WestCanMan

Antifa's protests are over hyped-up stories of people who shot at police and got killed, or who were in the room with someone who shot a cop and got killed in the ensuing gunfight. Their protests involve the murders of innocent civilians and police officers, arson, looting, rioting and widespread violence. They cost dozens of lives and billions of dollars in damage. The people in Washington right now are protesting a federal election that may have been stolen, or at the very least was greatly affected by proven instances of serious & widespread fraud. To this point they've done it without any violence or property damage to speak of. Do you think that murders and billions of dollars in property damages aren't worth wringing your hands over Boges? Can you explain to us how that works? Millions of people have seen evidence of a serious level of fraud. FYI that's far more worthy of protests than when the police shoot some drunk loser after he punches them and shoots at them.

Our media in Canada is just as tightly-controlled as the media in any of those countries, and our police are political pawns of the state as well. Democracy in North America is unravelling right now. Once the Dems convert the SC into the DNC Kangaroo Court, as was advocated for by Kamala and other high-level Demonrats, it's a done deal.

That's where the real party was on Nov 3rd. No one benefitted from Joe's election more than Xi did. Iran and NoKo are a close 2nd. I fully expect islamic terrorist attacks to spring up anew in NA again. When the cat's away.... Coming to CNN, this April: Dolt #1: "Casualty reports are still rolling in after two powerful bombs exploded in a crowded church while a Prius outside, loaded with men praising allah and screaming ,"Death to America", ran over people in the parking lot. This is clearly a gun-control/Republican hate issue, but it's still too early to say whether or not it was a terrorist attack. Luckily the men were wearing masks and driving an environmentally-friendly car, so the attack didn't spread covid or contribute to global warming. Unfortunately the men were killed by a citizen with a concealed carry permit, so they didn't make it to the nearby Walmart, which is another target-rich environment for Trump supporters." Dolt #2: "You just assumed that they were 'men', but we still don't know if they identified as male. We will keep the public informed regarding their gender as more reliable, truthful information becomes available."

Good point. He's the guy who can't draw a big enough crowd to fill a 7/11 but who managed to get 80 million votes.

Now it's a race to see which side can start a German-collusion conspiracy first lol.

Hunter's resume was just updated: Expected Wage: $40/hr minute

Because the Russian-made MAGA hats were fur-lined with ear flaps. Only Alaskans bought them.

That was actually pretty good, I'll give you credit, but the official food of the Dem party is pablum. You get bonus points if you let it dribble down your chin and get someone else to wipe it for you.

In other words, copy the Dems strategy of 2016 thru 2020 As opposed to: "Because Adam Schiff and Hillary Clinton said so!" or " Because an anonymous source close to the Whitehouse, who was contradicted by several persons who were present at the meeting, said so!". Got it. That's quite a downgrade from the Dems' system, where the media isn't even allowed to talk to the Dear Dementia Victim about topics that he has declared VERBOTEN! Also, there's no such thing as questioning Dear Dementia Victim. If you talk about his well-documented scandals you're a Russian pawn, a racist, a xenophobe, etc. And to be honest, there's really good reason for Trump supporters to look down their noses at the idiots (you called them 'infidels') who kept on making the same baseless accusations and promising the same evidence which never materialized. Honestly how god-damned stupid can the Demmie horde be, to keep kicking at the football that Adam Schiff keeps pulling away. At the end the leftist dolt horde was left clinging to Mueller's damning () accusation, "I still feel in my tummy tum tum that there was a crime, despite the fact that we spent tens of thousands of man-hours chasing windmills and we got caught breaking several laws to no effect." There was an actual conspiracy this time, as evidenced by your Dear Dementia Victim's videotaped confession that Dems had just created the most comprehensive voter fraud organization ever. It Freudian-slipped its way out of his mouth like the brekkie pablum that Dr Jillbo wiped off his chin a few moments earlier. There were some conspiracies, to be sure. The whole Russian collusion farce was an actual conspiracy, replete with all the usual banana republic tactics like 'a politically-motivated police force breaking laws and committing crimes to arrive at a pre-determined conclusion' and 'state-controlled media manipulating the mindless horde to make them believe something that was blatantly false'. 1) FYI 6 comes after 5, but that was a good guess. 2) Your second '5)' comment was your most salient point to date: it's to the point, contains no lies, and it perfectly summarizes all your knowledge of the topic at hand. Good job beave.

"We'll count the votes here once we figure out how many we need."

I thought you lost it for a second. He's not letting the truth slip out because it's the right thing to do, he's just doing it because CNN has to lower their dolt-horde's expectations of how "things are going to change drastically re: Russian foreign policy now that there's no longer a Ruskie-lover in the WH".

Just watching Fox right now, the GOP candidates are up by 1% and 1.8% right now, but I don't know if there's going to be a 5-day count again, with boxes and suitcases full of votes coming out from under desks at 3:00 am. Does anyone know when all of the votes have to be in for this?

100%. The conflict of interest doesn't end at elections though, it is packed into every story in the news. When a terrorist attack with a van is covered as a gun control issue you know that politics in the news is out of control.

