Jump to content

WestCanMan

Senior Member
  • Posts

    27,494
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    115

Everything posted by WestCanMan

  1. The removal of the search feature here is the leftists' best friend. Stealin' it!
  2. When they like the Hamas posts and regurgitate their propaganda and omit the same pertinent info from all of their messages it's not paranoia, eh? Do you like Hamas? And why?
  3. If Biden was the one handling this war, it would be a forever war. He wouldn't even be done his initial round of drone strikes against children yet and half of America's air force would already be gone.
  4. They don't trust the DEMS because so many DEMS are on the side of Hamas in this, and Hamas works for Iran. Sorry to break it to ya. Do you think Churchill was discussing D-Day plans with Nazis, Einstone?
  5. Dumber than Trudeau and Carney? TBH, they're selling dollars for less than 5 cents each, but that's not dumb, because they're only selling taxpayer dollars. Not their own 😉 "Here's $2.5B, Zel. I'll throw the other half in there after I see $20M in the account" - Trudeau "Here's $2.5B, Zel. I'll throw the other half in there after Brookfield's deal is signed" - Carney Do you understand that you just called your own gov't a terrorist org?
  6. When was the last time that the left4rds were right about something, eyeball? Did you hear any 'righties' screaming "You never cried loud enough about the dangers of covid or how safe and effective the jabs were"? If your cult leaders are so worried about global warming then why do they have mega yachts, private jets, and multiple mansions? Your average cult-leader has 2,000 times your carbon footprint. Probably way more. But they care, right eyeball? I bet they use the smiley-hugging-heart emoji a lot. *sigh* But flood-fires are only caused by global warming. Ask herbie. They're the them that knows
  7. Leftists are increasingly more and more against the US Gov't, against police, against ICE, against funding the DHS, against the current war, parroting Iranian propaganda, calling the war "illegal", and robo is even calling the US Gov't terrorists now. Robo's not even a fringe leftie - he's basically a mainstream guy from that side - so he's a fairly accurate barometer of the modern left4rd zeitgeist. Now, it's hard to tell if the robo-cult are taking the ayatollah's side because they hate Trump, or if they just don't see the ayatollah's regime as bad people. One thing's for certain though, the assertion that "Iran didn't pose an imminent threat to the US" is false because: they attacked hundreds of US bases in the ME while Biden was behind the Recumbent Desk they were amassing an enormous stockpile of better and better drones and missiles all the time we've seen even their current tech-lvl missiles break through US and Israeli defences now the cost between "Iran making cheap flying bombs" and "the US/Israel making detection and interception systems" capable take them out mid-flight puts Iran ahead by millions of dollars per interception. How far are they from making their missiles harder to detect, after the rockets are done? And from making missiles with enough range to hit the US using technology that they got from NoKo? And from building nukes? Can anyone really guarantee that they're not able to make them, or that NoKo or Pakistan wouldn't just give them nukes? Fact: Iranian proxies attacked US bases in the ME hundreds of times while Biden was president, and Biden didn't do anything in retaliation. So, from Trump's POV, if he did nothing now, and the friend of the ayatollah in the DNC won the next election or two, Iran could have been growing the nuclear program, upgrading their missile technology, and building drones until 2033 or 2037 without any interruptions. Just think about the capability that Iran has now, and what they could amass between now and 2033 or 2037, after one or two ayatollah-friendly Dem presidencies... Trump's decision to attack Iran was perfect. It is one of the smartest things that Trump ever did as president, and he has had a LOT of success as president. Anyways, my questions for lefties are: are you favouring the US or Iran right now? Is it like 100-0, 40-60, etc...? do you agree with robo, that the Americans are the terrorists now? for the ones that favour Iran: are you cheering for substantial American casualties, or just economic hardship and an overall loss, where the ayatollah's regime carries on and the US loses face? for the ones that favour America: are you hoping to see regime change, or just squeaking out a bare-bones win, where the ayatollah's regime carries on and Iranian citizens continue to live in a modern-day dark age? We are really at a time where we don't know which side most leftists are on, and clearly some are on the other side now. Can you tell us what "the best-case scenario" looks like, after this military phase has ended? I will answer for myself right now, but I don't speak for all conservatives: I want a total win for the US and for the Iranian people. Regime change, the whole works.
  8. That's just layers of stupid on top of stupid. All conservatives sound like lawyers from a leftist POV, because we know how to use words with 6+ letters.
