Goddess

Pharma Paid $1.06 Billion to Reviewers at Top Medical Journals - Science, Public Health Policy and the Law “The traditionally opaque nature” of peer review has hindered the evaluation of peer reviewers, “despite their crucial role in academic publishing,” the authors wrote. The typical conflict-of-interest policies most journals have for authors — requiring only that they disclose their conflicts — do not usually apply to peer reviewers, according to the JAMA study. Journal editors may inquire about those conflicts, but they rarely publicly disclose them — even though many reviewers for top journals may have industry ties.... This had led to: 1. Complete abandonment of independent clinical judgment to embrace unproven protocols. 2. Allowing money to be the sole driving factor in the management of patients. 3. Dismissal of oaths in favor of profit margins. This is why peer-review is not empirical - being able to reproduce results is what counts.

C-293 MUST be DEFEATED because it is a comprehensive threat to Canada’s civil structure and our rights. No term is defined and no power is limited. The grant of power is overly broad in the following ways: 1. The One Health Approach covers all sectors, and all disciplines (‘multisectoral,’ ‘multidisciplinary’). It covers 'animal, human, plant and ecosystem health’ which purports to be everything in the natural world. It includes the 'welfare Interface' which is all of citizens’ interactions with government and asserts that everything is 'central, to preventing future pandemics.’ 2. There is no definition of pandemic. 3. The plan covers any 'risk' that 'could lead' to a pandemic, where risk is not defined and does not have to be a proximate or material cause. 4. It is geographically and jurisdictionally broad, impacting Canadians’ activities at home and abroad. Activities are not defined. 5. It has many other jurisdictional issues. The plan requires all levels of government and indigenous communities to overcome 'jurisdiction challenges' (which could include court's jurisdiction, provincial jurisdictions, territorial jurisdiction, and indigenous treaty jurisdiction). Jurisdiction challenges are not defined. 6. Those in charge of the plan define the ‘state of research’ in order to establish interlinking surveillance systems which erode privacy. 7. Controllers determine the working conditions of employees across all sectors; manage (restrict access to) stockpiles and thus create a Soviet style command economy in which government controls all means of production and distribution. 8. Controllers define and manage 'communication of risk to the public' and therefore create and control the narrative without challenge. They set the 'communications capacity; infrastructure for electronic platforms’; provide for elimination or reduction of meat production and consumption. 9. Under the guise of reducing deforestation, the controllers determine land use in Canada, which has the power to expropriate rural, urban, agricultural and other lands and property from their owners. 10. It burdens Canadians with massive expenditures to address ‘global health equity’ and ‘global deforestation’ (aka agriculture). 11. C-293 allows the government of Canada to conclude agreements with organizations like WHO, UN Environment Program, Food and Agriculture Organization without public consultation, participation, or consent. 12. It allows for border measures such as “vaccine” passports and restriction of transportation. 13. It gives an additional unlimited, undefined grant of power to ‘the coordinator,’ allowing the Minister to 'delegate to the coordinator powers, duties and functions that the Minister considers appropriate.’ None of these powers, duties, or functions is defined within this Act. All powers granted by this Bill are broad, excessive and create jurisdictional issues. C-293 allows through 'sustained collaboration' (undefined), embedding of those in charge of this plan in all levels of government AND indigenous communities, all for the purpose of reducing an unquantified ‘risk,’ that 'could cause’ an undefined event alleged to be an undefined pandemic. 14. C-293 grants these authorities to the Public Health Agency of Canada which, since the adoption of the 2005 International Health Regulations, has been a satellite office or focal point of the World Health Organization (WHO). C-293 institutes a Marxist takeover of our country. The review committee is an irrelevant issue and a deceitful distraction from the purpose of this Bill, which is a severe infringement of rights on a grand scale. All Senators must defeat this Bill. MPs must cross the floor to recall the Bill. Provincial MLAs and Premieres need an immediate legal review of the broad jurisdictional assaults of this Federal Bill in order to pre-emptively go to Court to stop the operation of Bill C-293. The provinces must protect our rights when a Federal Bill has totalitarian reach into their Constitutional authority. Canada as we know it, and love, will no longer exist with the enacting of C-293.

