WestCanMan

1) If a man marries and 8 year old, he has most likely r4ped her as many as 1200 times by the time she turns 14. And that is actual r4pes that are guaranteed to have happened. That's only having sex 200x a year over that 6 yr period. 2) What you are talking about is very unlikely to have even happened. The accuser wouldn't be the first person to file an illegitimate lawsuit against wealthy men. In the most recent suit, Trump’s accuser asserted that while she was exploring a modeling career in 1994, she attended a series of parties at the Manhattan home of prominent investor Jeffrey Epstein. She alleges that during those parties the real estate mogul tied her to a bed and raped her. She also claimed Epstein raped her during that series of gatherings If she said that they did it at one party and then she went to the police or stayed at a relative's place, etc, that might make sense, but she was a 14 yr old model and what, she didn't have parents or anything? No primary caregivers at all? She just kept on going to those parties after she was "r4ped" the first time? (She describes two different r4pes). After your 14-yr-old goes to a party with grown adults, don't her parents say "How did it go"? And they didn't catch on? They never asked her if she was hit on? Did anyone tie you up and r4pe you? And how did they tie her to a bed? Was there a fight? A threat? Physical force? I'm just not buying that it randomly happened once or twice during this party stage and she ket going back. It's not hilarious like the Lisa Swetnick story, but it sounds almost equally ridiculous. If they want to publish a story like that they should at least put enough details in it to make it seem plausible. That reads like total BS to me. There are r4pe cases against Clinton with specific times, locations, witnesses to physical injuries on the accusers, corroboration of Clinton's schedule that dovetail with times of when his itinerary had gaps and he was away from his Secret Service detail... Leftists don't take them seriously at all. And now you're trying to float this as "he actually r4ped her"? Get real. And cougar: stop trying to act like "marrying an 8 yr old and having sex with them" is in any way ok. Dogs don't have sex with puppies. Cats don't have sex with kittens. Bulls don't have sex with calves. Pigs don't have sex with piglets. Bugs don't even have sex with baby bugs. Men should not marry children and have sex with them, period, Cougar. I can't believe I have to tell you that. Go see a shrink and get checked out. Your TDS is way past critical mass. You need to grow up now.

How the F did that post get a down-vote? Only a leftist could choose partisan politics over universal support against the gang-r4pe of a child. And just the other day cougar said "marrying a child and having sex with them isn't illegal in Iran", implying that it was ok somehow. The sad fact is that "being more of a pedophile" = "being further left".

TBH, that's exactly where they need to be in order to draw the most voters away from the LPoC.

It's true that Biden's Afghanistan withdrawal was a Custer Special, and Obama had all the military prowess of a baby bunny, but that doesn't mean that they never tried, robo. Be fair to those losers. Tell us how much higher gasoline prices were under Biden, when the US wasn't doing anything about Iran. Trump "provoked"? So you're saying that "the Strait is legitimately closed because "Trump provoked" Iran"? That's disgusting. Iran provoked with years decades generations of calls for genocide, and a serious attempt at building nukes. FYI closing the Strait isn't hard. If the US was going to wait until everything was super-easy this never would have gotten handled.

The losers who have nothing to do but grovel over unsubstantiated accusations don't like the facts. You triggered their confirmation bias to DefCon 5. It's the ultimate compliment when people like that dislike you.

I think that women that old have been conditioned to believe CBC their whole lives, so they can't think for themselves. Also, a lot of women from that generation never had to have 9-5's, so they don't understand life from the POV of a taxpayer. It's always been free money to them for their whole lives, and now they're coasting on pensions. When life is super-easy, socialism sounds normal.

They're temporarily pro-terror, for the most part. They're against babies being burned to death and women being raped, murdered and killed, just not nearly as much as they're against Trump. If it was a Dem president doing this they'd all be fist-pumping, wearing red white & blue, and screaming about burning tankers.

TBH what happened was, Trump said that he thought Carney was the better choice, and CBC et al said "TRUMP SAYS CARNEY IS BETTER! WE BELIEVE DONALD J TRUMP! WE TRUST DONALD J TRUMP SO MUCH!!!!!!" and liberal voters all believed that one thing that Trump said. Everything before and since was a lie according to them, but somehow that one thing was true.

