Jump to content

Leaderboard

Popular Content

Showing content with the highest reputation on 11/01/2020 in all areas

  1. Trudeau worked to spread the coronavirus and you're ok with that. What Changed Bubber? "It would be racist to block travellers from China, don't wear masks, visitors to the country can walk freely anywhere!" lol. The Dems told people to ride the subway and eat in restaurants like it's no big deal, after Trump had already started fighting the virus. You were ok with that. You have never condemned Cuomo's idiotic action of putting C-19-infected people back into care homes. You were ok with that. When people weren't allowed to visit other people, or hang out in large groups outside you supported the rioting, looting, arson and murders Bubber, in super-spreader groups. What changed? You're just being a mouthy hypocrite Bubber.
    2 points
  2. Martial law doesn't really go well with democracy in my opinion. And clearly Trump supporters aren't the one's that have a problem accepting democracy. The 2016 election was won fairly by the Republican side but to this day it's the Democrats that refuse to accept the results. They are planning to go much further and will likely rig the system to favor their side in future elections. I don't know how Joe Biden personally feels about instituting martial law ,that question should be asked to his puppet masters. Scroll it up on the teleprompter!
    2 points
  3. I'm curious about your opinion of the sizable BLM/ANTIFA riots . Large gatherings of people where the only purpose is to destroy things and cause havoc. Most on the political left are perfectly fine with these riots caused by anarchists in close proximity. Why are the Burn Loot Murder riots just fine but peaceful political rallies inherently dangerous?
    2 points
  4. Trump rallies are held outdoors since the Wuhan Flu arrived.
    2 points
  5. You are the rookie here....your question has been answered. You are also four years too late to the game....as most of the GOP including the Bushes criticized Trump long ago. So Trump promptly kicked their asses in the 2016 primary campaign.
    2 points
  6. He just takes CNN’s word for it.
    1 point
  7. You've never watched let alone been to a Trump rally.
    1 point
  8. True....a President Biden would face the same policy backlash as President Trump...defiance...resistance....and hostile criticism from nearly half of the population. Plus Biden needs the Senate and courts to get anything done. Biden is a centrist and political animal first and foremost, so his campaign rhetoric would be tempered by political and economic reality. Obama continued many of the Bush era policies, including tax cuts, TARP, and doubled down on foreign policy with military force. I don't expect the "progressive" agenda to win the day if Biden becomes prez.
    1 point
  9. Not sure whatBiden can do that is not already being done. IMO the President does not have the power to order the entire Nation to shut down nor to mandate wearing ofmasks. He/she can help make guidelines and suggestions and economic threats but this all takes time and will produce a lot of court challenges. Declaring Martial Law would be a quick way to get out of office and cause civil unrest. Read more: https://www.city-data.com/forum/politics-other-controversies/3209483-if-biden-becomes-president-will-he.html
    1 point
  10. Democrats have never accepted the results of 2016 having done nothing for the last 4 years but try to overturn the results, one way or another. I don't think Biden will enact martial law but would he override the will of the Governors? Well maybe, after he confiscates the guns that is :)-
    1 point
  11. It's almost the time of the year when I bring out this song that Mike O'Reilley wrote!
    1 point
  12. People wear masks. Fashionable MAGA ones, usually.
    1 point
  13. You’re still focusing on meaningless things. Nobody cares about that brag. Nobody cares about his other brags. They’re irrelevant. The only thing that’s relevant is policy. As has been said a million times. Trump supporters take his seriously but not literally. Trump detractors take him literally but not seriously.
    1 point
  14. That's because Trump has done far better with social media and direct digital, bypassing the traditional, more costly media advertising methods. The Democrats are getting better at it, but their "base" is far more fragmented.
    1 point
  15. I wasn't going to bother but now I'll point out that video above we appear to be using as some sort of model is a deceptive edit. I've seen that point by Trump made several times at the rallies so I can tell you what it actually is. He's remarking how Biden and the Dems like to Puff themselves up boasting about all the money they raise. Trump makes the point the Dems have sold their souls to the moneyed elite of Wall Street to get that money. He also like to brag about how the Drug companies hate him for bringing down the price of drugs. His claim on how he could be "the best" if he wanted to is a claim that he knows all those big money guys and if he wanted to sell out like the Dems did he could just call them up. He says he knows them all personally and could make deals. If he wanted to. But he doesn't, so he didn't.
