WestCanMan

Why do I care what she has to say about abortion? That has nothing at all to do with the price of tea in China. She said that "getting Don Cherry the Order of Canada is the conservatives PRIMARY FOCUS", and that is a lie, plain and simple. It is a lie. That is why I called her a stupid, lying b1tch. she came up with that stupid belief herself she chose those words herself she chose to take that snotty tone she chose to make a video to spew her lies in the hopes that she could suck in some hapless, low-IQ Canadians That makes her a stupid, lying b1tch, herbie. Stop acting like she isn't a stupid, lying b1tch. You just saw it yourself. Of course the conservatives have a lot of more pressing concerns than Don Cherry... I've seen Poilievre talk hundreds of times this year and not once have I seen him even mention Don Cherry's name. He talks a lot about the lies and broken promises of our f'd up gov't and our morally bankrupt state broadcaster, he talks about the importance of our energy sector and our economy, he talks about jobs and food prices and supporting America in this war. He talks about a lot of things, and Don Cherry certainly isn't chief among them. I don't "accuse" people of lying: when people are lying I point it out, and that's a huge difference. I also provide proof that they're lying when it isn't obvious, but in her case it was obvious, because most Canadians haven't even heard the CPC talk about Cherry this year. I know that video tickles your confirmation bias, herbie. You wanted to see someone get snotty and fire back against Poilievre, because PP's constantly sinking Carney's rubber ducky, and this toad went full-Karen on him so you just really liked it, facts be damned. And it's your right to like whatever you want, and you can even condone the lying if you want. Hell, cougar condones old men marrying young children and having sex with them (in Iran and islamic culture in general). But the bottom line here is, the facts matter to other people, herbie. You need to post your lies in a liberal echo chamber if you never want to get called out.

Their "primary focus"? What a stupid, lying b1tch. At least the one that robo cites is ok with the volume off. This one looks like she eats off the bottom of a pond. Try again, herbie.

As a favour, I edited your post to the point where it's accurate. No need to thank me.

If you don't see how badly you got dummied here, you definitely need a "phycologist". Again: left4rds shouldn't attempt to use words that have 6 letters or more.

Eyeball, the vaccines didn't accomplish anything. Not one thing. They didn't prevent the spread at all, and they didn't prevent people from dying. Deaths went up. They had two jobs, they accomplished neither of them. Deaths were actually up by a lot. And the vast majority of the people who died were muti-vaxed. Almost 90% in 2022. How did they spin that into a success? They said "But way more people got infected." Now, just keep in mind, the people who came up with that one were already guilty of lying to us many times before that. They lied about the origin of covid It was a lie for Fauci not to disclose that the NiH developed a coronavirus that was transmissible among humans just a km away from what they're calling ground zero they lied when they said that it was racist to prevent people from flying in from China they lied when they pretended that young people needed a vax they lied when they said that it would prevent the spread: vax manufactures never tested for any such thing they lied for a long time about vax safety - it was killing people and causing serious heart problems in very healthy people while they wee denying those things they lied when they pretended to know that HCQ and ivermectin couldn't possibly work, and when they pretended to know that the vaccines would work that was also a lie They lied when they pretended that the jabs were working as promised, and that they were safe they did abysmally stupid things like "let people fly in from covid-central and wander around inside of crowded public buildings until mid-March, and then ban Canadians from walking outside in public parks a week later". That might not seem like a big deal to you, but to anyone who understands what kills viruses and how they spread, that was an epidemiological abomination they lied when they pretended that covid was over in 2022 - it was killing far more people than ever before they said it was "a vaccine". Then two shots for one vaccine series. Fine. But then it was a 3rd, then it was "you'll always need new boosters". That counts as a lie. So after all those lies - and they were all lies because the truth was known to be the exact opposite of what they said when they said all those things - you wanna take them at their word for "deaths are only up because infections are WAAAAAAYYYYYYY up"? Swabs, eyeball. People died, and we know that, but they are telling you "Yeah but so many more swabs came back positive this year". I'm talking about actual deaths, they are counting the number of positive swabs, but you and I have no way of ever finding out of all those swabs even existed. And why would you take them at their word after so many lies? But even if the real reason actually was "infections were up by so much" then that's still a vax-failure, because "preventing the spread" was the jabs' main selling point? Right? Wasn't "preventing the spread" the only reason we forced young people to vax? And it didn't do that. We forced millions of Canadians to take the jab to prevent the spread and infections went up astronomically. Hey eyeball: deaths were at 15,000/yr in 2020 85% of us got vaxed by 2022, and the vax was supposed to prevent everyone who took it from dying, and even from preventing the spread. Did it prevent everyone who took it from dying? Because round 15,000 multi-vaxed people died in 2022. Oh, right, "the swabs". Stop saying it worked, dude. It failed 100%.

