WestCanMan

Link: 19,000 Canadians died of covid in 2022. That's 4,000 more than died in 2020, when covid was a novel virus and no one was vaccinated. Those are Health Canada's own numbers, not mine. I'm not guessing, I'm passing along that information to you. And it's a fact that 85.7% of covid deaths from June until the end of Sept in that year were among the multi-vaxed. Then our gov't just stopped giving us the "deaths by vax status" statistics. It's almost a certainty that MORE VAXED CANADIANS DIED IN 2022 than all the vaxed and unvaxed combined in 2020. And it IS a fact that WAY MORE VAXED CANADIANS DIED IN SUMMER 2022 than the total number of deaths in each summer prior. The ONLY place where you can find "evidence" of worthwhile vax success is in clinical studies. That is it. Canadian death stats do not flatter the jabs. Even if you could make the case that they helped a little, in some way, they definitely did nothing well enough to warrant forcing people to take it.

Vaccines DO NOT "SAVE THE LIVES" OF HEALTHY PEOPLE UNDER 50, BECUSE ALMOST NONE OF THEM DIED, EVER. I could just as easily clim to save the lives of 18 yr old girls at their 2025 proms by the power of my prayers. They didn't die, so it must have been me, right?

You're the "environmentalist" that's cheering for a bunch of tankers to sink/burn in the ocean. But your brain's not fried????

I don't want to be rude, but everything that you said there displays an acute lack of knowledge of covid and Trudeau. It's at a level that's alarming. VAX MANDATES: Go look at covid death stats by age and you'll see that covid was not dangerous AT ALL for people under 50 who were healthy. Their need was ZERO. Couple that with the fact that, by the time the at-risk populations were finally vaxed, and we could get around to vaxing people that didn't need it, we already knew 100% that the jabs did not prevent transmission, because people were already getting sick enough to die after being jabbed. (People who get sick enough to die are contagious, right?) So, with their own need being zero, and the "prevention of transmission" aspect gone, what reason was there for vaccinating young Canadians? Why give them an experimental vaccine that they didn't need, which provided no known benefit to society? The MAIN benefit of jabbing them was that "their cohort was always going to have outstanding covid stats, regardless of their vax status". If you vaxed 20M healthy young Canadians then you were guaranteed to end up with 20M m-vaxed people who never die of covid, thereby pumping up the stats, bigtime. Conversely, if the 20M aren't vaxed, then their success at surviving covid goes into the unvaxed camp. Right? One side or the other was going to get a cohort of 20M people who were going to have a 100% survival rate. Not only did their arrival in the vaxed camp make that camp look good, big pharma alos got the money for 20M doses X 2. Hijab Hoax: 12-yr-old muslim girl said that a Cinese guy attacked her and cut her hijab with scissors. Media tizzy... Trudeau quickly goes on TV to condem Canadians for being racist, as if anyone is more bigoted than muslims. Couple days later the police reveal that there was never an attack, and that she was just a liar out stirring up religious hatred, so Trudeau went and doubled down on his prior comments, saying that he still felt like Canadians are too racist. That was that. Ultra-pathetic. Vile. Sub-human. But not a big deal to the CBC, because you don't even know about it. Trudeau's Hitler Speech: During the pandemic he went on French TV and made a speech saying that: the unvaxed were anti-science very often racists and misogynists and he said "As leaders, and as Canadians, what we have to ask ourselves is 'should we tolerate these people?'" Note that at the time Trudeau was saying that, he was secretly building "voluntary covid self-isolation camps" in the Yukon. And I say secretly because it was secret. So secret, in fact, that when Ont MPP Randy Hillier first brought attention to the existence of these concentration camps that were built, Trudeau flatly denied the existence of anything being built there, and the media didn't even look into it - they just-mocked Hillier and anti-vaxers like a bunch of middle school bullies. It couldn't stay secret forever though, because people outside of the MSM didn't stp digging, so eventually they had to come up with the "voluntary self-isolation story. But let's be honest, no one was gonna go to the Yukon to fight off the flu, and sick elderly people weren't gonna be flown there... So think about those camps for a sec... Trudeau was freezing bank accounts, taking people's livelihoods away, forcing people to show a gesundheitspass everywhere they went, protesters were being beaten on the street, police were stealing gas from protesters, Trudeau was calling the unvaxed racists and misogynists and asking Canadians if they should even be tolerated, he was building concentration camps, and the MSM was lying to us about who even needed vaccines... Adolf Trudeau's Camps: Now remember, the legend went that there was a rabid death-bug that you could somehow carry asymptomatically, and the only way you'd know you were carrying it was from a nasal swab. So you could feel healthy, but a swab could say different, and then what... You'd be whisked away to a camp where all the CBC cultists expected you to die anyways, because "you had covid"? That's Hitler's wet dream right there: a secret medical test that revealed that you were carrying a deadly pathogen, necessitating your unwilling relocation to a camp where everyone expected you to die, and no one was allowed to viit you (remember we couldn't visit people in care homes - they died alone). Would Hitler have used such a thing? How close did Trudeau come to using it? He had vax-fascists like eyeball and EF riled up enough to cheer for the forced confinement of the unvaxed, for sure. No doubt his hate-laced screed on Quebec TV was just him testing the waters to see if he could get away with such a move.