I've emailed all the senators and MPs about C-293. It hands over our national sovereignty to unelected globalist alphabet entities. "Pandemic" and "emergency" are not defined. That is dangerous territory. Dangerous for democracy, human rights & freedoms, a country's economy, quality of life...... We saw the damage done with the overblown covid reactions to a virus that was only mildly more dangerous than the flu for only a small portion of people. It enabled the greatest wealth transfer in the history of mankind. This can never happen again. Humanity will not recover.

Will we ever find out who left the eight ball in the West Wing?

This reminds me of that story about Stalin. He grabbed a chicken, beat the crap out of it, plucked out most of its feathers. Then as it staggered around, he threw some seed on the floor and it ate. His point was that you could totally abuse your citizenry and they'd still be grateful for any crumbs you throw them. It's you. You're that chicken.

It's a newspaper. Their job is to report the news, not make it up or give opinions as fact. Who gives a 💩 what some random WaPo editor thinks about any candidate? Report the damn news.

I think he meant to be facetious at the time but @WestCanMan was right. The govt cure for c0v1d vax injury is MAID.

Wasn't it last year it was reported that China was building 2 new coal plants a week and was responsible for 95% of the world's coal power construction? Logic aside, it's bizarre to make the claim that China is doing about the same as the West in reducing CO2. Any of the itsy-bitsy gains made by Canada is eaten up by China in about 4 seconds. Maybe we could make a bigger difference if the climate change alarmist industry stopped grifting and actually used the $41 billion to do something besides fund more private jets for billionaires.

Up until recently, anyone who said exactly the things Trùdeau said in his lowering immigration announcement was a "racist". Can you tell I'm sick to death of "woke"?

This is a 10+ minute clip of a longer interview that Viva Frei (a lawyer) had with Dr. Jessica Rose. She explains the DNA contamination and SV40 promoter in the injections and what the ramifications of that are. This lady is one of Canada's smartest people. She does well at explaining very technical scientific ideas to lay people. Dr. Rose is one of quite a few incredibly intelligent Canadians who are currently being invited to speak on this topic all over the world, most recent was, I believe, Japan. It's astonishing to me how ill-informed Canadians are and, frankly, not the least bit interested in these experimental injections. The childish arguments put forward here by deliberately ill-informed people have been long-rejected by most of Europe and other countries. For ones like eyeball, who are still arguing that his vaccines aren't working because others didn't get them so everyone should be forced to, is insane and has absolutely no basis in science. Third-party benefit for these injections has NEVER been shown, which was the whole point of the mandates. I sometimes just can't wrap my brain around how astonishingly stupid these people are. And they are dangerous. Because en masse, they force governments to enact unscientific policies on the rest of us. I've written to all the Canadian senators and MPs in protest of Bill C-293. The scope of its policies are so ill-defined and broad that in the event of a mild cold, the government could enact policies that would make the covid era look like a birthday party. And people like eyeball will cheer it on.

Next time, we better demand to see the science.

Consensus by force and censorship is not consensus.

I encourage you to read the article Dr. Prasad cited in his substack above: How the CDC Abandoned Science - Tablet Magazine

