WestCanMan

Shut up, Chrissy. No one believes your drivel aside from the cult. FYI it's a matter of public record that the Dems controlled the KKK, and you know as well as I do that Antifa and BLM get their marching orders from Dem affiliates and Dem-controlled fake news organizations. Did you ever hear the Dems show disapproval when violence at college campuses was used to derail freedom of speech? Of course not. Their tacit and even verbal support of that violence is well documented. Did you know that even in Canada, left-wing violence has shut down speaking engagements? it has happened at UBC. Why didn't you hear about that? Because it was left-wing violence. It is supported by our MSM and gov't as well. If a gay rights activist had a speaking engagement cancelled because of a protest you would still be hearing about it 5 years later.

It's a cult. @BeaverFever: Would you characterize all those millions of people joining up to tilt at windmills together as a cult?

When private citizens are formed into militias which are controlled by the gov't - such as the Nazis' brownshirts or the Dems' KKK, BLM, or Antifa - and they use violence to suppress free speech, that constitutes the most sinister form of 'gov't suppression of speech'. The gov't's use of militias is actually the most worrisome of any governmental behaviours, because they operate extrajudicially, with no paper trail of their membership. Or as Jerry Nadler would put it: "Antifa doesn't exist" or whatever. FYI it wasn't the regular Pakistani army that was used to conduct the systemic genocidal r4pe campaign in 1971 that saw upwards of 300,000 women brutally r4ped, they sent out militias to do that. It was militias and supporting civilians who committed almost all of those r4pes. The fact that the Dems use militias to shut down conservative speaking engagements on college campuses should concern you MORE than if they tried to legislate against it. The darkest deeds are done in the dead of night, not in the SC. in front of Sotomayor and Kavanaugh. Rules for thee but not for me.

FYI it is members of the DNC that are telling their supporters that yelling at members of the GOP when they're out in public is the right thing to do. Members of the DNC are the ones saying that violent protests resulting in death and property destruction are ok. Members of the DNC are the ones saying that a protest at a SCJ's home is ok. Members of the DNC are the ones saying that threats against Trump's life are just comedy. Members of the DNC are the ones saying that a riot at the WH where police were assaulted and several dozens of police were injured is ok. Etc, etc, etc. The DNC have a long and storied history of using violent militias such as BLM and Antifa to inflict terror on the populace in order to push their wicked ways and keep people silent, going all the way back to when they ran the KKK, just like Hitler did with his brownshirts. The attack on Charlie Kirk was a direct attack on free speech in the most serious way of all: your life depends on your ability to stfu now if you're a conservative. And that came from DNC narratives that you regurgitated here incesssantly. You know that these assassins weren't lone-wolves, they are kids who were indoctrinated to believe that Trump is Hitler and the GOP are fascists, and you revel in spreading that rhetoric. At the end of the day, you did your level best to contribute to Charlie Kirks murder.

The die-hard cultists in the DNC and LPOC are dragging the narrative so far into Left Loonyville that anyone with a speck of decency has no choice but to abandon them now. Their lies aren't just blatant anymore, they're getting more and more unhinged and repugnant. You woulda thought that "Fiery but mostly-peaceful protests" woulda been their low-point, but they just keep finding new depths to slither to.

