Goddess

Well, you posted exactly the same info I did and I don't even know what your point is. FYI, even the CBC panelists are calling the Liberals out for this.

BC bought a hotel in downtown Vancouver for $55 million and filled it with drug addicts, who completely destroyed it. The government is now moving them out of the destroyed building and refuses to let media see the damage. In totally unrelated news, the BC government is canceling the construction of new healthcare facility - due to lack of funds. ‘Destroyed in less than a year’: Granville St. SRO resident wants public to see conditions - BC | Globalnews.ca

I haven't seen this kind of fanatical desperation to support id10cy since I left the cult. Seeing the psychopathy of it in real time is fascinating.

Being in the presence of lunacy. Like when an insane asylum inmate is really excited to show you what he pooped out into his diaper.

Do you have a cut-off date in mind for rules? I'm not following your "logic". Are you saying this procedure is 10 years old, so they don't follow it? You'll have to provide proof of that. I'm wondering because our Westminster system still has procedures on the books that date back more than a hundred years and they are still followed. Some of it looks silly now - like when they parade in new members and present them to the House. But it's still a procedure that s followed. The rule to not murder in Canada goes back further than that. Is that also an outdated rule? Maybe your friend John Stone can help you - he agrees with everything you are saying.

Amazing. Liberal cheerleaders are so rabid, they even reject the House Of Commons website as "misinformation" if it doesn't say what they want it to say. This is absolutely a cult.

Because the procedure still stands. Are you really this stoopid? Don't answer that. We can all see.

Were you unaware that 2 of the 4 mandated jabs were removed from the market for this?

Some will recall the information I posted here about the amyloid clots that embalmers began raising alarms about in early 2021. No one knew what they were at first, they've never been seen before. It was embalmers and morticians that first reported them, as they were unable to drain the blood from bodies in preparation for burial. It was a Canadian scientist that finally identified them as fibrous amyloid clots, thick and rubbery, and then went on to identify the mechanism for how and why they were forming. Misfolded fibrinogen. It was a huge breakthrough discovery because once identified, they can now be identified as a cause in living people and pulled from the veins of living people. We know now that the spike protein in the jabs causes abnormal clotting. Here are some pictures of them. In this video, you can see one being removed and see how fibrous and rubbery they are: https://x.com/MaryBowdenMD/status/2050570308667711585?s=20

Here: Broadcasting Services - The Parliamentary Record - House of Commons Procedure and Practice, Third edition, 2017 - ProceduralInfo - House of Commons of Canada What this means In the Canadian Parliament, “in camera” (closed‑door) committee meetings are not open to the public, and their minutes, transcripts, and evidence are kept confidential. According to House of Commons procedural rules, these records are archived and normally remain sealed for 30 years before they can be released. This 30‑year rule is part of the House of Commons’ broader approach to parliamentary records and is reflected in the way historical committee documents eventually become accessible through the Canadian Parliamentary Historical Resources archive, which includes materials only after long-term confidentiality periods expire. What becomes public after 30 years Once the confidentiality period expires, the following may be released: Committee minutes Transcripts (if any were taken — not all in camera meetings are transcribed) Documents submitted to the committee Reports or internal analyses These materials then appear in the Library of Parliament’s historical archives.

C'mon. Stop acting like you had no clue that the prevailing narrative at the time was that mandates were justified, forcing everyone to jab was justified "if it saved just one life."

Same here. We went from "If it saves JUST ONE LIFE....." to "Any previously healthy children who die from the jab is totally worth it."