DR. PRASAD'S SUBSTACK TODAY: If public health wants to regain trust, it has to take an honest assessment of what it got right and got wrong. It can’t celebrate errors. Sadly, it appears that public health is not interested in that task. Take a look. Walensky wins the Fauci award?! Wow. Here is just a short list of what each of them got wrong Walensky: When she was in Brookline, she advocated for school reopening, but when appointed by President Biden, who campaigned on the idea that schools were dangerous, she reversed that stance. She met privately and discussed CDC guidance with the teachers unions. She was dishonest about myocarditis. There is no way this was true by the end of April 2021. The Israelis reported a rate of 1 in 3000 by February, and the EMA would soon confirm the safety signal. Once she accepted myocarditis exists, she made no effort to lower it. No trials of spaced doses, lower or omitted doses. She lied constantly about the evidence for masking. She lied to congress stating there was not equipoise for a trial testing if masking worked in children. This was clearly false given that the European CDC and CDC had divergent recommendations— and member states had a range of policies (e.g. Sweden never masked <12, US masked 2+). A divergence of practice is the definition of equipoise. Walensky supported vaccine mandates, which were unethical, as COVID vaccines had never established a third party benefit. Walensky pushed vaccines in people who had COVID— a strategy that may even be harmful. Walensky pushed boosters in low risk populations, a decision that led to the resignation of Gruber/ Krause at FDA. Walensky’s communication on TV was a constant mess of flip flopping and insecurity; she was a notoriously bad communicator. She even hired an outside consulting firm to help her communications, using taxpayer money. What did she get right? I am actually not sure. I suppose she was correct that COVID is caused by a virus and that many vitamins don’t work— facts that a high schooler would know— so she got the bare minimum right. But on any policy decisions, particularly those that used the force of the state, she got it wrong. She famously refused to throw away 6ft of social distancing (a distance pulled from someone’s ass), when when we begged her to do so, as it was stopping school reopening. More on what she got wrong here. And she gets the Fauci award. What did Fauci get wrong? Fauci was of course initially told the truth that multiple RCTs of community masking showed it didn’t help, then he lied about it. He never opposed masking 2 year olds. He exaggerated the risk to kids. He opposed DeSantis in spring 2020 when DeSantis wanted to reopen schools. Fauci was wrong about giving 2 doses to fewer people over 1 dose to more people. Fauci was wrong to not meet with and discuss different ideas with the authors of Great Barrington Declaration. Fauci was wrong about double masking. Fauci was wrong about vaccine mandates and ignoring natural immunity. Fauci was wrong about boosters for young people, vaccines for people who already had COVID. Most notably, Fauci appears to have used Gmail to evade federal FOIA laws to conceal NIAID’s role in funding the laboratory in Wuhan to conduct gain of function research in sars-coronaviruses. Public health has a choice. It could actually aspire to have dialog and discussion and pursue the truth, or it could keep promoting the people who were wrong. If it continues to do the latter, I suspect trust will continue to fall. If I were giving out awards, I would give Rochelle Wallensky the Fauci award for clever and effective propaganda at a time of crisis that polarized a nation and undermined faith in science.

A Dutch court has ruled that billionaire and global vaccine proponent Bill Gates (WHO IS NOT A DOCTOR) will face trial in the Netherlands over his involvement in misleading the public about the safety of COVID-19 vaccines. Netherlands court orders Bill Gates and Albert Bourla to stand trial over Covid death and injury shots – www.cairnsnews.org The case, brought forward by seven plaintiffs who claim to have suffered vaccine injuries, marks a significant blow to Gates, who has been a key figure in pushing COVID-19 vaccination efforts worldwide. Father of vaccine-injured plaintiff made ‘emotional plea’ to the court At the Sept. 18 hearing, plaintiffs also delivered statements. According to Zebra Inspiratie, “One of the victims, who is very ill, was also given the opportunity to make a plea. She was no longer able to speak and was represented by her father. It was an emotional plea.” Krikke said the plaintiff’s father told the court that his daughter, who was previously healthy, fell ill after getting the COVID-19 vaccine and could no longer speak, telling the judge that he “would really like to speak to Bill Gates directly” to ask him what happened to his daughter. According to the judgment: Article 7 paragraph 1 of the Code of Civil Procedure provides that if the Dutch court has jurisdiction over one of the defendants, it also has jurisdiction over other defendants involved in the same proceedings, provided that there is such a connection between the claims against the various defendants that reasons of expediency justify joint proceedings. […] As the court understands, [redacted] et al. argue that Hofstra et al., and therefore Gates, are part of a worldwide group of individuals, legal entities and other entities that, in the context of the implementation of a project called Covid 19: The Great Reset, have misled people into taking Covid-19 injections, while they knew or should have known that these injections were not safe and effective. The court infers from Gates’ plea that Gates also understood [redacted] et al.’s position in this way. The court understands that [redacted] et al. further argue in this context that Gates committed this deception internationally through two videos that were published on YouTube in April and December 2020, in which Gates allegedly gave a false representation of the necessity of the Covid-19 injections and the safety of those injections respectively. To the extent that [redacted] et al. intended to state that any actions by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation should also be regarded as unlawful acts by Gates in this group context, the court disregards this in the context of this incident, as they have not substantiated this.