Nothing I said is the subject of debate anymore. It's all established fact that you just prefer to ignore. No lying covidjit cultist like yourself is gonna admit that he was wrong to force his wife and children to take the jab. You f'd up, and as long as you can keep on lying about it, you will. So you'll continue to make generic accusations, but you will never make the mistake of challenging facts directly again, because of what happened 3 days ago when you tried to say that Fauci never funded research to make the bat coronavirus more transmissible among human cells. Are you man enough to concede now, that Fauci funded that research, or are you just gonna hide behind your wall of blame, slander and accusations? 100% aware. I'm aware that he was responsible for Op Warp Speed, and even the sinister Prep Act, which paved the way for vax-pimping and deterred any other forms of treatment. I just can't believe that left4rds were the ones pimping Trump-juice. What a f'n joke. You don't even try to flirt with reality anymore, you just lie as if you're Trudeau himself, and your words are carved into stone by the CBC before the echo even gets back. Kimmel's opening words, from his monologue: “We hit some new lows over the weekend with the MAGA gang desperately trying to characterize this kid who m***dered Charlie Kirk as anything other than one of them and doing everything they can to score political points from it.” He was blatantly lying while simultaneously falsely accusing them of abhorrent behaviour. That's not TV comedy, idjit, that's some of the most vile, repugnant propaganda I've ever seen, and I've seen more thn my share of CBC, CNN and MSNBC. Buddy, it's Sept 2025 and you still have a shrine to Darth Fauci ffs, the guy who conned you into forcing your family to take the pseudovax. That's quite wrong. I've been very specific about all the stupid things that you said, and you have no rebuttal for any of them, aside from you snotty insults. Did Fauci fund research to make the bat coronavirus transmissible among human cells in the Wuhan lab - before he ever came on your TV blaming covid on a pangolin? The answer, Beave, is "Yes, Fauci 100% did fund that research, and that was proven beyond a shadow of doubt several years ago, in congress, under oath." This whole time you have been 100.00% wrong about Fauci's motives, the truth about covid, the potential for the jabs to live up to expectations, the actual safety and efficacy of the jabs, etc. I have been extremely specific about all the things that you were wrong about or lied about, and you just have generic BS. You can't challenge me on anything, because you know it's gonna back in your face like your stupid Fauci comment the other day. I can't even believe that you'd still challenge me on facts as recently as 3 days ago, Beave. That has always been a massive trainwreck for you. You still haven't learned anything since collusion lol. (Remember when I had to explain to you that collusion related indictments plus convictions on other unrelated offences doesn't = collusion-related convictions, dope? It has been a never-ending stream of me correcting you ever since). Why would I copy you, dummy? You're a gooey mess of lies, slander, and credulity. FYI I don't say that you're a cultist to insult you, that is an accurate characterization of you. You followed the vax-scam all the way from: the jabs WILL BE safe and effective, and will get us to herd immunity, to the jabs ARE safe and effective, and you don't have to worry about getting sick or giving covid to granny if you take it, to Ok, you'll go to the hospital. to ok, you will end up in ICU. to ok, your chances of dying are lower and it's hardly killing anyone, to the point where almost 90% of covid deaths in Canada were among the multi-jabbed, and covid deaths were up 30% from the year before, and 24% higher than ever, and the vax-manufacturers themselves said "we never said anything about preventing the spread". The reason I say that you're a cultist is because you consistently follow false narratives waaay past the point where they have unravelled into plain BS and lies, and then you still refuse to see Trudeau's New Panties. Then you jump right on the next blatantly false narrative from the exact same scumbags, as if their word had ever been good at some point. Tell me Beave, did you just get caught lying about Fauci 3 days ago? Did Fauci fund that research or no? C'mon, coward, just answer the f'ing question and then I will post the video of Fauci TALKING RIGHT IN F'ING CONGRESS.

Exactly. Saying "When you were 16, you used the word f4g in a FB post! You can never work in Hollywood again!" is cancel culture. Firing someone for an unhinged rant about how evil gay people are isn't cancel culture.

It's really, really sad if that's what it took to get ABC to do the right thing. If what you said is true, then this is almost as bad as the vax mandates.

He wasn't "making fun of people". He was trying to tell America that the killer was a conservative and that all conservatives were blah, blah, blah.... There was no entertainment value in that. There was no comedy in that. It was divisive propaganda, or even hate speech. It was basically an unhinged rant, representing ABC TV no less. Nah. Sorry, Jimmy Kimmel. If I'm running that TV station, you gotta stage your unhinged rants in your own basement, and out of the public eye. I would have walked on stage and fired him during the show. Used the old Vaudeville cane to pull him off stage"