I took you to school, Linkie. I twisted you in knots. It's weird that you kept your username. You shoulda gone into witness protection after your last public spanking.

Carney has literally never said that. He started with "ELBWS UP! I WILL HAVE A TRADE DEAL WITHIN SIX MONTHS!", the he said "Please, sir, may I have another!" while he was biting a pillow.

I doubt there's a left4rd on this site that passed grade 10 math.

Buddy, you'd be doing yourself a favour if you ran away. It's like you come here to prove how stupid you are.

Let me guess: it needs unanimous support from 10 elected chiefs and 10 hereditary chiefs. Still, we could be in luck, as long as none of them wants a fishin' boat. Awww, shucks 🥰

What's going wrong, Johnny? Does it make you sad to see ayatollahs and mullahs getting cooked with hellfires?

Huge flaw in your drivel and spew there: THE CHANCE OF AMERICA BEING ABLE TO LAUNCH A SURPRISE ATTACK AGAINST IRAN IF OMAR, TLAIB, JEFFRIES, STARM-GIRL AND MICRONUTS ALL KNOW ABOUT IT IN ADVANCE IS 0.00%. They might as well post their battle plans right on FB, Twitter, Instagram and Tinder.

If I had to bet my life on it, I would probably still bet that it was American, but I 100% understand where you're coming from. If one side had anything to benefit from this it is Iran, 100%, and they would do something like this without the slightest bit of remorse. Just, in the age of AI, I really question video's that are easy to fake. Especially when there's this much at stake. So I don't feel like it's worth arguing with left4rds about. It's hard enough to just convince them that Hamas isn't the army of peace. I am gonna side with Rampage on this one:

We are bimeasural in Canada. We go both ways. 👀 👀 TBH the reason it's like that is because British food sucks, so when people were faced with the choice between using British and American recipes, we went with American ones. Plus our grandmothers all handed down recipes using imperial measurements, and we don't F with grandma's recipes, ya hear? A rolling pin will fly outta the grave if we mess up her butter tart recipe during the Christmas holidays. When was the last time you saw a recipe call for 200g of butter? Right on the outside of the pkg it shows you where to slice it for a 1/4 cup, half cup, etc. The quickest way to lose an election is to get into women's kitchens and mess things up.

It could have been, and I said before this war happened that Iran was likely to already have plans in place to hit schools and hospitals of their own just so that they could blame the US/IDF, but the evidence that it was Iranian is just a picture of a missile travelling between Mach II & IV... In the age of AI I think we all need a bit more evidence than just a photo, especially when I have no reason to believe there was a camera nearby capable of catching a clear shot of a speeding missile. I can't really get behind that. It may be true, it may be fake (we're all gonna be lied to dozens of times during any war), but in the end, people understand that: there are tragedies like that in war, and one such mistake in 7,000 strikes takes an unbelievable amount of precision and luck The US clearly didn't do it intentionally because they had nothing to gain from killing children: their goal isn't terrorism, it's killing everyone in the IRGC.

OMG, down-arrow boy has words!!! Not his own, mind you, just an AI overview where he doesn't even show what his question was. And TBH, all his page shows is either statements that were retracted or where he was neither found guilty nor liable. That page reads like "Some b1tches that he dumped are angry at him, so they talked some sh1t, then had to backtrack." The only embarrassing for Trump on that page is the story of him going into the changeroom with the Bergdorf's slut. Not that he was accused of r4pe for that, because he clearly never r4ped her, just because being with a crazy ditch-pig like that is just not a good look.

All that just to answer every question with: "I came from a place where everybody had nice lawns" 😂

I can't wait to hear his Rogan podcast.

Trip for Carney to go to Kiev: $50M Canadian taxpayer dollars promised to Ukraine: $5B New business for Brookfield from Ukraine that same week: $5B CBC's evaluation of the trip: Priceless Cost per year of Carney's trips: $1B Value of all new trade deals from carney's trips, combined: $0 Number of pillows bitten: 3 But hey, at least the cost of living is going up here.

