Jump to content

WestCanMan

Senior Member
  • Posts

    27,522
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    116

Everything posted by WestCanMan

  1. Ohhh c'mon, herbie. You're used to bing called out for your stupidity and lying. Just accept it. It's never going away.
  2. It's somehow wrong to say "libbies", but saying MAGA is ok 😂. Thanks, herbie werbie. TBH, the term 'libbies' falls way short of the mark. The actual terms for you guys are either libtard or leftard.
  3. STFU you god-damned loser. Nothing I said there requires proof. You know that it's all true, just like you know the Florida Panthers won the Stanley cup this year without looking it up. You just can't discuss any of your prior talking points because on every topic you're caught either lying or being 100% wrong on everything that comes out of your disgusting mouth.
  4. The left has been lying and gaslighting for so long that their alleged belief system is way the F out in orbit. Islam is the religion of peace 8 yr olds are mature and wise enough to select gender reassignment therapy but 19 yr old college students don't know how loans work people who commit violent crimes don't belong in jail math is racist fiery but mostly peaceful protests seditious mobs 50-person car-crash etc, etc. I can't even repeat their crap anymore. They keep on trying to one-up their woke-BS game and it has left their platform completely detached from reality.
  5. Drop the partisan BS, MH. It's so stupid that you're just wasting everyone's time. Even herbie's. "Does it make sense that 'out of the millions of illegal immigrants in the US, some took good jobs from Americans'?" Of course it does. It's statistically impossible for that not to be the case. It's also a FACT that they lower the working wages for Americans at the lowest tiers of the economy, and their presence drives up the cost of low-income housing. Did you ask that question when Dr Fauci was recommending that we give the jab to children, or to force young women to take it, while knowing that they had NOTHING to personally benefit from the jab, and the jab was already theoretically protecting the vaxxed anyways? Buddy, what "makes sense", and what you advocate for are two completely different things. Stop acting like you give a F about what makes sense all of a sudden. You are a partisan hack first and foremost, so the only thing that makes sense to you is "what CBC and the LPOC say", period. You're incapable of any other train of thought. You truly are. It's like a part of your brain that doesn't even exist, like the ability to lift a dumptruck using telekinesis. You just ain't got it, bruhhh.
  6. Fact of the matter is that all borders eventually change, and all empires eventually crumbly, so any prediction that you make in that regard is eventually going to come true, it's just a matter of if it happens before 2028, by 20250, by 2150, etc.
  7. When we get to the point where the blue hairs are chugging D for a loaf of bread, maybe they will stop believing the Glory of Carney propaganda on CBC. Ironically, that's when the "peace, land, bread" slogan starts winning people over, which is communist, which is also LPOC.... Hmmmm.
  8. Who the F cares what you think you heard, Barqi
  9. It's also because PP is so unpopular. I think one of the tariffs is because his eyes are so close together.
  10. I expected GDP to be down because we have a f'ing LPOC clown in the PMO again. You're the one wearing the elbows-up panties, Link. Trudeau didn't need any help from Obama to sewer our energy sector when he got elected, he did that all on his own, so why are you blaming Trump for that?
  11. Do you think that Trump stumped for Carney because Trump's a nice guy who wants the best for Canada, Beave? Or just because Carney is such a swell guy? Why was Trump's support for Carney seen as a positive by the CBC and other LPOC cultists? They would hate the way he brushes his teeth if they knew how he did it. Their official policy is to instantly hate everything that Trump says and does in the first instant that he says it, and they're not above lying about it to make their case. So why did they just randomly decide to pretend that what Trump was doing was in the best interests of Canadians? Isn't it just a little bit concerning that Trump got Carney installed as our PM, and now Carney does everything that Trump tells him to do? I mean even if Carney just follows most of Trump's orders, and disobeys occasionally, the orders he follows are pretty big. Isn't that a bit suspect? Quick question: when the US interferes in elections/supports coups around the world, do you think that they're usually: trying to get the best possible leaders for that country, regardless of how that affects America's bottom line, or the most obvious f'ing answer imaginable By your own admission, Trump - the guy who got Carney elected - has a laundry list of menial tasks for Carney to perform, and on many occasions already, Carney has been seen to reverse course 180° in order to follow Trump's orders. Do you still see nothing at all going on? If he's so likeable, then why is he being so openly disrespected by world leaders, Canadian premiers, union bosses, FN chiefs, etc? It seems like everyone thinks that they can just disregard him, or boss him around, like Trump does, no? And as far as being so likeable around the globe goes, I'm not sure I'm a fan of that. "A friend to all is a friend to none", right? It's pretty plain to see that Trump is a friend to Americans first, by a wide margin, and then a friend to everyone else, based on what's in it for 'Murrica. What evidence do you have that Trudeau or Carney have ever put Canadians first, aside from some in criminal enterprises like SNC Lavalin, and family-funders like WE?
  12. You're not exactly a selling point for your country. You know that, right?
  13. I can never tell if he's dumb enough to believe what he's saying or if he's some kind of cult leader who knows it's all BS but he's here to rally the leftards. He's an interesting little fella, to be sure.