You don't like AI when it says something you don't like? Quel surprise. 🙄

checklist Here is a clear, practical, citizen‑friendly checklist for spotting early democratic backsliding. It’s designed to be concrete enough that you can actually track changes over time, not just think about them abstractly. You should still confirm political information with trusted, authoritative sources. 🧭 Democratic Backsliding Early‑Warning Checklist 1. Executive Power & Rule of Law Watch for: Emergency powers extended beyond the crisis that justified them Frequent rule‑by‑decree instead of normal legislative processes Ignoring court rulings or attacking judges who rule independently Replacing civil servants with loyalists rather than qualified experts If 2–3 of these happen at once, it’s a major red flag. 2. Elections & Political Competition Track whether: Voting rules change in ways that benefit the ruling party Opposition candidates face legal harassment, investigations, or disqualification Election commissions are politicized Gerrymandering or voter suppression increases Leaders cast doubt on election results before votes are counted Democracies rarely collapse without elections being weakened first. 3. Media Freedom & Information Control Look for: Government pressure on independent media (lawsuits, fines, raids) State-aligned business groups buying media outlets Journalists labeled as “enemies,” “traitors,” or “foreign agents” Restrictions on internet access, social media, or online speech When information becomes controlled, accountability collapses. 4. Civil Liberties & Public Protest Monitor: New laws restricting protests, assemblies, or public gatherings Police using disproportionate force against peaceful demonstrators Surveillance of activists, NGOs, or community groups Criminalization of dissent under vague terms like “extremism” or “disorder” Authoritarianism often grows by making dissent feel risky. 5. Judiciary & Legal System Check for: Court-packing (adding judges to shift ideological balance) Lowering qualifications for judges to allow loyalists in Selective prosecution of political opponents Legal immunity for government officials A captured judiciary is one of the strongest predictors of democratic decline. 6. Military & Police Politicization Warning signs: Security forces openly supporting a political leader Military involvement in domestic politics Police used to intimidate political opponents Expanding internal security powers without oversight When force becomes political, democracy becomes fragile. 7. Civic Culture & Public Norms Pay attention to: Leaders using “us vs. them” rhetoric to divide society Normalization of corruption or conflicts of interest Attacks on minorities, NGOs, or independent institutions Citizens becoming apathetic, believing nothing can change Democratic decline is often psychological before it is legal. 🧩 8. “Soft” but Important Cultural Indicators These are subtle but powerful: Satire becomes dangerous Whistleblowers are punished Government secrecy increases Public servants fear retaliation for neutrality These shifts often precede more visible authoritarian moves.

When a democratic country turns into an authoritarian or totalitarian country, what are usual steps citizens can keep an eye on for that happening? The clearest early signs that a democracy is shifting toward authoritarianism are gradual, legal‑looking, and often normalized while they happen. Citizens should watch for concentrated executive power, attacks on independent institutions, weakened media freedom, and rule‑bending that becomes routine. 🛑 1. Concentration of Executive Power When leaders begin centralizing authority, it’s one of the strongest indicators of democratic backsliding. This often appears as: Expanding executive powers through decrees or emergency measures that outlast the crisis. Politicizing or weakening checks and balances, such as sidelining legislatures or ignoring oversight bodies. Using legal mechanisms in anti‑democratic ways, where actions appear lawful but undermine democratic norms. 📰 2. Attacks on Independent Media Authoritarian shifts almost always involve controlling the flow of information. Warning signs include: Harassment or delegitimization of journalists. Takeovers of independent outlets by allies of the ruling party. Restricting access to information or labeling critical reporting as “fake news” or “enemy propaganda.” Independent media is one of the first institutions targeted because it shapes public perception. ⚖️ 3. Undermining Judicial Independence Courts are a major barrier to authoritarian power. Watch for: Removing or replacing judges with loyalists. Attempts to control judicial appointments. Selective enforcement of laws against political opponents. These steps weaken the rule of law and allow leaders to act without legal constraint. 🗳️ 4. Erosion of Electoral Integrity Democracies rarely collapse in a single moment; elections are often hollowed out over time. Key indicators: Changing voting rules to favor the ruling party. Restricting opposition participation or harassing political rivals. Manipulating electoral bodies or undermining trust in results. 📉 5. Declining Trust in Institutions A slow erosion of public confidence makes citizens more tolerant of authoritarian solutions. Polarization that frames politics as existential “us vs. them.” Fear‑based narratives that justify extraordinary powers. Citizens becoming passive observers, believing democracy is permanent and self‑sustaining. 🧩 6. Normalizing Rule‑Bending Backsliding often looks “legal” on the surface. Watch for: Frequent norm violations that become routine. Leaders dismissing criticism as overreaction. Small institutional changes that accumulate into major shifts. These changes feel incremental, which is why many people don’t notice until it’s late. 🛡️ 7. Restrictions on Civil Society Authoritarian governments weaken civic participation to reduce resistance. Targeting NGOs, activists, or watchdog groups. Limiting public protest through new regulations. Surveillance or intimidation of civic leaders. Today When a democratic country turns into an authoritarian or totalitarian country, what are usual steps citizens can keep an eye on for that happening The clearest early signs that a democracy is shifting toward authoritarianism are gradual, legal‑looking, and often normalized while they happen. Citizens should watch for concentrated executive power, attacks on independent institutions, weakened media freedom, and rule‑bending that becomes routine. 🛑 1. Concentration of Executive Power When leaders begin centralizing authority, it’s one of the strongest indicators of democratic backsliding. This often appears as: Expanding executive powers through decrees or emergency measures that outlast the crisis. Politicizing or weakening checks and balances, such as sidelining legislatures or ignoring oversight bodies. Using legal mechanisms in anti‑democratic ways, where actions appear lawful but undermine democratic norms. 📰 2. Attacks on Independent Media Authoritarian shifts almost always involve controlling the flow of information. Warning signs include: Harassment or delegitimization of journalists. Takeovers of independent outlets by allies of the ruling party. Restricting access to information or labeling critical reporting as “fake news” or “enemy propaganda.” Independent media is one of the first institutions targeted because it shapes public perception. ⚖️ 3. Undermining Judicial Independence Courts are a major barrier to authoritarian power. Watch for: Removing or replacing judges with loyalists. Attempts to control judicial appointments. Selective enforcement of laws against political opponents. These steps weaken the rule of law and allow leaders to act without legal constraint. 🗳️ 4. Erosion of Electoral Integrity Democracies rarely collapse in a single moment; elections are often hollowed out over time. Key indicators: Changing voting rules to favor the ruling party. Restricting opposition participation or harassing political rivals. Manipulating electoral bodies or undermining trust in results. 📉 5. Declining Trust in Institutions A slow erosion of public confidence makes citizens more tolerant of authoritarian solutions. Polarization that frames politics as existential “us vs. them.” Fear‑based narratives that justify extraordinary powers. Citizens becoming passive observers, believing democracy is permanent and self‑sustaining. 🧩 6. Normalizing Rule‑Bending Backsliding often looks “legal” on the surface. Watch for: Frequent norm violations that become routine. Leaders dismissing criticism as overreaction. Small institutional changes that accumulate into major shifts. These changes feel incremental, which is why many people don’t notice until it’s late. 🛡️ 7. Restrictions on Civil Society Authoritarian governments weaken civic participation to reduce resistance. Targeting NGOs, activists, or watchdog groups. Limiting public protest through new regulations. Surveillance or intimidation of civic leaders. 🌍 8. International Patterns Research shows that democratic backsliding is now the most common threat to democracies worldwide, and only a few countries reverse it once it begins.