Now we're in the thick of it: leftists/CBC cultists, are openly admitting to being pro-IRGC. So conservatives were correct. At least we all agree on something for once.

Oil tankers that were... sunk? F'n nutcase. I find it hilarious that the biggest environmentalist on this site is just saying: "Yeah, sink some tankers if it helps keep the IRGC safe". 😂 OMG you're loathesome. FYI, including that school, Americans have killed tens of thousands fewer people in Iran than the IRGC did in the last two months. They're been an open proponent of genocide for 40 years. How is that not "starting it"? Would you just give Iran nukes and ICBM's at the same time?

So what? You supported all of his vax-fascism, his denigration of Canadians during the hijab hoax, you said nothing when he called the unvaxed "racists and misogynists" and asked Canadians "Should we even tolerate these people?", you know that the CBC is biased AF and they lie all the time, and you never said shit when Trudeau continually talked about the need for the LPoC to control speech on the internet. Now it's an extension of the same brutal assaults on the pillars of democracy, and you're still here supporting every bit of it; gaslighting, lying, pettifogging and just being a good little LPoC cultist. FYI, once democracy is gone here, we're eventually gonna end up with a leader who hates someone, and that group will be royally f'd. If you look at Cuba as an example of another country that went communist, those cute cuddly buggers eventually started discriminating against minorities, leaving the inner city people and elderly hungry, detaining dissidents (ironic?), and left their middle class quite poor. You relish the end of democracy with no clue as to what that truly ends up looking like.

That's just stupid. CBC pushed all the pro-carbon-tax narratives and gave all the oxygen in the room to global warming criers. The just "support LPoC propaganda", that's it. You said "the carbon tax has zero to do with the price of oil", so you were trying to engage in semantics. I just blew past that BS and said it in terms of gas prices: "the carbon tax increased our gas prices". There's no room to debate that. So does the carbon tax, f-head. So does getting rid of coal-fired plants and changing to unreliable green energy. So does attacking our energy sector. You guys LOVED all that. "Costs be damned! Get the price of gas UP regardless of how bad it hurts! How dare your resist!!! You're killing the younger generations!!!!!!" - leftists Now the war is raising gas prices and you're all saying: "GET THE PRICE OF GAS DOWN!!!! KILL THE TURTLES BY SINKING OIL TANKERS UNTIL AMERICA LETS THE AYATOLLAH GO FREE!!!" - the same leftists as above I'm 100% correct. 😉 DO YOU WANT THE PRICE OF GAS UP OR DOWN?????? One or the other....

You just refuse to see the similarities between Hitler and Trudeau, Schiff, etc...

Stop, child. You know that CBC FULLY SUPPORTED HIGHER PRICES FOR CANADIANS. Gas prices. We hardly buy any "oil". Now, for some reason that makes no sense to me, the CBC is worried about high "oil" prices for everyone OUTSIDE of Canada, but of course that really means "gasoline and diesel". Make it make sense. Why did CBC love highergas prices for Canadians, now they're against it. Their pro-carban tax talking points that they pimped. The anti-carbon tax points that they scoffed at. Wrong. They affect people "disproportionately". Meaningless to the Dems and LPoC, but devastating fo r the poor people that they always pretend to care about. Biden, like Canadian libs, failed to see the importance of oil, pipelines, refineries, LNG infrastructure, etc. And coal. They bought Chinese green tech and gave up on coal and gas, China doesn't rely on their own green tech at all. They buy gas and coal.

