WestCanMan

Calm down Karen. There will most likely not be enough to change the whole election, but either way it's still extremely important to get to the bottom of this when it was clearly such a huge scandal. You shouldn't be against the truth sapper, unless you're anti-democracy.

While other people are engaging in adult discussion. Do you get it?

We are constantly showing our character and the worth of our opinions when we post sapper.

Those people didn't have all kinds of time to fix an election. There were 8, 10 and 12 hour pauses in the vote tallying which seems like a lot to outsiders, but to people on the ground trying to run a scam it's not a lot of time, especially with election observers there. This was a brief window of opportunity, and it's an example of 'haste makes waste'. They just screwed up and didn't cover their tracks properly. Out of all the places where the Dems ran their voter fraud schemes do you think that at least one group wouldn't overlook something like this? Maybe they didn't know about the cameras, maybe they thought that the cameras were off, maybe they didn't think that there would be an investigation, so the camera footage wouldn't matter. Plus they're Dems, so they're obviously not very bright. The MSM has been running a full-court press to legitimize the election since 9PM on election night, and they attempt to instantly de-legitimize any criticisms without paying them any attention, much like yourself. Everyone with at least half a brain knew that the Dems were planning on cheating by the number of voter-fraud-friendly systems they were trying to incorporate and how many times they've been caught cheating on the elections in the past. FYI they started working on mail-in ballots back in 2018, 2 years before the first signs of the plandemic.

Was that comment really worth posting? What do you think you're 'adding' to the discussion sapper?

She's no prize but that's not a pre-requisite for being a witness to something. People have been convicted of murder based on the testimony of lesser people than that woman. Eye-Witness testimony still actually means something in a court of law. By publicly shaming this woman I think that the media are trying to stop other people from testifying. Ironically CNN et al will make a hero of an anonymous whistleblower and give them all the credibility in the world but when it comes to people who put their name & reputation on the line and risk a perjury charge by appearing in court it's time to shame people into silence.

1) She's clearly a person who believes what she's saying. You can laugh because of he demeanour if you want but that's no defence. 2) An actual example of laughable was the Blasey-Ford testimony. I'll acknowledge that you weren't as sucked-in as the rest of the morons who trumpeted her clams as being newsworthy, but you still treated those farcical proceedings with a degree of interest and respect which they didn't deserve. If you recall the Kavanaugh accusation was a case that was shockingly out of the blue, with no witnesses and no merit of any sort whatsoever. This is a case where a multitude of things which were extremely fishy obviously occurred and there are hundreds of witnesses with signed affidavits and sworn testimony. It's absurd to see what case you decided to put stock in - the one that the known liars at CNN told you to.... Sheeple much?

Felony mishandling of classified information is a bit of a popularity contest. Some people go to jail, some are there briefly and then pardoned, some don't go to jail at all. There was a trial and an unconditional pardon of Hillary done by the MSM. 1 I wasn't chanting lock her up, and 2) I think we all knew that she'd skate. The FBI lets her off with "I don't knows" and "I can't remembers" every time she is interviewed by them. Don't you remember that during the 2016 election campaigns she claimed to have fallen backwards on the stairs and hit her head? That was he excuse for remembering nothing when she talked to the FBI. Then her memory was perfect again during the campaign. But that's ok. Everyone gets to tell the FBI that they bumped their head, right? I personally just believe that the people who don't get along with the Clintons are really really really really really really really really unlucky. The truth about Trudeau is that he was busted for being a groper (I'm not surprised that the info didn't penetrate your Libelar bubble). So are you saying that Trudeau is as bad as Clinton and other actual v-penetration rapists now? Because that was your standard for Trump.

Right, but it's an incident that can never be repeated, so policies regarding the processing of children at the border were changed.

Beave you're still a post behind. You have a whole lot of previous idiocy that you probably want to try to answer to.