    1 point
  16. There must have been at least 30k people at the gates...no way in. A cap of 250 had been suddenly placed...that'll show 'em. Trump waved...jumped into the Beast...literally...and drove down to address the blocked crowd. Those few at the rally site cheered thunderously. They then peacefully went home...and told two friends...my bet.
    1 point
  17. Raising campaign funds has long been the political benchmark, long before Trump. Hillary Clinton raised and spent far more than Trump in a losing effort.
    1 point
  18. Rep. Ilhan Omar has a significant advantage over her GOP rival (Lacey Johnson). Her district includes many Somali Americans and is very blue (Democratic Party). They want to defund the police even as crime soars in Minneapolis. Police officers are retiring or taking disability to escape. As in other swing states, President Trump's MN fate lies outside of the urban centers, where Trump-Biden campaign signs dominate. The riots and looting in the Twin Cities hurt the governor and mayors because of their inaction, and this could help Trump.
    1 point
  19. Because when "in Canada", do as Canadians do...deflecting about the United States.
    1 point
  20. The vast bulk of the Third World that flocks here and the USA stick to only the biggest cities. Leave the city....no more Third World for the most part.
    1 point
  21. Whatever you say...you got your answer whether you like it or not. Why is it so important to you anyway ? Nonsense...I love my username because it advertises the identical regard that America had for Canadian opinions about the 2004 U.S. presidential election....as in very little. Canada hated Bush's guts, so of course we re-elected him.
    1 point
  22. Already answered...quit whining like a child. Canada was anti-Bush too...so what ?
    1 point
  23. Indeed....here is one Canadian byline from 2016. Canadians don't watch Lebanese elections like this...or anybody else's for that matter. America votes...Canada watches America vote.
    1 point
  24. I can't speak for every Canadian but our various pensions have Wall Street in the mix.
    1 point
  25. Worse yet, in dealing with government, academia and large business, one is forced to try to work with someone with a poor command of English or French, have their position and/or title due to privilege, not merit and most of all have no concept of the ethics upon which our society, academia and business expect and depend upon. I still think the correct way to settle newcomers who don't come with professional credentials and a sponsoring employer is to send them to reserves. Aboriginals want to be treated as equals, so let's give them a few hundred thousand doses of equality. I suspect after a few hundred immigrants settled in, you would find a few who could design an adequate water system and a bunch more who would get off their ass and install it and a few more who would do what is seldom done and actually monitor and maintain it.
    1 point
  26. Geez Beave, try to keep up. The computer shop-owner no longer has the laptop. The FBI subpoenaed it. He made a copy before they took it. The FBI is not denying they have it. As far as to why those who now have the copy won't share it yet, Giuliani has explained that. There are more revelations coming. At first it was just Burisma. Then they trickled out the China stuff. They claim there's more. Trickling out the information was a technique created by the late great Andrew Breitbart. It's a guard against leftist media lies. They lie pretending they have knowledge the don't have. Then more information is trickled out showing they lie and haven't a clue. In this case, for example, Clapper and Brennan were in on a petition of their fellow, former, swamp creeptures saying without evidence that "Russia, Russia, Russia" was responsible for the Biden Crime Family laptop scandal. However the following day current, high-ranking officials of government security who have actually seen the contents of the document just laughed at them and gave an official statement that Russia had nothing to do with it. You know Beave...you personally have been burned by that Breitbart trick so many times I would think you would have figured it out by now. Also Giuliani says he will eventually release the total contents of the Laptop. You'll just have to wait but feel free not to learn your lesson and tell us how there was never anything incriminating on it.
    1 point
  27. I think your on crack, lets start with numbers from your own source, maybe it is the new math, next year over 400,000 new immigrants will enter Canada, but our major cities only have 175,000 surplus homes.... while your numbers seem huge it is the lack of housing that has driven the prices up. Toronto, Montreal, and most of the other big cities have an infra structure deficit, meaning they don't have the means to take on large numbers with out major construction, road networks, sewage plants, power grids, ... how does taking in more immigrants solve any of these problem help these problems , and while a lot are going to be placed in rural Canada, most will make they're way to these big city centers overwhelming them... Who foots the bill for all of that, I'm sure the major in Toronto just breathed a sigh of relieve because you think it is going to be alright.. And while you big city boys are used to crowded cities , here in the country not so much... The report states 66,000 homes are sitting empty in Toronto, and around 64,000 vacant homes are in Montreal. Calgary, Ottawa and Edmonton each “have more than 20,000 vacant properties,” and Vancouver has around 25,000 vacant homes.
