WestCanMan

You can't argue the facts, so you come out with a generic insult. Grow up MH.

The fact that you call it bullshit is like the dictionary definition of 'verified'.

Most of the free world knew the fix was in when the Demmies started pimping mail-in ballots back in 2018. Every single election change that they want to implement is always voter-fraud-friendly for some reason. The fact that CNN started calling the election results legitimate on election night made it even more suspicious. You know CNN right, the 'news' network that still doesn't even accept the results of the 2016 election after 4 years? Gimme a break MH. No one is as dumb as you're pretending to be right now.

Just FYI, threats to our democracy and to that of the leading nation in the free world should be taken seriously. For 4 years you chose to believe in the Russian collusion story which has never amounted to more than an idiotic conspiracy theory from the word go. To be honest, the actual fact of the matter is that the collusion farce was actually a threat to democracy all on it's own. Now that there was an actual election scandal you're just intent on covering it up, and doing an ostrich act. In case you're not aware, I was referring to the whole host of anonymous accusations about Trump which the legions of idiot CNN sycophants gobbled up as gospel truth. Example - CNN: "A dude that one of our reporters talked to knows a dude in the WH who says that Trump said 'all soldiers are losers'. THAT'S WHAT PASSES AS 'FACTS' around here. Several people who were at the same meeting went on record saying that this story is false, but we only trust anonymous sources. Go forth and pass this as gospel now you little idiots! The world needs our truths!" You can try to take that to the bank if you want to Beave, and I have zero doubts that it's a hit within your circle, but it's crap here. You need to put more stock in the things that people swear testimony to, the things that they swear to in affidavits, the things that you can see on video, and less stock in things that come from Adam Schiff and anonymous sources. Class dismissed. Pass or fail Beave, I don't care.

The Duffygate 'scandal' began in 2012 and it was still a regular item in the news right through 2015. CBC was calling it 'an election issue'. The SNC scandal broke in Feb 2019. Just last year. When was the last time you saw an SNC story on the news? Do you hear much about the obstruction of justice there? CBC loved the topic of Trump theoretically obstructing justice when Trump didn't even commit a crime, but Justin's actual obstruction of justice is somehow no big D to the CBC????? Where have you ever heard that SNC Lavalin was caught bribing a politician with $2.3M for a bridge contract, aside from when I post it here? Shouldn't Canadians be aware of the fact that the company that Trudeau subverted our democracy for has a recent court-documented history of bribing politicians? The We scandal is larger than the SNC scandal, and it's orders of magnitude larger than the Duffygate scandal. It is almost exactly 10,000 times as much money. Even the amount that Trudeau's mom got directly from We is almost 4x as much as the whole Duffygate scandal. The We scandal just came out in July. Do you still hear about the We scandal on TV? The obstruction of justice in the We scandal was brazen and atrocious. Documents were heavily redacted to the point of being useless, then destroyed altogether. Do you hear much about that now, just 5 months later, or do we hear crickets? CBC and CTV allowed Trudeau to act as is the whole We scandal amounted to a matter of "I should have recused myself from the obvious decision of choosing We", and then they stopped covering the story altogether. It's gone. So Duffygate (who paid back the $90K?) was a 3 year, front-page scandal. SNC was less than a year, We was less than half a year. Duffygate was more than twice the story of both of those scandals put together, and yet the other scandals were both far more serious. CBC and CTV are utterly worthless, aside from their value to the Libs as propagandists. They're 100% as bad as Xinhua and NoKo news. Period.

Texas is awesome. If it was a country, I'd be applying for citizenship there.

I agree that the monarchy is a bit of a clown-show, but the biggest threat to democracy from a Canadian POV is our state-controlled media. The extent to which our media protects Trudeau and demonizes the conservatives and their supporters is no joke now. The relationship between our media and the Libs is the same as the relationship between Xinhua and Xi, NoKo News and KJU, etc. They're in lock step, and there is no real opposition in a country where the gov't has complete control over the media. A perfect example of "weakening our ability and effectiveness at criticizing undemocratic institutions in other countries" was when Trudeau tried to pontificate to the the Chinese Gov't about how "the Canadian gov't doesn't interfere in judicial processes so we can't intervene on behalf of Meng Wanzhou" and then Xinhua busted him for intervening on behalf of SNC. Our own media wouldn't even call Trudeau out for that, so now we have communist news agencies talking down to us about our failed democracy.