FYI that's called "confirmation bias", and it's central to your cultist existence. If you were looking at something that said "Owinj Man bad" you would never be able to get enough of it, you could stay up 'til 3AM gloating over it, but when you see that the politicians that you admire share Hitler's own views on censorship, your brain shuts down. You actually should be looking at information that challenges your world views, Link. And not from a "what do I say to make it stop" POV, from a "does this make more sense from a democratic/humanitarian perspective" POV. You want to live in a bubble where the things that you were convinced of when you were 16 will always remain true, and that even includes just saying "You're poopy" to people who confront your beliefs with facts that contradict them. YOU DID support the "shut down the NYPost" attack on free speech. You FULLY supported social media's shadow bans and bans of conservative talking points. All leftists did. You railed against Elon Musk's purchase of Twitter, when that actually broke the left's stranglehold on social media censorship. You're on the dark side of history, Link, and I know that's hard for you to believe, because your side is using all the cool pejoratives like racist, misogynist, elitist, etc, but FYI it's actually more misogynist to beat up a woman for not wearing a hijab than it is to say that "pretending to be a woman doesn't give you the right to enter a bathroom with little girls in it". Quickly, Link, ignore all of that, because that information will cause cognitive dissonance for you, and it's the one thing that leftists shun, above all else.

In Canada, oil prices are artificially raised by carbon taxes, which the CBC fully supported. So, like I said, CBC FULLY SUPPORTED AN INCREASE IN OIL PRICES IN CANADA. Now they're saying that the US needs to stop fighting Iran to bring oil prices down. Again: CBC wants oil prices up here. Up. To fight climate change. it's actually a conservative position that rising energy costs affect poorer people disproportionately, because an extra $30 a tank is a lot for low-income people, and nothing for rich people. Leftists never cared until today. You're the first. Why don't you care about climate change? Oil prices in the US were exactly this high under Biden and leftists pretended it was no big deal. Now it's worth letting the IRGC off the hook? She's not involved at all: she's not celebrating the elevated oil prices, which drive down consumption, and save the planet she's not crying about sunken oil tankers destroying the environment. No left4rds are. Leftist media sources like CBC just say "Iran is escalating attacks in the Hormuz Strait" without mentioning the catastrophic environmental impact of that. There hasn't been a single "😭How dare you😭" from Great about sinking oil tankers. See above, dummy. Note that the girl who controls the left4rd mob tacitly supports Iran by not railing against their crimes against the environment. Leftards only see "HUGE CLOUDS OF BURNING OIL" when they can be blamed on Trump.

What are you talking about now, weasel? I just talked about DISGUSTING levels of censorship that LEFT4RDS FROM CANADA have supported in other countries, and our Libs are always pushing for more and more censorship in this country. They're jealous of the other fascists. And the LPoC WILL eventually push their censorship here, if they already haven't. I say that because it's a distinct possibility that the reason we don't have a search function in this forum anymore is because of censorship laws in Canada. We've tracked a lot of CBC false narratives here, gathered a lot of information here that runs contrary to LPoC lies, we've even got information here about Trudeau's scandals that our MSM has always kept hidden from the public. For example, the CBC has never mentioned that SNC Lavalin got caught bribing a LPoC-appointed bureaucrat in Mtl (close to Justin's Papineau riding) to win a bridge contract since news of Justin's scandal broke out. 99% of Canadians think that SNC's crimes were all just committed overseas, against Libyans, and they're ok with that. They don't know that Justin's ethics breach was committed for a company that committed crimes against Canadians.

Everything plays a factor. It was 100% for sure that Trump was going to accomplish his main goal, despite whatever left4rds wanna say about that: Iran's nuclear program was going back to the stone age one way or another. Period. There's no way that a religious nutjob who had dedicated his life to committing genocide was going to be allowed to have a nuclear/ICBM arsenal. How they were going to go about that was the next challenge. The most human-friendly way was the option that he chose: eliminate Iran's flight, anti-aircraft and missile interception capabilities loiter, and eliminate everything that says IRGC on it with accurate, clinical strikes The fact that Iran's anti-air capabilities are so diminished means the US can take their time and use cheaper bombs to hit their targets. They don't need over-the-horizon weapons to hit targets that they could fly biplanes over if they still had them. Cheaper bombs can now be used. The warthogs are even in Iran now, and have been for about a week. To answer your question: the fact that Persians wanted to rise up and claim their nation back presented Trump with a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity, so he's trying to take advantage of that. He's using extremely accurate, smaller bombs trying to squeeze the IRGC zits, instead of using "close enough" bombs that take off half the head. Hopefully by degrading the IRGC enough, that will give the Persian civilization the opportunity to come back and restore humanity. That's more of a cherry on top of the cake though. If the whole population of Iran was down with jihadi lunacy then a bunch of smoking holes would have been the final answer. Now you answer a question: whose side are you on? Are you just gonna regurgitate the ayatollah's propaganda to the end of your days now, no matter what happens in Iran, or is there a 1% chance that you could see an extinct ayatollah regime and a thriving Persian culture as a positive development? I'll be 100% honest with you: I can't imagine a scenario where you end up saying anything positive about Trump. I think that Iran could start planting roses instead of growing their capacity for committing genocide, and they could elect Hillary Clinton president, and the whole middle east could accept her as an empress, and the whole world could have peace parades every second Sunday, and you'd still hate Trump and call this a failure. I think you would write "But what about the school that Trump intentionally killed?" in your signature, and get it tattooed on your forehead. Am I right? (of course I am)