2 of them were contra-indicated for her condition, ding dong. No they're not.

I see. So let's say, you break your arm and it needs surgery. You're okay with a doctor denying you treatment unless you take multiple unrelated procedures. And you don't believe that infringes on your medical rights in any way. You have some very bizarre and extreme viewpoints.

She was denied medical treatment unless she took 3 unrelated vaccines. This is where giving up our right to medical bodily autonomy is now. You agree she should be denied medical treatment if she doesn't take them? Who is next? Lots of people go against medical advice. You believe a person with hypertension or diabetes who doesn't follow their doctor's dietary or lifestyle counsel should be denied all medical help? How far do you want to take this? What a bizarre take.

Sometimes I just post the data.

Maybe you can team up with @Michael Hardner and start a thread on how data doesn't matter.

Your question is why I ask questions. My question is why aren't you? Why try to shame those asking questions? I post studies and datasets, which you ignore, and just keep popping up to say basically, it's wrong to ask questions, wrong to post studies, wrong to post data. You are anti-science. You supported the wrong side and now you're desperate to justify your bad choices. Kindly get bent.

I'm not sure why this is so hard for some to figure out. It is a fact that we were lied to about the injection staying in the arm. The LNP's take the spike protein and the junk DNA fragments all over the body and right into your cell's nuclei. That means they will damage any number of bodily systems. It will be different for each person. It's why this injection has such a wide variety of adverse events - cardio, immune issues, hemo (blood clots), neuro, etc. More than any other vaccine in human history. This thread is a cumulative compilation of the science and effects of an experimental injection forced on billions of people, as it progresses. Perhaps if you're having trouble understanding, go back and read the thread.

Scientists: "Hmmmm, 2 years ago HIV components were found in the covid vaccine vials. Maybe we should keep an eye on the HIV data for the next few years." User: "How dare you!"

You certainly are against asking questions.

The only thing that's a "miracle" about this injection is that it's a miracle anyone survives it. Adverse events following COVID-19 mRNA vaccines: A systematic review of cardiovascular complication, thrombosis, and thrombocytopenia - PubMed Results: A total of 81 articles analyzed confirmed cardiovascular complications post-COVID-19 mRNA vaccines in 17,636 individuals and reported 284 deaths with any mRNA vaccine. Class switch toward noninflammatory, spike-specific IgG4 antibodies after repeated SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccination - PubMed Here, we report that several months after the second vaccination, SARS-CoV-2-specific antibodies were increasingly composed of noninflammatory IgG4, which were further boosted by a third mRNA vaccination and/or SARS-CoV-2 variant breakthrough infections. IgG4 antibodies among all spike-specific IgG antibodies rose, on average, from 0.04% shortly after the second vaccination to 19.27% late after the third vaccination. COVID vaccine's hot problems: erratic serious blood clotting, ill-defined prion-like reactogenicity of the spike, unclear roles of other factors - PubMed (Prion diseases are like Creutzfeldt–Jakob disease, which was rare and almost 100% fatal. If you check the "worthless" VAERS database, CJD cases exploded after the covid injections. This study, and the others I've posted, shows the mechanism for why this happens.) Soon after the large scale release of these vaccines, a cluster of first-dose immunized patients was underscored because of the following: abrupt onset of clinical signs in a week of the vaccine, including fever, severe headache, and abdominal colicky pain;5 detection either at the cerebral sinuses or at deep abdominal vessels of redundant amyloid-like material judged unusual for a common thrombotic deposition. Thus, we have envisaged two equivalent yet different ways of COVID-19 nucleic-acid based vaccines to induce uncontrolled blood clotting. We emphasize that this idea was developed independently and without each other knowledge. Both constructs emphasize the possible role of the spike, a highly reactive possibly prion protein. This ability of the virus and/or an ill-effective therapy to exert a “disease mimicry” is again an appalling feature of this agent.