Cougar, the US and Israel have hit about 7,000 targets now, and one was a school at a military base. It actually used to be part of that base. 1/7,000th of America's/Israel's munitions have hit civilian targets (Biden fired 1 drone during the Afgh withdrawal, it hit kids) 1/400th as many Iranian civilians have been killed by the US/IDF as by the IRGC in the last month [200/40,000]. The US would have to bomb 1 school that size every day for over half a year to catch up the the IRGC. Contrast that with: Iran's ballistic missiles are mostly aimed at civilian targets, cougar. Hamas fired 70,000 rockets into Israel, almost all aimed at civilian targets. Your friends in Hamas threw babies into the oven to die there, they beheaded others. They raped and tortured and killed women. They held women prisoner for 3 years and raped them almost every day. Your friends in Hamas intentionally murdered over 1,000 civilians on Oct 7th. Your friends in the IRGC have been torturing and raping women for decades. They flog them and throw them in jail for not wearing hijabs. Your friends in the IRGC killed around 40,000 protesters. Your friends in the IRGC don't have a minimum age limit for marriage, and children don't even have to consent to their own marriage. Small children get married off to old men, who have sex with them. Now your friends' strategy to fight this war is to sink oil tankers. Your friends in the IRGC and Hamas have openly called for genocide against Jews for 40 years now (in the case of Hamas, since their inception 35 years ago). Your friends are literally the shittiest people on earth. You can't possibly find more evil people on the planet than your own friends and allies. What redeeming qualities do the IRGC and Hamas actually have? Can you say one good thing about the IRGC and Hamas, aside from "They're fighting against Trump"? Is that it, you f'ing child? Can you say 1 good thing about the ayatollah? If Kamala Harris was the president while this was happening, would to still be cheering for the child-fking terrorists? Buddy, YOU CAN'T EVEN SAY THAT THE IRGC PROTECTS THEIR OWN PEOPLE, because they don't, they kill them. They rape them. They torture them. You're such a f'king loser that you'll cry for a woman who got shot while driving her car into a cop, but you're ok with women being raped, flogged and thrown in jail in Iran for not wearing a hijab. You are just one sick piece of shit, cougar. If there's a hell, you be chilling baking with mohammed when you die. Tell me: why do you love Hamas and the IRGC so much? What "good" things do you think they would do in the world if they finally managed to slaughter all the Jews and the Americans? Do you think they would be peaceful if they were as powerful as America is, or would tens of millions of people die every week? Keep in mind that Pakistan had nowhere near America's power and they killed 1M Sikhs and Hindus in a few days. And guess what the entire muslim world did when Pakistan was done slaughtering all those people? Did they hate them for 80 years, like they do Israel, who killed only 400 people? Nope. Pakistan was warmly embraced, and welcomed as a respected sovereign nation. You're abysmally stupid, cougar, and that's not even your worst quality.

I watched a CBC segment on YTube where they talked about Pierre showing up there and it was ultra-pathetic. One of the weasels there started off by talking about strong of a coalition Carney was building blahblahblah... The saddest part is that CBC still can't allow comments on any of their social media posts because they can't stand to see their dishonest talking points being shredded. Rest assured there will be a lotta down-votes 😂

There is no doubt in my mind you slept with 13 year olds.

