Goddess

This sort of tells me that you either didn't read or didn't understand the rest of the post.

Per the information I've already provided to you and my previous studies posted in the Trickle thread - the mechanisms for gene integration were identified long ago. That means they know HOW it happens. In 2014, Moderna admitted in 2 patents that gene integration due to DNA contamination would be a very bad thing and that it needed to be solved before mRNA tech was rolled out for human use or it would be catastrophic. (I posted the patents so you can see that it was already a concern). Per the information I provided to you, DNA integration into human cells has been confirmed in vitro. That means they know it CAN happen. Testing is continuing to be done. It will likely continue well into the future, as we do not know what effect altering YOUR DNA will have on YOUR children. We do know that the levels of contamination vary with vax brand and batch number. Those who got the worst batches are already experiencing issues. You can check out howbadismybatch.com to see that adverse events are associated with certain batches. You are correct this is not settled. But you are incorrect that it is not a cause for concern and should not be investigated further. You do understand it was an experiment, right? And that it's on-going?

The DNA contamination is only one part of what's in the jabs, as well. There's also the SV40 promoter, a known oncogenic. I'll see if I have time to put some info on that together, and how it relates to the DNA contamination, which was NOT DISCLOSED to governments or other authorities and is only known because of FOI's. A senior Health Canada (HC) official, Dr. Dean Smith, wrote in a FOI'ed email about the SV40 sequence:

@robosmith I'm putting some further info on the DNA contamination in the covid jabs here for you, as the topic we were discussing it on before (July 19) was not approp. ********************************************************************************** The dispute regarding the contamination is not just about whether the contamination levels are compliant with regulated allowable amounts. It's that the regulations should not apply to the mRNA injections. The reason being - the risk of naked residual DNA, which has a short half-life in the body, is not the same as the risk of DNA encapsulated in lipid nanoparticles (LNPs), which ferry their contents to all major organs in the body, where they transfect and dump their contents into cells. Dr. Phillip Buckaults of the University of South Carolina, called the application of standard DNA limits to the mRNA products a "serious regulatory oversight" during his testimony to a state Senate hearing in September last year. (You can see it here: Dr. Phillip Buckhault's Testimony on DNA Contamination in Pfizer's mRNA Vaccine (rumble.com) Professor Wafik El-Deiry, Director of the Cancer Centre at Brown University, agreed with Dr. Buckhaults’s concerns, stating that if the LNPs carrying contaminant DNA get into cells, “they can integrate in the genome which is permanent, heritable and has a theoretical risk of causing cancer depending on where in the genome they integrate.” It is true that biologics made with DNA plasmids are not new. But the LNP casing of the DNA - IS new. And the science around the potential concerns related to this is only emerging now. The LNPs have been praised as the technology that allowed the mRNA vaccines to work because they protect the mRNA from degrading as soon as it’s injected into the body. But, these LNPs protect the DNA just as much as they protect the RNA, thereby changing the risk profile of any residual DNA compared to that found in traditional vaccines. However in the mRNA vaccines, contaminating DNA and the active ingredient mRNA are both nucleic acids, meaning they are chemically similar and therefore more difficult to separate in the purification process. This challenge would not have been identified in the Pfizer clinical trial, which used a different manufacturing process for the trials, as that used for the mass rollout. (Most people don't realize there were 2 different manufacturing processes used - one for the trials and one for the rollout. See here: Pfizer’s Bait and Switch a ‘Gut Punch’ for Informed Consent - Umbrella News ) This pre-print study discovered that 40% of plasmids used in gene therapy, carry mutations and this raises serious alarm bells with regard to plasmid fidelity. See here: Prevalence of errors in lab-made plasmids across the globe | bioRxiv Now, there are some authorities that originally denied the contamination (Australia's TGA, for example) but this is very suspect - it's already been determined and replicated by numerous labs - in Germany, the US and in Canada. All these labs found levels in EXCESS of what regulations allow. Allowable level is <330 ng DNA/mg RNA. The injections are ranging from 360 to 534 times the permissible DNA limit. See this peer-reviewed German study by König and Kirchner, from May of this year: MPs | Free Full-Text | Methodological Considerations Regarding the Quantification of DNA Impurities in the COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine Comirnaty&reg; (mdpi.com) The above study used one very important methodolgy - it used the SAME method to measure the RNA AND the DNA in the injections, called fluorescence spectrometry (also called fluorometry). The authorities who have denied the importance of the DNA contamination like to use a different technique, qPCR (and I think we all now know how accurate PCR testing is), to measure DNA levels. But the qPCR method, the authors explain, checks less than 1% of the original template, with the other 99% being extrapolated mathematically. König and Kirchner were also concerned that the qPCR method does not pick up very small DNA fragments and that DNA at the particular region of the plasmid that Pfizer measures is susceptible to being “masked,” by the enzyme used in the qPCR measurement process, making it less detectable. Therefore König and Kirchner set out to measure ALL of the residual DNA in the Pfizer Covid vaccine. First, they used a detergent to disintegrate the LNPs to release the mRNA and any DNA encased within them. They then measured DNA levels flourometry, which resulted in the detection of such high levels of contamination. Other scientists agree that the RNA and DNA should both be measured at the same end point in manufacturing using the SAME tool. FURTHER READING: COVID vaccines and your DNA: What the science tells us (and what it doesn't) - Umbrella News

