Goddess

They immigrated millions of people and we don't have enough skilled workers. Kind of proves they've been lying to Canadians all these years about the quality of people we've immigrated in. Unless you count criminals as "skilled" labor. Sorry about the "anonymous" account. 🤣 One of the comments - "These people can't even get my Tim Horton's coffee order right, I would never trust them to build me a house."

If you wanna obsessively follow me around the board like your 12-yr-old friend, knock yourself out.

In spite of the accepted reality that VAERS underreports by 10X, it tracks them, obviously. I'm not getting drawn into this circular argument with you again. You: VAERS is useless as a database. Me: Why would they unleash an experimental vaccine on the population and not have a way of tracking adverse events? You: That's what VAERS is for. Me: OK. Here's some stats from VAERS. You: VAERS is a useless database. Repeat ad nauseum.

LOL Ya, absolutely nothing to do with policies that have been a disaster for over a decade now. Sorry, buddy. It's Liberals that are *that* shallow. Not Conservatives.

LOL They've stolen most of the technologies from other nations, including Canada. Remember Nortel? White House accuses China of industrial-scale theft of AI technology | Reuters The trade-offs of innovating in China in times of global technology rivalry | Merics China's technology theft a massive threat, FBI head warns | 60 Minutes - CBS News China steals too much US defense tech, says DCSA • The Register Five Eyes intelligence chiefs warn on China's 'theft' of intellectual property | Reuters Industrial espionage: How China sneaks out America's technology secrets China theft of technology is biggest law enforcement threat to US, FBI says | China | The Guardian How does China steal U.S. intellectual property? - Futurity They don't just steal industrial, defense and AI technologies. They also stole viruses from Canada and shipped them to Wuhan.

I will go through this one more time for those unfamiliar with the chain of events. A week before Ma crossed the floor, he posted on his official facebook page (not anonymous source), a meeting with a CCP-linked organization. The post was screenshotted by independent journalists tracking his CCP connections. The meeting was also entered into the records that all political parties keep of which meetings and with whom MPs are meeting with. Moonface rejects those sources. Ma deleted the post after crossing the floor. Ma is then given a right-hand position by Carney at talks with Beijing about Canada participating in establishing a New World Order with China. Ma then uses CCP talking points in a committee meeting to infer that slave labor is not being practiced in China. You are all welcome to make of this whatever you want. Moon clearly rejects all this. And he will go on rejecting all Liberal Party connections to CCP-linked organizations, because he only accepts CBC headlines as proof of anything and he is in a cult, so emotionally, he has to defend the Liberal party to the point of id10cy.

I'm not discussing this with you further. You cannot engage honestly to discuss actual facts, ideas and opinions. "I don't like your source" is all you ever got. Seriously dude or whatever you are - the Libs have just stacked committees and moved to turn off cameras and the majority gives them the votes to deny handing over documentation in corruption investigations by committee. You got bigger problems here than "I don't like Goddess' sources."

The federal Liberals have moved to turn the cameras off in a fourth Parliamentary committee this week. The government house leader denies they are weaponizing their new majority status. I've been watching committees for a lot of years and this has only been done occasionally when something being discussed is related to national security. It is looking like the Liberals are going to move that all committees are out of camera, which makes government business inaccessible to the public and the media, as well as MPs on those committees cannot speak publicly about what goes on in them. Accountability was squelched to near zero under the Liberal minority government, but at least the committees brought the more massive scandals to light - SNC Lavalin, SDTC, foreign interference, ArriveCan, PrescribeIT and so many more scandals. Any one of these would destroyed any previous government. Without the public at least being aware, the malfeasance will only worsen. Liberal cheerleaders - Some critical thinking, please. First they stacked the committees and now - cameras "off". Combine this with the ruthless push for censorship bills and we are quickly getting into banana republic, North Korea levels.

The only time you are active on this forum is to attack my sources. So, yes. I've given you the links before. And you know it. I do provide cites. You just don't like them and want me to go hunt down another source that you will accept. But the fact is - you reject, without consideration, ANY source that criticizes the Liberals in any way. That is cult thinking. 100% Cult thinking. You can't - and you don't even try - to discuss facts or opinions. You go directly to "I don't like this source - go find another one. Nope, I don't like that one either, go find another one. This source is also crap, go find another one." It's a game. Because you can't engage intellectually with facts, ideas or opinions. So you just reject any source, any cite that doesn't say what you want it to say.

