You could have done a Google search. I just did and it took me 1 second: https://vancouversun.com/health/can-a-walk-in-clinic-doctor-refuse-to-see-an-unvaccinated-patient-it-may-depend
So there it is. Vaxx or die.
And religion is a personal thing. So is one's body. The donor doesn't actually 'have to' get vaccinted, unless they want to help anther person survive. So, vaxx or let die.
Me neither, but the hospital just gave an opinion without any facts, evidence or data.
They don't. It's one donor for one specific patient. If they don't give that kindey to that specific woman then it stays inside of the potential donor.
But it is surprising that they're willing to watch the woman die just because she's defying Joe Biden's/Big Pharma's decree.
For a doctor to inflict their own biases on a patient under pain of death is not an option, the hippocratic oath doesn't give them leeway to do that.
The stats may favour the doctor's opinion, but in the end it's still just an opinion, that doesn't mean that the patient has to do what the doctor says or be left to die.
Furthermore, Drs in the US get comped very nicely by Big Pharma, and it's a fact that Drs in the US are prescribing medications to serve their own interests instead of their clients'. Patients have good reason to be skeptical of what Drs, politicians and the MSM have to say.
Can other hospitals refuse to treat women because they've had abortions, or they're pro-choice activists? "We're worried that you're going to kill more babies, or convince many other women to kill many more babies in the future, so we can't help you unless you release a statement against abortion."
Honestly, that's also just a Dr's opinion. They're also 'saving lives' in that scenario. How political is medicine allowed to be?