Yes, kids that were detained when Obama was POTUS actually were released into the custody of human traffickers. It's a fact. Even Snopes won't deny it, but their answer is more of a long-winded conversation about Trump than it is about what happened when Obama was POTUS. The fact is that Obama's policies led directly to that. He was the POTUS and he's responsible for the handling of immigrants under his watch because he was a central figure in that decision-making process. Things were carried on and some were modified under Trump, Trump is responsible for what happened when he was POTUS too, that's how it works. Right. The whole process of "let them all come in, catch them with drones and choppers and dogs and borders guards and with automatic weapons etc, and them put them into the bureaucratic boondoggle isn't a smashing success. Too bad walls are racist. BS. The fact is that the cages were built by Obama and they obviously used them too, and the main reason why there's a huge problem at the border is because the Dems like to prolong the agony there just to score political points. There should be a wall, and people should wait to get in legally.

Dude you're just busted for lying again, as usual. No one said anything about 'zero tolerance' under Obama or especially not why that policy started. Don't forget that Obama's administration put children back into the custody of human traffickers, so leaving kids with the people who are pretending to be their family members isn't always the best option. FYI the situation at the border is massive and extremely difficult/expensive but instead of trying to fix it the Dems just want to politicize it and keep the problem around. And back to the heart of the issue, I saw how the story was presented, and I know what the people who only get their opinions spoon-fed to them from CNN understand this topic, and it was a smear campaign just like I said. The Dems were also saying and doing everything that they could (promoting sanctuary cities and the abolition of ice, etc) to ensure waves of immigrants came to the US and overran the system during Trump's Presidency. The fact that America was suddenly enjoying their best economy ever helped increase the flood of immigrants. Another smear on the Trump campaign was "Walls are racist!" lol. "Walls don't work. Walls are too expensive. Helicopters and police patrols and dogs and etc will be much cheaper and more effective" lol. The demmies didn't want walls, which means that the crisis at the border will always involve massive amounts of people on American soil for the gov't to sort out and process. Dude the Demonrats smear 24/7. Their smears don't even have to make sense, or have a shred of evidence for their idiot followers to believe them. They just have to be angry and divisive and their drones are on it like white on rice.

Dude you don't even know what a smear is. If you're running for re-election against Hitler and you show some photos of his concentration camps that's not a smear. It's important for people to know the truth [that's a whole different story and I'm not going to explain that to you in this thread]. If you're attacking Donald Trump and you show pictures of kids in cages from when Obama was POTUS, and blame it on Trump, that's a smear. It's also a smear when you act like Trump invented the idea and that he was the only one to ever do it. Smear, smear, smear. It's the demonrat way.

Your original argument was just completely hypocritical and stupid and that's been proven over and over. IE, the GOP aren't 'the party of lying and smears' at all, and not by a long shot. The Dems have committed fake smears of epic proprtions over the last few years which were all completely bogus & groundless. By contrast, none of the GOP claims were groundless at all. Hillary did delete emails after they were subpoenaed, she did store classified information on a private server, her husband had a clandestine meeting on a tarmac with the AG right at the height of the incident to talk about their grandkids (who are Bill's grandkids again?). The Bidens told all kinds of lies about Joe's knowledge of Burisma and had to admit that they were busted when the photo with Devon Archer came out, Hunter admitted that he only got on that extremely lucrative board and other boards because of who his father is, Joe brazenly bragged about using the clout of the Vice-Presidency to fire Ukraine's top investigator and now there are emails out indicating that Joe went to Ukraine at the behest of Hunter's business partners. It's a quid pro quo on steroids, with reliable and verified evidence from all sides. OMG you live in a Libelar bubble. https://globalnews.ca/news/4318050/justin-trudeau-grope-creston-bc-reporter/ Don't you remember his comments "Women experience things differently" and "If I knew you were reporting for a national paper I wouldn't have been so forward"? https://nationalpost.com/news/politics/why-an-18-year-old-groping-allegation-against-justin-trudeau-is-not-a-metoo-moment Trudeau IS a groper and he wasn't just 'accused', it's a known incident. By your logic of Trump ==== B Clinton, Trudeau is just as bad as a guy who forces women to have sex with him. Dates and times of groping. Not rape. To the rest of the world there's a huge difference. Only you think that they're the same. I never said that Ezra Levant is a hero, I might have cited him 3 times here in all my posts. But he reports on things that need to be reported on which our lamestream media won't touch, and how many suits against him were successful? What does this even mean? Did you throw your alphabet soup down on the table and just copy what it said verbatim? (I'll admit that's probably not a bad strategy for a Lib.) Willie Horton was part of a group that robbed a gas station, and he stabbed the 17 yr-old kid who was working there 19 times after he had turned over the money. The kid was stuffed in a garbage can and bled to death there. Horton got life in prison, but got weekends out of jail because of a Dukakis release program, and Horton didn't return. Instead he [from wiki]: Horton got out because of a Dukakis plan, and Dukakis's idea was atrocious and moronic. Drawing attention to the fact that Dukakis is just a total idiot with horrible ideas wasn't a smear, it was a public service announcement. He's supposed to lead an entire country, and no one wants the biggest idiot in the country as their leader unless they're just as dumb as he is. The reason that the Horton photo was such a big deal is because the Demonrats knew that photo had sunk their battleship, so they cried "RACISM!!!!!". It's their plan A and their Plan B, they don't even have any other plans and they don't need any other plans because their voters are complete and total idiots.