Whoa, here you are doing exactly what I just talked to you about in the other thread. You don't get to exaggerate other people's comments just so that you can accuse them of overreaction. It's a big deal that our gov't failed to tell Canadians about an attack on a base that our soldiers are in. Conservatives have a right to hold their feet to the fire. And they were in a military base, herb. Not a military base disguised as a hospital, just a military base, in plain sight. With American flags. Iran was going to fire missiles at it regardless of whether or not there were Canadians in it because they wanted to kill Americans. Our gov't acknowledging that we had soldiers there is no big deal. We have soldiers at a lot of bases.

Why do I care what she has to say about abortion? That has nothing at all to do with the price of tea in China. She said that "getting Don Cherry the Order of Canada is the conservatives PRIMARY FOCUS", and that is a lie, plain and simple. It is a lie. That is why I called her a stupid, lying b1tch. she came up with that stupid belief herself she chose those words herself she chose to take that snotty tone she chose to make a video to spew her lies in the hopes that she could suck in some hapless, low-IQ Canadians That makes her a stupid, lying b1tch, herbie. Stop acting like she isn't a stupid, lying b1tch. You just saw it yourself. Of course the conservatives have a lot of more pressing concerns than Don Cherry... I've seen Poilievre talk hundreds of times this year and not once have I seen him even mention Don Cherry's name. He talks a lot about the lies and broken promises of our f'd up gov't and our morally bankrupt state broadcaster, he talks about the importance of our energy sector and our economy, he talks about jobs and food prices and supporting America in this war. He talks about a lot of things, and Don Cherry certainly isn't chief among them. I don't "accuse" people of lying: when people are lying I point it out, and that's a huge difference. I also provide proof that they're lying when it isn't obvious, but in her case it was obvious, because most Canadians haven't even heard the CPC talk about Cherry this year. I know that video tickles your confirmation bias, herbie. You wanted to see someone get snotty and fire back against Poilievre, because PP's constantly sinking Carney's rubber ducky, and this toad went full-Karen on him so you just really liked it, facts be damned. And it's your right to like whatever you want, and you can even condone the lying if you want. Hell, cougar condones old men marrying young children and having sex with them (in Iran and islamic culture in general). But the bottom line here is, the facts matter to other people, herbie. You need to post your lies in a liberal echo chamber if you never want to get called out.

Their "primary focus"? What a stupid, lying b1tch. At least the one that robo cites is ok with the volume off. This one looks like she eats off the bottom of a pond. Try again, herbie.

As a favour, I edited your post to the point where it's accurate. No need to thank me.

If you don't see how badly you got dummied here, you definitely need a "phycologist". Again: left4rds shouldn't attempt to use words that have 6 letters or more.

Eyeball, the vaccines didn't accomplish anything. Not one thing. They didn't prevent the spread at all, and they didn't prevent people from dying. Deaths went up. They had two jobs, they accomplished neither of them. Deaths were actually up by a lot. And the vast majority of the people who died were muti-vaxed. Almost 90% in 2022. How did they spin that into a success? They said "But way more people got infected." Now, just keep in mind, the people who came up with that one were already guilty of lying to us many times before that. They lied about the origin of covid It was a lie for Fauci not to disclose that the NiH developed a coronavirus that was transmissible among humans just a km away from what they're calling ground zero they lied when they said that it was racist to prevent people from flying in from China they lied when they pretended that young people needed a vax they lied when they said that it would prevent the spread: vax manufactures never tested for any such thing they lied for a long time about vax safety - it was killing people and causing serious heart problems in very healthy people while they wee denying those things they lied when they pretended to know that HCQ and ivermectin couldn't possibly work, and when they pretended to know that the vaccines would work that was also a lie They lied when they pretended that the jabs were working as promised, and that they were safe they did abysmally stupid things like "let people fly in from covid-central and wander around inside of crowded public buildings until mid-March, and then ban Canadians from walking outside in public parks a week later". That might not seem like a big deal to you, but to anyone who understands what kills viruses and how they spread, that was an epidemiological abomination they lied when they pretended that covid was over in 2022 - it was killing far more people than ever before they said it was "a vaccine". Then two shots for one vaccine series. Fine. But then it was a 3rd, then it was "you'll always need new boosters". That counts as a lie. So after all those lies - and they were all lies because the truth was known to be the exact opposite of what they said when they said all those things - you wanna take them at their word for "deaths are only up because infections are WAAAAAAYYYYYYY up"? Swabs, eyeball. People died, and we know that, but they are telling you "Yeah but so many more swabs came back positive this year". I'm talking about actual deaths, they are counting the number of positive swabs, but you and I have no way of ever finding out of all those swabs even existed. And why would you take them at their word after so many lies? But even if the real reason actually was "infections were up by so much" then that's still a vax-failure, because "preventing the spread" was the jabs' main selling point? Right? Wasn't "preventing the spread" the only reason we forced young people to vax? And it didn't do that. We forced millions of Canadians to take the jab to prevent the spread and infections went up astronomically. Hey eyeball: deaths were at 15,000/yr in 2020 85% of us got vaxed by 2022, and the vax was supposed to prevent everyone who took it from dying, and even from preventing the spread. Did it prevent everyone who took it from dying? Because round 15,000 multi-vaxed people died in 2022. Oh, right, "the swabs". Stop saying it worked, dude. It failed 100%.

