion". The medical records will list an "abortion". So the abortion numbers being tossed around to show that women are deviant creatures that thoughtlessly kill off babies, is not true.

In the interest of showing how common "abortions" are - technically, my medical records will show 5 abortions. They were all miscarriages, one at 18 weeks. No babies were "murdered". It's the reason why my children are 7 years apart and I'm also grateful that i didn't have to deal with a legal system during that time of my life.

Not from my visit with friends last night, but we did also discuss this case: I feel like I need to share part of my experience today in light of the overturning of Roe vs Wade. Two months ago on April 11th. I was one of the mothers who sat in a doctors office and was told that my baby no longer had a heartbeat. That the child I had prayed for, longed for, and fought for had passed away. My child was wanted. At 9 weeks pregnant. I found out that my child had down syndrome. I was offered the choice of an abortion which I declined. I wanted this child no matter what. Two weeks later I found out my child was developing a cystic hygroma ( swelling in my child's neck). I was offered an abortion again which I declined. One week later I found out my baby not only had down syndrome and a cystic hygroma which would severely alter his life but that he had now developed fetal hydrops and had a less than 3 percent chance of survival. I was offered an abortion again which I declined. One week later I found out that the hydrops had gotten worse and my child had less than 1 percent chance of survival. I was told to come in each week to see if my child had passed away or not. I had to start looking for symptoms in my own body because the likelihood of me developing a life threatening condition was high. I am one of the moms who had to face the fact that her child would pass away and would not be able to survive out of utero and that I could also die because of this. The mental anguish of knowing your child is going to die and nothing can be done is the most horrible thing. I understand the women who cannot live like this. At 18 weeks gestation, I found out my child passed away. I was told by doctors that my body may or may not go into labor. If I was to go into labor naturally at home, that there was over 90 percent chance that I would die. I wanted to see and hold the child that I had carried for so long. I opted to be induced the next day on April 12th. I delivered this baby naturally with the help of doctors and nurses and because of their help. I was able to hold my child that had passed away. I am eternally grateful for these doctors and nurses who saved my life when my child's life could not be saved. Even though my child had already passed away. Because he was born at 18 weeks gestation and not 20 weeks, by the current legal definitions, his birth was considered an abortion. On my medical records, it states that I had an abortion, instead of a stillborn which is a very hard thing for me to look at. The current definition of "abortion" includes infants who die in utero from natural causes. Those babies are included in the count and skew the numbers. All this being said. If my child had passed away today. Things would be very different. My life would be at risk. I wanted my baby more than anything in the world but he passed away and it was still considered an abortion. So before celebrating today's decision. Think about the moms that don't have a choice in an abortion. The ones who wanted their child but now have few options over their own bodies. There is so much more to this decision than killing a child. I am against killing children just like I think most of us are. Many abortions are not choices they are mothers making the hardest decisions of their lives. "Abortion" is a legal term that does not accurately describe what people think it does. How can you kill someone who has already passed away? Mothers are making the hardest decisions of their lives. We dont know the circumstances. They need to be able to make those decisions without the interference and judgment of others. This is what "abortion" can look like.

I was having a group chat last night with friends that included ones from both Canada and the US. Talking about this subject, it was mentioned that anti-abortion people seem to think that X number of abortions = X number of "babies killed". It really doesn't. Here's the comment from one of my friends: Another friend (and I never knew this, none of us did and this is why abortion should fall under the 14th amendment privacy laws) said this: I think these women's thoughts are worth considering before you take these decisions completely out of their hands.

So, to those here who insisted that unvaccinated Canadians should be denied healthcare because they chose to not get (or couldn't get) the jabs.....should vaccinated Canadians be denied healthcare because they chose to play Russian Roulette repeatedly with an experimental, untested medical product?

So far, the "conspiracy theorist" scientists are batting 100%. CBC, CTV and Global, etc. - goose egg.

