Shady

This is my favourite part of UShaditComing's posted reference: "We have to take on faith that the image is what the Soviets say it is," Zimmerman said. "I think that is reasonable assumption, because they would not have a motive to misrepresent it. Yes, the Soviets wouldn't lie. They'd have absolutely no motive whatsoever to undermine American foreign policy.

That's what someone who know's they're lying says. You can't provide links because you know you're wrong. Links or you're lying. It's your choice.

Another topic in which you know nothing about, but pretend to be an expert on. Actually, there's no way she can make up 110 delegates by including Florida and Michigan. Democrats use proportional representation in their primary process. She'd have to win 95% of the vote in both of those states to make up that kind of margin. I'm sorry to once again out your ignorance,

Like I said, provide links to back up your claims.

Oh, so kinda like the 911 attacks huh? And it was Saddam that led to the killing of Iraqi children. He built palaces instead of feeding the Iraqi populace. Stop making excuses for murderous dictators. Hmm, that's intesting since the European Union didn't come into existence until 1993, and a common currency (the euro) wasn't introduced until 1999. I guess Saddam was just pyschic huh? You're a buffoon. Stop embarassing yourself.

That's a great story and could make a great novel. Fiction of course. You know, if you're going to make outrageous claims, the least you could do is back them up with some references. Again, great story though. I especially liked the part about the Russian satellite. Sounds like something right out of Clancy.

One could even say that because of Iraq's actions in the late 80's and early 90's, they had sanctions coming. Sanctions that had a very negative impact on the Iraqi populace. Now, I wouldn't say they deserved it, but they did have it coming.

Personally, I think UShaditComing should diversify his forum posting. It would be wise for him to post in overseas forums.

Good, now if you could only recognize that the west also doesn't have a monopoly on evil. That the former government of Afghanistan was evil. That the former government of Iraq was evil. As is the current regime in Iran.

And thankfully, terrorist and dictator apologists such as yourself aren't representative of the Canadian population as a whole.

Wrong again "UShaditComing". Number 7 isn't anything like life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. It means you'll have the freedom to pursuit happiness, but not the right to attain it. Big difference. You also contradict yourself. Big suprise. You come across as opposing the border fence, but you also come across as opposing workers doing menial labour for a dollar a day. If the border fence prevents the exploitation of labour, isn't that a good thing? Also, what right does a non-American have working in America anyways? Answer, none.How in the world do you interpret number 11 as the abolishment of any social platform? Please enlighten us. As for the total confiscation of war profits, seems like a totally socialist-leftist-marxist idea to me. Just look at what you and your ilk have to say about companies like Haliburton (queue scary music). 13, 14, and 15 are all classic socialist ideas, that are still being sought after today. You can look at Europe, South America (Chavez in particular) and even the Democrat candidates as examples. Stop being so intellectually dishonest. On a side note, Mussolini was also a rabid socialist.

Yes, America has a monopoly on corrupt politicians. Luckily for us, Canada hasn't ever had to worry about problems like that....cough....sponsorship. Please tell us "UShaditComing", that you're just an out of work actor, brushing up on your skills to play a sterotypical left-wing wacko, void of any grip on reality. That's what I'm hoping anyway. I'm not sure what's more scary. Terrorist extremists or enablers like you.

I'd rather be an American apologist then an apologist for terrorists and dictators like you are.

Can anyone guess the common trait shared by 6 of the bottom 10?

Ditto.

I hope so.

Nope. Nice try. Everyone in Canada is given access to a fair trial. Nothing has changed. That's not a freedom. If one commits a violent crime (mandatory minimum sentences are only associated with violent crime, rape, murder) and a judge doesn't think a jail sentence is necessary, then that judge should be impeached. Legislators, who are voted into office my the Canadian people, writing legislation making a minimum prison sentence for violent criminals mandatory does not equal "precious" freedoms slipping away. That's quite absurd. Canadians didn't have the freedom to smoke, sell and/or grow marijuana before Harper became Prime Minister. To suggest otherwise is also absurd. Reverse onus laws only apply to bail not to trial, and are only associated with gun crimes. Harper first made these announcements with Dalton McGuinty (Liberal), and Toronto Mayor David Miller (New Democrat). Link I'm sure you could, and you'd be wrong and wrong.

I'm not sure if you're aware, but there are numerous ways to substantiate a person's confessions. Interrogators will have access to a terrorists background, and all the inelligence assocated with him. Usually, with any interrogation, you begin asking questions you already know the answers to, in order to determine the validity of the information you're gathering.It's not just a matter of waterboarding a suspect while asking questions without any purpose or strategy. That's a narrative people create in order to support their false premise related to waterboarding. It's incorrect.

You know when a troll is in need of attention when they change their signature, and make sure to let everyone know about it. Too funny. Are you saying waterboarding doesn't work? I bet it would take interrogators 2 whole seconds to get your PIN number.

They don't find it necessary to back up any of their arguments. I'm still waiting for an answer from DrGreenthumb on all the "precious" freedoms that have slipped away since Harper took office. So far, all he's been able to come up with is some delusional idea that we all had the freedom to grow and smoke marijuana pre-2006. And that someone who is convicted of violent crimes now serves a minimum amount of time in jail, is another freedom we've lost. I'm also waiting for Trex is tell us which countries he thinks are so-called dictatorships. He's been pretty silent on that point since I shut him up about it.

I would love to be proven wrong. Please Greenthumb, prove me wrong. Please UShaditComing, prove me wrong. Name some precious freedoms that have slipped away since Harper took office. For the love of God, prove me wrong. LOL. I'm still waiting. Actually, now for your answer, and from Greenthumb. Come on guys, I'll allow both of you to collaborate on answers if that'll help. Btw, don't post ignorant arguments if you're not prepared to back them up.

Very well stated. I can respect someone who worries that McCain may get America involved in another war. I can respect any legitimate concerns people with differing political views (or even similar ones) may have with John McCain as President. However, this thread was started as an obvious attempt to troll and insult. Bringing up a candidates spouse's medical troubles, or unfounded inappropriate relationships doesn't merit any real discussion. That also should apply to Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama.

I'm also Canadian, and like you, I also support the use of waterboarding. However, I've been told by the Canadian Thought Police that it's "un-Canadian" to think that way. We need to be careful, I don't wanna end up in a Human Rights tribunal.

Um, that response wasn't from me. Try and criticize me on things that I actually say.

Great question. I'd like to ask a follow-up. If it was clearly stated before Bush/Cheney, who stated it and how did they state it?