If you don't know the difference between a conspiracy theory and a court case with sworn testimony & hundreds of sworn affidavits then you've got your own issues to work out. This probably isn't the place for that though. For your edification: an anonymous accusation made by "a couple of people close to the administration" = 'a conspiracy theory'. A court case with video evidence & sworn testimony, is an actual court case.

She never 'believed' that, she just said that while knowing that it was false. She was the one who handed over the fake intel that she bought from sleezy Russians, remember? Russians did interfere in the American election. They put out thousands of dollars worth of attack ads against both parties on FB to sow discord in the US. It worked. Demmies jumped on the bait like sharks on chum and they shrieked about it for 4 years. The only people who truly believed it were Demmie peons watching CNN.

Gutfeld is brilliant. He makes more original, insightful and intelligent comments in a week than all the talking heads on CNN and MSNBC make in a year.

I just saw that the tents were for an NBC show called Good Girls. Not that it really makes any difference.

With some alt-leftists here and there.

This would be kind of funny if it was in a Jr High School newspaper but it's not the kind of thing that you'd expect to see in an adult forum.

Did you have some memes taken down by mods?

Lol. This from a Biden supporter. You want a guy who can't even speak english anymore as a world leader. Please grace us with your opinions wise one Are you calling William and Kate, and Harry & Meghan "intelligent, sophisticated people"? Prince Andrew? Prince Charles? In all seriousness, are you? Those people have all the character and wit of a pair of Barbie and Ken dolls. Pull their strings and they'll belch out platitudes all day. yaaaay. You must just love Greta Thunberg. Can you tell me the last thing you saw any one of the young royals say or do that was notable in the past 30 years Argus? Have Harry & Meghan's harrowing tales of racial bias touched you deeply? Are they to be considered worldly and wise now that they've lived in Canada and America...? Has the awkward romance of Charles and Camilla tugged at your heart strings for all these years Argus? :projectilevomitsmiley: They are not people of worth, or merit, and most importantly they'll never say anything insightful, profound or even honest in all their years on this planet. They're just light-skinned Kardashians with a 'royal pedigree' (aka inbreds). I couldn't care less where they go or what they do any more than I care about Miley Cyrus or Peewee Herman and I definitely don't consider them 'leaders' of any sort.

OMG, those food tents were for filming the Orville? Is that the Seth MacFarlane sci-fi show? I don't even know what's going on with that thing. It isn't watchable. It's not good sci-fi, it's not good drama, it's not funny, it's just a waste of time. I'd rather watch that old Lost In Space show.

Most western Canadians are even less fond of Trudeau than Quebecers are of the Queen, by a large margin. If western Canada was to separate though, I couldn't care less if we severed ties with the commonwealth. The young royals are bobbleheads at best. I'd be embarrassed to have Charles or William as 'our King' lol.

I think most people vote for 'the lesser of two evils' most of the time. There were 6M people that voted for Trudeau in the last election and 70M people (theoretically) voted for Biden in 2020. The number of people who truly trust and respect those two in North America is probably closer to 100K than 80M.

Garcetti knows exactly how to twist that knife that's in her back. Demonrats are pure scum.

I understand what you're saying, the shutdowns have caused a lot of very real damage in a lot of ways. It's just not really quantifiable. When there are 500,000 more people in NA with diabetes due to inactivity, when mental health issues rise and suicides and ODs are up, etc, it's hard to point the finger and directly blame C19. The main change that we're seeing from covid is we just have a far more socialist/communist country. People are getting paid to stay home, politicians have god-like powers, low-level capitalists are getting snitched on by their fellow citizens for trying to operate in the same way that mega-corporations are operating, and mega-corporations with far-left politician pals are getting stronger. Trudeau supporting We through this was a perfect example of how the government can pull their friends through C19 while at the same time ensuring the demise of their rivals.

