WestCanMan

Johnny, there never was a "MAGA wall" because unlike left4rds, conservatives are free-thinkers, and come to our own conclusions all the time. We disagree here in this forum constantly. User and I have epic exchanges that go on for days. By contrast, you will never see robo go against eyeball, or EF go against moonie, etc, because you guys are all in lock-step, every second of the say, in every thread, on every topic, regardless of how wrong you all are... If the LPoC says something blatantly false and stupid, or the dems, or CNN, or CBC, you will all defend it tooth-and-nail until the day you die, regardless of how blatantly false it is. At the very worst you will just stay away from a topic to draw attention elsewhere. Currently you're ALL trying to pretend that it's ok to demand that people show ID to get a job shovelling snow, but at the same time it's racist to require that those same people should need to show ID to vote. According to your theory, I should be able to go down to San Francisco and cast my vote as "Nancy Pelosi" and no one can challenge my right to cast that ballot, but I can't buy wine unless i have a driver's license. That's the depth of your stupidity. Not one leftist here can say "Yeah guys, voter ID makes sense" because you are all cultists. Period. You are all cultists, so none of you can admit that voter ID makes sense. Prove me wrong, johnny. Break ranks with your fellow leftards and say that, even if you don't believe it, for no other reason than to prove that you have free will, and you can say whatever you want.... I'll wait. You can retract your statement here tomorrow, and I will be your witness that it was just an experiment, and you didn't really disobey your handler, you were just trying to pretend to have freedom of speech. Johnny, there's no better example of a free thinker here than MH, our resident conservative who takes the LPoC position on literally every topic here, ever. Yeah. He's a conservative, but at no point has he ever sided with conservatives on a single policy or statement. Could one possibly be any more open-minded than the man who says "the other guys are always right, 100% of the time, we are always wrong, and the majority of us are racists and misogynists"?

Go look at the very first post of this thread, you stupid ape. In fact, I'll save you the time: Some Canadians are upset that a person who engaged in the 3-day gang-r4pe of a minor got out on bail, and your fellow cultist ex-flyer put a down-arrow on it. That's what we are discussing right now, dummy. He's a person who holds ALL OF THE EXACT SAME POSITIONS YOU DO, and he's putting violent pedophiles' rights to freedom ahead of protecting minors from r4pists. Can you say that a person like that shouldn't get out on bail, Johnny? Can you say that you're disgusted by the fact that a person who committed such a crime can get out on bail? Because i think that you're such a braindead cultist that it's impossible for you to speak out against such a thing, because your party supports it, and you don't have the intestinal fortitude or the integrity to acknowledge your party's most blatant failings. It turns out that we didn't need a "cultist" thread to prove that left4rds are cultists, we just had to have a thread about people who gang-r4pe children where you could all prove that you are cultists. Linkie ran away, Johnny. You got the tap. You have to represent the "pro-gang-r4pe" cult here now Johnny. Do your damnedest.

^^That^^ came from one of the dumbest cultists on the internet. Robo, you've made a career here out of being stupid and wrong, and you might think that's no big deal, but as a result of that, your attempts at slander stand as a ringing endorsement. If there's a pathological liar here, it's you, and every single person on this forum knows it, even if they're too much of a cultist to say it.

I'm saying that YOU are stupid, linkie. So are eyeball, MH, exflyer, moonie, herbie, etc. All the leftards here are cultist mor0ns. Joe Random can't possibly say anything dumber than your avg post from today. Just remember our current discussion is about exflyer's down-arrow on a post about a person who was part of the 3-day gang-r4pe of a child and then got out on bail.

If I was him I'd scour social media to find all the examples of students and other faculty members calling Trump/the GOP/CPC/Israel/the IDF/Netanyahu Nazis while nothing was done about it. And Hamas actually ARE like Nazis, 100.0%. Their charter called for the extermination of all Jews. There's no better comp for them than Nazis. I'm gonna sue that university for making Canadians look stupid if they don't STFU.

You're projecting, linkie. Leftists are by far the biggest cultists in NA. You get sucked in by CBC/LPoC/DNC/CNN lies on every major news story.

Be serious: you guys don't act like you want criminals off the streets: you are all intent on allowing criminals into the country you are all adamant that police shouldn't turn criminals over to immigration officials you are all adamant that immigration officials can't round up criminals facing deportation you support Dems AG's who decide that they aren't going to prosecute certain violent crimes anymore you all support the reduction of minimum sentences you all supported the Dems when they were releasing criminals from jail during covid you all supported Kamala Harris pimping a bail fund to get criminals back on the streets you all support laws against free speech that prevent people from talking about grooming gangs online right now you guys are supporting Hezbollah, Hamas and the IRGC in every instance where people were r4ped or killed by th epolicies and people you supported, you have always refused to acknowledge that there was a problem If you wanted to appear less supportive of violent crime, what could you possibly do differently? If you wanted to appear more supportive of violent crime, what could you possibly do differently?

