Leaderboard

WCM . . . . there's really no need to explain yourself to the narcissistic dimwit. If the 'ha ha, LOL', and other desultory fodder are removed from her/his posts, there's really nothing left.

You are missing something: "Communist" is defined as something the poster doesn't like. For example, if Trudeau uses "they" in a sentence he is COMMUNIST if Poilievre appoints a government stooge to approve what is taught in universities it is FREEDOM.

it makes no sense for Canada to design its own military hardware Canada threw its military lot in with the Americans when they came to our aid in 1917 the F-35 is the only fighter program that males sense for Canada its a turnkey solution offered by the Americans, custom made for allies such as Canada RCAF Lt. Colonel ( ret. ) Billie Flynn knows

It is the potential existence of a human. A fertilized egg is not a person. It only has the potential to be a person.

Especially if you define Mitt Romney as 'leftist' ?

Obviously that's not the main thing to learn from this crisis ffs. 1) We have too many eggs in one basket in the telecom/internet sector 2) Our economy is too reliant upon technology now 3) Going completely digital with currency is not feasible because our economy can be turned off like a lightswitch As far as the criticism against Trudeau is concerned, I don't know how much of this should be pinned on him. I don't remember whether Harper was opposed to massive telecom mergers, in favour of them, whether he was completely in favour of moving towards a system where we're all completely reliant on tech or not, or whether or not this was even something that he was talking about. Maybe he was oblivious. I dunno, so I won't weigh in until some of those questions are answered. Right now, statements to the effect of "this is all Trudeau's fault" are unsubstantiated, although that may not end up being the case. Maybe Harper was just as guilty or more, I don't recall. What we absolutely can say about Trudeau though, is his main concerns about the internet and currency to this point have been: 1) the gov't needs to control the flow of information 2) the gov't wants to move towards a digital currency 3) the gov't cannot be trusted with the amount of power they would exercise over digital currency, so we still need the traditional alternatives. All 3 of his main priorities seem pretty fascist in nature, without any concern whatsoever for the risks that they pose... Go figger.

Pierre is a Harpercon the Conservatives are going back to Harper and now you're so far to the left, that you think that's far right HarperCons govern like Liberals, dumb dumb and that's still not far enough to the left for NDP jackwagon clowns like you

Remember when the emoticons came in? The right moaned about how the left would gang up on the right and dislike all their posts. Turned out the opposite, and I never saw a leftie complain about that. Still, there was enough moaning that the "dislike" emoticons were removed. I once data-mined over a two week period, and in that two weeks, the right offered more insults then the left by a slight margin. I would assume in another two-week period it'd be the opposite. However, if you take a look at just the forum topics, there's a lot more insults to the left than the right. As for complaints, If say both the right and left complain - else the left would never complain that the forum moderation was biased right, which someone does from time to time.

British is an empire not a country British was once 25% of the world's population but only a tiny fraction of it was Englishmen the empire wasn't even built by the English the British Empire was a Scots German empire Ulster Scots German to be exact who was the enemy that forced Canadian Confederation ? it was the Fenians of course Upper Canada was made by the Orange Order in fact it's just me & my German Queen no Cricket playing English pouffs required between us no French usurping bastards from Quebec can force our surrender neither come and take this Red Ensign from our cold dead hands

Stop playing stupid and roaming the world to find situations to prove a point. We are in Canada and your use of BLM issues in the US as an example of violent protests is useless.

why do you pretend as if a run of the mill Harpercon is a far right extremist? how far to the left do you have to be to think something that ridiculous?

BLM in Canada were not violent.

Well to paraphrase from a very good Western, "Reality, I Don't Need No Stinkin' Reality."

So he has fucked up a lot, name 10 things he did right? Tell me his good accomplishments outweigh his fuck ups...You know as well as I do, The conservative party has already chosen the next leader, and you not going to like him, so vote any way you want. voters that are going to vote conservative don't really care who you vote for... And if Trudeau is your man after all he has or has not done, then good on you. after all the lying, and deceit, it's a telling character trait. As for the other centrists on the board that are out there nobody cares who you're going to vote for, that is your choice, or don't vote. But if you vote liberal don't bullshit the rest of the readers into thinking you are a conservative or would consider voting conservative.

Who is comparing? Your diatribe is so scattered, it makes no sense.

So, was he trying to buy Twitter or destroy it?

Harper is a right wing hawk not far right . Pierre is more right then him and welcomes far right voters and trash people like pp voters so yea conservatives are going to the far right