Not really a crime, per se. Countries do that all the time, and no one does it more than America. It's not even close. Trump even helped get Carney elected here in Canada. He put out a statement in favour of Carney/against Poilievre and the left4rd cultists ate it up. CBC hailed Trump as a great guy for about 1 week. None of that is to say that no one can do anything about it, and in this case, Trump might be doing something about it.

Let4rds hate Trump because they see him as being opposed to the ayatollahs and Xis of this world.

It's obviously pro-Iran for our PM to call the war "illegal", but then he said that we might send troops. To be fair to Carney though, he didn't say which side they'd be on... And then Carney said... I honestly don't even know. I would have to check my clock at the minute I wrote this post, and then corroborate it with Carney's most recent statement today, to know if we support the war, we think it's illegal, are joining it (and on which side), or whatever. The only thing we know for sure is that if Carney does make a declarative statement one way or the other, then it's one of 3 things: he's just lying, as usual he will change his mind ten minutes later, again or Trump will issue a direct order via meantweet which Craney will obey without hesitation CBC's Strait of Hormuz vdieo: If you watch this CBC video about the Strait of Hormuz right now it seems like the CBC even supports Iran's attacks on civilian oil tankers in the Strait of Hormuz... Our reporters are gloating about the trouble that the US is having at preventing the destruction of marine ecosystems. Wait, what??? Yup, the CBC doesn't even care that tankers are bing targeted. Nor does Greta. "SINK, BABY, SINK!!!" could have been the title of that video while it was in its design phase. It even starts with: "This is what America wants to show off..." But I can deal with that. Americans are putting out propaganda, sure. Everyone does. So, in fairness, the next thing that CBC will say is that "Iran is "showing off" their ability to kill more civilians and destroy all marine life within a 100km radius", right? Nope, just the purely objective statement: "Iran is escalating attacks in the Hormuz Strait." They make it sound like it's just some kind of "military success" that Iranians can be proud of. So what's the CBC's suggestion at the end of the video, to get the oil flowing again? "Stop fighting" lol. Could it get any more pro-Iranian than to just say: "Ok, Iran won, because their attacks on shipping are too disruptive, so let's end the war"? A more sensible position could be "Iran should stop sinking f'ing oil tankers, because that's ACTUALLY ILLEGAL", but nope. They think it's fine for Iran to keep on sinking tankers until the US/Israel just let them have their way lol. F me. Our state broadcaster is now a full-blown Iranian propaganda outlet in favour of sinking oil tankers. What Goals Does the CBC Promote? Look at this from the POV of CBC's two sacred cows: global warming and the environment/tidewaters: "At least oil consumption is down around the world, because oil prices are up 🥰. This is more effective than a carbon tax!!!"... They're saying that, Right? No? They're saying that it's bad that oil prices are up now. They're saying that the world needs to burn more oil, so the US should stop fighting." Then why did they pimp a carbon tax on us? "Iran is bad because sinking tankers obliterates marine ecosystems!"... Surely they saying that Iran should stop sinking tankers to protect the environment, right? No? But Greta is saying that sinking tankers is bad, right? No? It's OKAY??? How is that just ok from the CBC's POV, and from the Greta cult? Bottom Line: The CBC pimped a carbon tax to raise our oil prices in Canada so that we'd burn less oil The CBC wants to end the war with Iran to bring the price of oil down for the rest of the world make ^^that^^ make sense, left4rds the CBC and the Greta cult can't find fault with Iran for intentionally sinking several oil tankers and destroying the entire Strait of Hormuz ecosystem just to protect a regime that beats women, kills gays and slaughters thousands of freedom protesters. Hmmmm. Go Ayatollah!!!! the CBC and the Greta cult think that we can't ship oil through Canadian tidewaters because maybe 1 tanker will sink every 100 years...