You're gonna make linkie cry: he calls them "minor-attracted persons".

"My group" isn't on the wrong side of history all the time. We don't advocate for violence against the other side and call it comedy, we don't let murderers out of jail and say "oopsie", we don't say stupid things like "defund police" and then have to pretend we didn't, we don't open the border to criminals and then regret it later, we don't force people to take worthless jabs that they don't need and then try our best to ignore the suffering they caused, etc, etc. My group "reads things to implicitly understand them", but we think while we do it. We don't just memorize what we read and then it behind a wall of confirmation bias.

1) I'd knock all your f'ing teeth out if you said that shit to my face you f'ing loser. 2) Biden was in charge of all that info for 4 years and the Dems never said anything. Now they're saying "The info is in there, we just can't show you." All the dems have ever done from spring 2016 up until this point is lie about Donald Trump. Now they're even cheering for the ayatollah, as are you. it's time for you to get your f'ing head out of your ass you worthless POS.

I think it was Vassy who mentioned that "he is usually seen as attacking/criticizing everything"... The media should be doing some of that themselves: it's called "telling the truth". But instead they are always blowing sunshine up our asses about the LPoC, so Pierre shoulders that burden himself All Trudeau did as Opp leader was yell about $90k for 3 years and I never heard him described as negative by CTV or CBC For a guy who they like to characterize as just being negative, the Libs sure do like to steal PP's policies come election time Pierre is always on point, and sharp as a tack. I'm not looking fwd to the day when the MSM gets a chance to nail him on a comment that doesn't land 100% perfectly.

He wasn't just talking out of his ass, like you are. What he said was just a sad truth that you should seriously reflect on. Leftists are the ones calling for political violence, refusing to denounce violent rhetoric, and condoning the worst political violence possible, including assassinations. Those are not just salty talking points - they are all facts that you should consider. Leftist politicians have called for their followers to get into the faces of political opponents and make them not welcome. They have posted severed-head effigies, talked about assassinating the president, talked about blowing up the WH, and never faced criticism from their own side of the aisle for it. Leftist politicians and their main followers have harshly denigrated the police at times when they did nothing wrong, and then tried to taint them with issues of the distant past, while promoting violent riots against them, and talking about defunding them leftists have lied about Trump and other politicians thousands of times in order to incite hatred against them. In their minds, the accusations are all that matters - proof is never necessary. Then they flatly deny even the most obvious claims against leftist leaders. Leftists have gotten so bad now that they side with Hamas and the ayatollahs, and engage in lying about the ME conflicts to promote hatred against Jews Leftists even think it's ok to click "like" on posts about the glory of successful terrorist attacks where children were r4ped, tortured and killed, and women were r4ped, tortured and killed. You've 100% lost your humanity, and yet you still talk about humanity like you've cornered the market. Your lack of self-awareness is mind-blowing. If the conservatives don't win the next few elections, you'll get the authoritarian rule that you crave, but then you better hope that your ethnic grp/religion control all the weapons, because everyone else will be dead.

1) If a man marries and 8 year old, he has most likely r4ped her as many as 1200 times by the time she turns 14. And that is actual r4pes that are guaranteed to have happened. That's only having sex 200x a year over that 6 yr period. 2) What you are talking about is very unlikely to have even happened. The accuser wouldn't be the first person to file an illegitimate lawsuit against wealthy men. In the most recent suit, Trump’s accuser asserted that while she was exploring a modeling career in 1994, she attended a series of parties at the Manhattan home of prominent investor Jeffrey Epstein. She alleges that during those parties the real estate mogul tied her to a bed and raped her. She also claimed Epstein raped her during that series of gatherings If she said that they did it at one party and then she went to the police or stayed at a relative's place, etc, that might make sense, but she was a 14 yr old model and what, she didn't have parents or anything? No primary caregivers at all? She just kept on going to those parties after she was "r4ped" the first time? (She describes two different r4pes). After your 14-yr-old goes to a party with grown adults, don't her parents say "How did it go"? And they didn't catch on? They never asked her if she was hit on? Did anyone tie you up and r4pe you? And how did they tie her to a bed? Was there a fight? A threat? Physical force? I'm just not buying that it randomly happened once or twice during this party stage and she ket going back. It's not hilarious like the Lisa Swetnick story, but it sounds almost equally ridiculous. If they want to publish a story like that they should at least put enough details in it to make it seem plausible. That reads like total BS to me. There are r4pe cases against Clinton with specific times, locations, witnesses to physical injuries on the accusers, corroboration of Clinton's schedule that dovetail with times of when his itinerary had gaps and he was away from his Secret Service detail... Leftists don't take them seriously at all. And now you're trying to float this as "he actually r4ped her"? Get real. And cougar: stop trying to act like "marrying an 8 yr old and having sex with them" is in any way ok. Dogs don't have sex with puppies. Cats don't have sex with kittens. Bulls don't have sex with calves. Pigs don't have sex with piglets. Bugs don't even have sex with baby bugs. Men should not marry children and have sex with them, period, Cougar. I can't believe I have to tell you that. Go see a shrink and get checked out. Your TDS is way past critical mass. You need to grow up now.