This government would give money to Iran's military if they could find a way to take it from ours.

1) Who has a record of 'making fun of veterans and victims of crime'? I'm not following.... 2) I never said that the Dems or CNN advocated for violence against police, they just 1) spread inflammatory disinformation about the events that sparked the anti-police sentiments and the violence & rioting of 2014, 2015, 2016, and the middle months of 2020, 2) they glorified the rioting once it started 3)they pretended that the carnage was minimal/acceptable 4) they pretended that the violence was somehow disconnected from the BLM movement 5) they made no attempts to discourage the violence 5) they withheld evidence that hurt their narrative that 'police were acting violently & inappropriately', 6) they attempted to justify all of the violence/division/murders/property damage after it all happened. Those things are all bad, and for sure they completed fostered an environment where attacks and murders of the police were inevitable, but at no point did they expressly tell people to attack police and I never said that they did.

1) What I choose to believe is what has at least the ring of credibility to it. 2) I'm not here defending the party that says things like: "ALL WOMEN MUST BE BELIEVED!!!!! (unless the conniving little whores are talking about Bill Clinton)" FYI allegations which are so vague that they don't allow the accused a chance to defend themselves aren't worth considering. Dems are famous for accusations such as: Blasey-Ford: "He almost raped me in like 1985 or '86? I have no clue where it was and I have no witnesses. I've never mentioned it to anyone in my life before. Not the police, not my family, none of my closest friends. You just have to believe me." 49 Senators reply in unison: "WE BELIEVE YOU! ALL WOMEN UST BE BELIEVED!!!!" Mr Anonymous: "Some other anonymous dudes who were like, in the WhiteHouse, said that Trump said all soldiers are losers. That should be an international headline because there's like, so much evidence of it." E Jean Caroll: "He raped me in about '95 or '96 at a department store changing room somewhere." You get completely sucked in by all that ridiculous BS and then belch it like it's gospel truth. Jaunita Broddrick's story at least has some meat to it. It has an exact location, a date, Clinton was confirmed to be in that town on that date and had nothing on his official schedule at that time of day, there are witnesses to her injuries and her story from the time of the event, etc. It's a specific, serious accusation which has 100x more merit than the stories of BlaseyFord and Jean Caroll put together. You shouldn't be pontificating, you should be thinking critically, or listening to people who do. Libspeak 101: "Don't bother 'fessing-up when you're proven to be 100% wrong, just throw down some sandbox insults and make some broad generalizations which are off-topic." BWAAAhahahahahaha look at you, suddenly caring about 'vile accusations' lol. If you took all the vile accusations off of CNN and the Dems' speeches over the last 4 years there would have been complete silence. Lol. Sucked in by Michelle Obama's idiocy much? "When they go low, we go high"? FYI if I say "Let's keep our billions in the bank and just keep blending in with the middle class folk" that doesn't make me a billionaire. The Libs are not on the high ground, nor have they ever been for at least 10 years now. It's just a story for the Dems' idiotic base to regurgitate when they don't have their emotional support animals with them. Wow, you're using real swear-words beave. Ooooh you must be at least 16. FYI I'm not the one with the bloody nose, everything I said in my last post still stands unchallenged, and you still look like a fool beave. Maybe now more than ever.