Wrong again, and don't put words in my mouth - your reading comprehension sucks. For your edification: a lot of conservatives didn't think that we should have been bringing in tens of thousands of unscreened immigrants from the world's most terrorist-rich environment, just to meet our PM's idiotic virtue-signalling quota. We also thought that it was a bad idea to select the refugees from that region's population demographic who had the least to fear from islamic state. Trudeau: "Islamic state, I mean daesh, are committing genocide against Christians and Yazidis, so we need to get as many muslim refugees as possible out of that area!!!!" Nice deflection by the way. The actual topic at hand was your ridiculous inability to understand why the Americans didn't want an Afghani goat-herder-cum-general (for example) to be in command of American soldiers (ie, lives), and why they want their allies to pay their freight instead of just hiding under Uncle Sam's wing.

1) Ice-skating is illegal when you get ten people on a 48,000 sq ft rink. (Unless of course they're part of Brantford's city hall) 2) Are there more than 10 people per 48,000 sq feet in the photo below? Granted they're not exerting themselves, but this is more like 1,000 people per 48,000 sq feet. 3) IIRC, 'science said' that C19 isn't transmissible when you're fear-mongering against the police or rioting. Therefor, if the hockey players would have just destroyed some property and stole some things in support of a bogus cause - they would have had immunity to C19.

Leftists love to argue their You think that other countries should be commanding America's army. That's like your friends driving your nice shiny car. When your friends think they don't need to get a car because they can just tag along in yours, that's like when other countries want to sit around and watch America defend them. Some things just aren't fair. You can't understand it from someone else's POV, that's fine, but that's your own problem and not something that I need to be helping you with. em·pa·thy /ˈempəTHē/ Learn to pronounce noun the ability to understand and share the feelings of another.

The word is: you got sucked in by every idiotic story that ever came out of CNN. If you were the discerning person that you claim to be you would have turned that drivel off long ago because, FYI, BS does not equal 'nuance'. Here's how your mind works sap: when CNN is pumping out the drivel it has a sense of reality to you because "It's on the 'news' mom!" Once the dust has settled on all of those stories it's easy to see with hindsight just how bogus they all were. Trying to defend any of their old talking points is the epitome of being in an untenable situation. But when it comes out you're like a deer in the headlights. Try to understand this sapper - if all of their stories eventually get proven to be BS, why do you keep watching their next one? And their next one? How many times do you need to get sucked in by them before you become wary? Sapper - do you believe me when I say to you that CNN lies to you, or do you really think that they were just incredibly, ridiculously wrong 85% of the time?

Lol. Leftists don't actually choose 'what to watch/what to believe' based on facts or sensibility though, they choose to watch what they personally like. They like to watch the news that gives them a chance to point the finger at other people, truth be damned, and when they watch CNN their sippy cups runneth over. Everyone with any brains at all would know better than to believe what the Dems were saying during the Kavanaugh hearings, they know that Rayshard was shot because he punched a cop and shot a taser at his face and not because he was black, they know that Russian collusion was bogus, they know not to listen to an anonymous report from the WH that was contradicted by several people who were present, they know that AOC didn't see women in a detention center being forced to drink from toilets, they know that Brionna wasn't sleeping peacefully in her bed when she was shot by cops who entered without knocking, they know that Omar Mateen wasn't influenced by the GOP to kill 49 gay men, they know that AK-47's were illegal before Omar went into Pulse, they know that 'beloved father figure' isn't the most suitable description of Suleimani, they know that Antifa is real, they know that the riots weren't mostly peaceful, they know that when a terrorist attack is committed by men with AKs praising allah that it's not too early to call it a terrorist attack.... they know a lot of things that leftists like you just don't know sap, because they know better than to watch CNN and the rest of the sycophant media. I know that you'll deny that you watch CNN, literally everyone here does, but the sad fact is that you'll regurgitate all of their more idiotic lies here 'til the cows come home. Maybe you're not getting your obvious disinformation right from stooge central, but you're watching the stations that propagate their fake news just the same.

You have an irrational hatred for the US. If you have a nicer car than your friends should they drive your car when you go out or should you drive it? Is it ok if they decide not to get a car, based on the assumption that you'll always drive them around? Of course you'd want to have some kind of a reasonable balance. Of course you don't want to feel used. Of course the US expects their allies to develop and maintain military capabilities.

crickets....

LMAO, you quote CNN and they're less objective than NoKo News. Right now your accusation of me being a liar is still unsupported by even one single sentence in one single post sappy. Go cite a lie that I posted or change your name to 'lying weasel'.

I'll keep that one in my back pocket then, in case I ever lose a 'debate'. (FYI debates includes facts from both sides, not just from me). FYI the 'debate' was already over when I cited your actual lies and you just came back with unsubstantiated sandbox insults.

Your assertion that [insert anything here] didn't happen can almost be considered incontrovertible evidence that it actually did happen.

Nothing that you said is entirely untrue, but it stands to reason that the Americans would lead the charge when they're the ones with the largest and most sophisticated intelligence gathering capabilities, and they're the only ones who know exactly what weaponry is available to be used on the enemies. Why on earth would countries without full knowledge of the situation or of the firepower available and how to best use it be calling the shots? Can you imagine how f'd up NATO would be with Trudeau/Sajjan in a leadership role? I would rather just surrender immediately.

Why, so that you can ignore it and spew some more CNN propaganda?