Goddess

I've been watching the ArrivSCAM committee meetings and part of why they're having trouble figuring out who okayed what, is there are too many damn managers and directors in every department. There's Director Manager of this, Manager Director of that, Supervisor of this, Assistant Manger Director Supervisor of Blah Blah Blah, Level 5 employee, Level 3 employee, it's endless. No wonder we can't get anything done in this country. It's a scapegoat rodeo with everyone pointing the finger at everyone else. No one was "in charge".

You're the only one who keeps talking about Marjorie Taylor Greene.

This had nothing to do with a virus. This had to do with a system of control that was being imposed. You saw it in the ludicrousness of the imposed measures. This is literally Pavlov's dog. We're perceived as lapdog !d!0ts by the parasite class. We will be pushed as far as we can be pushed and that depends on how much we allow them to do that. Only the smarter people questioned why it was that you could catch covid if you bought nails at your local hardware store, but were safe from covid if you bought nails at Home Depot. Or why the virus was intelligent enough to know if you were standing or sitting at a restaurant. And only the brave stood up to it. We need less cowards and stoopid people. Pay attention next time. Don't be eyeball.

FAUCI IN 2021: “When people are vaccinated, they are not going to get infected.” FAUCI NOW: “I got infected about two weeks ago. It was my third Covid-19 infection, and I had been vaccinated and boosted a total of six times.”

Then STFU.

You clearly did not understand the science there. You should stop. You're looking more and more foolish.

It's like the last WWll soldier still hiding out on some forgotten atoll in the Pacific who doesn't realize the war is over. 🤣

You barf out opinions without any kind of links. Step up your game or STFU. Your uneducated opinions mean nothing.

Quit talking outta your a$$ and get educated. Then your opinions might be worth considering. M0r0n.

Odd comment from someone who advocates blind obedience to government. The Cato Institute conducted a very good interview that covered many of the controversies with the covid response. Worth a watch. If we don't learn from the mistakes made, then big tech, big pharma and big government will do it again. We must hold these entities accountable for the deliberate and damaging measures taken. The virus itself was not what damaged society and individuals, the economy and human dignity. It was the power-mad, money-grubbing responses that did far more damage than the virus itself.

Apparently it's not ludicrous to the US Senate and Congress.

You're here arguing that reverse transcription isn't real and you don't even know what it is, you dumb anti-science fuque-tard.

You don't get to just claim peer-reviewed papers and on-going scientific research are "fear porn". Show us where these scientists and molecular biologists are wrong. @eyeball Do it or shut the fuque up, you stupid m0r0n.

Explain to me how the scientists who found that the center 444 base pair amplicon is being taken up into the human genome are wrong then. Explain to me why you think all the labs that confirmed reverse transcription are wrong. Go ahead. You believe science, right? I'll wait.

No. I want him prosecuted. And there's a bunch of senators and politicians in the US that are trying to make that happen when they witnessed him lying about the gof research. So this act of yours, pretending that I'm the only person in the world who thinks he's responsible for the pandemic, is pretty fuquing lame. Question is: why DON'T you want the person responsible for the pandemic prosecuted? I mean if you truly believe there were swaths of bodies being bulldozed into mass graves all over the world, why wouldn't you?

See? I was right again!

Watch the news or tune into some of the US Senate hearings. Read some of the books written about it - there's lots. Don't tell me, let me guess what your next comment is - you refuse to read anything bad about Fauci's activities. 🙄

Type "bot farms" into X and people have been talking about Liberal bot farms for months.

It's not. Reproducibility is. It's why a lot of "peer-reviewed" studies get pulled. If you toss a bottle of water into the air and it lands right side up, you can then write a study that says all bottles will land right side up. But if other studies can't reproduce the same result - the study is useless, peer-reviewed or not. If you don't understand that, I don't know what to tell you. It's basic science. Summary - Reproducibility and Replicability in Science - NCBI Bookshelf (nih.gov) When a newly reported scientific study has far-reaching implications for science or a major potential impact on the public, the question of its reliability takes on heightened importance. Concerns over reproducibility and replicability have been expressed in both scientific and popular media. Reproducibility is obtaining consistent results using the same input data; computational steps, methods, and code; and conditions of analysis. Reproducibility: why it matters and how it can be nurtured | Elsevier Reproducibility – the repeatability of research findings to enable research and knowledge to progress – is vital and underpins trust in science. You don't get to ignore information that's given to you and then claim it doesn't exist, which is what you've done throughout the covid years. Ignore anything that doesn't agree with CBC headlines. I really think you just do not have the brain capacity to absorb anything beyond CBC headlines.

A virus so novel that it decided to kill more 15-64 year olds in 2021 versus 2020 in the US. As it became less virulent. And mass vaccinations. Excess deaths in 2020: 124k Excess deaths in 2021: 215k A 73% increase. Pandemic Scorecard (humanityprojects.info)

Now he's saying I reject peer-reviewed science when I'm probably the one who posts the majority of it here 🙄 I think he's literally insane.

What the fuque are you talking about? That's almost all I post. And you reject every one of them by stating some CBC talking point from 4 years ago. ??????

Ya, I know. You reject peer-reviewed scientific studies from top medical journals around the world. But you support scientists who tell you there's no such thing as natural immunity and believe that ivermectin is "horsepaste" because CBC told you so. You're anti-science.