  9. Now you have people who are mainstream democrats, like robo, echoing terrorist propaganda straight from the ayatollah, and calling the US terrorists. It's gettin' spicy.
  10. So the US is a terrorist regime now, robo? Is that your final answer? What level of terrorism from Iran do you support? Did you like Oct 7th, or was it basically fair, from a Democrat POV?
  11. Beave: You have TWELVE posts in this thread about "forgetting to take a hat off for a salute" and ZERO posts in TWO threads combined: one is about a CBC whistleblower telling a parliamentary committee that the CBC only allows LPoC MP's to be interviewed, one is about Mamdani's wife liking terrorist attacks. Both of those threads are about topics that are roughly 1,000 times more important than a hat-on salute. Why is it that you can't even say ONE WORD about topics that are far more important than this, but you can't stop talking about this? You're a RAGING sicko with TDS so bad that even Hillary looks sideways at you.
  12. Why are you SOOOOOOOOO active in a thread about forgetting to take a hat off for a salute and not active at all in the thread about Mamdani's wife liking terrorist attacks where women and children were tortured and burned to death? I get it, he shoulda took his hat off. Is that worse than Mamdani's wife clicking "Like" on a video where children are spitting on the corpse of a naked woman in a trucK?
  13. Trump crushes Iran: "Yay!" Forgets to take off his hat: "We HATE that guy now! Can we go back to the guy that lets terrorists out of prison and only drone strikes children?"
  14. In general, people who need emotional support goats are mentally unhealthy. Or 12 doses of a pseudovax. Do they have a mental illness because they are demonrats, or are they demonrats because they have a mental illness? Good question. Or because they just have to lie and weasel their way through life and they feel rotten because of it Or it's depression from living in their moms' basements Or they exercise the same poor judgment in rest of their life decisions as they do with politics Or he fact that they're liars and weasels means that they can never develop healthy, long-term relationships Or some combination of all the above. There's a lot to that. They were COMPLETELY controlled by a disease with a 0.001% CFR. They were COMPLETELY controlled by global warming fear. They all believed that the US gov't was "almost overthrown" by 200 unarmed boomers.
  15. Just think about the party that tries to brand themselves as "the good guys", and one of their 2 very best has a wife that cheers when she sees women and children being tortured and burned to death. And in truth, the people here who support terrorism all support the LPoC and Dems.
  16. Mark Cuban names 2 up-and-coming Democrats he's impressed with, says the rest can't 'sell dollar bills for 50 cents' Mark Cuban says he's disillusioned with the Democratic Party after supporting Kamala Harris in 2024. He has two Democrats who he likes because they've "figured out social media algorithms." He named NYC Mayor Zohran Mamdani and James Talarico, the Democratic nominee for US Senate in Texas. Mark Cuban is pretty down on the Democrats these days — but there are a couple that have caught his eye. During an appearance at the Punchbowl News Conference in Washington, DC, on Tuesday, the billionaire businessman named Texas Democratic US Senate candidate James Talarico and New York City Mayor Zohran Mamdani as two Democrats whom he's impressed with. According to a verified demonrat toadie, there are only 2 solid demonrats candidates, and one of them is a terrorist supporter 🤣
  17. Expected comment from one who prefers fascism and lies to democracy. Good cultist! Down girl! Quick question: What does it feel like for you when your Supreme Leader goes to the WH and gets spanked, and then says "Elbows down 😭"?
  18. If you think that "people born as males" have a "right" to compete in women's sports, you are sadly mistaken. That is not a "right". It is a "privilege" for any person to compete in any athletic league, but taking away other people's basic rights is never really a right. Likewise, men going into "public accommodations", ie "opposite-sex bathrooms" is not a "right" either. In fact, allowing them that right would mean that "no women anywhere in the US have a right to use a public bathroom without biological males present in it." That is actually "stripping a right away from 50% of the population" in favour of .01% of the population. Do you understand that? Allowing people who are PHYSICALLY "MALES" into girls' bathrooms mean that "every woman in the US is stripped of the right to a women-only bathroom". Simple. FYI wiki isn't a legal document. Anyone can write in to wiki to contribute to their pages, and in this case, really stupid people wrote in and got wiki to record some misleading info.
  19. "😭 But mommy Marge said that I'M the perfect beta-male!" - anonymous ex-PM
  20. Wrong. You are lying. The simple fact is that you made a serious accusation that you can't back up, so you keep on making these disingenuous replies to weasel out of it. This has nothing to do with trans and everything to do with you making a false accusation.
×
×
  • Create New...