The abject failures of the LPoC couldn't possibly be displayed any more clearly than they are now: if we would have carried on building pipelines and LNG terminals like we were under Harper, our country would be prospering massively right now, instead of struggling under tariffs while our energy is mainly landlocked we should have strong, calm leadership, closening our alliance with the most powerful nation on earth right now, and strengthening trade, instead of just being Trump's discarded puppet, sitting on the sidelines, pouting. That's never a good look. Carney's constant lying and flip-flopping has Canadians in a complete state of confusion right now: What does he actually stand for? Do we support the war at this exact moment of today? What about at dinnertime? Lunch tomorrow? Do we think the war is illegal - are we still regurgitating that ayatollah talking point? Are we gonna physically support the war in some way, like maybe send ships to the Strait of Hormuz? Are we gonna say that we're sending ships and planes but just not send anything? And if Carney says "we won't send ships there", does that mean that Trump will just issue another direct order via 'meantweet', which our PM will again promptly obey? There's a good chance that Trump is actually waiting for our PM to say that we won't send ships to the strait, just so that he can be seen to issue Carney another direct order, thereby solidifying Carney's position as underling All that I can say for sure right now is that we are mostly on Iran's side. Or are we? It seems that way. This CBC video seems to be gloating about Iran's success at blocking the strait, and happy about America's struggle to keep civilians safe. They haven't even mentioned the angle that Iran is again killing civilians and even destroying marine ecosystems to fight this war, which should seem repugnant. Does the CBC admire Iran for doing this? Can anyone point to the part of that video where we seem to be against the sinking of oil tankers? I.e., the destruction of marine ecosystems? Does Greta get mad when she sees a tanker sunk there? I think not. The CBC is pure shit. Filth even. I don't think they've said a word that the ayatollah couldn't use in his propaganda videos. Oh, and we're harbouring Iranian war criminals while our allies are fighting to eliminate Iran's nuclear threat. We're the Argentina of the 21st century now. Our country is shit.

To be honest, maybe what we're dealing with in this forum isn't really "Canadian leftists", but Iranian/Gazan puppets just regurgitating the ayatollah's propaganda. It makes more sense that Michael Hardner is actually a hardline terrorist than a Canadian LPoC supporter. Ditto for eyeball, and especially ExFlyer. They go long with all the fluffy BS to make it seem like they care, then they just support terrorism as if it's normal.

It's weird that the only free speech that leftists care about is the right to cheer for Quds Day, which is nothing more than a couched call to genocide in Israel. When Canadian doctors say that "they were threatened with jailtime for discussing several vaccine side-effects that they personally witnessed" leftists said: "But doctors should be threatened with jailtime for discussing vaccine side-effects that they personally witnessed". When the NYPost was banned from social media for saying something that was known by the FBI to be true, while "former intelligence officials" were allowed to go on social media and say things that the FBI knew to be lies, leftists said "nothing at all was wrong with that". (Can you imagine if X banned the NYT now for saying something that was true?) When people in Britain are sent to JAIL for telling the truth about muslim grooming gangs, etc, leftists don't care. But somehow the right to call for genocide is sacrosanct to left4rds. Have we seen enough yet?

I understand that inflation was "zero percent month-over-month" when he said it, but that's a ridiculous metric that no one has ever cited before or since, and he presented it in that manner to intentionally deceive people. Right? That's like if your weight gain is so bad that you have to talk in terms of pounds per hour to make it sound normal. "I just weighed myself this morning and I haven't gained a pound!!!" (since last night) And the truth is that Biden's comment dovetailed quite neatly with the overall false narrative that inflation wasn't very high during a period when INFLATION WAS AT RECORD-HIGH LEVELS. Right? At no point ever during Biden's term did the Dems or their MSM outlets ever acknowledge that inflation was at record levels. Biden's comment was just another way for the Dems/to pretend that inflation was normal at the exact moment that inflation was at 9.1% year-over-year, which is the only metric that people inherently understand. It's like if you're Canadian and you were trying to tell 20-yr-old Canadians think it was warm outside on Nov 15th last year, so you said "It was 30° outside!", but you were talking about Fahrenheit, which they have never used before. FYI 30° is extremely hot on the Celsius scale. It's 86° Fahrenheit. Temperatures in BC and Alberta max out at 95° once per decade.

This thread is a really good indication of just how f'd up the moral compasses of left4rds are, and how desperate they are to cling to cultist narratives.

Why do you suddenly care what the ayatollah's regime does to the Iranian people?

I woulda swore that you could speak English before.

Mr Hyde: "I'M AN ELBOWS-UP BADASS!! ME AN' MY EURO-BROS FORMED AN ALLIANCE TO PROTECT OURSELVES FROM THE US BECAUSE WE DON'T TRUST THE US ANYMORE, AND WE ARE ALL GONNA SPEND 5% OF OUR GDP ON THE MILITARY !!!!!!!! FIGHT DA POWAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHH!!!!!!!!!." Procto-Carney: "We're only spending 1.5% 👱‍♀️ Help me Obi-Trump!"