Are you pretending to not know the difference Spanky? The "Israelis" is a term for a group of people that includes 2M muslims. When they say "from the river to the sea" it is not a call for genocide, it is a statement that "they intend to keep their sovereignty over that 0.5% of the middle east, while muslims hold the other 99.5%." Hamas's constitution or whatever you wanna call it called for the extermination of all Jews. Several Hamas leaders have openly called for that. It is written in the islamic Hadiths that the Jews would be exterminated. It is 100% true to say that "Israel's sovereignty between the river and the sea is not based on any intent to murder anyone" Hamas's call of "from the river and the sea" is an open declaration of their intent to murder 10M people, and they are not kidding. They would actually do it if they got the chance. They showed you on Oct 7th that they can gleefully murder thousands of women and children by hand. Who could you gleefully murder with a machete, or by burning, Spanky? I'm not asking you to name anyone specifically, just tell me if there is a unnamed group of people that you hate so much that you could spend 8 hrs a day slaughtering their women and children for 7 straight days, and you'd still be smiling. Who could you do that to, Spanky? If you say that there is a group of people that you would do that to, then I will understand your sympathy for Hamas.

It's not "cancel culture" when you get fired for taking a dump on live TV. What you consider art, isn't necessarily ABC's definition of art.

Just because trump commented on something doesn't mean that ABC execs weren't thinking the same thing. imagine this, Spanky: Trump makes a comment, and your natural urge is to just do or say the exact opposite thing, but you know that his comment is 100% correct, and if you follow through on your plan of opposing him, you will seen to cede the moral high ground to him. Would you cede the moral high ground to Trump? Would you come off looking like the hateful bigot while Trump walks off looking like a saint? I think that you'd do the right thing, and just hate the fact that you had to do it. In this instance, Kimmel has been an over-the-line dirtbag for years now, he just never took a shit there while the cameras were rolling before that incident.

Wrong? For gawd's sake, Chrissy, it's not just wrong. It's diabolical. People walked around Canada chanting "from the river to the sea", most of them knowing that they were advocating for the slaughter of millions of women and children. Did any of them go to jail? Did anyone say that they should go to jail? TBH, when criminals like that want to go out in public and say those kinds of things, it's important to let them go out in public and say those kinds of things, because you need to know who you need to keep track of. Call it a police state if you want, but it's important to know who's planning to run around and kill a bunch of people: the opposite of crying about "a police state" is saying "How did they get away with plotting such a massive terrorist attack? Why did authorities not protect us?"

You supported the gov't forcing people to take a dangerous injection that they absolutely did not need, and now you're crying "FASCIM!!!" because a guy got fired for dancing on someone's grave? 😂 You're not only a political cultist, you're economically ret4rded. I swear that you're coming here to prove how stupid you are. If you were running a business worth billions of dollars would you let a ratings-disaster like Kimmel pump Trump's tires on national TV? Of course you wouldn't, hypocrite, you'd hire someone like eyeball to toe the party line and tell jokes that are predicated on left-wing narratives. And you would 100% fire someone just for being supportive of Trump, regardless of whether or not they fabricated ridiculous stories about a high-profile murder, and don't try to tell me otherwise.

1) Kimmel isn't "press" you m0r0n, 2) the MSM has told 100,000 material lies in the last ten years and they're still on the air. That's pretty free.

I disagree entirely. His only job is to talk in a way that 1) entertains people, and 2) falls within the station's ethical and moral boundaries. Once he ceases to do either of those things, he's no longer an asset. If he was just throwing a football or kicking a soccer ball i think that a league and team owners could make the case that they don't pay him to think, but Kimmel is paid to think, and he's not thinking. At times like this I always go back to that business statistic that says "only 4% of unsatisfied/disgruntled customers actually take the time to write a letter of complaint", so in other words, for every single person that complains there are 24 other people who feel exactly the same way, they just never got off their ass to say or do anything about it. Kimmel's comments would have drawn thousands of irate complaints. Even some from sensible liberals and unicorns would have complained. The guy is toxic now. Some leftists: "It's awesome that Kirk got killed for saying those things." The same leftists: "You can't fire me for exercising my right to free speech!"

Have you managed to educate yourself any further on this issue yet, bucktooth beta?