  14. I already made my point you illiterate piece of trailer trash. These were people who came to the US and then committed crimes before they even became citizens. How about don't get caught dealing drugs when you're not even a citizen yet? Beavey Boy: "😭 The poor guy got kicked out because of a little drug conviction 😭". FYI you don't get allowed into the country to "maybe deal a bit of drugs". They let you in based on the presumption that you'll be an upstanding citizen and contribute to the economy and your community. The problem is that when a credulous dolt like you sees a "Baaad, baaad Twumpy" smear-piece you get your little confirmation-bias boner and then accept every anecdote and multiply it by an estimated 80,000 cases, commit every bit of "sciency stuff" to memory (like a hockey-stick graph lol), and just believe every baseless accusation as if it's a conviction based on a confession and video evidence. Then you come here, run your mouth like a snotty 4th-grader, get humiliated, and then act like it never happened. Remember Russian collusion, dummy? You were totally convinced that some Trump associates were convicted of collusion-related offences because of a few misleading sentences in an article that you read, when nothing was further from the truth, and here you go again. Marijuana conviction... "Awwww, shuuuucks, is that all?" 😂 Play stupid games, win stupid prizes, jackass.
  15. I don't even know where you get your BS from. Not even CNN says the things that you do now. Are you watching MSNBC? Joy Reid, is that you?
  16. Dude, I don't give a shit about joining the US. If you want us to put in an application you can go F yourself. Personally, I just think that western Canada should separate from the east, and that doesn't mean that we should join the US.
  17. STFU, cultist. How do you think they got in? What does it mean when sanctuary cities refuse to turn over CONVICTED CRIMINALS when they're released from prison? How is that not "helping convicted criminals stay in the country"? What does it mean when democrat leaders openly declare their intent to protect convicted criminals from ICE? "Duhhh, CNN sed its ok, so it is gooder than not" - Beave Read your article, dumbfork. Those people were convicted of crimes. Beave: "Uhhh, what's the matter, officer? Is my paperwork incorrect?" Cop: "The paperwork is probably fine, but the 2 lbs of marijuana sitting on it is a problem." Beave: "TECHNICALITY!"
  18. All of the Canadian provinces have good resources & agriculture, and Que and Ont have decent population centers for industry, just like the rust belt. The only part of Canada that's a bit of a drain economically is basically 54.40 and north, but that region comes with claims to arctic oil and shipping lanes. Next thing you know the leaders of Hamas and islamic state will be refusing to visit the PMO.
  19. The principle is guilty when proven guilty. No one got convicted of having a joint or two.
  20. Ok Dr Greta. Cancelling and uprooting are totally different things, just FYI.
  21. The pendulum almost always swings too far, and when the gov't is dealing with tens of thousands of cases, like they are in this instance, they can't go through every file with a fine-tooth comb, or even on a case-by-case basis. They had to find some reasonably broad parameters and just work within them, and they chose "drug and other felony convictions" as their line in the sand, and that's the epitome of reasonable grounds for deportation. For years the Dems were allowing violent criminals, terrorists and fentanyl distributors into the US by the tens of thousands and shielding them from ICE, to the point where hundreds of thousands of convicted criminals, and tens of thousands of violent offenders had accumulated in the US. Eventually there had to be a change of course, and this is what a 180 looks like. The Dems could have done this on a case by case basis over the past decades, just by following existing laws that are already on the books, but they fought against that, so this problem got to the point where they had to use broad strokes to get it handled, and it's getting handled. Sure, some people don't like seeing 'that nice guy convicted criminal' get deported, but for every 'nice guy convicted criminal' there are 50 'not nice guy convicted criminals'. Once you start making exceptions and exemptions for the various levels of criminals, you start to form a queue, and queues cost taxpayers hundreds of millions of dollars. One last thing, there are tens of thousands of people in the US who have plead guilty to 'lesser charges' to save a costly trial with a foregone conclusion, or who only got light sentences because they were the ones who snitched on their fellow criminals. So just because a guy "only has a marijuana charge" doesn't mean much. Maybe the guy was a serial offender but the prosecution just didn't have the resources to pull all of the crimes together and try them all successfully, so they narrowed their dossier down to "the one case that we can win easily, and get a meaningful sentence for". And if there's one thing I know for 100% certain about leftists, they're omitting, exaggerating, tweaking and fabricating this into a story that bears absolutely NO resemblance to the truth. Book it.
  22. It's utterly pathetic that someone should even be able to use that as a slogan, and have it make sense. Most people should be able to look at that and say "That's what our gov't is already doing, duhhhhh", but the easiest promise for a Canadian politician to keep right now is "I will be more pro-Canadian than the last pile of snakes".
  23. In that case, Carney would be meeting with us... but he doesn't have to. They just grab all of our metadata, spy through our phones, access all of our phone/text/email messages, our bank records, our online shopping, etc.
  24. So knives kill people then, by your logic, correct? If knives kill people, and cars kill people, and vans kill people, and ropes kill people, and hammers kill people, and bats kill people, and diesel and fertilizer kill people, and guns kill people, and doctors kill more people than all of those things put together, should we just pick one thing from that list to ban?
  25. Science isn't supposed to be controlled by corporate greed any more than it should have been controlled by the church. When Big Pharm's own word on safety and efficacy is all it takes to get hundreds of billions of dollars worth of their own snake juice injected into people who - by the most basic science of all - don't even need medicine, that's not an example of a reasonable facsimile of science that was just a swing and a miss. When science looks like BS, smells like BS, eyeball and flyer swear it tastes like chicken, and it is inflicted on people who don't need it, it was NEVER an actual attempt at science.
×
×
  • Create New...