I’m curious as to what others on here think, but I’ve discovered over the years that the anti-development extreme environmentalist tends either to come from wealth and therefore doesn’t really have to worry too much about pesky things like having a job and cost of living or else it’s the society drop out type who may be poor but in any event hasn’t worked very much or had to function in the real world where things are built and sacrifices are made. The NDP paint the doers of the world as the rich patriarchy and promise to be Robin Hood. Their empowerment always ends the same way, with big debts, broken promises they couldn’t afford to keep, and businesses fleeing the jurisdiction.
Where the NDP are about redistribution of wealth to the poor, earned or not, the Greens are about asceticism, reducing consumption and waste. It sounds good at first glance. It means people will have and consume less. It’s a lean, mean lifestyle. It seems progressive, but then I remember that the founder of Earth Day murdered his wife and Hitler was a vegetarian. All that glitters is not gold. Whether it’s a Green or an NDP government, if you work for a living, expect to have less. If the people of your province want that, knock yourselves out. The suits in the steak houses on Bay Street and Wall Street think you’re all suckers, which is fine. You’re better than they are, right?