I saw this illustration today. It makes sense. See what you think. Elon Musk said something that really stuck with me about resource allocation. In essence: beyond a certain level of wealth, money is no longer about consumption—it's about capital allocation. That sentence changes everything. Economics, at its core, is just an allocation problem. You have finite resources and infinite uses. Who decides where what goes? Imagine a school playground. 100 kids, packs of Pokémon cards handed out at random. You let it play out. Very quickly, an order emerges. The good players accumulate rare cards, the collectors sort, the negotiators strike deals. No one planned it. And yet every card ends up in the hands of the one who gets the most value from it. The system maximizes the total happiness of the playground. That's the invisible hand. Now bring in the teacher. She finds it unfair. Leo has 50 cards, Tom has 3. She confiscates, redistributes, enforces equality. Three immediate effects: The good players stop playing—what's the point. The bad ones have no reason to improve; they'll get their share anyway. Trades collapse. The playground is equal. And dead. She maximized equality, and she destroyed happiness. The teacher's problem is that she doesn't have the information the playground had, collectively. That's Mises' economic calculation problem, formulated in 1920. The USSR tried to solve it for 70 years with the Gosplan. Result: shortages, lines, collapse. Not because the Soviets were stupid, because the problem is mathematically unsolvable in centralized mode. When Musk has 200 billion, he doesn't consume it—he allocates it. SpaceX, Starlink, Neuralink, xAI. Every dollar is a bet on the future. And he has a track record. PayPal, Tesla, SpaceX. He's demonstrated he knows how to spot massive problems and allocate resources to them with spectacular returns. The state has a track record too. Hospitals collapsing, education declining, debt exploding, public services degrading despite constantly rising budgets. The market identifies good allocators; politics identifies good communicators. Profit isn't an end goal—it's a signal. It says: you've allocated scarce resources to a use that people value enough to pay for. The bigger the profit, the greater the value created. When Starlink turns profitable, it means millions of people in rural areas finally have internet. When a ministry runs a deficit, it means it's consuming more than it produces. One creates, the other destroys, and we call that redistribution. In our societies, there are two categories of actors. Entrepreneurs and bureaucrats. The entrepreneur takes personal risk to spot a problem, mobilize resources, create a solution. If he's wrong, he loses. If he's right, his customers win, his employees win, his suppliers win, the state collects taxes. He's the basic cell of human progress. The bureaucrat takes no personal risk. His salary is guaranteed. At best, he maintains an existing system. At worst, he destroys it through overregulation, forced bad allocation, perverse incentives that discourage those who produce. But in no case does he create anything. Look at the last 50 years. iPhone, civilian internet, SpaceX, Tesla, Google, Amazon, Stripe, mRNA, ChatGPT. All private inventions, driven by entrepreneurs, funded by venture capital. Not a single government ministry has invented anything that's changed your daily life. France has become the world's laboratory for bureaucratic drift. 57% of GDP in public spending, an absolute record. A sprawling administration, a tax system that penalizes wealth creation. Result: falling behind the United States, Germany, Switzerland. Brain drain. Deindustrialization. Exploding debt. And the worst part is that bad allocation self-reinforces. The more the state takes, the less entrepreneurs create. The less they create, the less tax base there is. The less tax base there is, he more the state borrows and taxes. Perfect negative feedback loop. The teacher thinks she's helping, and every year the playground produces less. In our societies, it's always the entrepreneurs who advance civilization. Bureaucrats, at best, maintain a system; at worst, they destroy it. No society has ever progressed by taxing its creators to subsidize its managers. The question is never "Who has how much?". It's who allocates the next unit of resource best to maximize humanity's future. The answer hasn't changed in 200 years. It's not the civil servants.

I gave it to you the last time you did this.

In the Senate hearings right now, they just showed this chart from VAERS The argument has always been that the increase in vaccine deaths is because "we've administered billions of doses". But calculated at "rates of death per dose compared to the flu injections", the covid injection has a 55X increase. I'm still watching the hearings.

I gave you the CPAC link when you asked. I verify the committee snippets I post BY WATCHING THE GODDAMN COMMITTEE MEETINGS. I've told you this over and over. You don't accept my verifications anyways - SO VERIFY THEM YOURSELF. GO WATCH THE COMMITTEE MEETING AND SEE IF THE SNIP IS THERE. CPAC does not snip parts of the videos. If you don't want to watch the meetings and you don't want to accept snippets from journalists and MP members, then you're being unreasonable. I'm not going to snip parts of meetings for you. Others have done the work.

They did the same kinds of things with covid stats.

So, this is one of the reasons I follow and support independent journalism in Canada. I don't see a CBC article on this, but it was all over the independent media for the last few days. It was independent media in Canada, working along with relevant Iranian organizations that forced Canadian authorities to act and kept this IRGC official out of Canada. It's only the independent media holding the government to account. It's why the Liberal party is desperately enacting censorship bills and why the legacy media demonizes independent journalists. Iran football chief with IRGC ties sent back by Canada after arrival | Iran International EXCLUSIVE and BREAKING: Journalism still matters! After our investigation revealed the Canadian government granted a Temporary Resident Permit (TRP) to override Mehdi Taj’s inadmissibility, he was sent back just hours after landing in Canada at 10:05 p.m. last night. The immigration ministry commented only after Taj’s departure, declining to name him, citing privacy laws, and stating that individuals linked to the IRGC are not welcome in Canada—despite having granted him special permission to enter. His sudden departure now raises fresh questions—about how he was granted entry in the first place. Many Canadians are questioning how someone deemed inadmissible under the country’s own terrorism-related laws could have been offered an exemption or special permission to enter at all.