As to the topic of "Whether or not Iran was becoming a serious enough threat to America to justify this level of deterrence: Was Iran really getting to the point where they were becoming powerful enough to rely on their stockpile of ballistc missiles and drones to keep enemies at bay while they built nuclear warheads? Prior to the major military escalations in 2025 and 2026, Iran's strategic doctrine was precisely to use its massive conventional arsenal to create a "shield" while advancing its nuclear capabilities to the threshold of weaponization. This strategy, known as "asymmetric deterrence" or "forward defense," relied on three main pillars: 1. The Ballistic Missile and Drone "Shield" Iran built the largest and most diverse missile and drone arsenal in the Middle East to offset its lack of a modern air force. Massive Stockpile: Before the 2025–2026 conflict, Iran was estimated to have over 3,000 ballistic missiles and tens of thousands of low-cost Shahed-series drones. Deterrence by Punishment: This arsenal was designed to strike throughout the region, targeting Israel and U.S. bases to impose high costs for any attack on Iran. Economic War of Attrition: Drones costing as little as $20,000 forced adversaries to use interceptor missiles costing up to $4 million, a ratio Iran used to strain enemy resources. Arms Control Association +3 2. Strategic "Missile Cities" To ensure its arsenal survived a first strike, Iran constructed "missile cities"—extensive underground tunnel networks across multiple provinces. These hardened facilities allowed Iran to store and launch missiles even under heavy bombardment. The mobility of road-mobile launchers further complicated efforts by the U.S. and Israel to neutralize the threat entirely. 3. Reaching the Nuclear Threshold While the conventional "shield" kept enemies at bay, Iran's nuclear program reached a critical "breakout" stage: Enrichment Levels: By mid-2025, Iran had accumulated over 440 kg of 60% enriched uranium. Breakout Capability: The IAEA warned this stockpile was sufficient for at least 10 nuclear weapons if enriched further to 90% (weapons-grade), a step estimated to take only a few weeks. Strategic Ambiguity: Iran leveraged its "threshold status"—having all the components for a bomb without taking the final step of weaponization—as a source of diplomatic and military leverage. The Collapse of the Strategy This "new equation" faced a severe test during the conflicts of 2025 and 2026. Joint U.S.-Israeli strikes reportedly destroyed up to two-thirds of Iran's missile launchers and significantly degraded its naval and drone capabilities. By early 2026, Iran's daily missile launch rates had dropped by as much as 86%, suggesting the conventional shield was not enough to prevent a high-intensity, technologically superior campaign against its core assets. OK, I'll admit it. This AI is smarter than me. Don't look so shocked. We all knew this could happen one day. We just thought it would be in about 2096.

Hey left4rd dung-beetles! In accordance with my new resolution to use AI replies, in order to keep my interactions with you all more polite, I just ran this question through for you: Do Iran and Hamas have long-standing commitments to commit genocide against the Israelis Both Iran and Hamas have long-standing, official commitments to the destruction of the State of Israel, which many international observers, human rights organizations, and legal scholars characterize as genocidal in intent Hamas Hamas's foundational ideology is rooted in the elimination of Israel and its replacement with an Islamic state. The 1988 Charter: This original founding document explicitly calls for the "obliteration" of Israel. It contains virulently antisemitic language, including a call for Muslims to kill Jews, which many scholars identify as a direct incitement to genocide. 2017 Policy Document: While Hamas released a revised platform in 2017 that removed some of the original's overt antisemitic tropes—framing the conflict as against "Zionism" rather than Judaism—it did not renounce the 1988 Charter. Senior leaders have since clarified that the original goals remain intact. Recent Rhetoric: Following the October 7, 2023, attacks, senior Hamas officials have stated they would repeat such massacres "again and again" until Israel is annihilated. Iran The Islamic Republic of Iran has consistently called for the removal of Israel as a state since the 1979 revolution. State Policy: Iranian leaders, including Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei, have repeatedly described Israel as a "cancerous tumor" that must be "uprooted" or "eradicated from the world map". Support for Proxies: Iran provides hundreds of millions of dollars in funding, weaponry, and training annually to groups it calls the "Axis of Resistance"—including Hamas, Hezbollah, and the Houthis—specifically to advance the goal of destroying the Jewish state. Genocidal Incitement: Organizations like Genocide Watch and the U.S. Holocaust Memorial Museum have flagged this rhetoric as state-sponsored incitement to genocide, noting that it dehumanizes Israelis and Jews to make acts of terror seem more permissible. While both Iran and Hamas frequently use "resistance" as a justification for their actions, their formal documents and leadership statements consistently prioritize the total elimination of Israel over a negotiated two-state solution. There ya have it, Iran and Hamas openly talk about slaughtering Jews. If you think that you can make the same case against Israelis, go ahead and try. But it's plain to see that the US and Israel could turn Iran into glass right now if they wanted to, and all they're doing is removing the tumours.

I can't even get over how good AI's answer was. No one's even gonna hear my own terse, fact-laden orations anymore. I'm gonna throw everything through AI. I will waste computing power and bandwidth, sure, but I will actually try to be less judgemental with my replies. IE, I will leave out the inevitable part where I inform people of their insufficiencies.