LMAO. Literally THE MOST FARCICAL ACCUSATION THAT I EVER HEARD IN MY LIFE was Lisa Swetnick's hysterical story about attending numerous Kavanaugh gang-rape parties. I thought that it was the dumbest thing that I ever heard, but that didn't stop Demmies from falling for it. Her dirtbag lawyer was actually a leading contender for leadership of the Demmies for a while in 2018, according to CNN talking heads. Dems are the lowest of the low. They make our Liberals look almost human.

Trump won't be POTUS in 2021, but if there's any justice there will be people in jail for election fraud.

Karen is the stupid broad that was spent the last 4 years hyperventilating about Trump being a Russian Nazi and bemoaning all the damage that was done to the US by Far-Right Terrorists. (do you even have a single example of that?) You're the epitome of a Karen, and now you and Beave are the ones on full denial here, claiming yet another conspiracy theory. "VIDEO EVIDENCE, AND HUNDREDS OF PEOPLE WHO SIGN AFFIDAVITS & APPEAR IN COURT ARE NOT TO BE TRUSTED!!!!!!!!! ONLY ANONYMOUS SOURCES ARE TO BE TRUSTED, ESPECIALLY WHEN THEY'RE CONTRADICTED BY ACTUAL WITNESSES WHO ARE WILLING TO GO ON RECORD!!!!! SCHIFF WILL RELEASE ABSOLUTE PROOF OF RUSSIAN COLLUSION THIS WEEKEND!!!!!! ALL DEMOCRAT WOMEN ARE TO BE BELIEVED!!!!!" - Karen

That's true beave. Your half-baked theories don't make sense. Thanks for admitting to that. Are you honestly trying to tell me that you think what went on in that room was legitimate ballot-counting? Wait til the observers leave and then pull out the cases of ballots that were hiding under the desk.....? IMO you didn't have much credibility here to start with, but even if you had a rock-solid reputation for telling the truth you'd be below water after that idiocy. The only way that the video in question isn't a huge deal for Dem voter fraud is if it's a made-up video by the GOP. Either way, that video has the potential to be the single biggest voter fraud proven in the history of the USA.

No, you clearly don't know what happened re: Hillary. She was guilty of having emails on her server which were marked classified at the time they were sent and received, and it is a fact that emails were deleted from her server two weeks after they were subpoenaed. Other Americans have served actual jail time for having much less classified information on personal devices. They just didn't have a spouse who 'randomly bumped into the AG on a tarmac out in the middle of nowhere and then had a private meeting about their (non-existent) grandkids. Hillary was able to feign a complete lack of knowledge of the situation because she claimed to have fallen backwards on some stairs and bumped her head. She has at least two FBI interrogations now where she said nothing but "I don't recall" dozens of times. In case you don't get it, Hillary does not answer to the FBI, period. They reported the shit out of THEIR NARRATIVE, not the evidence that was stacked against her. Saying "This investigation is bogus" over and over again, as with the Biden scandals, isn't "covering the shit out of the story" FYI. By your standards the MSM is covering the shit out of election fraud too, because as far back as election night they were proclaiming that the election was 100% legit and there was no fraud. To be 100% honest, what she did was an actual crime in the espionage act. People pay for crimes in different ways. When Chrysler killed 50-some-odd people because of faulty ignitions because they didn't want to do a recall right away no one went to jail. They just paid a fine for mini-genocide or something. If Hillary was found guilty, there are ways for her to pay for her crime without going to jail, which would amount to more of a personal loss for her than what another person would suffer by being forced to go to jail for 6 months. When there's a lot of evidence of something and you draw attention to it, it's not a smear. Once that information starts unravelling, it's important to wind down the accusations accordingly. With Hillary's case, information was piling up, instead of going away. At the very end we now know that emails were wiped from her server two weeks after they were subpoenaed. Even lefty Snopes admits that. 'Sexual assault' is the most vague claim in the history of criminal law. It literally goes from butt-grabbing to forcible penetration, and what one woman will snicker about another will get litigious over. The actual fact of the matter is that Trudeau crossed the exact same line that Trump crossed. He's 100% as guilty as Trump, and what Trump did isn't 'sexual assault' by a reasonable man's standards. What B Clinton did is what would classically be called "rape" in any western country by any reasonable man.