    1 point
  28. If only it was that easy, lets start with the obvious first, Do you really think that our generals have not asked for equipment, laid out the when , why, how, etc.... The government has made procurement to complicated for a reason, That is to delay any purchases for years on end, the replacement for the F-18 has been on going for more than 20 years.. think about that for a minute... Next Canadians like you and me have no say in this matter at all... 2 and DND does not say we want this F-35, not at all, the create a spec sheet on it is listed everything they want this equipment to do, how fast, how big, how how far can it fly etc.... NO where do they say we want the F-35... these specs go to a civilian dept called PWSG they read the specs daft a call up to the worlds military industrial complex, once enough bids have been submitted they pick 4 or 5 examples for DND to test, DND scores each piece, the top piece is then sent to government, It is the "PMO office" that says what equipment is purchased, they decide from an entirely different set of rules, will it be built in Canada, how many Canadians will be employed and for how long....Will they pay offsets, will there be any tech and R&D trade offs and a few more, it is the PMOs office that has the final say...DND may say they want the F-35 as it is the best plane out there, but it is the PMO that gets to pick...Do you think the Airforce wanted to buy someone's used F-18 I don't think so...that was Justin This is a load of crap, most have started to make deep investments in their military, because there capabilities have eroded to the point they are ineffective for todays threats.. well almost everyone, except Canada...and a FEW other nations the Majority are increasing funding.... NATO is a defensive pact, no one gets paid, it's a signed defensive agreement, and just becasue you have a lot of equipment does not mean jack shit, Canada has barely any equipment yet we still got one of the harder jobs... compare to countries like Germany, France etc....So that theory is full of crap...My point is most of our country does not give a rats ass about it's military, and it does not mind sending soldiers into combat without the proper equipment...Becasue they want it that way... because we are cheap bastards... and we need more social programs that give us money Like I said, most of the NATO countries are increasing funding to their military with the goal of reaching 2 % of GDP...there are only a few hold outs, one should add no G-7 countries are holding out...as for them being two faced they are all 2 faced as far as i'm concerned... Another theory busted That was a choice made by past governments to slowly get rid of our military industrial base, Keeping our ship building capability alive is costing us 3 times the price to have it made overseas.... again another choice our government has decided to take... when you sign onto a defensive pact in todays world you need to atleast be able to honor it... and if that means buying foreign so be it...Europe has a huge military industrial complex , you don't find much American hardware in Europe ... Another theory busted....
    1 point
  29. So the "Muslim world" is up in arms yet again (are they ever not?). This time over French president Macron talking about how he's going to deal with foreign influence on France's Muslims and attack Islamists. It's worth noting that much of the Muslim world has spent the last year licking the feet of China's leader and praising him for his human rights record while ignoring that he's put a million Muslims into concentration camps to get them to abandon Islam. Turkey's would-be new Sultan has led the charge, as he's hoping to take up the mantle of great defender of Islam. He's certainly well on his way to establishing an Islamic state given he's destroyed all democratic freedoms in his country and thrown tens of thousands into prison and murdered hundreds of people. Now Muslims in places like Jordan and Egypt and Syria are boycotting French goods and making threats against France and Frenchmen, and no doubt soon there'll be more Muslim terrorism in France. Which, it seems to me, is just going to further harden France towards Islam and Muslims. I wonder if there will ever be a respectable Muslim government during my lifetime. I mean, there's fifty of them. You'd think one or two might be democratic, care a little about human rights, be competent and honest. But so far in the history of the world, nope. Every Muslim country continues to be bastions of intolerance, violence, and governmental corruption. https://www.france24.com/en/europe/20201028-turkey-blasts-charlie-hebdo-s-immoral-caricature-of-erdogan
    1 point
×
×
  • Create New...