IMO Trump has a 0.01% chance of keeping the Presidency, and even if he did the rioting and adversarial news cycle and rioting would just be worse. America is screwed for 4 years, it's just a matter of how much damage is done. Hopefully the Demonrats don't win the Senate.

lmao, that was pretty good.

1) No, not at all. Telling the truth about someone is not smearing them. 2) LMAO. You have no clue what you're talking about, as usual. I'm not ignorant of the Sandra Fluke story. It's just not a story. No one has heard of it. It's not even close to being on the level of the Bork/Thoms/Kavanaugh smears. You might as well compare your neighbour Je to Ted Bundy or Clifford Olson. 3) There's no "Republicans’ constant anti-gay rhetoric", you're chasing windmills kid. 4) First, your insistence that groping a woman with her clothes on is as bad as actually raping a woman with v-penetration just proves your atrocious level of understanding of life in general. Are you saying that groper Trudeau is as bad as groper Trump is as bad as groper/user Weinstein is as bad as groper/rapist Clinton is as bad as rapist/pedophile Epstein, etc....? Where do you make a distinction? Is the next level up from groper a rapist/murderer? Second, this: isn't a credible allegation. It's just a Blasey-Ford allegation (aka farce) when you don't even know what year it happened. I almost envy you your myopic, infantile understanding of the world. Life would be so much simpler if I just believed everything that I saw on TV, and I never questioned anything or bothered to think for myself.

If you don't understand the situation, maybe you should ask instead of misguidedly throwing around sandbox insults? I'm not going to try to speak for everyone, but just because I'm personally not going to take the vaccine doesn't mean that I don't want other people to be unable to get it. Do you understand that QM85? I don't want to take a vaccine with unknown side effects just to stop me from getting the sniffles, but I understand why people who could really suffer or die from C19 would be willing to take the risk of a new vaccine and I think that our government could save us a lot of money by giving out vaccines instead of doling out a few more months of CERB. The sooner we get a vaccine out there, and put an end to our MSM's relentless fear-mongering, the sooner we can all get back to some semblance of normalcy.

Lol. There's no flu this year because of all the C19 precautions, but Canadians aren't taking enough C19 precautions so C19 is everywhere.....

Do you have a link to any really scathing articles or anything from CBC or CTV news? You know, the kind of stories that our own Canadian media would have written about Trump if he had completely failed to take any action at all.... Didn't think so. In the US Trump's administration set up Operation Warp Speed back in late April. Trudeau still didn't get off his ass and go to www.amazon.com/vaccines until....... a few days ago?????? On behalf of all Canadians I'd like to say thanks to our glorious PM for initiating 'Operation Week Spud'.

This government hasn't been held accountable for anything at all yet. SNC and We are both big enough scandals that Trudeau should have been forced to resign, but they're downplayed on CBC and CTV until they can be ignored completely, and then they go away. And just remember that at the very beginning of this whole plandemic, we let flights from C19 infected areas pour in for 45 days after the US had already put a stop to it. We didn't screen any of those passengers, we didn't have mandatory quarantines for sick people from those planes, and we were all told NOT to wear masks. Those people rode transit and ate in restaurants with the rest of us, with no masks and no restrictions. Then a week after they put a stop to foreign travel they had to start shutting down businesses and some of them will never re-open. We let so much covid in that we had over 5,000 dead Canadians by May 12th. We were one of the first countries in the world to that total and we have the 39th-highest population. There has never been any indication whatsoever that members of the Canadian think that Trudeau and his health officials made the wrong call back then, and they won't care that Trudeau made a mess of this vaccine process either. There's literally a zero % chance that Trudeau's feet get held to the fire on this whole issue of his massive C19 failures, at literally every stage of the process.

That's the FBI's way of trying to act like the collusion fiasco was somehow justifiable. "We didn't find evidence that he colluded, but we didn't prove that he never colluded either." The Dems love making serious accusations which can never be disproven. Kavanaugh's was the exact same formula: "At an undisclosed location, in un undisclosed month, in an undisclosed year, Kavanaugh almost raped me." Try to disprove an accusation that vague.... it's impossible.