How the F did that post get a down-vote? Only a leftist could choose partisan politics over universal support against the gang-r4pe of a child. And just the other day cougar said "marrying a child and having sex with them isn't illegal in Iran", implying that it was ok somehow. The sad fact is that "being more of a pedophile" = "being further left".

TBH, that's exactly where they need to be in order to draw the most voters away from the LPoC.

It's true that Biden's Afghanistan withdrawal was a Custer Special, and Obama had all the military prowess of a baby bunny, but that doesn't mean that they never tried, robo. Be fair to those losers. Tell us how much higher gasoline prices were under Biden, when the US wasn't doing anything about Iran. Trump "provoked"? So you're saying that "the Strait is legitimately closed because "Trump provoked" Iran"? That's disgusting. Iran provoked with years decades generations of calls for genocide, and a serious attempt at building nukes. FYI closing the Strait isn't hard. If the US was going to wait until everything was super-easy this never would have gotten handled.

The losers who have nothing to do but grovel over unsubstantiated accusations don't like the facts. You triggered their confirmation bias to DefCon 5. It's the ultimate compliment when people like that dislike you.

I think that women that old have been conditioned to believe CBC their whole lives, so they can't think for themselves. Also, a lot of women from that generation never had to have 9-5's, so they don't understand life from the POV of a taxpayer. It's always been free money to them for their whole lives, and now they're coasting on pensions. When life is super-easy, socialism sounds normal.

They're temporarily pro-terror, for the most part. They're against babies being burned to death and women being raped, murdered and killed, just not nearly as much as they're against Trump. If it was a Dem president doing this they'd all be fist-pumping, wearing red white & blue, and screaming about burning tankers.

TBH what happened was, Trump said that he thought Carney was the better choice, and CBC et al said "TRUMP SAYS CARNEY IS BETTER! WE BELIEVE DONALD J TRUMP! WE TRUST DONALD J TRUMP SO MUCH!!!!!!" and liberal voters all believed that one thing that Trump said. Everything before and since was a lie according to them, but somehow that one thing was true.

Whoa, here you are doing exactly what I just talked to you about in the other thread. You don't get to exaggerate other people's comments just so that you can accuse them of overreaction. It's a big deal that our gov't failed to tell Canadians about an attack on a base that our soldiers are in. Conservatives have a right to hold their feet to the fire. And they were in a military base, herb. Not a military base disguised as a hospital, just a military base, in plain sight. With American flags. Iran was going to fire missiles at it regardless of whether or not there were Canadians in it because they wanted to kill Americans. Our gov't acknowledging that we had soldiers there is no big deal. We have soldiers at a lot of bases.

Why do I care what she has to say about abortion? That has nothing at all to do with the price of tea in China. She said that "getting Don Cherry the Order of Canada is the conservatives PRIMARY FOCUS", and that is a lie, plain and simple. It is a lie. That is why I called her a stupid, lying b1tch. she came up with that stupid belief herself she chose those words herself she chose to take that snotty tone she chose to make a video to spew her lies in the hopes that she could suck in some hapless, low-IQ Canadians That makes her a stupid, lying b1tch, herbie. Stop acting like she isn't a stupid, lying b1tch. You just saw it yourself. Of course the conservatives have a lot of more pressing concerns than Don Cherry... I've seen Poilievre talk hundreds of times this year and not once have I seen him even mention Don Cherry's name. He talks a lot about the lies and broken promises of our f'd up gov't and our morally bankrupt state broadcaster, he talks about the importance of our energy sector and our economy, he talks about jobs and food prices and supporting America in this war. He talks about a lot of things, and Don Cherry certainly isn't chief among them. I don't "accuse" people of lying: when people are lying I point it out, and that's a huge difference. I also provide proof that they're lying when it isn't obvious, but in her case it was obvious, because most Canadians haven't even heard the CPC talk about Cherry this year. I know that video tickles your confirmation bias, herbie. You wanted to see someone get snotty and fire back against Poilievre, because PP's constantly sinking Carney's rubber ducky, and this toad went full-Karen on him so you just really liked it, facts be damned. And it's your right to like whatever you want, and you can even condone the lying if you want. Hell, cougar condones old men marrying young children and having sex with them (in Iran and islamic culture in general). But the bottom line here is, the facts matter to other people, herbie. You need to post your lies in a liberal echo chamber if you never want to get called out.

Their "primary focus"? What a stupid, lying b1tch. At least the one that robo cites is ok with the volume off. This one looks like she eats off the bottom of a pond. Try again, herbie.

As a favour, I edited your post to the point where it's accurate. No need to thank me.

If you don't see how badly you got dummied here, you definitely need a "phycologist". Again: left4rds shouldn't attempt to use words that have 6 letters or more.