While I'm not against seeing people who were 100% known to be involved with Epstein (regarding the sex charges) face the music in some way, I hate that it's only 1% of them. Honestly, that's probably the best 1% of them, because they are the ones who have fallen out of favour with both sides, which places them in the middle. Is there a "best 1% of pedophiles"? TBH, i don't think that everyone who is implicated with Epstein is necessarily a pedophile. 1) For sure there are some people who would have visited his island to give it a sense of credibility, and who would have left knowing nothing about the girls, and 2) I know some sleezy business people here and they all like to keep a circle of decent people around them to lend the impression of decency. It's an important part of the con game. They like to bring their theoretical wives to functions as well, so that they seem like family men, but they are not even close. Now, you could say that it's ridiculous for me to contend that people who are in good standing with higher-ups on either side of the political spectrum would get protection from justice, but what friend of a former president is gonna pay the piper just for having sex with a 14-yr-old girl? That's not how it works. Those guys are all thick as thieves. I'd even contend that people like Epstein and Diddy are important cogs on the wheel, because they're the ones who get the dirt on everyone else, to keep them all in line. What better way to keep someone in line than get them drunk, and get them on video having sex with someone that they thought was 18, who turns out to be 15? There are 15-yr-olds who look 20 and 28 yr olds who look 14. 100%. Who's gonna get arrested for anything to do with Diddy's escapades? Who's gonna get arrested for anything to do with Epstein's escapades?

The closes that leftists can come to the truth is with Rock-Bottom style editing:

I'll be honest about Kirk: I find his position on abortion to fall in the "nutty outlier" category. I personally disregard people from the "Conceived by rape: so what? You still must carry to term!" and the "1 minute before birth = 100% ok to abort" camps. While Kirk does have a lot of important info for people about abortion, I would strongly advise any woman under 35 who got pregnant via rape to abort their baby. And that would just be my own simple and quick advice, fwiw. Honestly, above 35, I would just keep my mouth shut. I'd hate to give that advice to someone and then they never end up getting pregnant again.

There is no video available for "Kirk invoked a Bible verse about stoning gay people "to death" on a June 2024 episode of his podcast with Jack Posobiec, calling it "God's perfect law when it comes to sexual matters" from what i can see, and sources that made that claim come up blank when you click the links. Considering how much leftists lie, I'm gonna have to rate that as 100% false until I see some video. I just looked and Snopes rates it as lie...

No, that's not an issue at all. There are 3 issues: how his quote was mischaracterized by the MSM your own willingness to ignore the obvious and go along with the MSM's partisan slander your own unwillingness to acknowledge the positive outcome of violent crime across an entire city going down by 87%. It's sad that you're sitting in your mom's basement just praying that people get hurt in DC by violent criminals, just so that Trump doesn't have another thing to crow about.

Left4rd Problem: By sending the National guard into DC, Trump was able to drive violent crime down there by 87%, and there wasn't a major incident to report on. that could be characterized as a racial attack on blacks. Left4rd Go-To Solution: Find something to mischaracterize as racist, or Find something to mischaracterize as misogynist, or Incorrectly paraphrase a quote to make it sound incriminating, or Quote "an anonymous source close to the WH" and say whatever you want They went with option 3 this time. The cultist horde rejoiced: unfortunately crime was down by 87%, but they still found a reason to spread hate.

I wasn't lying or exaggerating, Chrissy. The false narratives that were referenced by Gato99 were very real conspiracy theories that were pushed by CNN, MSNBC and CBC et al, and if you're being honest, you were sucked in by them all, and loudly parroted them. Of course you parroted collusion. Of course you parroted claims that Trump was a loony when he said that Obama's administration had him spied on. Etc, etc. All left4rds did all of that, in lock step. Are you gonna admit that you knew those narratives were false, so you didn't get sucked in by them? Just FYI if you do, you're acknowledging that those MSM outlets peddled massive lies.

STFU, Chrissy. Literally everyone in North America is aware that the entire left4rd dolt horde was sucked in by all of those false narratives.