Fallacious equivocation is the vax-fanatics' favorite trick. An example of fallacious equivocation: Premise 1: All stars are in the sky. Premise 2: Some famous actors are stars. Conclusion: Therefore, some famous actors are in the sky. So we get: Yes, it IS a vaccine, because we just changed the definition of ‘vaccine.’ So there.

I would watch the shit outta this kind of Olympics 🤣

Ya, sorry about that. I got poking around the site and distracted by other stuff. Saved the wrong link. Anyways, there's over 80 papers (87, I think) that show IVM works for covid and they explain the mechanisms for how it works. There's also real world datasets from all over the world. I posted it all years ago. Not going to argue further against your 4 year old CBC headlines. Get educated.

No link. That's how you know rebound gets his medical info from CBC headlines 🤣 Dumbass.

https://wwwnc.cdc.gov/eid/article/25/8/19-0011_article The CDC says it does. The FDA was just sued by frontline doctors for demonizing ivermectin and were forced to recant and remove all their posts online and their website that called it horsepaste. I posted about this months ago. You are way behind. Get educated and stop spreading misinformation.

I provided proof on the trickle thread that this is incorrect. IVM was recognized, pre-covid, as a strong contender against coronaviruses. If you won't read the papers, then you will just continue to lie.

He just quickly googled something that sorta agreed with his already views. He didn't read the study or compare it to anything else. Prime example of gullibility and ignorance.

There's over 80 independent, peer-reviewed papers and datasets from many countries (like Uttar Pradesh, Ecuador, Mexico, etc) that show otherwise. The fact that you quickly Google one study that (barely) confirms your own bias and ignore the other 80 studies and real world data, and are still calling IVM "horsepaste", and you don't accept or understand off-label prescribing, is just........well, you're not very intelligent and unable to think for yourself.

Stay home if you're afraid then.

An offering:

Sorry, Foxy, one last time. @Rebound As I said, I posted the peer reviewed studies and the datasets on the trickle thread. There are none so blind as those who refuse to see. Or get their medical information from the CBC.

HHS Secretary Becerra just issued a PREP Act declaration for bird flu. This allows the FDA Commissioner to issue EUAs for bird flu vaccines, with no liability. The US government has ordered 4.8 million doses of bird flu from the CSL Sequirus company, produced in dog kidney cells and using a dangerous squalene-containing adjuvant. The AMA issued CPT codes for this vaccine last Friday, so doctors will be incentivized for administering it. There have been a total of 11 cases of bird flu in the US since 2022, all mild, most involving just conjunctivitis. None were shown to have been transmitted human-to-human. Why would you need this vaccine, unless you expected a much more virulent virus to appear which had mysteriously gained the ability to spread between humans?

You are incorrect. Start with the video here:

I covered all this in the trickle thread. There's studies and datasets there you can read. Until you read them, your opinion is misinformation.

You should stop getting your medical advice from the CBC.

Interview clip of author of "Fisman's Fraud - The Rise of Canadian Hate Science" 4 mins This is where eyeball and the others got their lies from, which they are still repeating. And it was the basis of vax mandates. The actual data showed that the vaccinated were getting covid far more than the unvaxxed. Trudeau paid Fisman to flip the data.

Our passport has be cheapened to the point of coming out of a Crackerjack box. In related news: 18 convicted of 150 offences of violent home invasions and carjackings in Peel.