Effects of Previous Infection and Vaccination on Symptomatic Omicron Infections | NEJM This study was huge in scale, data collected from over 100,000 people infected by the Omicron variant. Here are the key points: Those who have been "fully vaccinated" with two shots from Moderna or Pfizer are more likely to contract Covid-19 than those who have not been vaccinated at all Booster shots offer protection approximately equal to natural immunity, but the benefits wane after 2-5 months Natural immunity lasts for at least 300-days, which is the length of the study; it likely lasts much longer Key take-away: Vaccination increases risk of COVID-19, but infection without vaccination gives immunity This jives with what the government of Canada is finally admitting, that 4 out of every 5 covid deaths since mid-February are vaccinated, with 70% of those deaths being among the triple-vaxxed. The study shows that: Those who had a prior infection but no vaccination had a 46.1 and 50 percent immunity against the two subvariants of the Omicron variant, even at an interval of more than 300 days since the previous infection. However, individuals who received two doses but had no previous infection, were found with negative immunity against both BA.1 and BA.2 Omicron subvariants, indicating an increased risk of contracting COVID-19 than an average person. Over six months after getting two doses of Pfizer, immunity against any Omicron infection dropped to -3.4 percent. For two doses of the Moderna vaccine it was even worse - immunity against any Omicron infection dropped to -10.3 percent after more than six months since the last injection. Negative immunity means your immune system is failing, which is what the censored scientists and doctors said would happen ? Although three doses of the Pfizer vaccine increased immunity to over 50 percent, this was measured over JUST 40 days after the third vaccination, which is a very short interval. In comparison, natural immunity persisted at around 50 percent when measured over 300 days after the previous infection, while immunity levels fell to negative figures 270 days after the second dose of vaccine. Individuals that were previously infected but not vaccinated had half the risks of reinfection as compared to those that were vaccinated with two doses but not infected.

You may not have a choice. That's what happens when you give up all your rights to the government when they create an emergency. Hope you like cricket paste. World's largest cricket processing plant coming to London, Ont. | CBC News All the elites won't be eating it though. They'll still have filet mignon.

And ALL of our public health officers and Tam have access to these papers and they ignore. You know why? 22% pay raise to keep the panic and the jabs going. That's why.

If I seem angry, it's because I am. Because now Trudeau wants to change the definition of fully vaxxed to at least 3 doses. If you remember correctly, the third dose is pretty much guaranteed to KILL my sister.

Crunching some numbers: 15.1 serious adverse events out of every 10,000 jabs = .15% That is larger than the risk the average person has of dying of covid. Certainly larger than mine at 0.02%. If 90% of Canadians are vaccinated, that is 33,300,000 people. At 15.1 adverse events per 10,000 people = almost a half a million (500,000) SERIOUS ADVERSE EVENTS, INCLUDING DEATH. Compare that to the 41,000 alleged "covid deaths" in Canada. If you think this is new information, it's not. The censored doctors and scientists have literally been screaming this from the rooftops for the last year. Remember a few months ago when you all called me a liar for saying people were dying and getting permanently disabled from the jabs? And that more people were dying/injured from the jabs than from covid? And you called me an idiot and other names? And you laughed at that Ontario father whose teenage son was found dead from the jabs on his bedroom floor, by his mother? And you posted how all the censored doctors and scientists were idiots and as proof, linked to their Wiki pages, freshly scrubbed of all their life-time accomplishments by ???who??? and now saying they were crackpot conspiracy theorists? Remember that? Remember when you called me a murderer of grannies and babies for not getting the jabs, even after I told you my sister is permanently disabled by them? Yeah. Wait til I post the study that shows it's the vaccinated that drove the new variants and are the ones responsible for spreading it now and put ALL of us in danger - exactly like viruses and mutations have done for thousands of years - totally predictable - and warned by doctors and scientists you all pissed on, because "CTV said so, neener, neener, neener." But yeah, let's shoot up all the kids and babies now. ? Idiots.

It's not. No abortion means no abortion. It means an 11 yr old who is raped has to carry that baby and very likely die in childbirth. It means women who are raped cannot get the morning after pill to prevent implantation of a potential embryo.

Sabrina Maddeaux: Yes, overturning Roe v. Wade affects Canadian women (msn.com) Women are going to die needlessly.

How do you know they're not lying now about birth control and gay marriage? What other rights are they planning to take away from women? Do you know?

Pretty rich coming from a man whose own inter-racial marriage had to be fought for in the supreme court. I bet he won't be revisiting that ruling.