I can see why the pom-pom wavers have no logical reasoning. Their leader is the master of illogical reasoning. Summary of exchange in HoC today. Poilievre: "Carney doubled the deficit." Carney: "I reduced the deficit." Poilievre: "Trudeau's deficit was $31 billion, yours was $78 billion." Carney: "But now it's $67 billion. I reduced it by $11 billion." Poilievre: "65 is bigger than 31." New Liberal talking point: OMG OMG OMG! CARNEY IS A GENIUS, HE REDUCED THE DEFICIT BY $11 BILLION."

I also volunteered for 10 years to be a support for others leaving the same cult, although we occasionally had people come to us, escaping other cults. Different dog, same pile of sh1T. This is why I think Canada is done for. It's extremely difficult to get people out of cults, no matter how it harms themselves or their families. "It's the TROOOOOOOTH."

DOJ has until May 11 to indict Fauci: Exclusive | Pressure on DOJ to prosecute Anthony Fauci grows after adviser indicted—with days left to charge COVID 'lies' “99% of this country has no idea who Morens is,” said Oversight Project President Mike Howell. “It’s Fauci that they will blame for one of the worst government catastrophes in history in America. And so the test is Fauci. The Morens indictment is great, and we applaud it. But there are a lot of people out there that want to see Fauci held to account for the damage he wrought.” Howell, whose group sent the Justice Department a draft indictment for Morens last year, believes the adviser’s actions were closely linked to his boss. “[Fauci] lied about one of the most damaging events in American history routinely and was behind a massive coverup of the key factors,” Howell said.

What method was used in the trials and what method was marketed? And don't quickly google something. You're acting like you are expert in production methods of the covid jabs, so you must know this off the top of your head.

I posted this clip of John Brassard, Chair of the Ethics Committee giving his review of the latest committee findings in the HoC. The account, Ryan Gerritson, always posts committee clips, HoC clips, news clips & articles including from the legacy media. If you want to call this account "Anonymous" fine. But the only reason you do it, is because you don't want to talk about what John Brassard said in his speech. If you don't like this source, then go find the same clip and post it from a source you approve of.

They were not. Even Pfizer had admitted that. The contracts state it. Lightbound, who was our health minister at the time, testified to this in committee. The production methods used for the trials was totally different from the one that was marketed. My gawd, this is all proven. In committees, in Senate, in Congress, in the EU parliament, in documentation, in CDC and FDA ACIP meeting transcripts.

I see the lefties getting more and more cult-like. When I was in the cult, they expressly forbade getting information outside of the organization. You could get kicked out if you read or viewed anything the cult deemed a wrong source. They demonize anyone not them. "Polls show that Conservatives are the least educated, stupidest people in the country". "This study shows that unvaxxed people get into more car accidents." I don't know if you know my story, but my kids and I got out of a cult. Getting out physically was hard, getting out mentally was even harder. I read a lot of Steven Hassan books (the BITE model) and had some sessions with him, to fully get free. I know how cults work and I know what I'm seeing here. The Liberals are not a political party anymore. They're a cult.

the demand for sources and cites is only a distraction from the facts for them. You give them the links, they don't even acknowledge it. The discussion is over for them. They disappear. A week later, they ask for links to the same info.

To you. Because you don't want facts. Remple-Garner is the shadow minister for Immigration and Diab is the minister of Immigration. I post a committee clip from one of their official government accounts and you call it anonymous. I give you the link for all the committees and you refuse - "I'm too lazy to watch them." You won't watch the entire proceedings and you won't watch clips unless they're on a CBC social media account and the CBC doesn't cover committee meetings. You've painted yourself into a corner for information. You asked for a link regarding the immigration thing, I gave it to you. You didn't even look at it. You don't say "Oh, I guess you were right, after I called you a liar for 3 pages". GTFO, you dishonest, lazy, retarded, brain-dead, zombie poster.

Then find your own source of committee clips or watch the entire proceedings. This stupid game of "I can't refute the facts so I reject the source" is getting ridiculous. One of you retards on another thread posted yesterday that a post from someone else was "bullshit" because of the source. I posted 3 or 4 links from other sources saying the same thing and you know what the person did? F*cking ran away, just like you all do. This demanding of only sources and cites that YOU approve of is just a way for you to avoid FACTS.