Why bother with the question? He's been very clear - he supports everything the Liberal party has done in the past, supports everything they are currently doing, and will continue to wave pom-poms for everything they do in the future. The best you can get out of any of them is "Welllllll, we didn't like *some* of the things Trudeau did, but that was all Harper's fault anyways."

Historically, this kind of government secrecy and cover up never ends well for citizens. As they say, Those who ignore history are doomed to repeat it. The poo-flinging monkeys need to learn the hard way, I guess. A bit sad and frustrating for the rest of us.

Independent news journalists just kept an IRGC member out of Canada that your Liberal government provided special paperwork for, to let him in. I bet it really pissed you off that a top IRGC member was kept out of Canada.

These kinds of cases take time. For instance, it typically takes years to pull a drug from the market, even though the harms are well known during all that time. Opioid crisis ring any bells for you? Morens, recently indicted in the US for fraud, concealing and deleting records, was "still going along in his profession".....until he wasn't. It's looking like Fauci will be next. It will take time, but your "experts" are falling. Excuse me? It mattered to you that Dr. Cole had a complaint against him, but now you scold me that the resolution to the complaint matters? GTFO.

You don't see the importance of a resolution? 🙄 Yes, I do. If you don't, then knock yourself out.

Why didn't you post the resolution? Doctors get sued maliciously all the time. One of the biggest expenses for opening a practice is malpractice insurance.

In addition to moving committees take place out of camera so citizens and journalists have no access to what is going on in them, Liberal majority has also imposed a 30-year ban on discussing scandals uncovered in committees.

How come you only post the accusation but not the resolution to the case? I suspect it's because you just quickly goggled something "bad" about Dr. Cole and posted it. Idaho medical malpractice lawsuit against Dr. Ryan Cole ends in legal agreement Attorneys in a lawsuit against Idaho pathologist Dr. Ryan Cole for his alleged false cancer diagnosis that led a woman to undergo major surgery reached an agreement to dismiss the case. Cole is still licensed to practice medicine in Idaho, the Idaho Board of Medicine’s licensing records website shows. Cole remains on the Central District Health board.