I took you to school, Linkie. I twisted you in knots. It's weird that you kept your username. You shoulda gone into witness protection after your last public spanking.

Carney has literally never said that. He started with "ELBWS UP! I WILL HAVE A TRADE DEAL WITHIN SIX MONTHS!", the he said "Please, sir, may I have another!" while he was biting a pillow.

I doubt there's a left4rd on this site that passed grade 10 math.

Buddy, you'd be doing yourself a favour if you ran away. It's like you come here to prove how stupid you are.

Let me guess: it needs unanimous support from 10 elected chiefs and 10 hereditary chiefs. Still, we could be in luck, as long as none of them wants a fishin' boat. Awww, shucks 🥰

What's going wrong, Johnny? Does it make you sad to see ayatollahs and mullahs getting cooked with hellfires?

Huge flaw in your drivel and spew there: THE CHANCE OF AMERICA BEING ABLE TO LAUNCH A SURPRISE ATTACK AGAINST IRAN IF OMAR, TLAIB, JEFFRIES, STARM-GIRL AND MICRONUTS ALL KNOW ABOUT IT IN ADVANCE IS 0.00%. They might as well post their battle plans right on FB, Twitter, Instagram and Tinder.

If I had to bet my life on it, I would probably still bet that it was American, but I 100% understand where you're coming from. If one side had anything to benefit from this it is Iran, 100%, and they would do something like this without the slightest bit of remorse. Just, in the age of AI, I really question video's that are easy to fake. Especially when there's this much at stake. So I don't feel like it's worth arguing with left4rds about. It's hard enough to just convince them that Hamas isn't the army of peace. I am gonna side with Rampage on this one:

We are bimeasural in Canada. We go both ways. 👀 👀 TBH the reason it's like that is because British food sucks, so when people were faced with the choice between using British and American recipes, we went with American ones. Plus our grandmothers all handed down recipes using imperial measurements, and we don't F with grandma's recipes, ya hear? A rolling pin will fly outta the grave if we mess up her butter tart recipe during the Christmas holidays. When was the last time you saw a recipe call for 200g of butter? Right on the outside of the pkg it shows you where to slice it for a 1/4 cup, half cup, etc. The quickest way to lose an election is to get into women's kitchens and mess things up.

It could have been, and I said before this war happened that Iran was likely to already have plans in place to hit schools and hospitals of their own just so that they could blame the US/IDF, but the evidence that it was Iranian is just a picture of a missile travelling between Mach II & IV... In the age of AI I think we all need a bit more evidence than just a photo, especially when I have no reason to believe there was a camera nearby capable of catching a clear shot of a speeding missile. I can't really get behind that. It may be true, it may be fake (we're all gonna be lied to dozens of times during any war), but in the end, people understand that: there are tragedies like that in war, and one such mistake in 7,000 strikes takes an unbelievable amount of precision and luck The US clearly didn't do it intentionally because they had nothing to gain from killing children: their goal isn't terrorism, it's killing everyone in the IRGC.

OMG, down-arrow boy has words!!! Not his own, mind you, just an AI overview where he doesn't even show what his question was. And TBH, all his page shows is either statements that were retracted or where he was neither found guilty nor liable. That page reads like "Some b1tches that he dumped are angry at him, so they talked some sh1t, then had to backtrack." The only embarrassing for Trump on that page is the story of him going into the changeroom with the Bergdorf's slut. Not that he was accused of r4pe for that, because he clearly never r4ped her, just because being with a crazy ditch-pig like that is just not a good look.